The Preservation Process. Sequence of Preservation actions 1. Setting standards or criteria that define what is worth preserving. 2. Undertaking a survey.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HISTORIC Preservation Easements Michigan Historic Preservation Network May 29,2008.
Advertisements

Wilderness and Cultural Resources: Symbiotic Management Pei-Lin Yu Rocky Mountains Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit March 6, 2013.
City of San José Distinctive Neighborhood Program Policy Options Outreach Presentation.
Cultural Heritage and its Management Chaco Culture National Historical Park Larry J. Zimmerman.
NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT of 1966 as amended Garry J. Cantley Regional Archeologist Bureau of Indian Affairs.
The National Register of Historic Places. NOT THE: National Historic Registry National Historic Registry Historical List Historical List Historical Registry.
IDENTIFYING & EVALUATING HISTORIC PROPERTIES NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES –CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION HISTORIC.
HERITAGE - LOCAL GOVERNMENT by Susan O’Neill. Heritage - Local Government Strategic heritage planning – identifying and listing heritage items and translating.
Session 6 Integrated Emergency Management. Objectives of the Session Students will be able to 6.1 Define the principle of integration. 6.2Discuss the.
SAN JUAN BAUTISTA THIRD STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT PROPERTY OWNERS INFORMATIONAL MEETING October 7, 2008.
November 22, 2011 Historical Commission Mission : To promote, preserve and protect Alachua County’s historic resources.
Woodland-Larchmere Commercial Historic District Cleveland, Shaker Heights, Cuyahoga County, Ohio National Register Public Hearing May 21, 2015 Barbara.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
Feasibility Studies National Heritage Areas. Initiating National Heritage Areas National Heritage Area designations have been initiated in four different.
Federal Preservation Activities: Part 1. What did With Heritage So Rich (1965) and the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 provide to administer.
Historic Preservation AMCV1550, Week 4. Movement’s beginnings Mount Vernon Ladies Association (1853) Designated National Historic Landmark 1960 – Role.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
Section 106 Processes A Guide to the Ideals and Reals of CRM.
Planning for a Vibrant Community. Introduction Planning is a process that involves: –Assessing current conditions; envisioning a desired future; charting.
Heritage Tourism and the Historic Preservation Movement.
Driving Indiana’s Economic Growth. Management and Preservation of Indiana's Historic Bridges: A Programmatic Approach Thanks to Mead & Hunt & FHWA-IN.
Field Survey Introduction. What is a survey? Survey = process of identifying and gathering data on a community's historic resources. Field survey= the.
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
Discussion and Possible action on the historic designation by the City of Laredo Landmark Board on certain LISD Schools.
Saving places. WHY A CHAPTER ON HISTORICAL RESOURCES in the MASTER PLAN ?  A Master Plan is required by Zoning  A Historic Resources Chapter is to aid.
Field Survey Introduction. What is a survey? Survey means a process of identifying and gathering data on a community's historic resources. It includes.
Florida Cultural Resources and How They Relate to Your Public Works Project Presented by: Brent Handley, MA, RPA Archaeology Division Director.
Cultural Resource Management in the Department of Defense September 29, 2005 Maureen Sullivan Federal Preservation Officer.
Mitigation in the Section 106 Process Dave Berwick Army Program Manager Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
Procedures and Processes Phase II: Evaluation CRM Phases I-III This presentation uses materials taken from Ricardo Elia’s Cultural Resources Archaeology.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion March 20, 2012.
Is there a future for the past? Chaco Culture National Historical Park Larry J. Zimmerman.
Technical Assistance Grants to Communities Pipeline Safety Trust Conference New Orleans November 20, 2008 Steve Fischer PHMSA/Office of Pipeline Safety.
Nadine Peterson Preservation Planner NH Division of Historical Resources Lynne E. Monroe Preservation Company Christopher W. Closs Christopher W. Closs.
#oldhousefair Old v/s Historic What is historic anyway? Melissa Wyllie.
3D Technology and the Section 106 Process Matt Diederich Archaeologist Oregon State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Oregon Heritage Programs Division.
NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION DISTRICT STRATEGY Lund Consulting, Inc. Community Outreach Spring 2015 City of Seattle.
1 DoD Sustainable Ranges Initiative Readiness and Environmental Protection Initiative (REPI) Bruce Beard ODUSD(I&E) Land Trust Alliance Rally October.
National Historic Districts And Why Taylor Should Be Among Them.
By Rachel Coleman.  “ The head of any federal agency having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed federal or federally assisted undertaking.
Conservation in the Built Environment UD activity takes place within: - Newly built env. - Existing built env. To exercise informed judgment to identify.
Historic Preservation in Washington, DC. Purposes of the D.C. Historic Preservation Law Protect, enhance and perpetuate the distinctive elements of the.
Saving Tybee Island's history and preserving its character.
Historical Resources SURVEY SAVVY Marie Nelson State Historian II OHP-Survey/CLG Coordinator Sep 07 – Chico.
West Linn Historic Resources and Architectural Styles Overview March 17, 2015.
Historic Preservation Memoranda of Agreement. What is an MOA? As part of the Section 106 review process, it is an agreement among an agency official,
Private Preservation Protections: Preservation Easements.
San Antonio Unified Development Code Group 17. Numbering and Referencing The numbering system is consistent with the system used throughout the City's.
Yorba Linda Survey : Results Presented by: Andrea Galvin Planning Commission/ City Council Joint Session October 13 th, 7:00 p.m.
ARCH 5325 Conservation Policies Chapter 2 The Preservation Movement in the United States.
The Community Preservation Act. Open Space Historic Preservation Affordable Housing Allows communities to establish a dedicated fund for: The Community.
Cultural Resources office — St. Louis Planning & Urban Design Agency an introduction.
Surplus City Property – Request for Proposals Administration & Finance Committee February 1, 2012.
CITY PLANNING ACADEMY HISTORIC PRESERVATION CITY OF SACRAMENTO PRESERVATION OFFICE Community Development Department March 23, 2016.
1 City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Historic Landmarks Commission Type II Appeal of Approval LU HDZ –
The National Register. The National Register of Historic Places The National Register of Historic Places is authorized by Section 101 (a)(1)(A)of the.
Valuing Wealden’s heritage. National Planning Policy Framework Sets out the planning policies for England and how these are to be applied. “The purpose.
Anth January 2012.
Landscape Preservation and Archaeology
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project FERC Project No February 26, 2008.
Determination of Eligibility 5/4/16
Certification system for prepackages
National Historic Preservation Act
Determination of Eligibility 6/21/17
Determination of Eligibility 3/21/18
Fort Wainwright, Alaska Environmental Officer Course 2011
Browne’s Addition Local Historic District Plan Commission Workshop #1
National Historic Preservation Act
Determination of Eligibility 2/20/19
The Statement of Significance (SoS)
Presentation transcript:

The Preservation Process

Sequence of Preservation actions 1. Setting standards or criteria that define what is worth preserving. 2. Undertaking a survey to locate and describe resources potentially to be saved. 3. Evaluating the resources discovered in the survey against the standards established in step one. 4. Giving those properties that qualify “official status” in some way. This is Listing on the National Register 5. Following up with protective measures.

Why this sequence? Sequence represents an approach to government administration. a. Standards are set in legislative action. b. Administration of a disaster relief involves identifying scope, triage (planning what to do first), providing aid. c. All steps must be constantly under scrutiny and are subject to change.

Who does the work of Historic Preservation? Procedures are expressed without actors (agents). This approach obscures decisions of inclusion and exclusion and who constructs the rhetoric of those choices. Stated in this listing suggests a linear process-making the irrational appear rational. The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 created a protective structure and set the criteria for consideration, yet little of survey necessary for inclusion had been done.

High Standards of Standardness The standards of what is worthy of protection was codified in the language of the National Historic Preservation act of 1966 and has been further elaborated in publications of the National Park Service in defining properties eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. Eligibility is the term for meeting standards.

Criteria of the National Register A. Structures associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or B. That are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or C. That embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or D. Have yielded or likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.

How did we get standards? The standards of what is worthy of protection was codified in the language of the National Historic Preservation act of 1966 and has been further elaborated in publications of the National Park Service in defining properties eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. Background events: In 1963 the National Trust and Colonial Williamsburg sponsored a conference to discuss historic preservation, improving transportation and urban decay. The outlines from that conference contained in a 1966 publication Historic Preservation Today was narrow in focus on outstanding sites of historic content. In 1964 a small committee of preservationists began to push for new legislation. In January of 1966 the report of their findings With Heritage So Rich was published. The National Historic Preservation Act was created by vote of the 89 th Congress. How do you read a public law? First understand that the name of a law is not necessarily the official title, but a popular name used for convenience of the readers. The legal outline form involves: Title I. Section 101. (a)(1)(A)

Survey Field-based Research Design. The goal of research with any preservation organization is the development of a complete and fully documented, comprehensive inventory of the community’s historic properties. However, “a survey need not be complete and comprehensive in order to be useful.” National Park Service Bulletin 24 Criteria of survey includes a “fifty year” rule–moving target of survey. In 1970s administrators (with their own criteria) felt that surveys would be finished, however, newer buildings have continued to be added to mix.

Evaluation In order for properties to be listed on the National Register they must meet four conditions: They must a. possess a significance that b. meets at least one of the criteria of the national register and the significance must c. be developed from an understanding of the historic context (theme, time, place), and d. retain integrity of location and materials. Properties may have buildings that are Contributing or “non-contributing.”

Listings The National Register of Historic Places National Historic Landmarks Virginia Landmarks Register Local Historic Districts

Protective Measures and Incentives Protecting against the actions of man. a. Section 106 protections against the practices of government. Protecting against environmental and temporal effects– conservation. Funding the costs of preservation. tax incentives. Direct and Indirect. Grants.