The Endeavor Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent: Device Description and Comprehensive Update of the Clinical Trial Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Clinical Trial Results. org ABSORB Presented at the American College of Cardiology Annual Scientific Session March, 2007 Presented by Dr. Patrick W. Serruys.
Advertisements

SPIRIT IV A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing an Everolimus-Eluting Stent and a Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.
“Real World”: SVG, De Novo or Restenotic Coronary Artery Lesions Chronic Stable Angina, Silent Ischemia, Acute Coronary Syndromes Vessel Diameters:
EXCELLA BD Randomized Trial 12-month Results
Four Drug Eluting Stent Trials Keith D Dawkins MD FRCP FACC Southampton University Hospital Keith D Dawkins MD FRCP FACC Southampton University Hospital.
Five-Year Follow-up of Safety and Efficacy of the Resolute Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent: Insights from the RESOLUTE Global Clinical Trial Program in Approximately.
3rd CEEGI Advisory Board1 Resolute in the DES era: Indications & Limitations Georgios I. Papaioannou, MD, MPH, FACC, FSCAI Athens Medical Center Cardiac.
Resolute all comers trial Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of the new generation ZES stent versus the everolimus eluting stent. Study:Multicenter,
ISAR-LEFT MAIN 2 Randomized Trial Zotarolimus- vs. Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Lesions Julinda Mehilli,
2 Year Clinical Outcomes from the Pivotal RESOLUTE US Study Laura Mauri MD, MSc on behalf of the RESOLUTE US Investigators Brigham and Women’s Hospital.
Martin B. Leon, MD for the Endeavor IV investigators Columbia University Medical Center Cardiovascular Research Foundation New York City Monday, September.
University Hospital La Paz
29th ANNUAL SCIENTIFIC SESSIONS – SCA&I
Vascular wall biology with current generation stents Professor Martin Bennett BHF Professor of Cardiovascular Sciences, Cambridge.
DIABETES trial P Jiménez-Quevedo, M Sabaté, DJ Angiolillo, JA Gómez-Hospital, R Hernández-Antolín, J Goicolea, F Alfonso, C Bañuelos, J Escaned, R Moreno,
Clinical Result Overview
BIOSENSORS-CLINICAL UPDATE “LEADERS AND BEYOND” John E Shulze, CTO BIOSENSORS INTERNATIONAL GROUP Jan 29, 2010.
DR ALEX CHASE REGIONAL HEART CENTRE MORRISTON SWANSEA SLIDE MATERIAL:PERSONAL COMMUNICATION WITH AUTHORS ABBOTT, BOSTON SCIENTIFIC, CORDIS, MEDTRONIC TCT.
CYPHER® Clinical Evidence in Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI)
Drug Eluting Stents: Looking Forward Janine Lane
Meredith ● EVOLVE Primary Endpoint ● TCT 2011 ● San Francisco, CA Slide 1 Meredith ● EVOLVE overview ● TCT 2010 ● Washington, DC Slide 1 Clinical and Angiographic.
Trial Vignettes Contemporary trials 3: DES
Two-Year Clinical Outcomes Yan Li MD., PhD. On behalf of FIREMAN Investigators Associated Professor of Department of Cardiology of Xijing Hospital Fourth.
Welcome Ask The Experts March 24-27, 2007 New Orleans, LA.
The REALITY Study Results. REALITY Study Design The REALITY Study : Prospective randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CYPHER®
NOBORI New Generation Drug Eluting Stent Clinical Data Danny Detiege Clinical Manager - Cardiology Terumo Europe N.V. Leuven, Belgium.
1 of Presented by Gregg W. Stone, MD, ACC PROMUS Stent is a private-labeled Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System manufactured.
SIROLIMUS-ELUTING STENTS EFFECTIVELY INHIBIT NEOINTIMAL PROLIFERATION AS COMPARED TO BARE METAL STENTS IN DISEASED SAPHENOUS VEIN GRAFTS: 6-month IVUS.
A Randomized Comparison of Everolimus-­ Eluting Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds vs. Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents: One-Year Angiographic and.
Endeavor Safety: Pooled Analysis of Early and Late Safety of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Laura Mauri, MD, MSc Brigham and Women’s Hospital Harvard Clinical.
FRONTIER Registry The Guidant MULTI-LINK FRONTIER ™ Coronary Stent System for the Treatment of Pts with Native De Novo or Restenotic Bifurcation Coronary.
Late loss in the choice of DES: Monty Python or the Holy Grail? Azfar Zaman Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne.
