1 Physics Testing for Performance Based Protocol version 2.1 QIBA Group 1C.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMAGE GENERATION IN CT.
Advertisements

CT Scanning: Dosimetry and Artefacts
Image Reconstruction.
Image Quality Bushong Chapter 7.
IMAGE QUALITY.
Computed Tomography Physics, Instrumentation, and Imaging
Key CT Parameters - What Are They Called and What Do They Mean?
Seeram Chapter 13: Single Slice Spiral - Helical CT
RAD309 Patient Dose.
NC HPS Meeting 10/18-19/2001 Boone, NC Recent Advances in CT Technology and Issues of CT Dosimetry T. Yoshizumi 1,2, M. Sarder 1, R. Reiman 1,2, E. Paulson.
MULTISLICE CT.
1 Physics Testing for Performance Based Protocol version 3.0 (Now based on ACRIN 6678) QIBA Group 1C.
5 th September 2005 Paul Collins Computed Tomography Dosimetry Assessment of Effective Dose in Computed Tomography using an Anthropomorphic Phantom Paul.
David E. Hintenlang, Ph.D., DABR
American Association of Physicists in Medicine AAPM Working Group on Standardization of CT Nomenclature and Protocols.
IMAGE QUALITY NOISE LINEARITY CROSS-FIELD UNIFORMITY IMAGE ARTIFACTS.
CT Physics V.G.Wimalasena Principal School of radiography.
Computed Tomography III
CT and IGCT Norbert J. Pelc, Sc.D. Department of Radiology Stanford University.
tomos = slice, graphein = to write
QA in digital mammography: local activities and remote control H. Bosmans et al.
Seeram Chapter 11: Image Quality
Basic principles Geometry and historical development
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY - I RAD 365 CT - Scan
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY I – RAD 365 CT - Scan
CT Quality Control for CT Scanners. Quality Control in CT A good idea? Yes Required for accreditation? Sometimes Improves image quality? Sometimes Depends.
QIBA CT Volumetrics - Cross-Platform Study (Group 1C) May 6, 2009 Interclinic Comparison of CT Volumetry Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance.
QIBA Quantitative CT: Towards routine quantitative CT in obstructive lung disease JP Sieren 1, PF Judy 2, DA Lynch 3, JD Newell 3, HO Coxson 4 and EA Hoffman.
Context: How does Profiling fit in to what we are trying to accomplish overall? 9/3/2015Buckler Biomedical1 Public Data Infrastructure QIBA Define Profiles.
FDG-PET/CT Technical Committee
Dose Survey in Computed Tomography DS /CM Kampala IAEA/RCA Kampala.
Radiation Protection of Patients Unit
QIBA CT Volumetrics - Cross-Platform Study (Group 1C) December 23, 2009 CT Cross-platform Sizing of Phantom Lesions Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance.
Computed Tomography Q & A
Reduction of effective and organ dose to the eye lens in cerebral MDCT scans using iterative image reconstruction Zizka J, Jandura J, Kvasnicka T, Klzo.
Aim Clinical indication Manufacturing scan prosthesis CT scan protocol Double scan registration wizard Double scan.
CT Instrumentation and X-ray system
Factors affecting CT image RAD
S Demehri 1, M.K Kalra 2, M.L Steigner 1, F.J Rybicki 1, M.J. Lang, 3, S.G Silverman 1. 1.Department of Radiology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard.
QIBA CT Volumetrics - Cross-Platform Study (Group 1C) September 2, 2009 Interclinical Comparison of CT Volumetry Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Optimization of Protection in Computed Tomography (CT)-What can radiographers do? IAEA Regional Training Course.
Scanner Validation via the SNM Clinical Trials Network Phantom Program Paul E. Christian Molecular Imaging Program Huntsman Cancer Institute University.
QIBA CT Volumetrics - Cross-Platform Study (Group 1C) March 18, 2009 Interclinic Comparison of CT Volumetry Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance.
Image Quality The capacity to define, measure, and assess image quality is a primarily responsibility of a CT Technologist.
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY - I RAD 365 CT - Scan
Intended learning outcome The student should learn at the end of this lecture procedures of CT pulmonary angiography.
Image Display. But first a review Remember the 3 main steps 1. Data Acquisition 2. Image Reconstruction 3. Image Display.
CT QUALITY MANAGEMENT. SPATIAL RESOLUTION CONTRAST RESOLUTION NOISE IMAGE ARTIFACTS RADIATION DOSE.
Part No...., Module No....Lesson No
Part No...., Module No....Lesson No
Quality Assurance.
Quality Control Bushong Chapter 10.
What are the dose quantities in CT ? IAEA/RCA Kampala Kampala.
Computed Tomography Computed Tomography is the most significant development in radiology in the past 40 years. MRI and Ultrasound are also significant.
Computed tomography. Formation of a CT image Data acquisitionImage reconstruction Image display, manipulation Storage, communication And recording.
Sunday Case of the Day How does the presence of the object impact patient dose? A. Increases by 20% - 50% B. Increases by 3% - 5% C. No Change D. Decreases.
Basic Principles of CT Scanning. CT CT - Computed Tomography CAT Scan - Computerized Axial Tomography.
IMAGE QUALITY. SPATIAL RESOLUTION CONTRAST RESOLUTION NOISE IMAGE ARTIFACTS RADIATION DOSE.
CT Scanner Detection system. 2 CT Scanner n Generator s High frequency, kW n X-ray tube s Rotating anode, high thermal capacity: 3-7 MHU s Dual.
Page 1 Physics Case of the Day - Thursday During routine QA testing of a computed tomography scanner, the physicist recorded the data below for the tube.
Date of download: 9/20/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. (a) Photographs of the anthropomorphic phantom used in this study and (b) the inner.
Single Slice Spiral - Helical CT
-42 Impact of signal non-repeatability on spectral CT images
CT Multi-Slice CT.
Role of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction (ASIR) in lowering radiation dose for pediatric head CT Electronic Poster-eP 140 Azadeh Tabari, MD.
Computed Tomography Image Reconstruction
Computed Tomography (CT) Dose Optimization
Physics Testing for ACRIN 6678 Protocol version 3.0 QIBA Group 1C
Wednesday Case of the Day
Presentation transcript:

