In the ideal world… Transportation planning addresses NEPA principles. Collaboration/involvement starts in transportation planning. Planning leads to early.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Identify Problems, Planning Objectives and Constraints.
Advertisements

Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
Lesson 3 ODOT Analysis & Assessment. Analysis & Assessment Learning Outcomes As part of a small group, apply the two- part analysis by generating exposure-
Watershed Approaches and Community Based Planning
Sustainable Regional Water Resource Management By: Tucson Regional Water Coalition and Southern Arizona Leadership Council.
Presented to: 2010 Airports Conference By: Sue McDonald With slides by Tom Klin, CH2M HILL Date: March 3, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration Cumulative.
RESOLVE, Inc. National Geothermal Collaborative An Overview January 20, 2004.
The Building Blocks of Public Involvement Presented By Kevin E. Davis Environmental Supervisor ODOT Office Of Environmental Services The Ohio Planning.
1 C E T A S Range of Alternatives Presentation Date Project Name Project location (city, county) ODOT Key Number:
New I-65 Interchange at Worthsville Road Welcome!.
1 Planning and Environment Linkages: Case Studies Michael Culp and John Humeston FHWA November 2, 2006.
The Mystic River Corridor Strategy Project Metropolitan Area Planning Council Boston Redevelopment Authority City of Chelsea City of Everett City of Malden.
Joe Olson SW Region Director December 8,  History/Background  Next Steps (Planning & Environmental Linkages (PEL)  PEL Process  Schedule  Questions.
Okanagan Basin Conservation Programs (SOSCP and OCCP) 80+ organizations (government and non-government) working together to achieve shared conservation.
I n t e g r a t I n g C S S Practitioner Module 3 Module 3: CSS and Livability In Area Wide Planning.
I n t e g r a t I n g C S S Practitioner Module 6 1 Module 6: CSS and Livability in Construction, and Maintenance.
I n t e g r a t I n g C S S Practitioner Module 2 1 Module 2: Building the Case for Change.
I n t e g r a t I n g C S S Practitioner Module 4 1 Module 4: CSS in Corridor and Sub-area Planning.
Harnessing the Power of Environmental Data for Decision-Making IABIN Phase II.
EFFECTING CULTURAL CHANGE IN RESEARCH ETHICS AND INTEGRITY Encouraging a culture of research integrity Andrew C. Rawnsley.
Energy Issues in Peru and the Andes: Environmental and Social Aspects George Washington University January 28, 2005 Dr. Robert H. Montgomery Head, Environmental.
Barrington Road at Jane Addams Memorial Tollway (Interstate 90) Interchange Improvement Study Hoffman Estates Village Hall June 27, 2012.
State Smart Transportation Initiative October 9, 2014 Matthew Garrett Oregon DOT Director Erik Havig Oregon DOT Planning Section Manager.
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
Overview of SAFETEA-LU Sections 6001, 6002, 3005, and 3006 TRB January 13, 2008 Shari Schaftlein FHWA Project Development & Environmental Review Washington,
Quality Region Principles The New Visions Plan addresses the region’s quality of life in a number of important ways and provides a framework for improving.
I Larry Heil, FHWA October 15, 2003 Environmental Streamlining.
Frank Shipley, Chair, S-TEK Subcommittee Mary Mahaffy, Science Coordinator Karen Jenni, Insight Decisions - Facilitator S-TEK Implementation Plan.
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
1 Overview of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Objective: Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated Rulemaking Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
Planning and Environment Linkages: Overview and Examples TRB Workshop on Environmental Analysis January 13, 2008 Michael Culp and Rob Ritter FHWA Office.
1 Context Sensitive Design CE 453 Highway Design Iowa State University Howard R. Green Company.
TEN-T Experts Briefing, March Annual Call Award Criteria.
Statewide Strategies for Coordinating Regional Transportation and Land Use Planning Katie Benouar, Senior Transportation Planner Office of Regional and.
At the last Steering Team meeting… Goals (Rule-level) EPS (Measurable and Reportable) Natural Resources Human/Cultural Environment Administrative Avoid,
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Goals and Indicators. Sustainable Measures Goals, Principles, Criteria, and Indicators  Goal – a description of future condition community members wish.
1 C E T A S Purpose and Need Presentation Date Project Name Project location (city, county) ODOT Key Number:
1 C E T A S Triage Presentation, Date Project Name Project location (city, county) ODOT Key Number:
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: FROM PLANNING TO PROJECT Ohio Planning Conference July 16, 2014.
Strengthening Science Supporting Fishery Management  Standards for Best Available Science  Implementation of OMB’s Peer Review Bulletin  Separation.
Sustainable Regional Water Resource Management By: Tucson Regional Water Coalition and Southern Arizona Leadership Council SUMBER:
Andrew Winga, P.E. – WisDOT Project Manager.  Background on numerous Transportation Studies  What is a Planning & Environment Linkage Study  Problem.
Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Resource Management Plan Scoping Meetings August 30 and 31, 2010.
Linking Planning & NEPA Overview Mitch Batuzich FHWA Texas Division FHWA Texas Division April 17, 2007.
PP 4.1: IWRM Planning Framework. 2 Module Objective and Scope Participants acquire knowledge of the Principles of Good Basin Planning and can apply the.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
Oregon Passenger Rail Leadership Council Meeting June 6, 2012.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Overview on Performance Management National Forum on Performance-Based.
PEL 101: The Tools for Adopting and Implementing a PEL Approach August 20, 2009.
1 Identify Preferred Alternative and Finalize Plan Planning Steps 7 & 8.
Cooperating Agency Status Presented by Horst Greczmiel Associate Director, NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental Quality Washington, DC September 14,
1 Completing the CEQA Checklist Terry Rivasplata.
Traditional Project Development Process ConstructionPlanningNEPA Design ROW CE, EIS, EA Location and Design Concept approval.
San Diego Regional Comprehensive Plan Presentation to Senate Transportation and Housing Committee February 8, 2005.
24 August 2007 EDR Effort 1 CF&S Environmental Process for an Americas Regional Effort EDR Planning Jerry Aarons & Rod Walton.
Planning & Environment Linkages (PEL) July 20, 2011 PEL 101: The Tools for Adopting and Implementing a PEL Approach.
U.S. Section International Boundary and Water Commission Rio Grande and Tijuana River Flood Control Projects Programmatic EIS.
Highlights of the “Procedural Guidance” Results of transportation planning process “inform” the NEPA process. Format of planning products for inclusion.
A Strategic Agenda for Pinellas County’s Future Growth Whit Blanton, FAICP Pinellas Planning Council & Pinellas Metropolitan Planning Organization August.
Organizations of all types and sizes face a range of risks that can affect the achievement of their objectives. Organization's activities Strategic initiatives.
Executive Order Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews Priority Issues.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
Oregon State Rail Plan Update
“The people’s forests” Public Participation in National Forest Planning Susan Jane Brown, Staff Attorney Western Environmental Law Center The National.
Executive Order – The Basics
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)
Planning for automated travel
Potential Process and Decisions for Conn. River Watershed Pilot
Presentation transcript:

In the ideal world… Transportation planning addresses NEPA principles. Collaboration/involvement starts in transportation planning. Planning leads to early consensus on purpose and need and project concept. Planning decisions are rarely re-opened. … a seamless and collaborative process.

Planning Products Used in NEPA Development and/or refinement of purpose and need statements. Corridor or subarea studies may evaluate or eliminate alternatives. Analysis of the affected environment. Analysis of indirect and cumulative impacts.

Purpose and Need Transportation planning-level goals and objectives. General travel corridor or general mode(s) resulting from planning analyses (e.g., corridor or subarea studies). Special funding sources (e.g., tolls or public- private financing). Results of analysis from management systems (e.g., congestion, pavement, bridge, and/or safety).

Corridor or Subarea Studies May evaluate or eliminate alternatives. These studies (and their results) can be incorporated into a NEPA document (under certain circumstances). Alternatives analysis from the transportation planning process must have a rational basis that is thoroughly documented. This record should be made available for public review during the NEPA scoping process.

Affected Environment and Indirect and Cumulative Impacts Regional development and growth analyses. Local land use, growth management, or development plans. Population and employment projections. Outputs of natural resource planning efforts: – Wildlife conservation plans; – Watershed plans; and/or – Multiple species habitat conservation plans.

Get Others Involved For example, seek acceptance of problem statement and evaluation criteria as part of the transportation planning process: – Decision-makers; – Stakeholders; – Environmental, regulatory, and resource agencies; and – The public.

Linking Planning-Level Evaluation to NEPA Document the planning-level evaluation. Summarize and reference it in the NEPA document: – Purpose and Need chapter – Alternatives Considered chapter – Evaluation chapter Show that planning satisfied NEPA principles. Early involvement of resource agencies.

Goals of Environmental Analysis in Transportation Planning Influence the identification, development, and evaluation of alternatives. Ensure that decisions are “informed” by environmental information. – We know enough to make good decisions. – We know enough to make decisions that can be sustained through NEPA. Develop interagency and community relationships.

Planning/NEPA Handoff Data current Planning information format Resource agencies/public involved Reflects land use plans Planning products available to public Changes in study area Analysis and data/modeling reliable and defensible Reflects natural resource plans

Scoping Opportunity at start of NEPA process to: – Present findings of planning process – Check-in with public and resource agencies – Make the connection from the work performed and decisions made in planning to project development – Determine remaining issues

Tips for Success Keep process transparent Planning and Environmental Staff involved in planning studies, advisory committee meetings and scoping Clear documentation of analysis and decisions Credible data

Integrated Planning Context Sensitive Context SensitiveSolutions/CSD Linking Planning and NEPA Integrated Approaches Scenario Planning Putting It All Together

Unifying Principles Interdisciplinary Collaborative Public Involvement Resource agencies consulted/involved Honoring commitments Measures of Effectiveness Environmental context Data- appropriate scale GIS Potential