LHCb Radiation Shielding Wall – Lifting Tool Overview.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Check Beam Shear.
Advertisements

2.2 STRUCTURAL ELEMENT BEAM
Reinforced Concrete Flexural Members
STAIRCASES. STAIRCASES Introduction Staircases provide means of movement from one floor to another in a structure. Staircases consist of a number of.
Course Title: Strength of Materials (CVE 202)
1 Design and drawing of RC Structures CV61 Dr. G.S.Suresh Civil Engineering Department The National Institute of Engineering Mysore Mob:
Abstract This project is a structural analysis and design of a residential building located in JENIEN City, The building is consisted of 7 floors. The.
ONE-WAY SLAB. ONE-WAY SLAB Introduction A slab is structural element whose thickness is small compared to its own length and width. Slabs are usually.
Designing for Stiffness
AMADE University of Girona DRAFT NEXT-100 (1) Seismic pedestal and lead castle designs Authors: Jordi Torrent*, Roberto Palma**, Lluís Ripoll*, José L.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Mechanical Systems Peer Review, March 27, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-0XXXX Section 7.1 Stress Analysis 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Analysis of Basic Load Cases Axial Stress
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd
Minimum Weight Wing Design for a Utility Type Aircraft MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY AE 462 – Aerospace Structures Design DESIGN TEAM : Osman Erdem.
FOUNDATION DESIGN.
PSB dump endoscopy 30 th May 2013 Alba Sarrió on behalf of EN-STI-TCD Thanks to Pascal Mesenge (EN-MME)
Beam Design.
1 Design and drawing of RC Structures CV61 Dr. G.S.Suresh Civil Engineering Department The National Institute of Engineering Mysore Mob:
WORKSHEET 2 FAILURE, STRESS AND STRAIN
Chapter 6 Plate girder.
1 Design and drawing of RC Structures CV61 Dr. G.S.Suresh Civil Engineering Department The National Institute of Engineering Mysore Mob:
EDMS Nr /02/ tons, Platform – Q = daN, aprox. length to cover 4 m Cabling Groove – Q = 500 daN, aprox.
University of Palestine
Reinforced Concrete Design
Extra Examples.
FOOTINGS. FOOTINGS Introduction Footings are structural elements that transmit column or wall loads to the underlying soil below the structure. Footings.
Visit Gangway FromLHBIEP__0181 by Andre Coin ~ 2600 GANGWAY POSITION.
Supervisor: Dr. Mahmoud Dweikat.. Outline: 1. Introduction. 2. Static design 3. dynamic design 4. Conclusion.
1 5 December 2012 Laurent Roy Infrastructure / Electronics Upgrade -Cabling (long distance) -Rack and Crate (space, electrical distribution, cooling) -Detector.
Properties of Sections ERT 348 Controlled Environmental Design 1 Biosystem Engineering.
10/2010 IWLC2010 Global Design Effort 1 Brief Overview of Interaction Region Conventional Facilities in RDR Times Presenter Tom Lackowski.
1st LTEX 22 June 2009D.LACARRERE1 Protection of UX85 EDMS No IP8 Current Status & Plans  UX85 Expt Area  RB84 (8-7 sector)  RB86 (8-1 sector)
Mechanical Designs of The Central Detector Jinyu Fu
Structural Curriculum for Construction Management and Architecture Students 1 Prepared by: Ajay Shanker, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Professor Rinker School.
6- Calculation of shear stress at composite interface: A)Under service load: Strain and stress distributions across composite beam cross- section, under.
Pure Tungsten HCal: ‘staircase’ design Structural analyses and possible optimizations.
LHCb Radiation Shielding Wall – Status Wall Description Front Part 1 Aprox. 6 m Front Part 2 Aprox. 6.6 m Labyrinth.
Practical Design of PT Buildings
Stresses in Machine Elements Lecture Number - 03 Venkat S Mechanical Engineering SINHGAD COLLEGE OF ENGG,vadgaon Strength of Materials.
EC3 VERIFICATION SCIAENG® EC3 VERIFICATION SCIAENG® SPECIAL THANKS TO ALL INVOLVED D. ALVAREZ FEITO J.C. BATISTA LOPES C. BAULT O. BELTRAMELLO A.CATINACCIO.
Overview of Loads ON and IN Structures / Machines.
UNIT - IV PLASTIC ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES
AR362 - Structural Systems In Architecture IV Lecture : Foundations
Rad. Shield 2 Feb. 06D.LACARRERE1 IP8 POINT 8 – RADIATION SHIELD – UX85 Introduction  History (in brief)  Conceptual Design  Why installation shifted.
Platform Design for the Target Spectrometer using Heavy-Weight Rollers J. Lühning, GSI Darmstadt, Three design goals for Platform: Low construction.
SBN Far Detector Installation & Integration
Shear in Straight Members Shear Formula Shear Stresses in Beams
AQQABA SECONDRY SCHOOL Structural Design.
Design of Beams for Flexure
Outer Shell (fuel grain housing) Inner Shell (NOS/rocket housing)
Outline: Introduction: a ) General description of project b) Materials
Structural aspects related to the vacuum vessel of the SHIP Project
MODULE 4 BUILDING MATERIALS.
By Arsalan Jamialahmadi
soil improvement using shredded rubber tires
Structure II Course Code: ARCH 209 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg
- BEAM Sinusoidal Web Beam
Analysis and Design of Multiple story building
Analysis and Redesign of Al – Tatbeqea Faculty
Mahesh Dhakal Stud Wall Design Mahesh Dhakal
Design of Reinforced Concrete
Outline CH1.Introduction CH2.Preliminary Design CH3.3D Model.
Design Ribbed and Flat Slabs
Structure II Course Code: ARCH 209 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg.
By :Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg
An Najah National University Submitted to : Dr.Munther Diab .
Graduation Project 2 3D Seismic Design of Omar Al-Alool School
The Bunker Steel Structure – Structural Analysis
Neutron guide Shielding Concept
Presentation transcript:

LHCb Radiation Shielding Wall – Lifting Tool Overview

LHCb Radiation Shielding Wall – Lifting Tool Overview Protected area Shielding Wall Experiment Area

LHCb Radiation Shielding Wall – Lifting Tool The experiment area of LHCb caver is equipped with two overhead travelling cranes which characteristics are related in the following tables. Table 3: Characteristic for Carne PR721 (1x40 t). Number of hooks (tons)1 Load by hooks (tons)40 Free height under hook* (mm)13500 Free height under crane* (mm)13450 Lateral Stroke* (mm)11000 (X = to X = 5500) (*) theoretical nominal lengths than should be checked “in situ” Table 4: Characteristic for Carne PR720 (2x40 t). Number of hooks (tons)2 Load by hooks (tons)40 Free height under hook* (mm)13500 Free height under crane* (mm)13450 Lateral Stroke* (mm)11000 (X = to X = 5500) (*) theoretical nominal lengths than should be checked “in situ” Constraints OVERHEAD TRAVELING CRANES

LHCb Radiation Shielding Wall – Lifting Tool Constraints Wall end 12450* Free height under crane* (*) Aprox. dimensions Free height under hook* Free height* 1000

LHCb Radiation Shielding Wall – Lifting Tool More distant Concrete blocks 2400x1200x800 – 55 kN Constraints

LHCb Radiation Shielding Wall – Lifting Tool Crane Rail Outer Layer 1600 mm Inner Layer 1600 mm Upper Part 2400 mm Front Part 3200 mm Concrete blocks 2400x1600x800 – 75 kN Crane Rail Concrete blocks 2400x1600x800 Constraints ??

LHCb Radiation Shielding Wall – Lifting Tool Environment Front Part 3200 mm TOP VIEW Upper Part 2400 mm Inner Layer 1600 mm Outer Layer 1600 mm Concrete blocks 2400x1600x800 – 75 kN Concrete Pillar Chicane for services Crane Rail 7350 from cavern axis ??

