Www.bmvi.de Safety Distances and Object Classifications for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF-04-05.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intersection Sight Distance Case C1 Ryan Miller CE /19/10.
Advertisements

Assessing and Managing Risk
Driving In Different Environments & Situations
The Driving Task The driving task is everything it takes to operate a motor vehicle. The three skills of the driving task are: A. Physical-coordination.
Transportation Tuesday TRANSPORTATION TUESDAY REAR ENDERS – HOW CAN WE PREVENT THEM? A collision occurs when two vehicles occupy the same space!
INTRODUCTION TO TRANSPORT Lecture 7 Introduction to Transport Lecture 7: Signal Coordination.
ACSF Informal Group Industry proposals 1 st Meeting of ACSF informal group April 29 and 30, 2015 in Bonn 1 Informal Document ACSF
Ch. 16 Driving on Highways.
IPDE Process IDENTIFY Give meaning to what you see. The sooner you identify a possible hazard the more time you will have to react safely. Look For:
The IPDE Method.
“Drivers’ Ed.” Physics Interesting examples from the Alabama Driver Manual Albert A. Gapud University of South Alabama AAPT-Alabama.
Outline of Definition of Automated Driving Technology Document No. ITS/AD (5th ITS/AD, 24 June 2015, agenda item 3-2) Submitted by Japan.
Presentation for Document ACSF-03-03_rev1 Oliver Kloeckner September rd meeting of the IG ASCF Munich, Airport Informal Document.
Damage Mitigation Braking System
Braking Distance.  The distance a car travels while it is trying to stop is called the braking or stopping distance.
Interacting With Other Users. Most collisions occur when two or more objects try to occupy the same space at the same time. Drivers must identify movement.
THINK*PAIR*SHARE Why do you think the chances of a collision are greater at an intersection than at any other point on the roadway? (Your answer should.
DEFENSIVE DRIVING “ A BETTER USE OF MIRRORS” DEFENSIVE DRIVING.
1 ACSF Test Procedure Draft proposal – For discussion OICA and CLEPA proposal for the IG Group ACSF Tokyo, 2015, June Informal Document ACSF
Identification of regulatory needs for ACSF Oliver Kloeckner 16-17th June nd meeting of the IG ASCF Tokyo – Jasic Office Informal Document.
Driving in City Traffic.  This chapter discusses the skills necessary to navigate driving situations in city traffic.
Protective Braking for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF
Minimum Risk Manoeuvres (MRM)
Research on HMI Homework item 1 (ACSF-01-13)
Stopping A Car This section is about stopping a car safely.
Results of the Study on ACSF Transition Time Informal Document: ACSF National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory, Japan 4th Meeting of ACSF.
Traffic Safety Terms. Acceleration Lane An expressway lane used to speed up to highway speed.
v- tx-tKinematics Reaction Time Chase.
B1.7a Using formulas to calculate displacement Chapter B1.
Dynamic Turn Indicator: Research/Investigation Findings Informal document GRE (70th GRE session (21-23 October 2013, agenda item 5(f))
ACSF - Traffic Jam Assist on all roads OICA and CLEPA proposal for the IG Group ACSF Tokyo, 2015, June Informal Document ACSF
1 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016 Requirements for “Sensor view” & Environment monitoring version 1.0 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA.
Module 3 Brianna James Percy Antoine. Entering the Roadway/Moving to the Curb/Backing  The seven steps to safely pull from a curb. Place foot firmly.
St. Francis Prep Driver Education
Informal Document: ACSF-06-16
Unit 5 VEHICLE HANDLING SAFE VEHICLE CONTROL
Lane Change Test for ACSF
Informal Document: ACSF Rev.1
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
Dr. Patrick Seiniger, Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt)
Automatic Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS)
Timing to be activated the hazard lights
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
Stopping distances.
AUTOMOBILE PARTS.
#SafeDriver ROAD SAFETY, A MAJOR PRIORITY FOR TOTAL “I adapt my speed without ever exceeding the speed limit” Awareness Meetings, 2017.
Driving in City Traffic
Dr. Patrick Seiniger, Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt)
Industry Homework from AEB 02
on Transition for level 3 Automated Driving system
Vehicle Characteristics and Car Following
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
AEBS 4th Meeting UK Position Paper December 18 OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE
Chapter 1 Introduction.
Quintessences Proposal for Category C of Germany and Japan
A car is decelerated to 20 m/s in 6 seconds
Baseline (Aiming for 4): List the factors
Safety Distance to the front
Reaction time & Safety time gap
Reason for performance difference between LVW and GVW
Comparison of Cat.C HMI solution and vehicle without Cat.C
AEB 07 – Euro NCAP Summary Overview
“ A BETTER USE OF MIRRORS”
Informal Document: ACSF-10-08
Reaction Time & Braking Distance
“ A BETTER USE OF MIRRORS”
Safety considerations on Emergency Manoeuver
lesson 14.2 FOLLOWING AND MEETING TRAFFIC
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Automated Lane Keeping Systems
Presentation transcript:

Safety Distances and Object Classifications for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF-04-05

Safety Distances Aim: No collision with other road users, road furniture or other objects while using ACSF Rationale: - ACSF may encourage driver to carry out secondary tasks so that he is distracted or looses situation awareness - ACSF actions may affect other road users (e.g. during a lane change) Solution: Requirements for safe distances (without endangering other traffic) at which speed and position of other objects should be classified

Safe distances (without endangering other traffic) at which speed and position of other objects should be classified: Front: x FOC = x BD = v VUT 2 / (2∙a VUT ) Reference is the vehicle front end Reaction time is not needed because of the automatic protective brake Example to ‚Collision Avoidance with Stationary Target Test‘: v VUT = 120 km/h, BD with mean deceleration of a VUT = 3.7 m/s 2 (min. value for wet roads in German directive for road construction) V FO = 0 km/h => x FOC = m Worst Case*: v VUT = 130 km/h, BD with mean deceleration of a VUT = 3.7 m/s 2 V FO = 0 km/h => x FOC = m *Driving with max. system speed of 130 km/h x: relative Distance m v: Speed km/h a: Deceleration m/s 2 FOC: Front Object Classified BD: Brake Distance m FO: Front Object VUT: ACSF Car (Vehicle Under Test) Safety Distances (Front) a VUT includes the deceleration built up phase

Safe distances (without endangering other traffic) at which speed and position of other objects should be classified: Rear:x ROC = x RT + x BB + x BD +x ST (Reference is the vehicle rear end) Example to Lane Change Test‘: v VUT = 22,2 m/s (80 km/h), v RO = 36,1 m/s (130 km/h), RT = 1.2 s, BB = 0.5 s (to a RO = 3 m/s 2 with 6 m/s 3 ), BD with max. reasonable deceleration of a RO = 3 m/s 2, ST 1 s => x ROC = 16.7 m m m m = 77.9 m Worst Case*: v VUT = 16,6 m/s (60 km/h), v RO = 36,1 m/s (130 km/h), RT = 1.2 s, BB = 0.5 s (to a RO = 3 m/s 2 with 6 m/s 3 ), BD with max. reasonable deceleration of a RO = 3 m/s 2, ST 1 s => x ROC = 23.3 m m m m = m *German Autobahn: Normal driving without traffic jam for full speed range system (up to max. 130 km/h) x: relative Distance m v: Speed km/h a: Deceleration m/s 2 ROC: Rear Object Classified RT: Reaction Time s* BB: Brake Built up time s* BD: Brake Distance m* ST: Safety Time gap to VUT after braking s* RO: Rear Object VUT: ACSF Car (Vehicle Under Test) *for Rear Object driver x BB is calculated with a mean deceleration a RO /2 = 1.5 m/s 2 Safety Distances (Rear)

Safe distances (without endangering other traffic) at which speed and position of other objects should be classified: Sides: x SOLC = x SORC = 2 ∙ x L Reference is the vehicle longitudinal axis because this is independent from the vehicle width and the lane width is defined Reaction time is not needed because lateral velocities are low and automatic steering is active Assumed case*: x L = 4 m (lane width), VUT must be abel to check two lanes for objects to the desired side for a lane change => x SOLC = x SORC = 8 m (to each side of the vehicle longitudinal axis) *German Autobahn: Normal driving on a 3-lane Autobahn x: Distance m SOLC: Side Object Left Classified SORC: Side Object Right Classified L: Lane VUT: ACSF Car (Vehicle Under Test) Safety Distances (Sides) 2 ∙ x L

360° Surround View on Safe Distances Side L Side R Front Rear x SOC ≥ 8 m x FOC ≥ 176 mx ROC ≥ 113 m