Slow-rate release polymer-based paclitaxel- eluting stent compared with bare stent in patients with single complex coronary lesions TAXUS V Presented at.
Two-Year Outcomes After Everolimus- or Sirolimus- Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease in the ISAR-TEST 4 Trial Robert A. Byrne, Adnan.
A Prospective, Randomized Trial Evaluating a Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon in Patients TReated with Endothelial Progenitor Cell CapTuring Stents for De Novo.
Endeavor 4: A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus- Eluting Stent and a Paclitaxel- Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Martin B.
Www. Clinical trial results.org Cypher sirolimus-eluting stent Primary Endpoint:  In-stent and late lumen loss at 9 months (determined by QCA) Secondary.
The Black Back Yard of D.E.S [D.ES Pitfalls) Ehud Grenadier M.D H.M.C, Assuta, Rambam Med. Ctrs. Israel The Black Back Yard of D.E.S [D.ES Pitfalls) Ehud.
Boston Scientific Drug eluting stent program A Scientific Approach Identify therapeutic agent Identify appropriate polymer carrier Evaluate a broad range.
Compare Trial 2 year follow-up Peter Smits Maasstad Ziekenhuis Rotterdam The Netherlands.
For OMA distribution only. © 2014 Medtronic, Inc. All rights reserved DOC_1A 03/14 Four-Year Outcomes Following Resolute Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent.
Early and Late Stent Thrombosis Rates in 5,054 Real-World Patients from XIENCE V USA With and Without Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Interruptions James Hermiller,
Endeavor IV: A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus- Eluting Stent and a Paclitaxel- Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Martin B.
NEXT A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Cre8, a Polymer-Free Stent Eluting Sirolimus, to a Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Didier Carrié, MD,PhD On behalf.
Final 5 year results from the all-comer COMPARE trial: a prospective randomized comparison between Xience-V and Taxus Liberté TCT 2013 San Francisco Pieter.
Prof. Dr. Sigmund Silber, FESC, FACC On behalf of the RESOLUTE
Everolimus-eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: ABSORB III Trial 2-Year Results Stephen G. Ellis, MD,
Disclosures Runlin Gao has received a research grant
Runlin Gao, M.D. On behalf of ABSORB China Investigators
XIENCE V vs TAXUS: Game Over! The Studies are Definitive
New Generation Resolute Integrity Drug-Eluting Stent Superior to Benchmark Xience Drug-Eluting Stent: Primary Endpoint Results from the PROPEL Study –
Two-year clinical outcomes in the EVOLVE FHU trial: A randomized evaluation of a novel bioabsorbable polymer-coated, everolimus-eluting stent Ian Meredith.
12 Month Outcomes in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Implanted with a Resolute Zotarolimus-eluting Stent: Initial Results from the RESOLUTE Global Clinical.
ABSORB Japan: 3-year Clinical and Angiographic Results of a Randomized trial Evaluating the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold vs. Metallic Drug-eluting.
LONG-DES II Trial Randomized Comparison of the Efficacy of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in the Treatment of Long Native Coronary.
The RESOLUTE Program: today and tomorrow
On behalf of J. Belardi, M. Leon, L. Mauri,
Two-Year Extended Follow-up in Patients Receiving a Zotarolimus-eluting Stent in the E-Five Registry Martin T. Rothman, Ian T. Meredith, Keyur Parikh,
TAXUS II and IV: two-year follow-up
Kyoto University Hospital, Japan
3-Year Clinical Outcomes From the RESOLUTE US Study
ENDEAVOR IV: 5 Year Final Outcomes
Presented at ACC 2003 Late Breaking Clinical Trials
SIRIUS: A U.S. Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the SIRolImUS-Eluting Stent in De Novo Native Coronary Lesions Presented at TCT 2002.
ENDEAVOR II Five-Year Clinical Follow-up
FOR DISTRIBUTION BY MEDTRONIC OFFICE OF MEDICAL AFFAIRS ONLY.
Gregg W. Stone, MD Columbia University Medical Center
ENDEAVOR III Multicenter Randomized Trial Clinical/MACE Angio/IVUS
Updated 3-Year Meta-Analysis of the TAXUS Clinical Trials Safety and Efficacy Demonstrated in 3,445 Randomized Patients Time allocation for this talk.
Long Term Clinical Results from the Endeavor Program: 5-Year Follow up
Presentation transcript:

The Endeavor Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent: Device Description and Comprehensive Update of the Clinical Trial Program

Endeavor DES Device Technology Overview Clinical Trial Perspectives

Endeavor DES Device Technology Overview

ENDEAVOR Safety Considerations Design Features Histopathology Rapid drug elution Stent design = reduced injury (rounded thin struts) % Drug Eluted Time (Days) PC Basecoat (≈ 1μm) Drug Layer 90% Zotarolimus 10% PC (≈ 2-4μm) Stent Strut Biocompatible PC Safeformulation

% Endotheliazation Endothelial Coverage Histopathology Porcine days Days Endeavor eNOS Staining BaselineAch (10 -5M ) mm 90days Vaso-reactivity ENDEAVOR Safety Considerations Animal Studies (rabbits and pigs)

OCT Angioscopy Endothelial Function Proximal Distal ENDEAVOR Safety Considerations Human Results IVUS ZES (n=14) vs. SES 8 mos FU ZES improved neointimal coverage (P=0.0004) and fewer thrombi Awata et al; J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52; overlapped ZES in 17 6 mos FU (24,076 struts analyzed) ZES no malapposed or uncovered struts; no intraluminal thrombus Guagliumi et al; ESC ZES 8 mos FU 0.4% late incomplete apposition; no positive remodeling; homogeneous neointimal distribution Fitzgerald et al; Stanford IVUS core lab ZES (n=20) vs. SES (n=20) vs. BMS (n=10); Ach 6 mos; ZES improved endothelial function cw SES (P<0.001) and similar to BMS Kim et al; ACC 2008

Endeavor DES Clinical Trial Perspectives

Endeavor Clinical Program Overview 1yr 2yr 3yr 4yr 5yr Continued Access Single Arm (n = 296) 4yr ENDEAVOR II CA ENDEAVOR I Single Arm First-in-Man (n = 100) 5yr ENDEAVOR II 1:1 RCT vs. BMS (E = 598,D = 599) PK (n = 106) 4yr ENDEAVOR III 3:1 RCT vs. Cypher ® (E = 323,C = 113) 3yr ENDEAVOR IV 1:1 RCT vs.Taxus ® (E = 773,T = 775) 2yr ENDEAVOR PK Pharmacokinetic Study (n = 43) 2yr Single Arm (n = 99) 1yr ENDEAVOR Japan E-FIVE Open Label Single Arm (n = 8000) 1yr PROTECT 1:1 RCT vs. Cypher (E = 4400,C = 4400) Post Approval Premarket Safety and Efficacy Package

1yr 2yr 3yr 4yr 5yr Continued Access Single Arm (n = 296) 4yr ENDEAVOR II CA ENDEAVOR I Single Arm First-in-Man (n = 100) 5yr ENDEAVOR II 1:1 RCT vs. BMS (E = 598,D = 599) PK (n = 106) 4yr ENDEAVOR III 3:1 RCT vs. Cypher ® (E = 323,C = 113) 3yr ENDEAVOR IV 1:1 RCT vs.Taxus ® (E = 773,T = 775) 2yr ENDEAVOR PK Pharmacokinetic Study (n = 43) 2yr Single Arm (n = 99) 1yr ENDEAVOR Japan E-FIVE Open Label Single Arm (n = 8000) 1yr PROTECT 1:1 RCT vs. Cypher (E = 4400,C = 4400) Ongoing Premarket Safety and Efficacy Package 20,519 Patients Endeavor Clinical Program Overview