LHCb Radiation Shielding Wall – Lifting Tool SIDE VIEW Front Part 3200 mm Upper Part 2400 mm Inner Layer 1600 mm Outer Layer 1600 mm Concrete blocks 2400x1600x800 – 75 kN Concrete Pillar Chicane for services Crane Rail ~ 750 ~ 350 ~ 250

LHCb Radiation Shielding Wall – Lifting Tool Environment constraint Protected area Experiment Area Shielding Wall

LHCb Radiation Shielding Wall – Lifting Tool Environment h2 h1 h5 h0 h3 ~ 8500 h7 C. Axis Protected area Shielding Wall Experiment Area ~ 7500 ~ 8300 ~ 3400 ~ 4000 ~ 1700 ~ 7800 h4 h6 Level Ref. Height from floor level (mm) Element h00Cavern floor h13000Chicane h26200Platform h36300Balcony h49400Platform h510700Tower h611800Tower h713400Gantry Table of heights

LHCb Radiation Shielding Wall – Lifting Tool Concrete block Counterweight FRONT VIEW TOP VIEW Max. 350 PR 721 Hook 250 Lifting tool – Option hook

LHCb Radiation Shielding Wall – Lifting Tool Wall Thickness Crane Limit 5500 from cavern axis Angle Lifting tool – Option hook

LHCb Radiation Shielding Wall – Lifting Tool Hook PR721 Concrete block CounterweightFRONT VIEW TOP VIEW Max. 350 PR 720 Hook for axis alignment position PR 720 Hook for tilted position 250 Lifting tool – Option hooks

LHCb Radiation Shielding Wall – Lifting Tool Distance between hooks Wall Thickness Crane Limit 5500 from cavern axis Angle ~ 6000 Lifting tool – Option hooks

LHCb Radiation Shielding Wall – Lifting Tool Study View from Experiment Catia 3D model as build performed by Andre Coin

LHCb Radiation Shielding Wall – Lifting Tool Study Catia 3D model as build performed by Andre Coin Hook max. lateral stroke position Range Area for 5 m Cantilever Lifting tool

LHCb Radiation Shielding Wall – Lifting Tool Overview CANTILEVER SECTION RESISTANCE MOMENT Considering a cantilever of 4.8 m a nominal load of 75 kN and the follow safety factors: -Partial safety factor νe = Dynamic factor ψ = 1.6 y = 1+ ξ*VL VL = 1 (m/s) ξ = 0.6 -Safety factor used = 1.6 x 1.5 = 2.4 That yields a section profile with a resistance moment at least of: MRd = (75000 x 2.4 x 4800) = 864 kNm The shear effort must be considered for each shape section. ~ HEB 500

LHCb Radiation Shielding Wall – Lifting Tool Overview CANTILEVER FEA CALCULATION Calculation has been performed with the following data: Material: Steel Density:7800 kg/m^3 Elastic Module: N/mm^2 Poisson ratio:0.3 FEA element type: ANSYS SHELL63 3D model main dimensions: Total length:4800 mm Profile height 1:500 Profile height 2:250 Length for h1 height:2000 Length for h2 height:1500 Top plate large: 300 mm Top plate thickness: 28 mm Bottom plate large:300 mm Bottom plate thickness:28 mm Web thickness:14.5 mm Load and safety factor Load:75 kN Global safety factor:2.4 Picture shows the von Mises Stress in the cantilever

LHCb Radiation Shielding Wall – Lifting Tool More info DocumentNumber Mur de blindage UX85 – Partie frontale – Plan 1 LHBIERM_0054 Mur de blindage UX85 – Partie frontale – Plan 2 LHBIERM_0055 LHCB – UX 85 - Mur de blindage – Blocs béton 2400x1200x800 mm LHBIERM_0056 LHCb Shielding Wall – Front part construction EDMS v3 Code D1 Lifting equipmentEDMS v2 Internal Working document, Technical specification for DO will be created if necessary

LHCb Radiation Shielding Wall – Lifting Tool Conclusion EDMS CONCLUSION The main dimensions and performances for the lifting tool are shown in this document but before the final design of the lifting tool, check all critical dimension as free heights “in-situ” is important, also the hook closer to Shielding Wall is a critical point in the design of the lifting tool, reducing this closer position will be an important improvement in the design. Option 1 lifting tool could be more expensive than option 2 but will be more suitable due to its smaller dimensions. Special attention must be taken in the suspension design in the pick-up point in order to reach the available free height under crane rails