The 2011 Census: Estimating the Population Alexa Courtney.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Statistical Disclosure Control (SDC) for 2011 Census Progress Update Keith Spicer – ONS SDC Methodology 23 April 2009.
Advertisements

2011 SARs Consultation: Analysing ethnicity and identity variables David Owen, University of Warwick.
Output Consultation Plans and Statistical Disclosure Control Strategy developments Angele Storey and Jane Longhurst ONS.
Data Imputation United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD) 16 March 2011 Santiago, Chile.
Progress on the SDC Strategy for the 2011 Census 23 rd June 2008 Keith Spicer and Caroline Young.
International, internal migration and ethno-cultural characteristics: Proposed changes to CES recommendations UNECE Task Force on migration and ethno-cultural.
Quality assurance -Population and Housing Census Alma Kondi, INSTAT, Albania.
Weighting and Imputation for CORE Social Housing Statistics Julia Bowman & Niall Goulding.
March 2013 ESSnet DWH - Workshop IV DATA LINKING ASPECTS OF COMBINING DATA INCLUDING OPTIONS FOR VARIOUS HIERARCHIES (S-DWH CONTEXT)
Scotland’s 2011 Census Migration Matters Scotland Thematic Event Cecilia Macintyre 26 February 2015.
© John M. Abowd 2005, all rights reserved Analyzing Frames and Samples with Missing Data John M. Abowd March 2005.
2011 Census Using administrative data to address under-enumeration Robert Beatty Northern Ireland Census Office.
Scotland’s 2011 Census. Scotland’s Census The census is Scotland's biggest and most comprehensive population survey Is the only reliable measure of the.
National Household Survey: collection, quality and dissemination Laurent Roy Statistics Canada March 20, 2013 National Household Survey 1.
Imputation in the 2011 Census NILS Brownbag Talk – 6 May 2014 Richard Elliott.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. PROCESSING, Part 1 Data capture, editing, imputation and tabulation Quality assurance for census.
Work Package 5: Integrating data from different sources in the production of business statistics Daniel Lewis Office for National Statistics (UK)
GEOG3025 Census and administrative data sources 3: Integration and future development.
12th Meeting of the Group of Experts on Business Registers
Intruder Testing: Demonstrating practical evidence of disclosure protection in 2011 UK Census Keith Spicer, Caroline Tudor and George Cornish 1 Joint UNECE/Eurostat.
LOOKING TOWARDS 2011 Ian Cope Director 2011 Census.
Statistical Disclosure Control for the 2011 UK Census Jane Longhurst, Caroline Young and Caroline Miller (ONS)
1 Statistical Disclosure Control Methods for Census Outputs Natalie Shlomo SDC Centre, ONS January 11, 2005.
Record matching for census purposes in the Netherlands Eric Schulte Nordholt Senior researcher and project leader of the Census Statistics Netherlands.
1 Statistical Disclosure Control for Communal Establishments in the UK 2011 Census Joe Frend Office for National Statistics.
All the answers? Statistics New Zealand’s Integrated Data Infrastructure Paper by Felibel Zabala, Rodney Jer, Jamas Enright and Allyson Seyb Presented.
The Use of Administrative Sources for Statistical Purposes Matching and Integrating Data from Different Sources.
Coverage assessment and adjustment methodology Owen Abbott Methodology Directorate, ONS.
Plans for Access to UK Microdata from 2011 Census Emma White Office for National Statistics 24 May 2012.
2011 CENSUS Coverage Assessment – What’s new? OWEN ABBOTT.
Register-Based Census 2011 in Slovenia – Some Quality Aspects Danilo Dolenc Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia UNECE-Eurostat Expert Group.
2011 Census 2007 Census Test – emerging findings Garnett Compton, ONS Updated 4 September 2007 BSPS – 12 September 2007.
© John M. Abowd 2007, all rights reserved Analyzing Frames and Samples with Missing Data John M. Abowd March 2007.
6.0 Code Release New ICOTS Features. Features Added – Alert to warn/confirm that a user is about to withdraw a case or compact activities – Back Functionality.
Internet versus paper mode effects in the 2011 Census of England and Wales: analysis of Census Quality Survey agreement rates Cal Ghee 26 September 2014.
2011 Census: Lessons learned from the Business Sector Dr Barry Leventhal MRS Census & Geodemographics Group CAG Meeting 8 th January 2015.
1 Data Linkage for Educational Research Royal Statistical Society March 19th 2007 Andrew Jenkins and Rosalind Levačić Institute of Education, University.
