Policy Lifecycle Policy Created Published & Communicated Periodic ReviewRevised or Retired 10/4/2010 Policy Development Process-v4.b.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
Advertisements

A Procedure for Major Consulting Services Contracts February 8, 2008.
Process and Procedure Documentation. Agenda Why document processes and procedures? What is process and procedure documentation? Who creates and uses this.
Financial Policies Training: Formulation and Issuance of University Financial Policies (2.1.9) Effective: October 1, 2008.
Library Board Meetings 101 Kathy Schalk-Greene Director, Mount Laurel Library New Directors’ Orientation New Jersey State Library.
Presented by: Dick Dawson Executive Director, Audit, Compliance & Risk Services Heather Foster Policy Specialist.
Dialogue: Does the Cornell Policy Process Play in Peoria? David Stack, Ph.D. Deputy CIO University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee Merri Beth Lavagnino, M.L.S.,
UNIVERSITY OF BALLARAT RISK MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES John Gavens Managing Principal.
Review of 2010 Biennial Audit of Capital Projects Cyndi Fout Project Services Director February 28, 2011.
ECM Project Roles and Responsibilities
An Educational Computer Based Training Program CBTCBT.
Grants.gov – What to Expect Presented by the Office for Research Cindy Hope, Director Office for Sponsored Programs.
April 2, 2013 Longitudinal Data system Governance: Status Report Alan Phillips Deputy Director, Fiscal Affairs, Budgeting and IT Illinois Board of Higher.
ACUPA The Association of College and University Policy Administrators Communicating Policy Michele Gross University Policy Program Director.
An Introduction to the Fairfax County Communication Strategy
4.2 Develop Project Management Plan
Records Managers’ Forum 28 February Draft standard on the appraisal and disposal of State records Catherine Robinson Senior Project Officer, Government.
Establishing A Compliance Program: It Makes Sense
Session 5 Integrating CLAS Into Policy and Practice CLAS Training [ADD DATE] [ADD PRESENTER NAME] [ADD ORGANIZATION NAME]
Roles and Responsibilities
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves Statement of Scope (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing
Department of Grants and District Initiatives 1 San Antonio Independent School District Department of Grants and District Initiatives The purpose of the.
Texas Regional Entity Update Sam Jones Interim CEO and President Board of Directors July 18, 2006.
The Report of the Provost’s Advisory Group on the SUNY Assessment Initiative September 2009 Tina Good, Ph.D. President Faculty Council of Community Colleges.
Student Involvement in Decision-Making. Policy 2.3 Part 1: To promote appropriate levels of student participation... Part 1:... students shall have the.
AY 2009 Unit Review Data Delivery Plan Data Description Process – Timeline Rev
Marketing and Sales Production Process. Summary 3 Phases Conceptual Production Execution Roles Sponsor, Producer, Analyst, Senior Executive, Executive,
MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1.Organizational Structure B2.Standards Development: Roles and Responsibilities B3.Conformity Assessment: Roles and Responsibilities.
Paragraph 81 Project. 2RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY Background FERC March 15, 2012 Order regarding the Find, Fix, Track and Report (FFT) process  Paragraph.
A GENCY P OLICY : T HEORY & P RACTICE. First. The Theory.
1 Development of STRATEGIC PLAN through DEVELOPMENT STEPS.
Implementation Strategy July 2002 STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT LIFECYCLE PROCESS ORP Publishes & Maintains 8 Standing Committee Recommends Approval / Disapproval.
Policies, Policies, Policies! What are they? Why are they important? How do I develop new ones or revise old ones? Office of Legal Affairs Fall Symposium.
Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Proposal Preparation Office of Academic Programs, Assessment,
Records and the Law Jan Liebaers Cayman Islands National Archive.
1 EMS Fundamentals An Introduction to the EMS Process Roadmap AASHTO EMS Workshop.
AACP Admissions Workshop Understanding ACPE Standards and Guidelines Pertaining to Admissions Robert Beardsley, PhD University of Maryland School of Pharmacy.
Delivering the Message Public Notification vs. Public Involvement Strategic Communication Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of.
Promoting Copyright Education and Compliance on Campus Copyright Basics: Utilizing Available Tools and Resources Educause SouthWest Regional Conference.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE VIU POLICY REVIEW PROCESS. STEP 1 SUBMISSION Scheduled Review  Every 5 years (at least) to Executive Responsible  Delegated.
NKU Annual Budget Process NKU Budget Office Training Presentation and
1 Office of the Vice President for Planning and Policy Overview of Policy Administration.
WHAT THEY ARE, HOW THEY CHANGE MRAM MARCH 2014 OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS GRANTS INFORMATION MEMORANDA.
Page  ASME 2013 Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B7. The Appeals Process.
BSBPMG501A Manage Project Integrative Processes Manage Project Integrative Processes Project Integration Processes – Part 2 Diploma of Project Management.
Implementing Program Management Standards at Duke Energy.
OVERVIEW PRE AWARD From idea generation to study design Proposal development and support Proposal submission POST AWARD Account establishment Monitoring.
All About Discovery! New Mexico State University nmsu.edu The States of New Mexico & Texas Legislative Process and NMSU/Texas Human Resources related Policy.
Award Acceptance Process Governance Team Project Update December 13, 2011.
1 Presented by David Thompson, TIA December 14, 2005 NFPA 1600 and Emergency Communications.
Routing new or revised Rules
Contract Compliance Training
Standards and Certification Training
Planning Commission Public Hearing September 9, 2016
An Introduction to the Fairfax County Communication Strategy
Save these dates! October 14, 15 and 16, 2010 ASU Student Union
Implementation Strategy July 2002
An Introduction to the Fairfax County Communication Strategy
MAC Board Effectiveness Survey
Contract Compliance Training
Proposal Phase Draft & Review Phase Approval Phase
Colorado state university-pueblo policy and administration (PA)
Centralization of Texas State Contract Compliance Functions
MAC Board Effectiveness Survey
Do We Have a Policy About That. Do We Need One
Administrative Policy Development Process Doc # , Approved by Division Directors on , Updated , , Administrative Policy Committee.
Budget and Legislative Request
Presentation transcript:

Policy Lifecycle Policy Created Published & Communicated Periodic ReviewRevised or Retired 10/4/2010 Policy Development Process-v4.b

Policy Development Process Administrative Policies Policy Promulgation Policy Maintenance Policy Need Identified Impact Statement Review Draft & Edit Policy Review Executive Policy Group Review & OGC Approval PROPOSE REVIEW & APPROVE ANNOUNCE & MAINTAIN 10/4/2010 Policy Development Process-v4.b

) May lead to review at senior executive level at the discretion of President’s Office. v Administrative Policy Development Process InitiatePreliminary Review Need Identified for new policy, revision to policy, or retirement of policy Impact Statement Review by: UPO Policy Office Advisory Group (POAG) (as needed) Steps: 1.Impact Statement (IS) (template) developed by Responsible Policy Owner (RPO) 2.IS reviewed/approved by Executive Sponsor (VP) and forwarded electronically to University Policy Office (UPO) Steps: 1.UPO reviews IS & distributes to POAG team if new policy or substantial change to existing policy 2.POAG team reviews & provides feedback aimed at successful advancement of policy. Affirms it meets criteria for inclusion in Handbook of Operating Procedure. 3.UPO provides Responsible Policy Owner with POAG comments & advisement. Copy to Executive Sponsor. 4.UPO monitors status of policy development and awaits first draft of policy or existing HOP policy revisions. Phase 1: PROPOSE 10/4/2010 Policy Development Process-v4.b

cy draft) draft) v Administrative Policy Development Process Draft & Edit Initial Draft Policy Review Responsible Policy Owner drafts policy with Editorial Group assistance Draft Policy Review: UPO POAG (as needed) Steps: 1.Responsible Policy Owner (RPO) seeks stakeholder and governance input 2.RO working with Editorial Group drafts policy (new or revised) using Policy Template 3.RO submits policy draft along with summary of any governance input that was not inserted into policy draft to University Policy Office (UPO) Steps: 1.UPO reviews first draft with focus on inclusion of essential elements of policy, clarity, grammar/spelling. Redistributes to POAG for further review. 2.POAG has opportunity to provide feedback through UPO. 3.UPO continues review with RPO and Legal Affairs. 4.If policy draft meets Legal Affairs review, UPO will advance policy draft to President’s Office for executive level review. Included will be commentary on any outstanding issues and confirmation about review process. 5.University Policy Office (UPO) continues to monitor status of this policy. Continued review by UPO & Legal Affairs working in conjunction with Responsible Policy Owner Phase 2: REVIEW & APPROVE UT Office of General Counsel may be alerted to forthcoming policy 10/4/2010 Policy Development Process-v4.b

Administrative Policy Development Process Executive Level & UT System Review Draft policy advanced to President’s Office UPO initiates appropriate response on policy action as conveyed by President’s Office Executive Policy Group Steps: 1.UPO submits policy draft and commentary including outstanding issues to President’s office 2.President reviews with his executive cabinet at his discretion. 3.President’s Office reports back to UPO and Responsible Policy Owner (RPO) on decision to proceed or other direction with regard to advancing policy further. Steps: 1.If President’s Office gives approval to adopt new/revised HOP, the UPO will forward policy draft to the UT Office of General Counsel. 2.UPO will coordinate OGC’s review comments with RPO and Legal Affairs. 3.UPO will notify President’s Office, Legal Affairs and Responsible Policy Owner when final approval by OGC and Executive Vice Chancellor has been received. 4.UPO will coordinate with RPO on communication for announcing new policy/revisions. 5.UPO will update Policy Library HOP website. Continued review by UPO & Legal Affairs working in conjunction with Responsible Policy Owner Phase 2: REVIEW & APPROVE (cont’d) 10/4/2010 Policy Development Process-v4.b

Administrative Policy Development Process AnnouncePolicy Maintenance Responsible Policy Owner announces policy. Scheduled policy review or updating as required by law or by changes at Board of Regents direction. Steps: 1.Responsible Policy Owner announces new/revised HOP policy to intended audience through appropriate communication channels. 2.RPO coordinates & initiates appropriate training as required to address awareness and compliance issues. Steps: 1.UPO and Responsible Policy Owner continues to monitor UT System and legal environment that may impact HOP policies. 2.RPO will initiate periodic scheduled policy review or as needed for updating as required by law or change in Regents Rule. 3.UPO will monitor HOP policy issues and will coordinate with RPO as needed. Phase 3: ANNOUNCE & MAINTAIN Policy Lifecycle Continues 10/4/2010 Policy Development Process-v4.b