AFS Overview, the Universal Interface, and AFS Modernization Plans Network Operations Board (NOB) Meeting October 25, 2006 David Hindin, Director Enforcement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DC Responses Received WA OR ID MT WY CA NV UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX ND SD NE KS OK MN IA MO AR LA WI IL MI IN OH KY TN MS AL GA FL SC NC VA WV PA NY VT NH.
Advertisements

NetDMR Electronic DMR Reporting
Reforming State Long-Term Care Services and Supports Through Participant Direction NASHP State Health Policy Conference October 2010 Suzanne Crisp Director.
P2Rx Mission: The Pollution Prevention Resource Exchange (P2Rx) is a national network of regional centers dedicated to improving the dissemination of.
AASHTOWare Program Benefits Standing Committee on Highways October 18, 2013 Tom Cole, Idaho DOT AASHTO Special Committee on Joint Development.
1 Using CDX and the Exchange Network Services Roy Chaudet US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information 2007 STORET/WQX Conference.
1 State/EPA Environmental Information Exchange Network December 2004 Molly O’Neill State Director, Network Steering Board Environmental Council of the.
Electronic Reporting: ICIS Data Publishing Presented by: Alison Kittle, U.S. EPA Elisa Willard, Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment Roy.
1 FTA Program Update 2009 SCOPT Winter Meeting Phoenix, AZ December 1 – 4, 2009.
Electronic Reporting for Clean Air Act NSPS and NESHAP Regulations
MTAC Update November 6, 2002 Larry Goodman USPS Co-Chair Dan Minnick Industry Co-Chair.
AQS Web Quick Reference Guide Changing Raw Data Values Using Maintenance 1. From Main Menu, click Maintenance, Sample Values, Raw Data 2. Enter monitor.
ASCA PBMS Implementation Is your agency ready to participate in PBMS? Let’s look at the issues.
Robert W. Pinner, M.D. June 4, 2012 Update on ELR in the U.S CSTE Annual Conference Omaha, Nebraska.
A SSET M ANAGEMENT Northeast Bridge Management Peer Exchange (BMPE) April 26, 2011 Manchester, NH Bridge Management Questionnaire Report Wade F. Casey,
Electronic Exchange of Drinking Water Lab Data Presented by: Mike Matsko NJDEP Exchange Network Users Meeting April 18, 2006.
RCRAInfo May 6, RCRAInfo: What is it? The national (mission critical) information system that supports the RCRA Subtitle C program. A national.
CAA Program Reporting Clarification Regarding Federally-Reportable Violations for Clean Air Act Stationary Sources (March 2010) (FRV Clarification Memo)
NICS Index State Participation As of 12/31/2007 DC NE NY WI IN NH MD CA NV IL OR TN PA CT ID MT WY ND SD NM KS TX AR OK MN OH WV MSAL KY SC MO ME MA DE.
AFS Modernization NACAA Meeting – May 5, AFS Modernization Status  Long agreed upon need to modernize  Efficiencies and cost savings from modernization.
Compliance Monitoring and the Integrated Compliance Information System Getting the most out of ICIS 2/2007 NPDES Inspector Workshop.
1 Electronic DMRs: Key to Burden Reduction and Improved NPDES Program Management David Hindin, Director, Enforcement Targeting and Data Division Office.
1 Quick Update for NOB On ICIS-NPDES and Possible NOB Role NOB Conference Call September 13, 2006 David Hindin Office of Compliance, OECA.
1 ICIS 2.0 Status and FY2007 Plan Senior Enforcement Managers Meeting Denver October 11, 2006 David Hindin Michael Stahl Office of Compliance, OECA.
1 The National Environmental Information Exchange Network History and Overview Office of Water National STORET/WQX User Meeting November 27, 2007.
Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) and the Exchange Network David A. Hindin, Director Enforcement Targeting and Data Division Office of Compliance.
1 Brief Update on ICIS-NPDES (PCS Modernization) David Hindin, U.S. EPA Director, Enforcement Targeting and Data Division October 26, 2005 SHORTER VERSION.
Agencies’ Participation in PBMS January 20, 2015 PA IL TX AZ CA Trained, Partial Data Entry (17) Required Characteristics & 75% of Key Indicators (8) OH.
6/13/2016 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1 Starting a Facilities Flow Lee David
What’s New - TurningPoint
MD VT MA NH DC CT NJ RI DE WA
NCWE Presentation: Student Career Solutions
Employers and States Working Together to Improve the UI Program
Electronic Death Registration Systems, by Jurisdiction
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
/ March 2015 Net Metering Note: Net Metering rules are being actively discussed in over a dozen state public service & utility commissions.
Open Water Certification Count
The State of the States Cindy Mann Center for Children and Families
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 384 sessions with 11,279 participants
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 379 sessions with 11,183 participants
Net Metering Note: Net Metering rules are being actively discussed in over a dozen state public service & utility commissions across the country.
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 386 sessions with 11,336 participants
Executive Activity on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, May 9, 2013
WY WI WV WA VA* VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Mobility Update and Discussion as of March 25, 2008
IAH CONVERSION: ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES BY STATE
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 362 sessions with 10,873 participants
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2018
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 386 sessions with 11,336 participants
Status of State Participation in Medicaid Expansion, as of March 2014
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 394 sessions with 11,460 participants
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 392 sessions with 11,432 participants
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2017
(map is coded by CAE-CD region)
S Co-Sponsors by State – May 23, 2014
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 396 sessions with 11,504 participants
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 402 sessions with 11,649 participants
Executive Activity on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, May 9, 2013
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 402 sessions with 11,649 participants
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 401 sessions with 11,639 participants
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 416 sessions with 11,878 participants
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 429 sessions with 12,141 participants
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 436 sessions with 12,254 participants
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 386 sessions with 11,336 participants
New Mexico Environment Department ICIS-Air Dataflow Project
Presentation transcript:

AFS Overview, the Universal Interface, and AFS Modernization Plans Network Operations Board (NOB) Meeting October 25, 2006 David Hindin, Director Enforcement Targeting & Data Division

2 What is AFS? The Air Facility System (AFS) is EPA’s system of record for collection of Clean Air Act (CAA) stationary source compliance and enforcement data. AFS resides on the mainframe and is written in ADABAS/NATURAL In FY2001, the Office of Air and Radiation (OAR) transferred AFS to OECA. AFS had previously been part of OAR’s Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS), with the CAA ambient data (Air Quality System) and emissions data (National Emissions Inventory).

3 What Data does AFS Contain? Minimum Data Requirements (MDR) per our AFS Information Collection Request include:  Compliance Monitoring Activities – including inspections and investigations  Violations – including high priority violations  Enforcement Actions – informal and formal  Facility and Classification Data

4 Who Reports to AFS? Approximately 650 Users  93 Agencies 56 State Agencies (inc., Trust Territories, Guam, American Samoa, etc) 27 Local Agencies  10 EPA Regional Offices

5 Four Methods for AFS Data Entry 1. Batch File – State/Local agency routinely sends files to the AFS using the flat file batch upload process 2. Online Data Entry – State/Local agency enters data into the AFS directly. 3. Regional Input – State/Local agency does not have a database to hold AFS data and sends the data to the Region for entry into AFS 4. Universal Interface (UI) – State/Local agency utilizes the UI for data validation and conversion into AFS flat file format for batch updating.

6 What is the UI? The UI is an OECA software product that facilitates the reporting of data from State/Local agencies to EPA’s AFS. UI users experience substantial reductions in the burden of reporting AFS MDRs to EPA. UI Platform:  Software resides on State/Local agency web server (inside their firewall)  Users access the UI through a browser on their desktop  Software written in visual basic code

7 State/Local Agency Database Extract Software Creates Data Text Files for UI Data Valid? Import State/Local Agency Data into UI Validate Data and Review Report Universal Interface Transfer File to EPA Mainframe Export Data in AFS Flat File Format Correct Data in State/Local Agency Database AFS Batch Update 1. Compare Submittal 2. Update Submittal Database Process Condition LEGEND No Yes Universal Interface (UI) Process Flow October 23, 2006 XML Schema Generates Import Files for UI Function Performed by UI Function Performed by State In Development Current Process

8 Use of the UI 18 states/locals, accounting for over 30% of major source data (CT, ME, MA, NH, NY, DE, PA, WV, OH, LA, NM, OK, NE, MT, AZ, AK, OR, Puget Sound) Several states in the queue to implement (MD, NC, MS, MI, MO, HI)

9 Current Approach for AFS Modernization Integration with ICIS (Integrated Compliance Information System)  Eliminates need for double-entry by EPA Regions;  Eliminates costs to develop and then operate separate air system; Uses existing ICIS 2.0 architecture (hardware and software) with only modest changes expected. Builds off existing processes set up with EPA’s National Computer Center and Central Data Exchange. Most or almost all of functionality for AFS is already in ICIS. Most of the facility level data for AFS already in ICIS.  Improves data integration.

10 Other Approaches for AFS Modernization Other approaches have been considered, but none appear cheaper, quicker or more effective than ICIS Integration because:  Resource constraints (staff and contract dollars) within OECA for AFS modernization in 2007 and 2008 affect all approaches. We are exploring options for finding additional resources, but tight budget climate.  Non-ICIS approaches require duplication of much of the work and infrastructure already accomplished for ICIS.  There are no short-cuts given need for data migration, state data flows via the Exchange Network, conformance with data standards, conformance with EPA architecture, and System Life Cycle Process requirements.

11 AFS Modernization Timelines FY 2007  Start AFS Business Requirements  Develop detailed schedule for AFS modernization. FY2008 Start Alternatives Analysis

12 AFS Business Requirements Analysis Document the programmatic (business) need for CAA compliance monitoring and enforcement data flows  Explain the functions and data needs for a modernized AFS.  We assume AFS meets most needs of the air community, but need to confirm this and document it. Identify and document current limitations of AFS that should be addressed by modernized system. Identify if there are any functions in AFS that might night be necessary to include in modernized system.  We will build on prior work already done by AFS user community. Solicit input from our stakeholders and users.

13 Alternatives Analysis Required by OMB  Review of other options (information systems)for meeting the business needs. Includes a Closeness of Fit Analysis (COFA) to compare the AFS Business Requirements to the Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) Develop alternatives (options) for meeting ICIS business needs as well as AFS Modernization needs. While we expect that modernization of AFS into ICIS will be the least cost option, we must still do the analysis.

14 Questions?