New and easier ways of working with aggregate data and geographies from UK censuses Justin Hayes UK Data Service Census Support.
Imputation in the 2001 Census Robert Beatty NILS User Forum 11 December 2009.
Use of Administrative Data Seminar on Developing a Programme on Integrated Statistics in support of the Implementation of the SNA for CARICOM countries.
Towards a high quality 2011 Census The 2011 Census Questionnaire Pete Benton Deputy Director, Census Programme.
Essex Dependent Interviewing Workshop 17/09/2004 British Household Panel Survey.
WP 19 Assessment of Statistical Disclosure Control Methods for the 2001 UK Census Natalie Shlomo University of Southampton Office for National Statistics.
Quality Assurance Programme of the Canadian Census of Population Expert Group Meeting on Population and Housing Censuses Geneva July 7-9, 2010.
Statistical Expertise for Sound Decision Making Quality Assurance for Census Data Processing Jean-Michel Durr 28/1/20111Fourth meeting of the TCG - Lubjana.
JOINT UN-ECE/EUROSTAT MEETING ON POPULATION AND HOUSING CENSUSES GENEVA, MAY 2009 DETERMINING USER NEEDS FOR THE 2011 UK CENSUS IAN WHITE, Office.
Using Targeted Perturbation of Microdata to Protect Against Intelligent Linkage Mark Elliot, University of Manchester Cathie.
General Register Office for S C O T L A N D information about Scotland's people The 2011 Census in Scotland: what will be different and why Sandy Taylor.
The future of Scottish Government Cross-Sectional Population Surveys Sara Grainger Survey Methodology and Co-ordination, Office of the Chief Statistician.
Disclosure Control in the UK Census Keith Spicer 11 January 2005.
The Long Term Strategy for Population Surveys in Scotland 2009 – 2019 Alex Stannard Statistician, Scottish Government.
Paolo Valente - UNECE Statistical Division Slide 1 Technology for census data coding, editing and imputation Paolo Valente (UNECE) UNECE Workshop on Census.
MICROCENSUS 2015 – THE FIRST STEP TO THE RUSSIAN CENSUS 2020 Galina Sheverdova Deputy chief of Population Statistics Department Russian Federation Federal.
Creating Open Data whilst maintaining confidentiality Philip Lowthian, Caroline Tudor Office for National Statistics 1.
United Nations Workshop on Evaluation and Analysis of Census Data, 1-12 December 2014, Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar DATA VALIDATION-I Evaluation of editing and.
Data Management and Analysis John Hollis Demographic Consultant, GLA Data Management and Analysis Statistical Aspects.
2011 Census Data Quality Assurance Strategy: Plans and developments for the 2009 Rehearsal and 2011 Census Paula Guy BSPS 10 th September 2009.
© Statistisches Bundesamt, VI A Statistisches Bundesamt The new method of the next german Population census Johann Szenzenstein, Federal Statistical Office,
United Nations Workshop on Evaluation and Analysis of Census Data, 1-12 December 2014, Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar DATA VALIDATION-II Consistency check.
JOINT UN-ECE/EUROSTAT MEETING ON POPULATION AND HOUSING CENSUSES GENEVA, 7-9 JULY 2010 A QUALITY ASSURANCE STRATEGY FOR THE 2011 CENSUS IN ENGLAND AND.
Towards the 2011 UK Census Editing Strategy Heather Wagstaff and Steven Rogers Methodology Directorate Office for National Statistics, U.K.
Census 2011 – A Question of Confidentiality Statistical Disclosure control for the 2011 Census Carole Abrahams ONS Methodology BSPS – York, September 2011.
JOINT UN-ECE/EUROSTAT WORK SESSION ON MIGRATION STATISTICS GENEVA, OCTOBETR 2012 COLLECTING MIGRATION DATA IN THE UK CENSUS IAN WHITE, Office for.
2021 Census Topic Consultation Statistics User Forum 17 June 2015 Ann Blake, ONS.
The complexities of publishing gridded data for the UK European Forum for Geostatistics Krakow – October 2014 Ian Coady Geography Policy and Research Manager.
The value of the Census to the family history researcher by Hywel Roberts, C.Stat. The published census records between 1841 and 1911 show that more information.
Introducing the 2011 Census January 2010 CENSUS HISTORY A count (estimate) of the whole population – every town, every village, every street Once a decade.
11 Measuring Disclosure Risk and Data Utility for Flexible Table Generators Natalie Shlomo, Laszlo Antal, Mark Elliot University of Manchester
Integrating administrative data – the 2021 Census and beyond
Presentation transcript:

The 2011 Census: Estimating the Population Alexa Courtney

Overview Background –New topics on questionnaire –Internet Data Collection Delivery of data Overview of 2011 processing –Discuss “downstream” processes

2011 Census 27 th March 2011 –Census Rehearsal: 11 th October 2009 Most complex UK Census –More questions and topics than previous censuses –Range of delivery and completion options Similar to 2001 – keep what worked Some new/modified methodologies –Operational and statistical Wide range of outputs

Questionnaire New topics –Citizenship –Second address –National identity –Language Full census returns from short-term migrants –In UK for 3 months or more –Identified through intention to stay question

Questionnaire completion Internet completion being offered for first time –Internet Access Code provided on front of paper questionnaire Offers opportunities to improve data quality and reduce respondent burden –Automatic routing –Validation rules –Use of radio buttons No unnecessary changes from paper questionnaire to minimise modal bias Advantages and disadvantages –Reduces amount of editing required –Increases possibility of multiple responses

Data delivery Can be split into three groups –Questionnaires returned within 6 weeks of Census day Majority of data Fully processed across UK Matched to CCS –Questionnaires returned within 10 weeks of Census day Fully processed in England, Wales & Northern Ireland –Questionnaires returned more than 10 weeks after Census day May be used in coverage adjustment

Removing false persons Problem identified in 2001 Census –Records created in error Pages crossed out Dust on scanner “Two of Five” rule Name (from individual questions) or Date of Birth AND One of: Name (from individual questions), Date of Birth, Sex, Marital Status, or Name (from household members table)‏ Important for data quality and matching

Multiple response resolution Overcount Several types of multiple response –Two questionnaires from same household Two paper questionnaires Paper and Internet –Person on same questionnaire twice (or more!)‏ –Person on Household and Individual questionnaire –Person on Household and Internet questionnaire Needs to be a quick process

Multiple response resolution Duplicate households identified when receipted –Questionnaire tracking for England, Wales & Northern Ireland –Matched questionnaire IDs and address in Scotland Resolved by matching people within household –Key variables: Name (or soundex), Date of Birth, Sex –If Age <30, name must match exactly Minimise risk of matching twins –If no people match, two household records created –If any people match, questionnaires merged

Multiple response resolution Merging questionnaires –“Most complete” response kept –Missing variables copied from duplicate record(s) –Priority given to individual questionnaires Process for within postcode multiples –People completing neighbour’s questionnaire –Similar principles for resolution

Filter Rules Based on 2001 Rules Used to identify incorrect/unnecessary responses Deterministic – based on other responses Used to prepare data for main edit & imputation e.g. Person aged <16, economically inactive (student) e.g. Person employed, not looking for work

Edit and Imputation Will use CANCEIS system Resolves inconsistent data –Probabilistic –Programmed with all possible inconsistencies Impute missing data –Based on complete records –Searches for similar donor Ensures complete and consistent data

Output flags Non-standard outputs possible for England & Wales –Use information on Second Residences Population staying in UK 3-12 months identified –Exclusion from standard outputs –Production of specific outputs –England, Wales and Northern Ireland only Considering including this population in coverage adjustment Mark records now to enable easy production of these outputs

Coverage assessment process Estimation Matching Adjustment 2011 Census Quality Assurance Census Coverage Survey

Disclosure Control - Options Necessary to protect confidentiality of respondents Three options were short-listed: –Pre-tabular: Record swapping (pre-tabular) –Small number of records swapped across areas –Adds uncertainty to “unique” records Over-imputation (pre-tabular) –Some variables deleted and re-imputed –Post-tabular: Invariant ABS Cell Perturbation (IACP) –Small counts can be altered –Two stage process to ensure “additivity”

Disclosure Control – Chosen Methodology Pre-tabular method recommended –User preference for consistency between tables –IACP method rejected Record swapping chosen instead of over-imputation –No persons or data items removed –Outputs at national level and high geographies unaffected

Outputs Main base will be Usual Residents –All people living in UK for 12 months or more –Consistent across UK First outputs – September 2012 –Other standard outputs by Spring 2013 ONS producing non-standard outputs –e.g. Weekday population, Majority of time –Consultation to decide exactly what Outputs on short-term migrant population –All people living in UK for 3-12 months –England, Wales and Northern Ireland

Questions?