Company LOGO Georgia Truck Lane Needs Identification Study Talking Freight Seminar March 19, 2008 Matthew Fowler, P.T.P Assistant State Planning Administrator.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study -- Benefit Assessment Presented by: Jack Lettiere, Commissioner New Jersey Department of Transportation Presented to:
Advertisements

City of Omak Central Avenue Bridge Replacement Project Prepared by Highlands Associates Photos by FlyBy Photos.
I-10 Exercise. Project Description Current and anticipated congestion due to rapid growth, one lane in each direction will be added to Interstate 10 from.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Douglas R. Failing, P.E. Executive Director, Highway Program Public Private Partnerships CTF Transportation.
Traffic & Congestion In Connecticut State of Connecticut Department of Transportation April 2010.
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.
Freight Data - A Transportation Perspective September 2010 Michael Sprung – FHWA, Office of Freight Management and Operations.
Use of Truck GPS Data for Travel Model Improvements Talking Freight Seminar April 21, 2010.
Overview of the Freight Analysis Framework Rolf R. Schmitt January, 2008.
Texas Freight Forecasting Rob Bostrom Monisha Khurana Liza Amar Planning Applications Conference 2015.
Freight Analysis Framework version 3 (FAF3) __________ Talking Freight Webinar October 2010.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Talking Freight Seminar presented by Richard Margiotta Cambridge Systematics, Inc. September 21,
Transportation—Managing the Flow of the Supply Chain Lecture 8.
Meeting Agenda Stakeholder Participation Panel July 14, 2003 Welcome/Introductions Study Overview Tasks/Products/Schedule Traffic Patterns Break Key Project.
Integrated Corridor Analysis Tool (ICAT) William W. Stoeckert I-95 Corridor Coalition.
Feasibility of a Metropolitan Truck-only Toll Lane Network: The Case of Atlanta, Georgia Michael D. Meyer, P.E., Professor School of Civil and Environmental.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
1 Florida Trade Flow Study presented to Florida Transportation Commission November 5, 2010 presented by Carrie Blanchard, Ph.D., Florida Chamber Foundation.
Florida Multimodal Statewide Freight Model
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. COUNCIL BLUFFS INTERSTATE SYSTEM MODEL Jon Markt Source: FHWA.
A Case Study of Promoting Metropolitan Freight Collaboration: The Twin Cities Experience Performance Management Framework Minnesota Department of Transportation.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
Talking Freight Promoting Economic Revitalization through Enhanced Freight Transportation Eric G. Madden Deputy Secretary for Aviation and Rail Freight.
1 June 11, 2015 Raleigh, NC. PRESENTATION OBJECTIVE To give an overview on the newly adopted Strategic Transportation Corridors. 2.
Jennifer Murray Traffic Forecasting Section Chief, WisDOT Metropolitan Planning Organization Quarterly Meeting July 28 th, 2015.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Lance Neumann Cambridge Systematics, Inc. August.
December 2006 Study Update We’ve been busy since our last round of advisory committee and task force meetings were held in the summer and fall. Our next.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
DRAFT What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? Public Forum on Alternative Transportation and Land-Use Scenarios National Capital Region.
1 Patriot’s Crossing  PROVIDES MOST REGIONAL CONGESTION RELIEF  UNIQUELY POSITIONED TO SUPPORT REGIONAL ECONOMIC GROWTH  IMPROVING TOTAL REGIONAL CONNECTIVITY.
Regional Goods Movement Study for the San Francisco Bay Area presented by Michael J. Fischer Cambridge Systematics, Inc. November 12, 2004 Agenda Item.
Major Transportation Corridor Studies Using an EMME/2 Travel Demand Forecasting Model: The Trans-Lake Washington Study Carlos Espindola, Youssef Dehghani.
1 What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? February 2005 Public Meeting on Alternative Transportation and Land-Use Scenarios National Capital Region.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Overview of Metro’s Transportation Program Pam O’Connor Metro Chair July 25, 2007.
Southern Bridge Project Brown County Executive
TRACECA CONSTRUCTION OF INTERMODAL TERMINAL IN THE REGION OF RUSE CITY BULGARIA Infrastructure Working Group Kiev, 11 May 2011.
Transportation Forecasting The Four Step Model. Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate.
Review of the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) 2007 Urban Mobility Report By Ronald F. Kirby Daivamani Sivasailam TPB Technical Committee October 5,
Innovation for a Nation on the Move U.S. Department of Transportation Research and Innovative Technology Administration 2007 Commodity Flow Survey Purpose,
2004 Transportation M etropolitan A tlanta P erformance Report – Congestion Measures Presentation to ITS Georgia August 29, 2005.
Abstract Background Methodology Methods While the project is in the data-collection and background research phase, there are several studies that utilize.
The Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study Initial Results of CLRP/CLRP+ Analysis with Round 6.4 Growth Forecasts and Five Alternative Land Use Scenarios.
A Sketch Planning Assessment of Managed-Lane Options for the I-5 Freeway Corridor Master Plan William R. Loudon, DKS Associates.
IH-10 Managed Lanes Project: A “Public-Public” Partnership ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Presented at the Value Pricing Conference.
Summary of the WILMAPCO Congestion Management Process Prepared for T3 Webinar September 18, 2007.
CEE 320 Winter 2006 Transportation Planning and Travel Demand Forecasting CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA AMPO Conference - October 23, 2014.
Ron O’Blenis, PE Senior Rail Project Manager (617) Session 3 Multi-Modal Transportation Projects Moderator: Peter Clary.
The Transportation Logistics Company Indiana Logistics Summit Infrastructure Needs and Opportunities September 26, 2007.
SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE MEASURES, RANKING AND PRIORITIZATION CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PLANS INCORPORATION INTO STIP & TIP STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION MONITOR.
Transportation Revenue Sources Presentation to the Discovery Institute October 6, 2004 Amy Arnis Deputy Director Strategic Planning and Programming Washington.
Presented to Indiana Logistics Summit Indianapolis, Indiana presented by Keith Bucklew Director - Freight Mobility Indiana Department of Transportation.
Freight Rail in Georgia Creating Jobs Moving Georgia Forward GRA Website.
Rice University – Baker Institute
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
Downtown Valdosta Truck Traffic Mitigation Study
I-80 California Goods Movement
Performance Measure Exploration Preparing for the 2018 RTP
NGTA Halton Planning and Public Works Committee
Progress Report Implementing the Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan May 22, 2003 in Sacramento Brian Smith, Deputy Director, Planning and.
Future Construction FasTracks Corridors Federal Funding Analysis
Transportation Planning Applications Conference Sheldon Harrison
ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD
Critical Commerce Corridors
Bi-County Parkway Evaluation of Impacts on Fairfax County Roads
Chattanooga Transportation Data Collection Review
Southern Bridge Project Brown County Executive
Presentation transcript:

