NSTX NSTX TF, PF and umbrella Upgrade Internal ReviewFeb 24, 2010 1 NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Potential Upgrades to the NBI System for NSTX-Upgrade SPG, TS NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U.
Advertisements

NSTX-U T&T TSG Contributions to FY15 JRT NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U.
Summary of Presentations on Plasma Start-up and Progress on Small ST devices from STW2011 R. Raman University of Washington, Seattle, WA The Joint Meeting.
Langmuir Probe Peer Review Josh Kallman for the LLD Team February 13, 2009 NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics.
Development and characterization of intermediate- δ discharge with lithium coatings XP-919 Josh Kallman Final XP Review June 5, 2009 NSTX Supported by.
NSTX Team Meeting June 25, 2010 College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics.
Vertical Stability for NSTX and NSTX-U Egemen Kolemen D. A. Gates, S. Gerhardt Monday Physics Meeting PPPL, NJ Nov/15/2010 NSTX Supported by College W&M.
NSTX NSTX Team Meeting Jan. 3, 2013 NSTX Team Meeting Jan. 3, 2013 Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu.
NSTX Team Meeting May 28, 2008 Supported by Office of Science College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL.
Quality Assurance Readiness for Operations Review Judy Malsbury, Head of QA Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory NSTX Upgrade LSB B318 December 9-11, 2014.
Relay Feedback and X-point Height Control Egemen Kolemen S. Gerhardt and D. A. Gates 2010 Results Review Nov/30/2010 NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado.
PCS Navigation D. Mueller January 26-28, 2010 Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS.
ISTP (and other…) Update Stefan Gerhardt NSTX-U Monday Physics Meeting Feb. 20, 2015 B318 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
Current status of high k scattering system J. Kim 1, Y. Ren 2, K-C. Lee 3 and R. Kaita 2 1) POSTECH 2) PPPL 3) UC Davis NSTX Monday Physics Meeting LSB-318,
1 Update on Run Schedule R. Raman NSTX Team Meeting PPPL, Princeton, NJ, 08 February, 2006 Work supported by DOE contract numbers DE-FG02-99ER54519 AM08,
RF Operations: Commissioning the RF systems and antenna conditioning J. Hosea et al. NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
Supported by Office of Science Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U.
Simple As Possible Plasmas (SAPP) on NSTX Adam McLean, ORNL Boundary TSG Session NSTX Research Forum Dec. 2, 2009 NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado.
NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U Tokyo JAEA Hebrew.
Radiative divertor with impurity seeding in NSTX V. A. Soukhanovskii (LLNL) Acknowledgements: NSTX Team NSTX Results Review Princeton, NJ Wednesday, 1.
NSTX Team Meeting July 21,, 2011 NSTX TF Update NSTX Team Meeting July 21, 2011 NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
NSTX Effects of NTSX Upgrades on DiagnosticsFebruary 8, NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL Johns.
Prototype Multi-Energy Soft X-ray Diagnostic for EAST Kevin Tritz Johns Hopkins University NSTX-U Monday Physics Meeting PPPL, Princeton, NJ June 25 th,
Direct measurement of plasma response using Nyquist Contour Z.R. Wang 1, J.-K. Park 1, M. J. Lanctot 2, J. E. Menard 1,Y.Q. Liu 3, R. Nazikian 1 1 Princeton.
Second Switching Power Amplifier (SPA) Upgrade Physics Considerations Discussion S.A. Sabbagh 1, and the NSTX Research Team 1 Department of Applied Physics,
ASC Five Year Plan Chapter Status Stefan Gerhardt NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu.
NSTX Upgrade Project – Final Design Review June , NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL.
1 R Raman, B.A. Nelson, D. Mueller 1, T.R. Jarboe, M.G. Bell 1, J. Menard 1, R. Maqueda 2 et al. University of Washington, Seattle 1 Princeton Plasma Physics.
Xp705: Multimode ion transport: TAE avalanches E D Fredrickson, N A Crocker, N N Gorelenkov, W W Heidbrink, S Kubota, F M Levinton, H Yuh, R E Bell NSTX.
NSTX-U Construction Erik Perry Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory NSTX Upgrade Readiness to Operate Review LSB B318 December 9-11, 2014 NSTX-U Supported.
Development of Improved Vertical Position Control S.P. Gerhardt, E. Kolemen ASC Session, NSTX 2011/12 Research Forum Location Date NSTX Supported by College.
1 Roger Raman for the NSTX Research Team University of Washington, Seattle NSTX Run Usage 27 February – 5 May, 2006 NSTX Mid-Run Assessment PPPL, Princeton,
NSTX Upgrade Project – Final Design Review June , NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL.
NSTX Upgrade Project – Final Design Review June , NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL.
Energy Confinement Scaling in the Low Aspect Ratio National Spherical Torus Experiment (NSTX) S. M. Kaye, M.G. Bell, R.E. Bell, E.D. Fredrickson, B.P.