D eliverabilit y E fficacy S afety Endeavor DES

D eliverabilit y Endeavor DES

(%) (%) p = (%) (%) ENDEAVOR III 99.4% 95.6% Procedural Success Endeavor (n = 323) Cypher (n = 113) ENDEAVOR IV p = % 96.8% Procedural Success Endeavor (n = 774) Taxus (n = 775) ENDEAVOR Deliverability Procedural Success vs. Cypher and Taxus

TCTMD Physician Survey on DES Use Patterns % Physicians US (n=143) OUS (n=347) Deliverability EndeavorCypherXience/PromusTaxus TCTMD

D eliverabilit y more user-friendly (esp. Rx platform) very deliverable in complex lesions and challenging anatomy excellent sidebranch access Endeavor is… Endeavor DES

E fficacy Endeavor DES

SIRIUS (n=501/525) TAXUS IV (n=618/650) Pivotal Trials TLR - DES Arms ENDEAVOR II, SIRIUS, and TAXUS IV NA EII (n=581/598) Years of Follow-up TLR (%) Years of Follow-up TLR (%) Years of Follow-up TLR (%)

Primary Endpoint: TVF at 9 months Secondary Endpoints: In-segment % DS at 8 months; TLR and TVR at 9 months Drug Therapy: ASA and Clopidogrel/Ticlid >6 months Zotarolimus Dose: 10  g per mm stent length Endeavor IV Single Blind RCT vs. Taxus DES PI: Martin B. Leon Single De Novo Native Coronary Lesion Vessel Diameter: 2.5–3.5 mm Lesion Length: ≤ 27 mm Pre-dilatation required 1:1 randomization N = 1,548 patients 80 sites US Endeavor Stent n=774 Taxus Stent n=774 30d 6mo 4yr 3yr 2yr 9mo 12mo 8mo 5yr Clinical/MACE Angiography/IVUS QCA and IVUS Subset (328 total = 21.2%)

Endeavor IV TLR and TVR at 12 months Endeavor (34/749) Taxus (24/741) Endeavor (47/749) Taxus (50/741) P = TLRTVR Rate P = % 3.2% 6.3% 6.7%

Endeavor IV TLR by Angio FU at 12 mos TLR Rate 12/141 4/133 22/60820/608 EndeavorTaxusEndeavorTaxus Angiographic Follow-up Clinical Follow-up P =0.070 P = % of pts 82% of pts

Endeavor In-Stent Late Loss Endeavor II, II CA, III and IV % of Patients TLR Probability In-Stent LL (mm) 800 pts with angio FU at 8 mos

Primary Endpoint: MACE at 12 months Secondary Endpoints: MACE at 30 days and 6 mo, Stent thrombosis, procedure success rate; device success rate; lesion success rate Drug Therapy: ASA and Clopidogrel ≥ 3 months Zotarolimus Dose: 10  g per mm stent length Primary Endpoint: MACE at 12 months Secondary Endpoints: MACE at 30 days and 6 mo, Stent thrombosis, procedure success rate; device success rate; lesion success rate Drug Therapy: ASA and Clopidogrel ≥ 3 months Zotarolimus Dose: 10  g per mm stent length Single and Multiple Coronary Artery Lesions Stent Diameters: mm Stent Length: 8/9-30 mm Single and Multiple Coronary Artery Lesions Stent Diameters: mm Stent Length: 8/9-30 mm N = 8,000 patients followed for 1 yr N = 2,000 patients followed for 2 yrs N = 2,000 patients followed for 2 yrs 200 sites Europe, Asia Pacific, Israel, New Zealand, South America Clinical/MACE 30d 6mo 2yr 12mo E-Five Registry Prospective Multicenter Registry PIs: Chaim Lotan, Ian Meredith, and Martin Rothman

Cardiac Death MI e-Five (n = 7832) TVRMACETLRTVFDeathARC ST Def ARC ST Def/Prob E-Five Registry Clinical Events to 12 mos