Company LOGO Georgia Truck Lane Needs Identification Study Talking Freight Seminar March 19, 2008 Matthew Fowler, P.T.P Assistant State Planning Administrator

Company LOGO Freight Growth in Georgia  Freight flows in Georgia are forecast to increase 260% by the year  Trucks currently carry 86% of the freight moving through the state.  Truck Traffic is growing twice as fast as car traffic. 945 Million Tons 2.5 Billion Tons 260% Increase

Company LOGO Georgia Freight Movement, By Mode Share Water 3% Truck 86% Rail 11% Air <1% Year 2004 Year 2035 Truck 88% Rail 10% Air <1% Water 2% (Based on the weight, not value of the freight) Source: Transearch data

Company LOGO Overview of Truck Lane Study  Questions  Do truck-only lanes significantly reduce peak-period congestion, corridor wide?  If so, where should we build them?  How much would truck-only lanes cost?  Are there benefits to truck-only lanes?  Study assumptions  Follow existing freeway alignments  No tolls  Voluntary usage

Company LOGO Study Area Statewide: All Interstates plus select U.S. and State Routes All Interstates plus select U.S. and State Routes Savannah Sub-Area Inset

Company LOGO Data Collection and Inputs  Total Traffic Volumes  Truck Traffic Volumes  Congestion Levels (existing and future year)  Freight “Origin & Destination” Surveys  Establishment Surveys  Freight Bottleneck Locations  Major Freight Generators

Company LOGO Traffic Volumes – 2004 & 2035

Company LOGO Truck Volumes & 2035

Company LOGO “Origin-Destination” Survey  Weigh Stations  Truck Stops  Intermodal Facilities  Ports  Approximately 5,600 total surveys

Company LOGO  Average Daily Truck Traffic >30,000  Congested Conditions – Level-of-Service “E” or “F”  Major ‘Through’ Travel Movements Major Truck Generators Freight Bottlenecks Initial Evaluation Results (2035) as presented to GDOT Board in April 2007

