Cherrill Spencer, SLAC. MDI Workshop Jan '05 1 Impact of Crossing Angle Value on Magnets near the IP Overview of several unusual quadrupole designs that.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ramesh Gupta, BNL D1 Dipole Design / IR Magnet Study LARP Collaboration Meeting, Oct 5-6, D1 Dipole Design Task (terminated in 2005) IR Magnet Study.
Advertisements

ADJUSTABLE STRONG PERMANENT MAGNET FOR FINAL FOCUS QUADRUPOLE T. MIHARA, Y.IWASHITA Kyoto University M. KUMADAN.I.R.S. C.M.SpencerS.L.A.C.
Quadrupole Magnetic Design for an Electron Ion Collider Paul Brindza May 19, 2008.
Zero Degree Extraction using an Electrostatic Separator Take another look at using an electrostatic separator and a weak dipole to allow a zero degree.
SLIDE Beam measurements using the MICE TOF counters Analysis meeting, 23 September 2008 Mark Rayner.
Crab cavity location for 2-mrad x-ing December 7, 2004 A.S.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 IR Upgrade M. Sullivan 1 PEP-II Interaction Region Upgrade M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory Workshop Hawaii.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B.
Mark Rayner, Analysis workshop 4 September ‘08: Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing, slide 1 Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing Analysis.
Beam Crossing Angle for  Tohru Takahashi Hiroshima University International Linear Collider January 2005 MDI Workshop SLAC.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Yichao Jing 11/11/2010. Outline Introduction Linear lattice design and basic parameters Combined function magnets study and feasibility Nonlinear dynamics.
CLIC main detector solenoid and anti-solenoid impact B. Dalena, A. Bartalesi, R. Appleby, H. Gerwig, D. Swoboda, M. Modena, D. Schulte, R. Tomás.
ATF2 Magnets ATF2 Magnets KEK, 19 Dec 2006Cherrill Spencer, SLAC ATF2 Mag Design & Production 1 Design and Production Status of New ATF2 Magnets Cherrill.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
ATF2 Magnets ATF2 Magnets 11Mar '08, Weekly MtgCherrill Spencer Status Report ATF2 FD quads 1 Status Report on the ATF2 “Final Doublet” quads being made.
Matching recipe and tracking for the final focus T. Asaka †, J. Resta López ‡ and F. Zimmermann † CERN, Geneve / SPring-8, Japan ‡ CERN, Geneve / University.
Bnl - fnal- lbnl - slac US LHC Accelerator Research Program A Quadrupole Design for Crab Cavity Optics Ramesh Gupta Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton,
Adiabatic eRHIC Extraction June 3, 2015Stephen Brooks, eRHIC meeting1 With emittance growth analysis.
ATF2 Magnets ATF2 Magnets 27/28 Feb 2007Cherrill Spencer, SLAC. Info for QC3 machining discussion 1 Information for discussion about how to enlarge the.
Page 1 Overview and Issues of the MEIC Interaction Region M. Sullivan MEIC Accelerator Design Review September 15-16, 2010.
Optimization of Field Error Tolerances for Triplet Quadrupoles of the HL-LHC Lattice V3.01 Option 4444 Yuri Nosochkov Y. Cai, M-H. Wang (SLAC) S. Fartoukh,
rd ATF2 project meeting Permanent Magnet Updates Y. Iwashita, M. Ichikawa, Y. Tajima, M.Kumada, C.M. Spencer Kyoto University, NIRS, SLAC Contents:
Open Midplane Dipole (OMD) Design for Dipole First Layout R. Gupta (BNL), N. Mokhov (FANL) bnl - fnal- lbnl - slac US LHC Accelerator Research Program.
17 th November, 2008 LCWS08/ILC08 1 BDS optics and minimal machine study Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC & The Cockcroft Institute Daresbury Laboratory.
ATF2 background and beam halo study D. Wang(IHEP), S. Bai(IHEP), P. bambade(LAL) February 7, 2013.
