1 Update on Efforts to Reduce Emissions and Risks at High Risk Railyards February 25, 2010 BNSF San Bernardino California Environmental Protection Agency.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Calista AVCP Regional Energy Plan. Preliminary Planning and Stakeholder Involvement Resource Inventory and Data Analysis Develop and Review Draft Energy.
Advertisements

Item #16 California Measure SB375: Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital.
Air Resources Board’s Freight Efforts February 26, 2015 Sacramento Heather Arias Chief, Freight Transport Branch.
California Air Quality Governance Bart Croes, Chief Research Division
Update: National Ambient Air Quality Standards Association of California Airports September 15, 2010 Phil DeVita.
Policy and Mitigation Measures - Heavy Duty Vehicle Emissions in California India – California Air-Pollution Mitigation Program (ICAMP) Oakland, CA, October.
IDEM OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY PRIORITIES FOR Accomplishments In 2003 Achieved federal approval of Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit.
Southeast Diesel Collaborative Carol L. Kemker, Deputy Director Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division.
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD DIESEL EMISSIONS STANDARDS AL UPTON BUTTE COUNTY FLEET MANAGER  Four separate rules apply to Public Agencies  On-Road.
Lassen Lodge Hydroelectric Project Public Scoping Meetings November 5, 2014 (Sacramento and Red Bluff) State Water Resources Control Board Division of.
1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Issues Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 17, 2009 Ted Graham & Steve Bieber COG Department.
1 Delta Levees Investment Strategy Delta Stewardship Council Central Valley Flood Protection Board Levees Workshop July 10, 2015.
1 Southern California Water Dialogue April 23, 2008 Jon Costantino Climate Change Planning Manager California Air Resources Board AB 32 California Global.
2015 Northern California Clean Cities Funding Workshop Low Carbon Transportation Investments and Air Quality Improvement Program (AQIP) July 9,
Screen | 1 EPA - Drivers for Regionalisation Max Harvey Director Operations Environment Protection Authority Presentation, reference, author, date.
Administrative Penalty Program SB Regulatory Item California Air Resources Board Enforcement Division Public Hearing December 12, 2002 Sacramento,
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
1 Public Hearing to Consider Proposed Amendments to the Emission Inventory Criteria and Guidelines Regulation for the AB 2588 Air Toxics “Hot Spots” Program.
California Experience in Converting Vehicles to Alternative Fuels New Delhi, India May 2001 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Air Resources Board.
Diesel Regulations Affecting Public Fleets Presented for the Public Fleet Supervisors Association January 19, 2006 Diana Acevedo.
Planning and Community Development Department Housing Element City Council February 03, 2014.
Workshops on Discussion Draft of Guidelines December 2014.
2014 IRWM Drought Grants Sierra Water Workgroup Summit June Tracie L. Billington Department of Water Resources Financial Assistance Branch.
Diesel Risk Reduction Plan California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board.
California Measure SB375: Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital Region.
1 Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 Update on Preparations for the CEPA 1999 Parliamentary Review September, 2005 Presentation to the Canadian.
Senate Select Committee on Climate Change and AB 32 Implementation December 3, 2013.
Stationary and Area Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, D.C. Hall of the States 1.
AB 32 and SB Implementation Process and Issues Presentation to Ventura County Civic Alliance Southern California Association of Governments October.
National Clean Diesel Campaign Upcoming Funding Opportunities Rosalva Tapia June 3, 2009 National Tribal Forum on Air Quality Management Conference 2009.
California Environmental Protection Agency AIR RESOURCES BOARD Public Transit Bus Fleet Rule and Emission Standards for New Urban Buses California Air.
CPUC Role in AB 32 Implementation LIOB – 2 nd June, 2010 San Diego, CA.
Emissions Solutions Al Gray Technical Communicator Cashman Equipment.
CAPCOA Jack Broadbent. Who We Are  35 Air Districts  Representing nearly 2,000 Air Quality professionals  Governing Board made of 14 APCOs  Coordinates.
2014 Program Priorities January 23, Outline Major 2014 Goals 2013 Accomplishments Major 2014 Activities Partnerships 2.
Union Pacific Railroad Comments February 23, 2005.
STAKEHOLDER CALL/MEETING TO DISCUSS AND PROVIDE INPUT ON ZEV INCENTIVE PROGRAM GUIDELINES CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD March 7,
June 26, Background of Federal GHG Regulation Supreme Court determines greenhouse gases (GHGs) are “air pollutants” under the Clean Air Act U.S.
Reducing Emissions From Diesel Engines Robert Cross Chief, Mobile Source Control Division California Environmental Protection Agency AIR RESOURCES BOARD.
California’s Efforts to Address Air Quality Impacts Related to Goods Movement Activities.
CALIFORNIA’S AIR TOXICS PROGRAM: IMPROVEMENTS TO ASSESS HEALTH RISK Update to the Air Resources Board July 24, 2014 California Environmental Protection.
PM 2.5 Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #1 South Coast Air Quality Management District June 8, 2006.
James Goldstene California Air Resources Board AB 32: The Global Warming Solutions Act of th LEA/CIWMB Partnership Conference October 16, 2007.
Item #11 Alternative Approaches for Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital.
Mobile Source Control Division September 25, 2003 Monitoring and Laboratory Division Board Hearing California Air Resources Board Control Measure to Reduce.
July 21, Today’s Proposed Action Approve ozone SIP revisions for South Coast and San Joaquin Valley Reasonable Further Progress Transportation.
2013 Priorities January 25, Overview of 2013 Board Actions State implementation plans Climate change: plan update, regulatory actions, sustainable.
1 South Coast AQMD Staff Comments on Proposed Regulation for In-Use Off-Road Diesel Vehicles South Coast Air Quality Management District Agenda Item No.
1 ITSA Meeting April 2, 2004 San Diego Thermal Spraying in California.
Keeping Our Air Clean Local and Regional Strategies to Improve Air Quality in Chittenden County Presentation to: CCMPO – February 17, 2010.
1 Final Regulation Order for Truck and Bus Regulation California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board November 20, 2014.
30th Space Wing Team Vandenberg - HAWKS 1 California Airborne Toxic Control Measures for Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel-Fueled Engines John Gilliland.
Public Workshop: California Regulations and Test Procedures for Sand Cars October 24, 2006 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency.
1 Public Workshop to Discuss Amendments to the AB 2588 “Hot Spots” Emission Inventory Criteria and Guidelines Regulation California Air Resources Board.
California Environmental Protection Agency Market Advisory Committee Public Conference call May 15, 2007.
Allen Lyons May 2015 I/M Solutions Virginia Beach, Virginia 1.
AB 118 Air Quality Improvement Program (AQIP) Proposed 2011 Funding Plan Air Resources Board Meeting July 21, 2011 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.
1 Proposed Amendments to the Verification Procedure for In-Use Diesel Emission Control Strategies August 23, 2012 California Environmental Protection Agency.
Today’s Action Approve Fiscal Year Research Plan Total $6.5 million 17 research concepts 2.
Board Questions Loan denial Incentives and small fleets Cattle trucks Additional credits for compliant fleets Lower use school buses Water trucks Enforcement.
1 Proposed Amendments to the Truck and Bus Regulation California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board April 24, 2014.
PORT OF TACOMA. Provide updates on: Recent air quality news Air emissions inventory as a point of reference Northwest Ports Clean Air Strategy – Performance.
Status Report to the President under EO EPA ACTIONS 1 Executive Order: Improving Chemical Facility Safety & Security.
REGIONAL RESPONSE TEAM NOVEMBER 5, Executive Order: Improving Chemical Facility Safety & Security.
Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC)
Quarterly Meeting November 30, 2016
AAPA Environment Committee
Highlights on Statewide Strategies Benefitting Communities
Presentation transcript:

1 Update on Efforts to Reduce Emissions and Risks at High Risk Railyards February 25, 2010 BNSF San Bernardino California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board Air Resources Board UP Commerce

2 September 2009 Board Meeting Presented general recommendations to further reduce emissions and risks from locomotives and at railyards Presented general recommendations to further reduce emissions and risks from locomotives and at railyards Discussed emerging locomotive technologies that can further reduce emissions Discussed emerging locomotive technologies that can further reduce emissions Highlighted the benefits of existing ARB and U.S. EPA actions Highlighted the benefits of existing ARB and U.S. EPA actions

3 ARB and U.S. EPA Actions Already Reducing Emissions and Risks ARB Regulations ARB Regulations Drayage trucks Transport refrigeration units Cargo handling equipment Clean fuels for intrastate locomotives ARB/Railroad Agreements South Coast locomotive fleet average Idle reduction devices on intrastate locomotives Clean fuels for all locomotives U.S. EPA Locomotive Standards Federal and State Incentive Funding Carl Moyer Incentive Funds Proposition 1B Bond Funds ARRA-DERA Incentive Funds

4 Significant Diesel PM Emission Reductions Already Occurring at the 18 Major Railyards * Locomotives 85% of remaining railyard diesel PM emissions (37%) (55%) (66%) * Based on existing U.S. EPA and ARB regulations and agreements.

