Date Planning for Compliance with the Final 316(b) Phase II Regulations For APPA – March 8, 2004 David E. Bailey EPRIsolutions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Cycle Management
Advertisements

World Meteorological Organization Working together in weather, climate and water WMO OMM WMO Process and essential steps of Capacity Development.
Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA Region 10, Seattle,
Clean Water Act Integrated Planning Framework Sewer Smart Summit October 23, 2012.
Status of 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS Program in Clark County Presentation to Air Quality Forum May 10, 2005.
Florida Pilot Initiative for the Performance Approach to Measurement Systems Stephen Arms Florida Department of Health.
The decision box represents key management decisions and serve as the GATES which delineate phases. The decision can be to proceed, exit, or recycle. More.
Intentional Adulteration Phase 2 Workgroup 1.
REGULATORY ACCEPTANCE OF POST-CLOSURE CARE INNOVATION Mr. Charles G. Johnson Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Hazardous Material and.
Project Management Process. Project Complexity means that: a team of people are needed to supply expertise the work needs to be broken into manageable.
Role of actuarial function supporting the FLAOR leading to the ORSA Ian Morris June 2014.
1 Assessment: Audits. Assessment: Audits - Module 9 2 Learning Objectives At the end of this activity, you will be able to: Develop a process to prepare.
Opportunities for RAC Participation. Three Part discussion General presentation; Example of oil and gas decision making; and Panel Discussion of RAC involvement.
Chapter 2 A Strategy for the Appraisal of Public Sector Investments.
REVIEW AND QUALITY CONTROL
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Environmental Impact Assessment Prepared by: Miss Syazwani Mahmad Puzi School of Bioprocess Engineering UniMAP.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.
GEF Project Cycle Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in the Pacific SIDS Auckland, New Zealand, September 2008.
1 MBA PROJECT Nasir Afghan/Asad Ilyas. 2 Objective To enable MBA students to execute a client focused challenging assignment and to enhance.
Don Von Dollen Senior Program Manager, Data Integration & Communications Grid Interop December 4, 2012 A Utility Standards and Technology Adoption Framework.
GEF Project Cycle Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in Asia May 2008, Manila.
Commissioning of Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems Presented by: Charles Kilfoil Bechtel National Waste Treatment Plant Richland WA.
Clean Water Act Section 316(b) Proposal Regulations for Cooling Water Intake Structures at Existing Facilities April 6, 2011.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Water Quality Reduction Trading Program Draft Rule Language Policy Forum January 29,
Hunton & Williams EPA’s New Rule for Cooling Water Intake Structures at “Existing” (Phase II) Facilities Kristy A.N. Bulleit Hunton & Williams 1900.
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public 1 Version 4.0 Gathering Network Requirements Designing and Supporting Computer Networks – Chapter.
Energy, Environmental Impacts, and Sustainable Development Presented by Cat Shrier, Ph.D., P.G. Water Resources Planner (403)
1 Unit 1 Information for management. 2 Introduction Decision-making is the primary role of the management function. The manager’s decision will depend.
Biological Aspects of OTC Compliance in California October 15, 2013 John Steinbeck Tenera Environmental San Luis Obispo, CA 1.
Background Management Council (MC) was briefed on approach in early Feb 2003 and approved it Agreed that every Service Group (SG) will participate in.
Technology Transfer Execution Framework. 2 © 2007 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Relationship Between Your EPRI Value and.
The Use of Environmental Management Systems in Permitting Decisions National Environmental Partnership Summit 2006 May 10, 2006 Christine Steagall SC Department.
EPA Cooling System Regulations Hall of States Briefing February 22, 2011.
Welcome to Session 3 – Project Management Process Overview
1 Overview of Minerals Management Service’s Alternative Energy Program Ocean Law Conference May 22, 2008 Seattle, WA Walter D. Cruickshank Deputy Director.
Stationary and Area Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, D.C. Hall of the States 1.
EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.
METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Key Steps to Delivering Project 1.Lead agency submits final project scope, budget and schedule to MTC 2.MTC.
Watershed Management Act ESHB 2514 by 1998 Legislature RCW Voluntary Process Purpose: to increase local involvement in decision-making and planning.
Implementation of critical studies necessary to promote better planning and efficient management of hydropower projects in an Int’l River Basin context.
Item #11 Alternative Approaches for Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
1 Water Quality Antidegradation: Guidance to Implement Tier II Summary of Discussion: Review the Tier II Rule requirements. Clarify what feedback we are.
Leading the way; making a difference Ballast Water Management State of Affairs Hong Kong, 26 November 2013 Tim Wilkins INTERTANKO Senior Manager - Environment.
Clean Air Act Section 111 WESTAR Meeting Presented by Lisa Conner U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation November 6, 2013.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
Outreach for the On-Call Hazardous Waste Site Investigation and Design Services Contract Caltrans D9 February 17, 2016.
A Software Engineering Model Based Curriculum Development Approach Leon Pan University of the Fraser Valley.
Cottonwood’s Proposed Site-Specific Selenium Standards in the Cherry Creek Basin Comments Presented by: Cherry Creek Basin Water Quality Authority Regulation.
RECOVER Role/Science Guidance during Design, Construction and Implementation Phases RECOVER Science Meeting March 1, 2016.
Determinations / verifications under JI – Experience to date UNFCCC Technical Workshop on Joint Implementation Bonn, February 13 th, 2007 For the benefit.
Data Collection & Management: Observational Data Plan (ODP) & Data Management Plan (DMP) Sarai Piazza Craig Conzelmann.
CMRA WEBINAR ON NEW SPECIFICATIONS AND IMPLEMENTATION JUNE 15 TH, 2010 Recycled Asphalt Shingles in HMA Implementation: A Perspective from Wisconsin.
Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage Environmental Impact Statement Environmental Impact Report Information Presentation to YBFEPT July.
Proposed EPA Power Plant Cooling System Regulations.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Rob Connatser NSS Instrument Work Packages and XLPM.
ISO Session 3 Environmental Management and Ethics in Management.
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson
Joint Army-EPA Mitigation Rule
OECD good practices for setting up an RIA system Regional Capacity-Building Seminar on Regulatory Impact Assessment Istanbul, Turkey 20 November 2007.
GEF Project Cycle Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points
316(B) COOLING WATER INTAKE STRUCTURES
Stakeholder Engagement
Presentation transcript:

Date Planning for Compliance with the Final 316(b) Phase II Regulations For APPA – March 8, 2004 David E. Bailey EPRIsolutions

Title 2 316(b) Decisions Facing Companies and/or Facilities  How much is this going to cost?  Which of the 5 compliance options should I use?  Should I start collecting impingement and entrainment samples?  What technologies will work at my facilities?  What should I be doing to help my Company prepare to comply?  Where should I go to get help or how to I select a consultant or consultants?

Title 3 Good News, Bad News & Uncertainties  Good News – Lots of flexibility for compliance  Bad News – All Phase II facilities will have 3 ½ to 4 ½ years to complete the Comprehensive Demonstration Study (CDS)  Uncertainties: - Outcome of Phase II Litigation? - EPA Guidance? - State Implementation?

Title 4 Flexibility and Complexity The rule allows facilities many options for compliance and providing required CDS:  5 Compliance Options  4 Options for developing impingement mortality and entrainment baseline  Numerous choices for use of alternative fish protection technologies or operational measures  Numerous options for use of restoration measures as an alternative to technologies and operational measures  2 Options for demonstrating compliance

Title 5 Steps in Overall Compliance Process 7 to 10 yrs.  Step 1 - Develop Strategic Compliance Approach Submit Proposal for Information Collection  Step 2 - Collect and Analyze Data to Evaluate Technologies 2005 and Establish Impingement and Entrainment & Baseline 2006  Step 3 - Make Compliance Decision and Prepare and Submit 2007 Comprehensive Demonstration Study  Step 4 - Implement Compliance Plan 2008  Step 5 - Verification Monitoring and Compliance 2009 Determination based on Meeting the Performance & Standard or conformance with the Technology 2010 Compliance and Assessment Information  Step 6 - Depending on Compliance Option either Abbreviated ? Submittal or Submit Revised TIOP or Prepare and Submit a Site-Specific Compliance Plan

Title 6 Three Phased (CDS) Compliance Process Step 1 (2004) - Develop Strategic Compliance Plan based on facility: a). design & location of intake and cooling system b) available biological data/information, c). preliminary technology/operational measure evaluation d). compliance options - Prepare and Submit “Proposal for Information Collection” - Meet with NPDES permitting authority and other appropriate State and/or Federal to: o Educate them on 316(b) o Discuss compliance plan and proposal for information collection

Title 7 Three Phased CDS Process (Cont.) Step 2 (2005 & 2006) Data Gathering and Analysis: - Implement and monitor results of the information collection plan using an adaptive management approach - Complete biological & engineering study analysis Step 3 – (2007) Prepare Comprehensive Demonstration Study (CDS)Submittal: - Based on Step 2 results make final decisions for facility compliance (Jan/Feb 07) - Develop detailed information supporting compliance plan (Feb – June 07) - Internal review and approval of CDS (July/Aug 07) - Submit CDS to NPDES permitting authority (Mid- Sept 07)

Title 8 Goals of Strategic Compliance Planning  Select most cost-effective compliance approach  Determine information collection needs  Provide a basis for forecasting budget to: - prepare CDS - costs of compliance

Title 9 Evaluating Technologies and/or Operational is a Key Element of Strategic Compliance Planning Evaluating Alternative Technologies and Operational Measures is Necessary to: - Identify credit for existing design and operation - Identify any cost effective technologies and operational measures for compliance - Demonstrating that restoration measures will be more feasible, cost effective and environmentally desirable than technologies and/or operational measures - Evaluate potential for use of an “approved technology” - Developing the cost component for both the cost-cost and cost-benefit test

Title 10 Impingement Mortality and Entrainment Baseline Characterization Studies  Most expensive component of CDS if biological field sampling is necessary.  A well designed Impingement Mortality and Entrainment Characterization should be based on: - potential technologies and/or operational measures that may be used for compliance - overall compliance strategy  If entrainment sampling is necessary be ready of 2005 sampling season

Title 11 What Should Facilities Be Doing Now  Educating management on rule impacts to facilities  Organizing a 316(b) team. Team members might include: corporate support, engineer, facility operator and/or environmental coordinator.  Deciding how much can be done in house and where consulting support is needed  Preparing strategic compliance plans  Forecasting budgets to: - prepare CDS - estimate costs of technologies and/or operational measures and/or restoration measures for compliance

Title 12 UWAG Advisory Session Benefits of Attendance include: - Better understanding of regulatory requirements - Technical presentations on studies and technologies - Feedback on questions that have been posed by companies who read the rule - Feedback on EPA responses to ?s - Information to help educate State and/or Federal regulators - Opportunity to meet vendors providing consulting services or compliance technologies.

Date For Assistance in 316(b) Phase II Strategic Compliance Planning or Full Compliance Support Sevices Contact: Dave Bailey 571/ Working in Partnership with Alden Research Laboratory, Inc.