LoA Verification Plan & Status ContractorDirectorPlanned DatesStatus 1.Al Turki ONDCompleted 2Dalma UWDCompleted 3Petrogas GDCompleted 4MHD UIDPlanned 5Cactus UWDPlanned 6G Beijing UWD 7Dawood OSD 8Larsen Toubro OSD 9Petrojet OSD 10Abed UWD

LoA: Mid year Findings Analysis AREAS OF LOW EBS

LoA: Mid year Findings Analysis ISSUEREMARKS Sub contractor ManagementPoor prequalification and monitoring. (Of understanding - once approved by PDO, no need to prequalify) Competence Assessment & AssuranceExpectations here are not clear with contractors Identifying & Assessing HSE critical PositionsMeaning of HSE critical positions is not clear with contractors Compliance to training MatrixUpdating and implementing action plans to close gaps Compliance with FTW as per SP 1230Term FTW & expectations - not very clear to contractor Mixing terms of HEMP and updatingMixing of terminologies, poor coverage of applicable hazard, underrating risks Waste managementWrong application of consignment notes and waste not segregated at source EMERGED COMMON AREAS OF CONCERN WITH CONTRACTORS

LoA: Mid year Findings Analysis ISSUEREMARKS HSE Controls for non-self supervising contractors (mode2&3?) need to be clarified Current HSE controls are mainly geared for Self managing contractors Small but High/Medium HSE risk contracts may not be audited during their lifecycle with PDO. Some found not to have been audited at all since engagement Checking of Omanisation percentageIn some contracts Omanis are not very visible Harweel Area Emergency Planning may not meet expectations. Escape routes first leads towards Harweel station. Contractor staff are not provided with Extra BA as provided to PDO staff On extension the extended contracts continue with the use of old documents. Same Terms and Conditions. C09 requires application of updated documents. FTW for PDO staff – is it done?? PDO LEARNED LESSONS