NOVEMBER 2011 PRINCIPAL PROFESSIONAL LEARNING TEAM.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is District Wide Accreditation? Ensure Desired Results Improve Teaching & Learning Foster a Culture of Improvement A powerful systems approach to.
Advertisements

A GUIDE TO CREATING QUALITY ONLINE LEARNING DOING DISTANCE EDUCATION WELL.
Quality, Improvement & Effectiveness Unit
Campus Improvement Plans
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Education Renewal Zone Advisory Board Meeting October 23, 2012.
WELCOME COLBY SCHOOL DISTRICT Stakeholder Driven Strategic Planning January 8, 2014.
SUPERINTENDENT AND BOARD OF EDUCATION MEMBER PERCEPTIONS REGARDING PREFERRED LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS FOR SUPERINTENDENTS IN WEST VIRGINIA Keith A. Butcher.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
Professional Learning Communities OKGEAR UP Public Schools April 2, 2015.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Teacher Development and Evaluation Model October 22, 2012.
Principal Professional Learning Team February 2011.
Session Materials  Wiki   Wireless  Network: OpenAir  Password:
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
School Leadership Teams Collaborating for Effectiveness Begin to answer Questions #1-2 on the Handout: School Leadership Teams for Continuous Improvement.
Starting from Scratch Building culture, systems and traditions for the new school in Penhold.
SAM Administrative Institute Supported by the International Center for Leadership in Education SAM Administrative Institute Supported by the International.
New Teacher Introduction to Evaluation 08/28/2012.
Pontotoc City School District. Pontotoc City School District believes LEARNING is a priority, a need, and a desire. To be successful, we must nurture.
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Professional Learning Action Team March 2013 Do Now: Turn on your laptop and locate the Special Educator and General Educator Survey Results (in )
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting January, 2014.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Dr. Timothy Mitchell Rapid City Area Schools
Please sit at mixed tables - mix elementary and secondary as well as SDTs and Reading Specialists. Thank you!
Analysis of 2007 BOD Assessment Checklists Prepared by: Cambria Tidwell.
University Planning: Strategic Communication in Times of Change Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Texas State University-San Marcos Presented at the July.
The Role of the Institutional Setting in Teachers’ Development of Ambitious Instructional Practices in Middle-Grades Mathematics Paul Cobb Kara Jackson.
The Power of Professional Learning Communities at Work 2009 Hanover County Public Schools Leadership Conference.
Administrator Development What does successful implementation of high preforming professional learning communities look like and how will we know when.
OCTOBER 2011 Principal Professional Learning Team.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
Professional Learning Teams Cascade High School September 18, 2015.
Professional Learning Action Team October 2012 Do Now: Turn on your laptop and locate the Special Educator and General Educator Survey.
Project 3 Supporting Technology. Project Proposal.
{ Principal Professional Learning Team March 2012.
September 2013 DO NOW! On a note card write down One success of your CLT today One challenge your CLT today faced today One way the Professional Learning.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
ISLLC Standard #1 Implementing a Shared Vision Name Workshop Facilitator.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental II: Inclusive Practice.
Budget Analysis Presented by: Jay Masterson. Preface ► The budget was developed with reduced funding as an expectation ► Recognition of the current economic.
2015 SAA Board Survey. Raw Board Survey ResultsStrongly Agree AgreeDisagreeStrongly Disagree Don't Know Total Points Responses minus DKs Average Score.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental III: Climate and Engagement.
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Supporting Education Reform Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Leadership Planning with Indicators of Quality Instruction.
Superintendent’s Entry & Learning Plan Jeremy Ray.
School Development Implementation and Monitoring “Building a Learning Community”
PLC LEADERSHIP ACADEMY November 17/December 15/January 19 Jeremy Koselak Secondary RtI Coordinator.
“Professional Learning Communities” Helping All Students be More Successful in School.
Principal Student Achievement Meeting PLC Visioning and Beyond.
NOVEMBER 2011 PRINCIPAL PROFESSIONAL LEARNING TEAM.
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning DeeDee Washington, Associate Superintendent of Academics Elementary.
PLCs in Mount Airy City Schools Purpose of PLCs Collaborative meetings of educators in which data-driven decisions are made to improve teacher’s instruction.
Session Materials  Wiki   Wireless  Network: OpenAir  Password:
District PLC Leadership Team Meeting July 31,
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
MA DSAC Collaboration Institute for Special and General Education Leaders Session 2: November 15, 2011 Focus on Clear and Collaborative Relationships.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
Principal Professional Learning Team March The mission of the Parkway School District is to ensure all students are capable, curious and confident.
February 8, 2017.
Principal Professional Learning Team
Professional Learning Update & Scorecard
Grady High School Good Morning/Afternoon! Today we begin the process of planning our school’s budget for FY20. I know we are all here for the same reason.
Presentation transcript:

NOVEMBER 2011 PRINCIPAL PROFESSIONAL LEARNING TEAM

WELCOME The mission of the Parkway School District is to ensure all students are capable, curious and confident learners who understand and respond to the challenges of an ever- changing world.

NORMS FOR WORKING TOGETHER Listen to understand Mission focused Well-planned agenda Active and respectful participation

ESSENTIAL QUESTION Mission Accomplished - Parkway 2016 “How do we get from here to there?”

TODAY’S AGENDA Welcome Bonnie & Desi Updates Dr. Keith Marty & Paul Tandy Budget Orientation and Discussion Mark Stockwell Instructional Support Model Update Kathy Blackmore Teacher Professional Learning and Evaluation Joy Torgerson and Liz Morrison Professional Learning Communities Desi Kirchhofer and Liz Morrison Levels Meetings Secondary (Dr. Denise Pupillo – Gifted Programming) Elementary

PARKWAY UPDATES Dr. Marty & Paul Tandy Misc. Updates Budget Presentation

BUDGET ORIENTATION AND DISCUSSION Mark Stockwell, CFO Building Budgets Funding Sources Discussion Questions: What process do you use to build a budget? Is there a way to build a school budget based on District and School Goals?

FUNDING SOURCES Tax Dollars School Building Budgets, Coordinator Budgets, Assistant Supt. Funds Line of Credit No gifts, gift cards, staff clothing, donations, flowers. Food is strongly discouraged. Non-Tax Dollars Coke Monies Student Activity Interest Funds (Maureen Dennis-58060) PTOs Grants Staff Contributions Donations

BUILDING BUDGETS 10% Reduction Elementary$ $149 Middle$ $161 High$ $216

BUDGET SUBMISSION TIME-LINE Jan 10MUNIS Available for Budget Input Jan 11-Feb 24Input and Principal Review Feb 25-Mar 9SAT Level Review Mar 10-Mar 29CFO Review Mar 30-April 13Finance Department Processing May 2Prelim. Budget Presentation to BOE June 2Final BOE Approval

BUDGET DEVELOPMENT Budget Should Support...  District Mission  Strategic Plan  District and Building Goals

TWO MAJOR TYPES OF BUDGETING Incremental & Zero Based Incremental Budgeting: In traditional incremental budgeting, department managers begin the process with a baseline from the prior year. Supporting detail may or may not be submitted in support of the request. Frequently, the allocated amount is a % increase or decrease from the prior year and isn’t based on actual identified needs.

BUDGET DEVELOPMENT Zero Based Budgeting A method of budgeting in which all expenses must be justified. Zero-based budgeting starts from a "zero base" and every function within the school is analyzed for its needs, costs, and impact on organizational goals. Budgets are then built around what is needed for the upcoming period, regardless of whether the budget is higher or lower than the previous one.

ZERO BASED BUDGETING Advantages Efficient allocation of resources, as it is based on needs and benefits rather than history. Drives managers to find cost effective ways to improve operations. Detects inflated budgets. Increases staff motivation by providing greater initiative and responsibility in decision-making. Increases communication and coordination within the organization. Identifies and eliminates wasteful and obsolete operations. Forces departments to identify their mission and their relationship to overall goals. It helps in identifying areas of wasteful expenditure and, if desired, it can also be used for suggesting alternative courses of action.