E-Five Registry High Risk Patients and Lesions High Risk included patients with: AMI (<72 hrs) 13.9% AMI (<72 hrs) 13.9% Multivessel stenting 10.9% Multivessel stenting 10.9% Long lesion (>27 mm) 16.6% Long lesion (>27 mm) 16.6% Ostial lesion 5.8% Ostial lesion 5.8% Bifurcated lesion 18.9% Bifurcated lesion 18.9% In-stent restenosis 4.8% In-stent restenosis 4.8% Graft stenting 1.8% Graft stenting 1.8% Severe tortuosity 3.3% Severe tortuosity 3.3% Small vessel (RVD<2.5 mm)OR Small vessel (RVD<2.5 mm)OR Large vessel (RVD>3.5 mm) 18.3% Large vessel (RVD>3.5 mm) 18.3% Left main stenting 2.4% Left main stenting 2.4% Moderate/severe Calcification 31.6% Moderate/severe Calcification 31.6% Moderate/severe renal impairment 5.3% Moderate/severe renal impairment 5.3%8314Patients6189 High Risk 2125SimpleSimple

0% 3% 6% 9% 12% 15% Time after Initial Procedure (days) Cumulative Incidence of TLR 2.8% 5.0% 4.5% Simple (n = 2,125 pts) High Risk (n = 6,189 pts) Overall (n = 8,314 pts) TLR Standard Overall High Risk E-Five Registry – “High Risk” Cumulative TLR to 12 mos

Endeavor 在 “ 真实世界 ” 研究中一致的 TLR ESTROFA-2 TLR rates not available. 1 E-Five 12-month data: Rothman et al., EuroPCR Lassen F et al., TCT months 12 months E-Five 1 n = 7832 SORT-OUT III 2 n = 1162

E fficacy Endeavor DES associated with higher angio late loss but, similar TLR/TVR, even in some high restenosis subgroups angio FU magnifies the visual “oculostenotic reflex” when late loss is relatively higher Endeavor is…

S afety Endeavor DES

Time after Initial Procedure (days) Cumulative Incidence of Def/Prob ST (ARC) % 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 0.9% 0.1% Endeavor Taxus 1-2year HR 0.17 [0.20, 1.39]P=0.059 Endeavor Taxus ENDEAVOR IV – 2yr FU ARC Def/Prob ST mos (VLST)

0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% ARC (Def/Prob) Endeavor No. at Risk Cypher Taxus Year2 Years3 Years Pooled Data Xience V /Promus NA NA 4 Years Days Endeavor Stent: 确保长期安全性 ARC 定义 ( 肯定 / 可能 ) 累积 4 年支架血栓 Results come from separate clinical trials. Data may differ in a head-to-head comparison. 1. Leon et al. TCT Mauri L et al. N Engl J Med. 2007;356: Serruys PW et al. ACC Stone GW et al. PCR 2008.

Endeavor 在 “ 真实世界 ” 的 研究一致的血栓发生率 n=1162 ARC 定义 1 E-Five 12-month data: Rothman et al., EuroPCR Hernandez et al., TCT Lassen F et al., TCT months 12 months E-Five 1 n = 7832 ESTROFA-2 2 n = 967 SORT-OUT III 3 n = 1162

% Physicians US (n=143) OUS (n=347) EndeavorCypherXience/PromusTaxus TCTMD Physician Survey on DES Use Patterns Safety (esp. stent thrombosis)

S afety Endeavor DES associated with improved pre-clinical safety evaluations AND very low clinical safety endpoints (death and MI) AND very low stent thrombosis (esp. very late) – “BMS-like” IVUS without late incomplete apposition or aneurysms Endeavor is…

All Comers Dual APT >3 to <12 months N = 8800 >200 International Sites Randomization 1:1 Endeavor N=4400 Clinical Follow-up 30d6mo 4 yr 3yr 30mo24mo5 yr Primary Endpoint: ARC Definite or Probable Stent Thrombosis at 3 years Principle Secondary Endpoints: Death/Non-Fatal MI, Cardiac death/Non-Fatal MI Additional Endpoints: MACCE, TLR, TVR, Procedural Success Clinical Follow up and Dual Antiplatelet Monitoring: At 30 days, and every 6 months until 3 years, than each year until 5 years Cypher N= mo18mo PROTECT Worldwide RCT (Endeavor vs. Cypher) >8500 pts enrolled

Endeavor Experience 1 case from Fu Wai 1 case from Fu Wai