1 HOW THE ORGANIZATIONAL SENTENCING GUIDELINES AFFECT HOW THE ORGANIZATIONAL SENTENCING GUIDELINES AFFECT COMPLIANCE AND ETHICS PROGRAMS FIFTH ANNUAL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Defense Industry Initiative Best Practices Forum June 23, 2011 Dodd-Frank Act Sentencing Guidelines Trends in Administrative Agreements Iris E. Bennett,
Advertisements

Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct Laura K. Kennedy Senior Vice President, Ethics and Compliance SAIC.
Implementing Business Ethics in a Global Economy
Chapter 6 The Role of Government Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written.
FEDERAL SENTENCING GUIDELINES AND THEIR EFFCT ON CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITY Gary A. Jones, Senior Environmental Counsel Siemens Corporation Franco.
John W. McReynolds Assistant Chief, New York Field Office Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice Judicial Training Program Moscow, Russia July.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act. 2 What Is It? Act passed by Congress in response to the recent and continuing corporate scandals. Signed into law July 30, Established.
©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Fraud Auditing Chapter 11.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 The Role of Government.
Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 The Role of Government McGraw-Hill.
Compliance Programs after The Affordable Care Act Angela Mattie, JD, MPH Teresa Tai, PhD, MA Quinnipiac University, School of Business, Department.
Presented by MUHAMMAD YAHYA AHMAD College of Education and Allied Program PCU, Manila.
Contractor Management and ISO 14001:2004
E-Commerce: Legal and Practical Issues Legal Issues: Security – December 2, 2005 Stephen M. Foxman Philadelphia.
WELCOME Annual Meeting & Compliance Seminar. Code of Conduct - Impact on Corporate Culture by Andy Greenstein Knight Capital Group, Inc.
Weyerhaeuser Company and Waste Management Weyerhaeuser Nancy Thomas-Moore Director, Ethics and Business Conduct Waste Management Bill Prachar VP, Business.
POST-AWARD FINANCIAL COMPLIANCE Presented by: Jerry Fife, Assistant Vice Chancellor for Research Finance, Vanderbilt University,
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. 1 Part Four: Implementing Business Ethics in a Global Economy Chapter 8: Developing an Effective Ethics Program.
Supplier Ethics: Program Checklist
Corporate Ethics Compliance *
Sarbanes-Oxley Project Summary of COSO Framework Presented by Larry Dillehay & Scott Reitan Parkfield Group LLC.
James Rose, Corporate Director of Internal Audit February 7, 2002 Welcome To The New Humana 5th Annual National Congress on Health Care Compliance Internal.
Building a Compliance Risk Monitoring Program HCCA Compliance Institute New OrleansApril 19, 2005 Lois Dehls Cornell, Esq. Assistant Vice President, Deputy.
Development of an Effective Ethics Program
Guidelines for constructing a Compliance Program for Medicaid Managed Care Organizations and PrePaid Health Plans As provided by the Medicaid Alliance.
Minnesota Adoption of the Green Book April 16, 2015 Jo Kane Internal Control & Accountability Specialist.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Non Profit Board Responsibilities Effective Compliance Program Oversight John H. Fisher, II, JD, CHC Presented To The Board of Directors of Your Favorite.
6 Months Since Sarbanes/Oxley 259 criminal actions in FY2002 by 30 different U.S. Attorney's Offices and DOJ for securities-related offenses or obstruction.
Ethics and Legal Compliance in Business The Sentencing Guidelines, Sarbanes-Oxley, and Beyond.
The Institutionalization of Business Ethics
Kuliah Minggu ke 5 Internal Controls and Fraud Protection Board and Management Responsibilities.