Some Halo Current Measurements in 2009 S.P. Gerhardt Thanks to: E. Fredrickson, H. Takahashi, L. Guttadora NSTX Results Review, 2009 NSTX Supported by.
NSTX Upgrade Project – Final Design Review June , NSTX Supported by Vacuum Pumping, Gauging and RGA Systems W. Blanchard Princeton Plasma.
NSTX Team Meeting February 7, 2007 Supported by Office of Science College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U.
Supported by Office of Science NSTX H. Yuh (Nova Photonics) and the NSTX Group, PPPL Presented by S. Kaye 4 th T&C ITPA Meeting Culham Lab, UK March.
Development and characterization of intermediate- δ discharge with lithium coatings XP-919 Josh Kallman XP Review - ASC Feb 2, 2009 NSTX Supported by College.
Supported by Office of Science NSTX S.M. Kaye, PPPL For the NSTX Research Team ITPA T&C Mtg. Naka, Japan 31 March – 2 April 2009 The Effect of Rotation.
NSTX Team Meeting December 21, 2009 College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics.
Enhancement of edge stability with lithium wall coatings in NSTX Rajesh Maingi, Oak Ridge National Lab R.E. Bell, B.P. LeBlanc, R. Kaita, H.W. Kugel, J.
Effect of 3-D fields on edge power/particle fluxes between and during ELMs (XP1026) A. Loarte, J-W. Ahn, J. M. Canik, R. Maingi, and J.-K. Park and the.
NSTX-Upgrade Magnetics And Related Diagnostics SPG NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu.
NSTX NSTX Team Meeting May 7, 2013 NSTX Team Meeting May 7, 2013 Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu.
First results of fast IR camera diagnostic J-W. Ahn and R. Maingi ORNL NSTX Monday Physics Meeting LSB-318, PPPL June 22, 2009 NSTX Supported by College.
NSTX NSTX LidsJuly 6, NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar.
NSTX Upgrade Project – Final Design Review June , NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL.
NSTX Team Meeting June 30, 2009 College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics.
Supported by Office of Science NSTX S.M. Kaye, PPPL ITPA PPPL 5-7 Oct Confinement and Transport in NSTX: Lithiumized vs non-Lithiumized Plasmas Culham.
Planning for Toroidal Lithium Divertor Target for NSTX and Supporting Experiments on CDX-U/LTX R. Kaita Boundary Physics Science Focus Group Meeting July.
Upgrades to PCS Hardware (Incomplete) KE, DAG, SPG, EK, DM, PS NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo.
NSTX 2007 MHD XP Review – J. Menard 1 Optimization of RFA detection algorithms during dynamic error field correction Presented by: J.E. Menard, PPPL Final.
Presently Planned Vacuum-Side Diagnostics for the NSTX-Upgrade Center Column NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
XP-945: ELM Pacing via Vertical Position Jogs S.P. Gerhardt, J.M. Canik, D. Gates, R. Goldston, R. Hawryluk, R. Maingi, J. Menard, S. Sabbagh, A. Sontag.
Preliminary Results from XP1020 RFA Measurements J.W. Berkery Department of Applied Physics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA NSTX Monday Physics.
V. A. Soukhanovskii, XP1002 Review, 9 June 2010, Princeton, NJ 1 of 9 XP 1002: Core impurity density and P rad reduction using divertor condition modifications.
Implementation of a 3D halo neutral model in the TRANSP code and application to projected NSTX-U plasmas S. S. Medley 1, D. Liu 2, M. V. Gorelenkova 1,
NSTX NSTX Team Meeting –Masa Ono August 15, 2014 NSTX-U Team Meeting August 15, 2014 Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo.
Advanced Scenario Development on NSTX D. A. Gates, PPPL For the NSTX Research Team 50th APS-DPP meeting Dallas, TX November 17, 2008 College W&M Colorado.
NSTX-U Collaboration Status and Plans for: M.I.T. Plasma Science and Fusion Center Abhay K. Ram, Paul Bonoli, and John Wright NSTX-U Collaborator Research.
Monitoring impact of the LLD Adam McLean, ORNL T. Gray, R. Maingi Lithium, TSG group preliminary research forum PPPL, B252 Nov. 23, 2009 NSTX Supported.
Comments on HC Measurements for NSTX- Upgrade SPG CS Upgrade Meeting 11/2/11 NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
Correlation between Electron Transport and Shear Alfven Activity in NSTX College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins.
NSTX Team Meeting August 9, 2011 NSTX TF Update Team Meeting August 9, 2011 Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto.
Neutron diagnostic calibration transfer XMP D. Darrow and the NSTX Research Team XMP & XP review meeting Control Room Annex June 11, 2015 NSTX-U Supported.
NSTX Team Meeting April 5, 2006 Supported by Office of Science College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL.
XP-950: XP-950: Dependence of metallic impurity accumulation on I p and the outer gap in the presence of lithium deposition S. Paul, S. P. Gerhardt are.
NSTX NSTX Upgrade Project – Final Design ReviewJune 22-24, NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL.
Presentation transcript:

NSTX NSTX TF, PF and umbrella Upgrade Internal ReviewFeb 24, NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics New York U Old Dominion U ORNL PPPL PSI Princeton U Purdue U SNL Think Tank, Inc. UC Davis UC Irvine UCLA UCSD U Colorado U Illinois U Maryland U Rochester U Washington U Wisconsin NSTX Center Stack Upgrade Internal Review Engineering Conference Room Feb 24, 2010 Coils Support Structures Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U Tokyo JAEA Hebrew U Ioffe Inst RRC Kurchatov Inst TRINITI KBSI KAIST POSTECH ASIPP ENEA, Frascati CEA, Cadarache IPP, Jülich IPP, Garching ASCR, Czech Rep U Quebec Danny Mangra

NSTX NSTX TF, PF and umbrella Upgrade Internal ReviewFeb 24, 2010 PF4/5 Loading Conditions PF 5 max ~ 240,000 lbs PF4 max ~ 200,000 lbs PF4 + PF5 max ~ 300,00 lbs PF 5 –current design Max stress ~ 126 MPa Allowable ~ 233 Mpa PF4 –current design Max stress ~ 380 MPa Allowable ~ 233 MPa

NSTX NSTX TF, PF and umbrella Upgrade Internal ReviewFeb 24, 2010 Options To reduce stress to PF4 1) Do nothing 1/16” gap between pf4/5 and support load existing weldment to vessel matching to limit load to weldment on vessel 2) Use current columns disconnect during bake out match to limit load to tabs’ rating field welding/machining 3) PF5 is a strong back to PF4 add clamps/links from PF4 to PF5 no maximum 4) Add new columns, avoiding existing columns and tabs max of 12 columns 5) add strong back 30 Deg segment centered on new columns 6 such strong backs(50%) of circumference 6) Combinations of 3,4,and 5

NSTX NSTX TF, PF and umbrella Upgrade Internal ReviewFeb 24, 2010 Options chosen - modifications to current design Option 3 connect PF4 to PF5 -clamps Option 4 if required Add more columns to PF5

NSTX NSTX TF, PF and umbrella Upgrade Internal ReviewFeb 24, 2010 Minimum effort - less shape fidelity Use as it- coil is not free to move at control points maximum stress to coil < 10,000 psi do nothing except alignment at room Temp Max 5 mm alignment to magnetic center Include compliances to existing constraints Introduce springs (less rigid) shape constraints Matched shape at room temperature Relax during bake-out During coil operation -displacement to springs -Allow profile to change- reduces shape fidelity - Increase the force during operation from room temperature via soft spring but not as much as using as it Offset shape constraints (variation of springs)

NSTX NSTX TF, PF and umbrella Upgrade Internal ReviewFeb 24, 2010 Temperature rise -Maximum shape fidelity Match profile at Maximum operating temperature-use existing constraint alignment shape control Periodic symmetry at best in all situation Always operate at this set temperature, if required additional heat (hot water) to maintain temp Relax during bake out-loss of shape Relax at room temperature-loss of shape Current data show recovery from relax shape to proper shape is adequate Smart/shape material-passive type-less effort

NSTX NSTX TF, PF and umbrella Upgrade Internal ReviewFeb 24, 2010 Maximum shape fidelity vs ease What is preferred Shape fidelity? Effort? Suggested plan of action PS copper is chilled-12 C Match profile at Maximum operating temperature-use existing constraints off set shape control compressed coil to correct profile Undo compression by.1” Radius use gaps if compression of coil is small Or heat coil to max temp Error ~.15% diameter Alignment 5mm Field measurement at both conditions

NSTX NSTX TF, PF and umbrella Upgrade Internal ReviewFeb 24, 2010 TF effort Being analyzed for hardware selection Path forward Outer rings 1 Fix link per TF (6 degree of constraints) 1 pinned link per TF( 4 degree of constraints) 2 joints totally Inner rings not required Compliant Links (new) to clevis( use as is) with load ratings ~ 5000 lbs or so Pinned to TF Pinned to clevis

NSTX NSTX TF, PF and umbrella Upgrade Internal ReviewFeb 24, 2010 Stress over view Von Mises Stress Most 20,000 psi High points ~ 30,000 psi, Clamp /Cu interface Cu to Al block ~TBD

NSTX NSTX TF, PF and umbrella Upgrade Internal ReviewFeb 24, 2010 Overall Displacement Displacement Max ~.67” Between PF5 ~.5” Outer ring 1 Fixed 1 pinned Compliant links 1 Pin at Tf and pin at clevis Limit loads ~ 7,500 lbs Displace further reduced

NSTX NSTX TF, PF and umbrella Upgrade Internal ReviewFeb 24, 2010 Summary-way forward PF4/5 6 columns package more connections from PF4 to PF5 12 columns if required TF Outer rings compliant links (new) to clevis, used as is