ZERO BASED BUDGETING Disadvantages More time-consuming than incremental budgeting. Justifying every line item can be challenging for departments. Requires additional effort and cooperation, due to increased complexity vs. incremental budgeting. The amount of information supporting the budget may seem overwhelming.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS  What process do you use to build your budget?  How can you build a budget that is based on District and School Goals?

INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORT MODEL Kathy Blackmore

THE PROFESSIONAL LEARNING AND EVALUATION MODEL Make a prediction: On a note card write down What you believe is a positive response trend evident in the responses from teachers and administrators? What you believe is negative response trend evident in the responses from teachers and administrators?

ESSENTIAL QUESTION—PROCESS What evaluation model will best support accomplishing the mission/vision/learning principles/commitments of the Parkway School District?

ENDURING UNDERSTANDING Parkway stakeholders will understand that… An effective evaluation instrument provides feedback to teachers about their practice and connects to professional development. An effective evaluation instrument emphasizes collaboration between teacher and administrator throughout the process. An effective evaluation instrument must be designed in such a way as to facilitate consistency in use among evaluators and teachers. Highly effective evaluation instruments focus on mission ‐ related student learning outcomes Highly effective evaluation instruments provide clear descriptions of the role and responsibility of the teacher inside and outside of the classroom. Is the new model on the right track to successfully meeting the enduring understandings of an effective evaluation instrument?

PARKWAY’S STRATEGIC PLAN—GOAL #5 GOAL 5: Recruit, employ, develop and retain an exceptional staff dedicated to and representative of Parkway’s diverse community. Measurable objective: All employees will be effective in their roles as measured by Parkway’s evaluation models.

PROFESSIONAL LEARNING AND EVALUATION MODEL Share predictions Update from the Committee Small number of respondents (24% of teachers and 56% of administrators) A clear majority of the small pool of respondents indicated the model was effective. What ideas do you have to make the process more effective? Brainstorm Record on Poster Paper Share with the Group

TALKING POINTS Timelines Summative Evaluations Client Surveys and Reflections eFolio (Data Collection) Other

Read and highlight the text selection (pg. 47 – 54) Highlight and mark the following Agree: One thing with which you agree Argue: One thing with which you might argue Aspire: One thing to which you aspire Leaders of Learning Leaders of Learning Individually: Groups at Work – Copyright MiraVia LLC – All rights reserved

TURN AND TALK Turn to a person sitting next you First - Share your agreements Second - Share your arguments Third - Share your aspirations

SELF-ASSESSMENT Read each of the Principal Responsibilities and the corresponding Application to Collaborative Teams of PLC (pg. 54 – 56) Assess yourself for each “Application to Collaborative Teams of PLC” 1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 (1 = I haven’t considered this yet and 5 = I am a rock star)

AROUND THE ROOM AND BACK AGAIN Take your book and move around the room sharing either your thinking on where you are on Application to PLCs. Talk to three other people. Return to your tables after you have shared and listened to three other people. Group Share – What did you notice?

THE COLLABORATIVE TEAM AS A CATALYST FOR SHARED LEADERSHIP Factors for Consideration Facilitator Reads Each Factor Jot down the names of the first two faculty members who come to mind next to the factor in the book. What did you discover from this process? Turn and Talk

WHAT’S HAPPENING AT YOUR SCHOOL? Move into groups of four Share one action your school has taken toward the establishment of professional learning communities.

DUFOUR VIDEO CONFERENCE Administrator Role in the Professional Learning Community with Rick and Becky DuFour February 7 th 4:30 – 6:00 PM Central High School Commons Please arrive in time to begin the conference promptly at 4:30 pm

QUESTION STORM Two note cards – write down one question for the DuFours for the video conference Whip Around Each person shares his/her first question (no comments) Each person shares his/her second question (no comments) Categorize Questions (use chart paper and markers to give each category a title) With your team – select your top three questions (or combine re-write questions) Share three questions with the group

LEVEL MEETINGS Secondary – Desi Elementary - Bonnie