Jeff Kaplan/Kaplan & Walker / Society of Corporate Secretaries & Governance Professionals 2012 Mid-Atlantic.
HROFFICE USER CONFERENCE 2005 Creating an Effective Ethics and Compliance Program Ascentis User Group September, 2005.
CORPORATE COMPLIANCE Tim Timmons Vice President Compliance and Regulatory Services Health Future, LLC.
Institutional Research Compliance Juliann Tenney, JD Research Compliance and Privacy Officer Director, Institutional Research Compliance Program.
Developing an Effective Ethics Program
Establishing A Compliance Program: It Makes Sense
AUDITS & PROCEDURES TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH U.S. SENTENCING GUIDELINES MICHAEL BRAZIL EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT & GENERAL COUNSEL, SAKS INCORPORATED.
Why the Office of Compliance and Ethics was Created
Corporate Responsibility and Compliance A Resource for Health Care Boards of Directors By Debbie Troklus, CHC and Michael C. Hemsley, Esq.
EVIDENCING EFFECTIVE COMPLIANCE TO MINIMIZE AN ORGANIZATION’S CULPABILITY SCORE HFMA – TEXAS GULF COAST CHAPTER SEPTEMBER 17, 2004 Presented by.
The Institutionalization of Business Ethics
The Third Annual Medical Device Regulatory, Reimbursement and Compliance Congress How to establish a Compliance Program that will Minimize the Impact of.
Michael Flores, CPA, CGMA Regier, Carr and Monroe Faculty Fellow Wichita State University ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING EDUCATION.
MA. EXPORT CENTER COMPLIANCE CLINIC
Roadmap For An Effective Compliance And Ethics Program The Top Ten Things the Board Must Know [Name of Presenter] [Title] [Date]
Current Issues in Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Compliance Management Introductory Comments Pharma, Medical Device & Biotech Colloquium June 6, 2005.
BSA PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS.  Written, approved by the board of directors, and noted in the board minutes.  Based on the risk assessment  Fully implemented.
DOJ Perspectives on Effective Compliance and Investigations Maxwell Carr-Howard Husch Blackwell, LLP October 8, 2012.
When Pharmaceutical Marketing Crosses the Line: Best Practices For Investigation and Remediation.
Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizations: Ethics and Compliance Mandates.
HARRIS PROPRIETARY 1 assuredcommunications™ NCMA Each of Medco Health’s False Claims Was “Knowingly Submitted” Because Medco Health Had No Effective Corporate.
Chief Compliance Officer
William Kolasky September 26, 2007 IMPLEMENTING AN EFFECTIVE ANTITRUST COMPLIANCE PROGRAM.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada 9-1 Chapter 9: Internal Controls and Control Risk.
ORGANIZATIONAL SENTENCING GUIDELINES THE HONORABLE RUBEN J. CASTILLO VICE-CHAIR, U.S. SENTENCING COMMISSION.
Developing an Effective Ethics Program
Valiants Verify Compliance Program Judith W. Spain, J.D., CCEP ® Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer General Counsel (Effective March 2016) 1.
BusinessAllstars.com 1 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 BusinessAllstarsPresents Copyright © 2004 by Gainbridge Associates All right reserved This material may.
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.8-1 Chapter 8 Developing an Effective Ethics Program.
Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 The Role of Government McGraw-Hill.
Overview of Tampa Electric’s Compliance Program APPA Reliability Standards and Compliance Program January 10, 2007.
Roadmap For An Effective Compliance And Ethics Program
The Institutionalization of Business Ethics
Developing an Effective Ethics Program
Providing Access to Your Data: Handling sensitive data
Understanding the Principles and Their Effect on the Audit
Chapter 8 Developing an Effective Ethics Program
Defining An Effectiveness Standard
Presentation transcript:

1 HOW THE ORGANIZATIONAL SENTENCING GUIDELINES AFFECT HOW THE ORGANIZATIONAL SENTENCING GUIDELINES AFFECT COMPLIANCE AND ETHICS PROGRAMS FIFTH ANNUAL PHARMACEUTICAL REGULATORY AND COMPLIANCE CONGRESS WASHINGTON, D.C. NOVEMBER 15, 2004 JOHN R. STEER COMMISSIONER AND VICE CHAIR UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION

2 “CARROT AND STICK” Operation of the Criminal Penalty Structure Encourage partnership in crime control Encourage partnership in crime control Reward self-policing, self-reporting, and voluntary disclosure Reward self-policing, self-reporting, and voluntary disclosure

3 FINE RANGE §§8C2.7; 8A1.1 n.2 Fine Range x = Seriousness of the Offense Culpability BASE FINE MULTIPLIERS Minimum Maximum Exception Environmental, Export, Food/Drug Violations

4 DETERMINING CULPABILITY SCORE §8C2.5 BASE OFFENSE LEVEL 5 POINTS BASE OFFENSE LEVEL 5 POINTS Level of Authority + 5/+4/+3 Level of Authority + 5/+4/+3 Size of Organization + 2 or + 1 Size of Organization + 2 or + 1 Prior History + 2 or + 1 Prior History + 2 or + 1 Violation of an Order + 2 or + 1 Violation of an Order + 2 or + 1 Obstruction of Justice + 3 Obstruction of Justice + 3 Effective Program to Prevent and Effective Program to Prevent and Detect Violations of Law - 3 Detect Violations of Law - 3 Self-Reporting, Cooperation and - 5/ - 2 Self-Reporting, Cooperation and - 5/ - 2 Acceptance of Responsibility - 1 Acceptance of Responsibility - 1

5 INCENTIVE STRUCTURE: WHAT’S IT WORTH? $40,000,000 $500,000$10,000,

6 GENESIS OF 2004 AMENDMENTS Decade of compliance and business ethics practice Decade of compliance and business ethics practice Caremark case and corporate governance Caremark case and corporate governance Expanded field of practitioners Expanded field of practitioners Legislative and regulatory responses to corporate scandals Legislative and regulatory responses to corporate scandals Sarbanes-Oxley Act, SEC, NYSE Sarbanes-Oxley Act, SEC, NYSE Recommendations of Ad Hoc Advisory Group Recommendations of Ad Hoc Advisory Group See October 7, 2003, Report at See October 7, 2003, Report at

7 Stand-alone Guideline for “Compliance and Ethics Program” Stand-alone Guideline for “Compliance and Ethics Program” Promote ethical conduct & organizational culture of compliance Promote ethical conduct & organizational culture of compliance Seven minimum steps expanded Seven minimum steps expanded Small organizations addressed Small organizations addressed Assessing risks of criminal conduct made explicit Assessing risks of criminal conduct made explicit Cooperation credit not contingent on privilege waiver Cooperation credit not contingent on privilege waiver OVERVIEW OF CHANGES

8 §8B2.1(a) CRITERIA FOR EFFECTIVE PROGRAM Exercise due diligence in fulfilling seven minimum requirements at §8B2.1(b)(2) Exercise due diligence in fulfilling seven minimum requirements at §8B2.1(b)(2) Promote ethical conduct and organizational culture that encourages a commitment to compliance with the law Promote ethical conduct and organizational culture that encourages a commitment to compliance with the law

9 §8B2.1(b)(1) STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES “[E]stablish standards and procedures to prevent and detect criminal conduct” “[E]stablish standards and procedures to prevent and detect criminal conduct” “[S]tandards and procedures” = “standards of conduct and internal controls that are reasonably capable of reducing the likelihood of criminal conduct” “[S]tandards and procedures” = “standards of conduct and internal controls that are reasonably capable of reducing the likelihood of criminal conduct” See Application Note 1 See Application Note 1

10 §8B2.1(b)(2) PROGRAM RESPONSIBLITY Governing Authority Governing Authority Must be knowledgeable and exercise oversight Must be knowledgeable and exercise oversight High-Level Personnel High-Level Personnel Overall responsibility to ensure effectiveness of program Overall responsibility to ensure effectiveness of program Senior Management or equivalent Senior Management or equivalent See Application Note 3(b) §8A1.2 See Application Note 3(b) §8A1.2 Operational Responsibility Operational Responsibility Adequate resources and appropriate authority Adequate resources and appropriate authority Periodic reporting Periodic reporting May be delegated by high-level personnel but then d irect access to governing authority required May be delegated by high-level personnel but then d irect access to governing authority required