5 September 2009 Board Direction Develop approach for railroads to prepare and implement risk reduction plans for high- risk railyards Develop approach for railroads to prepare and implement risk reduction plans for high- risk railyards Use San Bernardino railyard as a template Use San Bernardino railyard as a template Investigate potential enforcement provision that would trigger ARB regulatory action Investigate potential enforcement provision that would trigger ARB regulatory action Coordinate with stakeholders Coordinate with stakeholders Report back to Board with recommendations Report back to Board with recommendations

6 Actions Taken Since September Discussed possible approaches with key stakeholders Discussed possible approaches with key stakeholders Collected technical information on railyards Collected technical information on railyards   Diesel PM emissions assessment   Potential cancer risks   Projected changes in growth   Potential applicable control measures Solicited input from stakeholders on a possible enforceable provision Solicited input from stakeholders on a possible enforceable provision

7 Summary of Proposal Obtain commitment from railroads to reduce emissions/risks from high risk railyards Obtain commitment from railroads to reduce emissions/risks from high risk railyards Work with interested stakeholders to establish specific provisions for the railroad commitment Work with interested stakeholders to establish specific provisions for the railroad commitment Implement through exchange of letters between ARB and the railroads after public consultation process Implement through exchange of letters between ARB and the railroads after public consultation process

8 Locomotive Emission Reduction Measures MeasuresTimeframe Emission Reductions PMNOx Switcher Locomotives (Pre-Tier 0 to Tier 3) %90% Med HP Locomotives (Pre-Tier 0 to Tier 3) %80% Interstate Locomotives (Tier 2 to Tier 2+/Tier 3) %N/A

9 Additional Measures Operational measures (e.g. gate relocations) Operational measures (e.g. gate relocations) Accelerated turnover of cargo handling equipment, drayage trucks, transport refrigeration units, etc. Accelerated turnover of cargo handling equipment, drayage trucks, transport refrigeration units, etc. Alternative fuel/electrification of equipment Alternative fuel/electrification of equipment Stationary collection systems for locomotive maintenance (“Hood Technology”)

10 Summary of Key Provisions Identify high-risk railyards Identify high-risk railyards Establish railyard-specific targets for reductions over time Establish railyard-specific targets for reductions over time Routinely assess and report emissions, risks, and compliance with targets Routinely assess and report emissions, risks, and compliance with targets Include public participation and outreach Include public participation and outreach Establish enforceable provisions that “keeps ARB’s feet to the fire!” Establish enforceable provisions that “keeps ARB’s feet to the fire!” Identify specific ARB actions to be taken if commitments not met Identify specific ARB actions to be taken if commitments not met

11 Possible ARB Actions if Commitments Not Met Adopt the following regulations: Control non-preempted locomotives Impose risk reduction program, with periodic reporting Evaluate the following possible regulations: Hood technology for locomotive maintenance Electrification of cargo handling equipment, TRUs, or other equipment Pursue greater authority from new federal legislation and regulations

12 Next Steps Discuss specific provisions of the commitment letters with stakeholders Discuss specific provisions of the commitment letters with stakeholders Release draft commitment letters for public comment Release draft commitment letters for public comment Revise commitment letters as appropriate Revise commitment letters as appropriate Present final commitment letters to Board for concurrence Present final commitment letters to Board for concurrence Railroads release detailed railyard-specific plans for meeting commitments Railroads release detailed railyard-specific plans for meeting commitments

13 Proposed Timing March/AprilPrepare draft letters and hold public workshops April/MayPresent letters to the Board May/JuneExchange signed letters JulyRailroads release details of how commitments to be met August/SeptemberHold community meetings

14 Benefits of the Proposal Achieves greater emission reductions than existing measures Achieves greater emission reductions than existing measures Covers both preempted and non-preempted locomotives Covers both preempted and non-preempted locomotives Quick implementation schedule Quick implementation schedule Facilitates dialogue between the railroads and the local communities Facilitates dialogue between the railroads and the local communities

15 Staff Recommendations Pursue commitment with railroads to reduce emissions and risk at high risk railyards Pursue commitment with railroads to reduce emissions and risk at high risk railyards Direct staff to: Direct staff to:  Initiate detailed discussions of key provisions with interested stakeholders and to conduct public meetings  Return to the Board in April/May with final commitment letters