Overview: Universal Screening & Progress Monitoring Assessments for PK-6 Collaborating for Iowa’s Kids Partnering with Iowa’s Local Schools Adapted from.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accelerating Achievement in Boston Public Schools: Academic Achievement Framework.
Advertisements

+ Curriculum Director Network March 25, Purpose 1. Review Definition of Multi Tiered System of Support (MTSS) 2. Identify the Multi Tiered System.
Response to Intervention (RTI) in Fresno Unified School District Presentation for SELPA Directors December 1 st 2005 By Sue Pellegrino, FUSD SELPA Director.
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
INTRODUCTION TO THE FAST SYSTEM The FAST Team University of Minnesota Theodore J. Christ, PhD
Robyn Seifert February 6,  smarterbalanced.org  K-12 EDUCATION  Administrators 2.
Superintendent’s meeting December 4 th, RTI – Response to Intervention MTSS – Multi-Tiered System of Supports RtI/MTSS in Iowa is an every-education.
Iowa State Board of Education Annual Retreat June 4-5, 2013 Update on the Status of the State Board’s Priorities Reducing the Achievement Gap Michelle.
C4K Overview Collaborating for Iowa’s Kids Partnering with Iowa’s Local Schools.
North Penn School District Phase III Update Introduction to Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTII): A Schoolwide Framework for Student Success.
RtI at AACA Response to Intervention Workshop. Good Morning! Dear Parents, We are excited to share our RtI work with you. We are making big strides in.
C4K – Building an efficient and effective delivery system to impact critical outcomes for kids Our initial focus as we build this system is early literacy.
May Dr. Schultz, Dr. Owen, Dr. Ryan, Dr. Stephens.
Iowa Department of Education Early Literacy Implementation & Support Summer / Fall 2014.
Thinking Smart About Assessment Ben Clarke, Ph.D. Rachell Katz, Ph.D. August 25, 2004 Oregon Reading First Mentor Coach Training © 2004 by the Oregon Reading.
Large Scale Assessment Conference June 22, 2004 Sue Rigney U.S. Department of Education Assessments Shall Provide for… Participation of all students Reasonable.
Aimsweb overview Group-Administered Measures: Training Format
Using Targeted Interventions to Support School Improvement Presenter: Kathleen Smith Director Office of School Improvement.
Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring Nebraska Department of Education Response-to-Intervention Consortium.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Georgia’s Pyramid. Pyramid Vocabulary  Formative Assessment  Universal Screening  Intervention  Progress Monitoring.
Chapter 9 Fluency Assessment Tina Jensen. What? Fluency Assessment Consists of listening to students read aloud for a given time to collect information.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Research Foundations and EGRA Protocols or Why these measures? Sylvia Linan-Thompson.
1 Preventing Reading Difficulties with DIBELS Assessment.
IOWA Department of Education Substantial Deficiency: Fall, Winter, Spring.
Early Childhood Initiatives : Roles for Child Assessment February 15, 2007.
RTI: Response to Intervention An Evidence-Based Practice.
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
STANDARD C Laura Adams, Literacy Consultant, CCSSI Team.
Webinar Series to support Keystone AEA 1 Session #2 ●Substantial Deficiency ●Progress Monitoring ●Interventions.
WW Why Evaluation?. Evaluation formalizes the shared responsibility of state and LEAs to improve student achievement and close the achievement gap in.
1 Session 1 November 2011 As you arrive, please read and complete the survey titled, “A History of Literacy In FUSD.” This can be found in your binder.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
Response to Intervention Franklin Community Schools January 24, 2011.
RtI Data System Collaborating for Iowa’s Kids Partnering with Iowa’s Local Schools.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Response to Instruction: Using Data to Make Decisions PRESENTER: Lexie Domaradzki.
Spicewood, IB World School Response to Intervention.
Parent Leadership Team Meeting Intro to RtI.  RtI Overview  Problem Solving Process  What papers do I fill out?  A3 documenting the story.
Iowa Department of Education Early Literacy Implementation & Support W. David Tilly III Deputy Director, Iowa Department of Education.
Webinar 1: Overview. 1. Overview  Link to SLD Rule  Multi-tiered Systems of Support (MTSS)  Systems of Assessment 2. Introduction to Tiers  Tier 1:
Class Action Research: Treatment for the Nonresponsive Student IL510 Kim Vivanco July 15, 2009
C4K Overview Collaborating for Iowa’s Kids Partnering with Iowa’s Local Schools.
Data-Based Decision Making: Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring.
Shelly Dickinson, MTSS Trainer Charlie Eccleston, MTSS Trainer.
Third Grade Guarantee. Overview of the requirements of the Third Grade Reading Guarantee. Implications of the Third Grade Guarantee for Worthington City.
 Iowa Reading Research Center 267 (September 5, 2014) Michelle Hosp Ph.D., Director.
Wake County Student Support Team Process Melissa Bunn
Types of Assessment: Curriculum Based Measurement Characteristics : Simple Accurate Efficient Generalizable Reliable and valid Predictive Sensitive Flexible.
Part 2: Assisting Students Struggling with Reading: Multi-Tier System of Supports H325A
CE300-Observation and Assessment in Early Childhood Unit 2 Using Standardized Tests and Authentic Assessments Feel free to chat with each other. We will.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
“ Let us not be content to wait and see what will happen, but give us the determination to make the right things happen”- Horace Mann 2014 MCAS Overview.
Early Literacy Implementation Reporting for Non-FAST Districts DECEMBER 15, 2014.
Using Data to Implement RtI Colleen Anderson & Michelle Hosp Iowa Department of Education.
Progress Monitoring Goal Setting Overview of Measures Keith Drieberg, Director of Psychological Services John Oliveri, School Psychologist Cathleen Geraghty,
Response to Intervention Updates Iowa ASCD Conference April 11, Iowa Department of Education.
S TAR Assessment New Teacher Orientation
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
Linking Progress Monitoring with High-Stakes Assessments: Setting Standards-Based Goals in Reading John Hosp & Kristen Missall The University of Iowa Pursuing.
Maxine McCormick Assessment Solutions Consultant
Supplemental Math Digital Tool: Dreambox
Tier 1 Building a Strong Core.
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
Suite of Computer Adaptive Tests (CAT) for Iowa
Data-Based Instructional Decision Making
Lake Myra Elementary School * July 2009
Title One Program Evaluation
CHAPTER 14: Assessing Written Expression
Presentation transcript:

Overview: Universal Screening & Progress Monitoring Assessments for PK-6 Collaborating for Iowa’s Kids Partnering with Iowa’s Local Schools Adapted from a presentation developed and delivered by Michelle Hosp & Brad Niebling, Iowa DOE, and Sue Daker, Keystone AEA

Definitions: Universal Screening & Progress Monitoring  Universal Screening Assessments: are administered to ALL students to identify which students are at-risk for failure on a meaningful outcome measure.  Progress Monitoring Assessments: are administered to only those students who are receiving additional instruction beyond Universal to determine if they are benefiting from that instruction. 2 Collaborating for Iowa’s Kids Phase One Implementation June 2013

Questions that can be answered with Universal Screening Data--- Collaborating for Iowa’s Kids Phase One Implementation June 2013  Is Universal instruction meeting the needs of the majority of our students?  At the beginning of 1 st grade which students are at-risk for not being proficient in reading by the end of 1 st grade on a meaningful outcome measure? 3

Questions that can be answered with Progress Monitoring Data--- Collaborating for Iowa’s Kids Phase One Implementation June 2013  Is this student responding positively to the reading intervention they are receiving?  Is this student learning at a rate that will ensure they will reach their goal (i.e., close the gap)? 4

Critical Features of Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring Assessments Collaborating for Iowa’s Kids Phase One Implementation June AssessmentsCritical Features Universal Screening Predictive of future academic success Identify who is at-risk Conducted at least three times a year Used with All students Brief to administer and score (5 – 15 minutes) Progress Monitoring Rates of growth and level of performance Conducted on a routine basis (weekly) Used with students who are at-risk or identified as having a disability Brief to administer and score (1 – 10 minutes)

FAST Collaborating for Iowa’s Kids Phase One Implementation June 2013  FAST stands for Formative Assessment System for Teachers  They are out of the University of Minnesota  Dr. Ted Christ is the Developer  FAST includes a suite of assessments:  earlyReading  CBMReading  aReading 6

IGDIs Collaborating for Iowa’s Kids Phase One Implementation June 2013  IGDIs stands for Individual Growth and Development Indicators  They are out of the University of Minnesota and Early Learning Labs Inc.  Dr. Scott McConnell is the Developer  Direct Measures of Early Literacy Construct:  First Sounds  Picture Naming  Rhyming  Sound Identification  Which one doesn’t belong 7

For More Information Collaborating for Iowa’s Kids Phase One Implementation June 2013  LINK TO POST QUESTIONS: /faq /faq  LINK FOR RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS: man&task=doc_download&gid=15291&Itemid= man&task=doc_download&gid=15291&Itemid=4303  LINK TO WEBINAR: 8