ILC-GDE Meeting Beijing Feb Effect of MDI Design on BDS Collimation Depth Frank Jackson ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory Cockcroft Institute.
Location of the LW detector- Simulation of the LW signals Lawrence Deacon RHUL ATF2 meeting August 23 rd 2006 KEK.
L. Keller 3/18/02 Beam-Gas-Bremsstrahlung and Coulomb Scattering in the NLC Beam Delivery System Conditions for Calculation: 1. Program is DECAY TURTLE.
COMPENSATION OF DETECTOR SOLENOID FIELD WITH L*=4.1M Glen White, SLAC April 20, 2015 ALCW2015, KEK, Japan.
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Mokka simulation studies on the Very Forward Detector components at CLIC and ILC Eliza TEODORESCU (IFIN-HH) FCAL Collaboration Meeting Tel Aviv, October.
ATF2 Magnets ATF2 Magnets 14 Sep 2007Cherrill Spencer, SLAC. Cooling Solid Wire Sextupoles 1 Report of the effort to cool an old FFTB solid wire sextupole.
Studies on low crossing angle bumps for the LHC luminosity upgrade G. Sterbini Accelerator Technology Department Magnet and Superconductors Group CERN,
Detector / Interaction Region Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski Joint CASA/Accelerator and Nuclear Physics MEIC/ELIC Meeting.
Accumulator & Compressor Rings with Flexible Momentum Compaction arccells MAP 2014 Spring Meeting, Fermilab, May 27-31, 2014 Y. Alexahin (FNAL APC)
Practical aspects of small aperture quadrupoles Dr Ben Leigh Tesla Engineering Ltd.
SuperB Meeting XVII May 28 – June 2, 2011 IR design status 1 IR Design Status and Update M. Sullivan For M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni,
MAIN DUMP LINE: BEAM LOSS SIMULATIONS WITH THE TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov E. Marin, G. White (SLAC) LCWS14 Workshop, Belgrade, October 7, 2014.
Design challenges for head-on scheme Deepa Angal-Kalinin Orsay, 19 th October 2006.
The design of the 2mrad extraction line Rob Appleby Daresbury Laboratory On behalf of the SLAC-BNL-UK-France task force ILC European Regional Meeting and.
Cherrill Spencer, SLAC Member of ATF2 Magnet Team
Interaction Region and Detector
Idea for the low field dipoles near to IP in 2mrad crossing
High Gradient Magnet Design for SPring-8 Upgrade Plan
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
Benchmarking MAD, SAD and PLACET Characterization and performance of the CLIC Beam Delivery System with MAD, SAD and PLACET T. Asaka† and J. Resta López‡
Cherrill Spencer, SLAC Member of ATF2 Magnet Team
M. Sullivan for the SLAC SuperB Workshop Jan , 2009
The Interaction Region
Optimization of Triplet Field Quality in Collision
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Cherrill Spencer, SLAC Member of ATF2 Magnet Team
Status of ATF2 FD Magnets and Info on their FFTB supports & mover
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
Compact and Low Consumption Magnet Design The DESY Experience
Y. Iwashita, T. Mihara, S.Nakamura,
Updates on IR and FF for super-B factory
Y. Iwashita, T. Mihara, S.Nakamura,
The 2mrad horizontal crossing angle IR layout for the ILC
Compensation of Detector Solenoid with Large Crossing Angle
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
IR Lattice with Detector Solenoid
M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni,
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov (SLAC), M-H. Wang
Upgrade on Compensation of Detector Solenoid effects
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Option 1: Reduced FF Quad Apertures
S. Bettoni on behalf of the whole team
Presentation transcript:

Cherrill Spencer, SLAC. MDI Workshop Jan '05 1 Impact of Crossing Angle Value on Magnets near the IP Overview of several unusual quadrupole designs that may be used to satisfy some stringent spatial requirements on magnets near the interaction point. CHERRILL SPENCER, Y. IWASHITA, KYOTO UNIVERSITY, JAPAN. Showing the need for early and close collaboration between accelerator physicists developing beamline lattices and magnet engineers.

Cherrill Spencer, SLAC. MDI Workshop Jan '05 2 Relative positions of the incoming & extraction magnets L*=TBD For 2mr :Incoming & extracted beams pass through QD0. Extracted beam gets extra kick of ~4 mrad Extracted beam passes through 3 quads QD0 Probably superconducting Warm quads in incoming beamline Crossing angle: TBD Distance TBD For 2mr ~ Crossing angle+4 mrad TBD=To be Determined ∆x is horizontal distance between the centers of the 2 beamlines Interaction Point Photon beam

Cherrill Spencer, SLAC. MDI Workshop Jan '05 3 Extraction quad requirements with a 20mr crossing angle. To minimize beam size, quad apertures and dimensions in the extraction line, the quad focusing has to start soon after the IP. Even so the beam width gets very large. But, the first extraction quad has to be placed at sufficient distance from IP where it can realistically fit without interference with elements of the incoming beamline. Two options of extraction optics are compared below - with 8 and 15 m space between IP and the first extraction quad. Lattices from Yuri Nosochkov, SLAC

Cherrill Spencer, SLAC. MDI Workshop Jan '05 4 Unusual Quad Styles for areas with close adjacent beams ~221mm Field-free region for secondary beam. Primary beam passes through center of regular quad, bore radius=35mm Quad for HERA Luminosity Upgrade. 726 mm Q2 in PEPII 368mm Field-free region for secondary beam. Primary beam passes through center of regular quad, bore radius=47.8mm ~142mm

Cherrill Spencer, SLAC. MDI Workshop Jan '05 5 Extraction quad requirements with a 2mr crossing angle. If the crossing angle is only 2mr then the horizontal distance between the incoming and extracted beam, ∆x, becomes even smaller, forcing even stranger quadrupole designs. For example, based on a very preliminary and not fully- developed lattice with a 2 mr crossing angle and the first extraction quad at 10m from the IP (lattice from Yuri Nosochkov) these are the requirements on the first three extraction quads, for 250Gev/beam: QuadL (m)GL(T)R mm ∆ x mm QFEX QDEX QFEX This set of magnet requirements is just one of many possible sets. Difference between ∆x and R is approximate space available for coil packet and core backleg in a conventional quad- NOT enough space in any of these 3 quads, so need to consider atypical quad designs.

Cherrill Spencer, SLAC. MDI Workshop Jan '05 6 Septum Half Quad from TESLA TDR for 1 st extraction quad 350mm 110mm Incoming beam passes throu’ notch in steel septum. Septum thickness=10mm. Field here needs to be <~20G. Precision engineering needed to achieve this. Design is based on a HERA luminosity upgrade quad. Bore radius = 75mm. Extracted beam passes through HALF quad to the right of its center and so beam sees a dipole field on top of the quad field. The magnet’s effect on the beam shape has to be modelled using some field data from a magnet simulation program. Extracted beam horizontal profile is NOT Gaussian, nevertheless outlying particles will hit face of magnet if half-aperture is too small. Steel septum In my opinion one cannot satisfy QFEX1 requirements with such a design. When 2mr reqts are finalized I will make a detailed model.

Cherrill Spencer, SLAC. MDI Workshop Jan '05 7 Side-by-side Quads: a different approach, using permanent magnets Idea from Y.Iwashita, Kyoto University Conceptual figure: PANDIRA model. Very preliminary. NEOMAX46 pm bricks Permendur, soft mag material QD QF Vary gap height to vary gradient Sides are open X=0 Have full quad fields in both beamlines.

Cherrill Spencer, SLAC. MDI Workshop Jan '05 8 Gradient variation with x for side-by-side quads Gradient varies along x : has sextupole component. Maximum value of ~100T/m at x=+-10mm QD QF Possible way to have 2 quads in very close adjacent beamlines.

Cherrill Spencer, SLAC. MDI Workshop Jan '05 9 Conclusions on Magnet Design for near IP Magnets and Comments on Process The requirements for the first few magnets near the IP, in both the incoming and extraction beamlines, are very stringent from an engineering point of view. The spatial constraints associated with any small crossing angle, especially a 2mr scenario, lead to quads that are on the cusp of being feasible to fabricate. Lattice designers must not generate new extraction beam lattices without giving the basic quad requirements to a magnet engineer for them to check their feasibility & make designs and computer models- and the fields predicted by the models should be used by the lattice designers in their tracking studies. How to match up accelerator physicists and magnet engineers can be discussed during last session of this workshop.