1 Physics Testing for Performance Based Protocol version 2.1 QIBA Group 1C

Goal From a specification of image quality performance, determine scanner settings which achieve that performance

Statement of Image Quality Performance QIBA 1C Image Quality Performance Specification: QIBA 1C Image Quality Performance Specification: 120 kVp 120 kVp Reconstructed slice thickness between 0.75 to 1.25 mm Reconstructed slice thickness between 0.75 to 1.25 mm Beam Collimation (Detector configuration), Pitch and rotation time set to that scan through an entire thorax could be completed in under 15 seconds* Beam Collimation (Detector configuration), Pitch and rotation time set to that scan through an entire thorax could be completed in under 15 seconds* Spatial Resolution of 7 lp/cm on ACR phantom spatial resolution section in ACR Phantom Module 4 Spatial Resolution of 7 lp/cm on ACR phantom spatial resolution section in ACR Phantom Module 4 Standard Deviation (proxy for noise) of 12±1 HU in ACR Phantom water equivalent Uniformity Module- Module 3 Standard Deviation (proxy for noise) of 12±1 HU in ACR Phantom water equivalent Uniformity Module- Module 3 * Example of a breathold constraint; technically not an image quality performance specification, but related.

General Outline of Testing Protocol Record required data on accompanying spreadsheet, Record required data on accompanying spreadsheet, Set 120 kVp Set 120 kVp Set Scan Field of View or Patient Size (or equivalent) setting to values that are appropriate for phantom being scanned. Set Scan Field of View or Patient Size (or equivalent) setting to values that are appropriate for phantom being scanned. Set Slice thickness between 0.75 to 1.25 mm (depending on scanner’s available reconstructed slice thickness) Set Slice thickness between 0.75 to 1.25 mm (depending on scanner’s available reconstructed slice thickness) Set nominal beam collimation (NxT such as 16 x 0.5mm, or 128x0.6mm, 320 x 0.5 mm) rotation time and pitch such that scan can cover a 35 cm thorax in 15 seconds or less Set nominal beam collimation (NxT such as 16 x 0.5mm, or 128x0.6mm, 320 x 0.5 mm) rotation time and pitch such that scan can cover a 35 cm thorax in 15 seconds or less Values near pitch 1 are preferred. Values near pitch 1 are preferred. ITERATE (hopefully only a few times) on reconstruction kernels to meet spatial resolution spec. ITERATE (hopefully only a few times) on reconstruction kernels to meet spatial resolution spec. ITERATE (again, hopefully just a few times) on mAs or effective mAs setting, given beam collimation, pitch and rotation time. ITERATE (again, hopefully just a few times) on mAs or effective mAs setting, given beam collimation, pitch and rotation time.