Company LOGO Candidate Corridors Routes meeting the initial evaluation criteria (further studied):  I-75 North (I-285 to Chattanooga)  I-75 South (I-475 to I-285)  I-85 North (I-285 to Barrow/Gwinnett County Line)  I-85 South (Coweta/Meriwether County Line to I-285 South)  I-20 West (Georgia/Alabama Border to I-285)  I-20 East (I-285 to Newton/Morgan County Line)  I-285 (All)  I-675 Routes that did not meet the initial evaluation criteria:  I-16  I-59  I-24  SR 400  SR 166  US 78

Company LOGO System-Level Alternatives Metro Atlanta

Company LOGO System-Level Alternatives (cont’d.) Metro Atlanta

Company LOGO System-Level Evaluation  Traffic Flow and Speeds  Traffic Volumes  Benefits and Costs

Company LOGO 2035 PM Peak Period Speeds Truck Only Lanes only increase peak period General Purpose Lane speeds by 10 mph, on avg

Company LOGO 2035 Daily Traffic Volumes System 1 System 2System 3 System 4 Avg Total Truck Lanes Volume Avg Total GP Lanes Volume – No Build Avg Total GP Lanes Volume -- Build

Company LOGO 2035 GP Lane Daily Traffic Volumes 6% 4% 5% Trucks shifting to Truck Only Lanes frees up capacity in General Purpose Lanes; however, the capacity is “consumed” by new travelers attracted from parallel arterials (latent demand/diverted traffic), resulting in minimal reductions in General Purpose Lane congestion

Company LOGO 30-Year User Benefits and Costs (in 2007 Dollars) Project Benefits Project Costs Truck Only Lanes generate benefits (VMT and VHT reductions, secondary economic benefits); however, benefits primarily accrue to trucking community

Company LOGO System 3 ■System 3 yields greatest benefits ■Complete, comprehensive network ■Cost:  $13.2 Billion (current year dollars)  $21.69 Billion (future year dollars) ■$13.2 Billion represents approximately 14 years worth of eligible federal-aid highway funding available for Georgia (in current year dollars) (Estimated current year cost per lane-mile: $20 Million) Metro Atlanta

Company LOGO Study Findings  Traffic Flow and Speeds  Truck Only Lanes only increase ‘peak period’ General Purpose Lane speeds by approximately 10 mph  Any substantial improvements to speeds in General Purpose Lanes are “consumed” by motorists attracted from parallel arterials (latent demand/diverted traffic)

Company LOGO Study Findings  Traffic Volumes  Trucks are not the largest number of customers in a corridor  On a daily basis, trucks average 10%-15% of traffic volume on Metro Atlanta Interstates  During peak periods, trucks average approximately 6% of total traffic volume on Metro Atlanta Interstates  Atlanta mirrors national trends; in metropolitan regions, cars overwhelmingly dominate vehicle mix during peak travel periods  Truck Only Lanes result in minimal reductions in General Purpose Lane traffic volumes, due to latent demand/diverted traffic

Company LOGO Study Findings  Benefits and Costs  Overall, Benefits exceed Costs; however, the primary benefit is to the 6% of traffic (trucks) travelling in the peak periods  Other motorists, representing 94% of the vehicle mix, do not realize direct and significant benefits in General Purpose Lanes  Truck Only Lanes are cost prohibitive based on funding availability and study assumptions

Company LOGO Study Conclusion  Do not pursue stand-alone Truck Only Lanes  Truck Only Lanes provide direct benefits for trucks, which comprise only 6% of peak period traffic  Vehicles in General Purpose Lanes (94% of vehicle mix in peak periods) would not realize direct and significant benefits  Truck Only Lanes do not significantly reduce peak period congestion in General Purpose Lanes  Truck Only Lanes are not the only strategy to address truck traffic

Company LOGO Next Steps  GDOT’s Metro Atlanta Managed Lane System Plan (MLSP) is underway  MLSP will explore all managed lane options (HOV/HOT/TOL/TOT/ETL or a combination thereof) in order to serve all of GDOT’s travelling customers  Findings from Truck Only Lane Study will feed into MLSP  Anticipate realizing increased benefits for all customers with MLSP  Presently working with our Metro Atlanta transportation planning partners

Company LOGO