BDS Lattice Design : EDR plans GWP03 Meeting 04/12/2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EXTRACTION BEAM LOSS AT 1 TEV CM WITH TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov, G. White August 25, 2014.
Advertisements

Study of the Luminosity of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel CERN June F. Willeke, DESY.
Overview of Beam Delivery System Final Focus Optics Collimator Final Doublet Extraction/Dump Others S.Kuroda ( KEK ) MDI meeting at SLAC 1/6/2005.
ATF2 FB/FF layout Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group FONT meeting January 11, 2007.
November 2005M. Woodley1 ILC Beam Delivery System layout with end-of-linac undulator.
ILC BDS Collimation Optimisation and PLACET simulations Adina Toader School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester & Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury.
ILC BDS Collimation Optimisation and PLACET simulations Adina Toader School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester & Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
LCLS-II Transverse Tolerances Tor Raubenheimer May 29, 2013.
1 ATF2 Tuning and its application to ILC and CLIC FFS/IR region ASTeC and MAN : working together on tuning methods for the ATF2 and ILC IR/extraction design.
Beam Delivery System Review of RDR(draft) 1.Overview 2.Beam parameters 3.System description 3.1 diagnostic, tune-up dump, machine protection MPS.
ILC Beam Delivery System Layout and Lattice Design Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, Cockcroft Institute Cockcroft Institute SAC th November 2006.
November 07, 2006 Global Design Effort 1 Beam Delivery System updates BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Hitoshi Yamamoto, Andrei Seryi Valencia GDE.
ILC RTML Lattice Design A.Vivoli, N. Solyak, V. Kapin Fermilab.
Relative Error on Parameter Pessimistic Estimate Optimistic Estimate β function at the LW 3% 1% LW readout error 2% 1% Laser spot waist 10% Laser Pointing.
CLIC RTML collimation systems and beam stabilisation R. Apsimon CERN, TE-ABT-BTP ECFA LC2013 at DESY, Hamburg 27 th -31 st May 2013.
Transfer Line -2 Optics Design For CTF3 Amalendu Sharma, Abdurrahim, A.D.Ghodke, Gurnam Singh and V.C. Sahni Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology.
ILC BCD Crossing Angle Issues G. A. Blair Royal Holloway Univ. London ECFA ILC Workshop, Vienna 14 th November 2005 Introduction BCD Crossing Angle Rankings.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
October 31, BDS Group1 ILC Beam Delivery System “Hybrid” Layout 2006e Release Preliminary M. Woodley.
January 10, 2007M. Woodley (SLAC)1 ILC Beam Delivery System “Interim Working Assumption” 2006e Release European LC Workshop, January , Daresbury.
Global Design Effort Beam Delivery System => EDR LCWS07 June 2, 2007 at DESY Andrei Seryi for BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, A.S., Hitoshi Yamamoto.
D. Angal-KalininEUROTeV Annual Meeting, DESY WP2 : Beam Delivery System D. Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, STFC, Daresbury Laboratory 4 th EUROTeV Annual.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
Status of ILC BDS Design Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC/Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury Laboratory Andrei Seryi SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory ILC-CLIC.
ILC Beam Delivery System / MDI Issues for LCC-phase (~
Status of the Rebaselining D. Schulte for the Rebaselining Team D. Schulte, CLIC Rebaselining, October 2013.
11th December 2007 LET workshop, SLAC 1 Beam dynamics issues in Beam Delivery System Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Overview: Primary Sensitivities Nov S. Childress Page 1 NuMI Overview: NuMI Primary Beamline Sensitivities NuMI requirements are for a very large.
Global Design Effort ILC Crab Cavity Overview and requirements Andrei Seryi SLAC on behalf of ILC Beam Delivery and Crab-Cavity design teams Joint BNL/US-LARP/CARE-HHH.
GDE questions, including one or two IRs Grahame Blair, Tomo Sanuki, Andrei Seryi for WG4 Snowmass, CO, August 25, 2005 Grahame Blair, Tomo Sanuki, Andrei.
Design of the Turnaround Loops for the Drive Beam Decelerators R. Apsimon, J. Esberg CERN, Switzerland.
October 20, 2006 Global Design Effort 1 ILC Interaction regions : The GDE perspective Talk based on several talks presented by BDS area leaders Andrei.
17 th November, 2008 LCWS08/ILC08 1 BDS optics and minimal machine study Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC & The Cockcroft Institute Daresbury Laboratory.
28-May-2008Non-linear Beam Dynamics WS1 On Injection Beam Loss at the SPring-8 Storage Ring Masaru TAKAO & J. Schimizu, K. Soutome, and H. Tanaka JASRI.
ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design ( Modified FODO ) ** Yi-Peng Sun *,1,2, Jie Gao 1, Zhi-Yu Guo 2 Wei-Shi Wan 3 1 Institute of High Energy Physics,
BDS: 1 October 13, 2007 BDS KOM EDR planning discussion Andrei Seryi October 13, 2007.
1 Alternative ILC Bunch Compressor 7 th Nov KNU (Kyungpook National Univ.) Eun-San Kim.
1 Alternative Bunch Compressor 30 th Sep KNU Eun-San Kim.
1 V. Kashikhin for ILC ALCPG 2007, FNAL Meeting October 23, 2007 Ring to Main Linac Magnets.
1 DR -> IP Beam Transport Simulations with Intra-Train Feedback Glen White, SLAC Jan 19 th 2006.
Design options for emittance measurement systems for the CLIC RTML R Apsimon.
Low Emittance Generation and Preservation K. Yokoya, D. Schulte.
Task Lists of ATF2 commissioning Toshiyuki Okugi ATF2 Project Meeting 12 / 17 / 2008.
Simulations - Beam dynamics in low emittance transport (LET: From the exit of Damping Ring) K. Kubo
BDS, Start to End Simulation, Simulation Codes Summary D. Schulte.
IWLC10, 18 th -22 nd October10, CERN/CICG 1 Global Design Effort Updates to ILC RDR Beam Delivery System Deepa Angal-Kalinin & James Jones ASTeC, STFC.
BDS/MDI Deepa Angal-Kalinin Andrei Seryi AD&I Meeting, DESY, May 29, 2009.
N.Solyak, RTMLLCWS’08, Chicago Nov.16-20, RTML progress 2008 Nikolay Solyak.
Beam dynamics and linac optics studies for medical proton accelerators
ILC BDS Commissioning Glen White, SLAC AWLC 2014, Fermilab May 14 th 2014.
J-Parc Neutrino Facility Primary Proton Beam Design A. K. Ichikawa(KEK), Y.Iwamoto(KEK) and K.Tanabe(Tokyo) et.al. 7 th Nov. 2003,
Layout and Arcs lattice design A. Chancé, B. Dalena, J. Payet, CEA R. Alemany, B. Holzer, D. Schulte CERN.
MAIN DUMP LINE: BEAM LOSS SIMULATIONS WITH THE TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov E. Marin, G. White (SLAC) LCWS14 Workshop, Belgrade, October 7, 2014.
Design challenges for head-on scheme Deepa Angal-Kalinin Orsay, 19 th October 2006.
Design of Transfer Line-2 (TL-2) for CLIC Test Facility – 3 (CTF-3) Amalendu Sharma, A.Rahim, A.D.Ghodke and Gurnam Singh IOAPDD Raja Ramanna Centre for.
The design of the 2mrad extraction line Rob Appleby Daresbury Laboratory On behalf of the SLAC-BNL-UK-France task force ILC European Regional Meeting and.
1 April 1 st, 2003 O. Napoly, ECFA-DESY Amsterdam Design of a new Final Focus System with l* = 4,5 m J. Payet, O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
Emittance Dilution and Preservation in the ILC RTML
Test of Optical Stochastic Cooling in CESR
Accelerator and detector requirements specification and optimisation on example of interaction Region BDS Design Team 11-13th October 2007 BDS KOM, SLAC.
AD & I : BDS Lattice Design Changes
ILC BDS Emittance Diagnostics: Design and Requirements
Progress activities in short bunch compressors
Progress of SPPC lattice design
CLIC damping rings working plan towards the CDR
Linac Design Update P. Emma LCLS DOE Review May 11, 2005 LCLS.
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
ILC Beam Switchyard: Issues and Plans
Presentation transcript:

BDS Lattice Design : EDR plans GWP03 Meeting 04/12/2007

MPS collimators : specifications –6mm radius in switchyard Beam switchyard –Coupling correction, emittance measurements, laser wire and polarimeter chicane – What is the acceptable time scale to study all the design issues discussed during 29 th Nov GWP03 meeting? –Any other plans to work out different designs? Tune-up/fast extraction line –Is design okay (what changes required to change from +/-10% to -20% acceptance?) –Kicker, septa designs

Collimation and final focus –energy chicane outside the matching quadrupoles (may be better?) –Tuning of beam line for different L*, beam parameters (Guidance on energy range from PM/EC etc) –Collimation depths –Collimation performance with full tracking –Effect of jitter amplification – analytical formulae vs tracking (PLACET, MERLIN) –Real estate for engineered designs of spoilers (taper angle etc) –Octupole tail folding –Effect of beam and machine errors

Energy measurements –What kind of scanning required and how it will affect the beam after this chicane? Standardisation of magnets/power supplies Magnets on strings Keep the design for 1 TeV CM?

Extraction line –Losses for new beam parameters –Include beam and lattice errors, solenoid, anti- DID and anti-solenoid –Downstream diagnostics (angle measurement) –Costing of downstream diagnostics and constraints on extraction line design –Savings in the extraction line cost without downstream diagnostics?

 Document performance driven specs  Study performance vs. optics length  Study optics for magnet types standardization  Study optics for aperture standardization  Different L* optics performance & tunability  Study abnormal optics & MPS issues  Study Z, 350, 1000 GeV CM performance  Study High Lumi upgrade path Lattice Design

Optics, Tolerances, Tuning and Feedback WP leader? Lattice Design ? Tuning and tolerances ? Luminosity Delivery ? Emittance measurement Beam switchyard & Tune up extraction line Collimation & final focus Extraction Line Energy measurements Polarisation Measurements Upstream ? Downstream ? Upstream Downstream Field and p/s tolerances Alignment tolerances Tuning (LET) Feedback Wake fields ? Collimator IR Vacuum chamber Magnet team wants this info to start their work

Lattice design plan till Sendai –Decide whether or not the design can be upgraded to 1 TeV without changes in the tunnel? –Maximum allowable emittance dilution for entire TeV? –Decision about combining or not LW + polarimeter + MPS collimator –Matching section for wide parameter range with optimised phase advances for better collimation? –Minimum operable energy –Magnet aperture standardization and magnets on strings