1.On accompanying spreadsheet, record: a)Scanner Manufacturer (e.g GE) b)Model (e.g. VCT) c)Site id (e.g Scanner 95) d)Software version e)Testing date ( ) 2.Set kVp to 120 or just lower if there is no 120 kVp setting a)Record selected setting on accompanying spreadsheet 3.Select Patient Size (Toshiba), Scan Field of View (SFOV – GE) or equivalent for each scanner. The value selected should be appropriate for size of phantom being scanned (ACR Phantom is 20 cm in diameter); do not use setting for adult thorax. a)Record selected setting on accompanying spreadsheet 4.Set reconstructed slice thickness between 0.75 to 1.25 mm (depending on scanner’s available reconstructed slice thickness) 1.Record selected setting on accompanying spreadsheet Specific Instructions for Testing Protocol

5.Set the following parameters such that the scan could cover a 35 cm thorax in ≤ 15s AND that reconstructed slice thickness selected in step 4 is possible. The accompanying spreadsheet calculates scan time for 35 cm long thorax given selected parameters Select: a)Nominal beam collimation (NxT such as 16 x 0.5mm, or 64x0.625mm, 320 x 0.5 mm, etc.) b)Rotation time (in seconds) c)Pitch (Values near pitch 1 are preferred) Specific Instructions for Testing Protocol

6.ITERATE on recon kernels to get 7 lp/cm in ACR phantom 6.1 Scan phantom once through section 4 of ACR CT accreditation phantom, using: a)kVp selected in step 2 b)Patient size or SFOV selected in step 3 c)Reconstructed slice thickness selected in step 4 (use contiguous reconstructions) d)Other acquisition parameters (nominal beam collimation, rotation time, pitch) as selected in step 5. e)Select mA, mAs/rotation or effective mAs – for this step, use high enough mA to get 200 effective mAs; spreadsheet has calculator to confirm 200 effective mAs (even if you specify mA). a)Record mA or mAs or eff. mAs setting on spreadsheet. f)Instructions continued on next page Specific Instructions for Testing Protocol

6.2 Reconstruct images using several recon kernels, display with Level =1100, Window=100 a)For each recon filter used: a)Record the name of recon filter b)Record the size of the line pair object (e.g. 6 lp/cm etc.) observed for that filter b)Select smoothest kernel that allows user to see 7 lp/cm: a)Record the name of recon filter selected b)Provide image (DICOM or jpeg) reconstructed with this filter 6 lp/cm 7 lp/cm 6 lp/cm 7 lp/cm B30 B45 ACR Spatial Resolution Section (Module 4) Zoomed in Specific Instructions for Testing Protocol

7 ITERATE on mA or eff. mAs settings to meet Standard Deviation Specification ( 12±1 HU) 7.1 Scan and reconstruct images of section 3 (homogeneity) of ACR CT accreditation phantom, using: a)kVp selected in step 2 b)Patient size or SFOV selected in step 3 c)Reconstructed slice thickness selected in step 4 (use contiguous reconstructions) d)Other acquisition parameters (nominal beam collimation, rotation time, pitch) as selected in step 5. e)Reconstruction filter as selected in Step 6 f)Select an initial mA (or mAs or effective mAs) setting a)Record initial mA or eff. mAs setting on spreadsheet g)From Reconstructed image, measure standard deviation a)Record standard deviation for this setting on spreadsheet Specific Instructions for Testing Protocol

7.2 If standard deviation is within specification ( 12±1 HU), then: a)Record mA (or eff. mAs setting) b)Record scanner reported CTDIvol c)Provide image (DICOM or jpeg) using this setting. 7.3 If standard deviation is NOT within specification ( 12±1 HU), then: a)Adjust mA (or eff. mAs) setting and repeat steps 7.1.f and 7.1.g until standard deviation is within specification. b)When specification is met, then perform step 7.2 Specific Instructions for Testing Protocol

Example of Testing Protocol to Determine Parameters That Meet Specification Step 7 – Example on Siemens Sensation 64. Step 7 – Example on Siemens Sensation 64. Low Dose (25 eff. mAs) Low Dose (25 eff. mAs) Conventional Dose (250 eff. mAs) Conventional Dose (250 eff. mAs) 25 eff. mAs; std dev = eff. mAs; std dev = 12.2 ±1 Spec: std dev= 12±1 HU MEETS SPEC! Tech. Params: 120 kVp 1mm Pitch sec B45

Testing Protocol to Determine Parameters That Meet Specification Conclusion: For Siemens Sensation 64, these settings meet QIBA 1C specifications: Conclusion: For Siemens Sensation 64, these settings meet QIBA 1C specifications: 120 kVp 120 kVp Reconstructed Slice thickness 1.0 mm Reconstructed Slice thickness 1.0 mm Nominal beam collimation 64x0.6 (actually 32x0.6 with flying focal spot) Nominal beam collimation 64x0.6 (actually 32x0.6 with flying focal spot) Rotation time 0.5 seconds Rotation time 0.5 seconds Pitch 1.0 Pitch 1.0 Recon kernel B45 Recon kernel B45 Effective mAs setting 250 Effective mAs setting 250 CTDIvol = 18.0 mGys CTDIvol = 18.0 mGys

Next Scanner?