11 §8B2.1(b)(3) PERSONNEL SCREENING Screen Substantial Authority Personnel Screen Substantial Authority Personnel See Application Note 3(c) of §8A1.2 for SAR Definition See Application Note 3(c) of §8A1.2 for SAR Definition Applicable Screening Standard Applicable Screening Standard “[O]rganization knew or should have known [individual] had engaged in illegal activities or other conduct inconsistent with an effective... program ” “[O]rganization knew or should have known [individual] had engaged in illegal activities or other conduct inconsistent with an effective... program ” Application Note 4: Factors for Screening Application Note 4: Factors for Screening Relatedness of prior misconduct to specific responsibilities Relatedness of prior misconduct to specific responsibilities Recency of prior misconduct Recency of prior misconduct Frequency Frequency

12 §8B2.1(b)(4) TRAINING Training Now a Requirement Training Now a Requirement Training in standards and procedures for compliance Training in standards and procedures for compliance Extends to All Levels of Organization Extends to All Levels of Organization Directors and senior management Directors and senior management Employees Employees Agents, as appropriate Agents, as appropriate

13 §8B2.1(b)(5)(A)(B): EVALUATION, MONITORING, AUDITING Ensure program is followed Ensure program is followed By monitoring and auditing By monitoring and auditing To detect criminal conduct To detect criminal conduct Periodically evaluate program effectiveness Periodically evaluate program effectiveness

14 §8B2.1(b)(5)(C) REPORTIING SYSTEMS Maintain and publicize a reporting system Maintain and publicize a reporting system To be used by employees and agents To be used by employees and agents To report potential or actual criminal conduct To report potential or actual criminal conduct To seek guidance on potential conduct To seek guidance on potential conduct Reporting systems may include Reporting systems may include Mechanisms for anonymity or confidentiality or Mechanisms for anonymity or confidentiality or Any other system organization may devise to meet goal Any other system organization may devise to meet goal

15 §8B2.1(b)(6): PROMOTE PROGRAM Appropriate Incentives Appropriate Incentives Appropriate Disciplinary Measures Appropriate Disciplinary Measures §8B2.1(b)(7): APPROPRIATE RESPONSE TO DETECTED VIOLATIONS

16 §8B2.1(c): ASSESSING RISK OF CRIMINAL CONDUCT Explicit new requirement Explicit new requirement Design, implement, or modify application of seven requirements within organization to reduce risk of occurrence of criminal conduct Design, implement, or modify application of seven requirements within organization to reduce risk of occurrence of criminal conduct Guidance in Application Note 6 Guidance in Application Note 6 Nature and seriousness of conduct Nature and seriousness of conduct Prior history of organization Prior history of organization Likelihood of violations given nature of business Likelihood of violations given nature of business

17 FOCUS ON SMALL ORGANIZATIONS Modified requirements for smaller organizations Modified requirements for smaller organizations Application Note 2(C)(iii) Application Note 2(C)(iii) Suggests large organizations encourage small organizations to promote ethics and compliance programs, especially with potential and actual vendors Suggests large organizations encourage small organizations to promote ethics and compliance programs, especially with potential and actual vendors Application Note 2(C)(ii) Application Note 2(C)(ii) Establishes a rebuttable presumption if high-level involvement in offense Establishes a rebuttable presumption if high-level involvement in offense See §8C2.5(f)(3)(A) See §8C2.5(f)(3)(A)

18 WAIVER OF PRIVILEGES Addition to Commentary to §8C2.5(f); See Note 12 Addition to Commentary to §8C2.5(f); See Note 12 “Waiver of [privileges] is not generally required in order to qualify for credit for cooperation” “Waiver of [privileges] is not generally required in order to qualify for credit for cooperation” But there may be times when necessary “in order to provide timely and thorough disclosure of all information known to the organization” But there may be times when necessary “in order to provide timely and thorough disclosure of all information known to the organization”

19