RF break-down studies in the CTF3 TBTS Accurate measurements on TBTS RF Break-Down Studies in the CTF3 TBTS 29 Jan. 2013 Wilfrid Farabolini 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam-based Measurements of HOMs in the HTC Adam Bartnik for ERL Team, Daniel Hall, John Dobbins, Mike Billing, Matthias Liepe, Ivan Bazarov.
Advertisements

Breakdown Rate Dependence on Gradient and Pulse Heating in Single Cell Cavities and TD18 Faya Wang, Chris Nantista and Chris Adolphsen May 1, 2010.
Probe beam distortion in TBTS due to high gradient RF acceleration (first part: observations) CTF3/TBTS Logbook 17 May 2013 Wilfrid Farabolini – Alexej.
High gradient test results from X-BOX1 Ben Woolley XBOX Team CERN, Switzerland February 2014.
INVESITGATION OF AN ALTERNATE MEANS OF WAKEFIELD SUPPRESSION IN CLIC MAIN LINACS CLIC_DDS.
CARE07, 29 Oct Alexej Grudiev, New CLIC parameters. The new CLIC parameters Alexej Grudiev.
1 X-band Single Cell and T18_SLAC_2 Test Results at NLCTA Faya Wang Chris Adolphsen Jul
R. Corsini, CLIC Project Meeting - 24 th May 2013 CTF3 1 CTF3: Highlights of the 1 st run R. Corsini for the CTF3 Team 1.
Alessandro Cappelletti for CTF3 collaboration 5 th May 2010 RESULTS OF BEAM BASED RF POWER PRODUCTION IN CTF3.
1HG may 2013 TriesteTesting with beam in CTF3 - W. Farabolini Testing with beams in CTF3: breakdown kick and advanced diagnostics.
CTF3 commissioning status R. Corsini - CTF3 committee 17 th September 2009 Update on CTF3 Operations and schedule This time I will try to give a more complete.
RF background, analysis of MTA data & implications for MICE Rikard Sandström, Geneva University MICE Collaboration Meeting – Analysis session, October.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
Drive Beam and CTF 3 International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010 October 22, 2010 Erik Adli, Department of Physics, University of Oslo and CERN Bernard.
Photocathode 1.5 (1, 3.5) cell superconducting RF gun with electric and magnetic RF focusing Transversal normalized rms emittance (no thermal emittance)
Longitudinal transfer function a.k.a. (M 55 ) measurements at the JLab FEL Pavel Evtushenko, JLab  Jlab IR/UV upgrade longitudinal phase space evolution.
IWLC - 21st october 2010Califes CTF3 probe beam - Wilfrid Farabolini1 CTF3 Probe Beam Status 1.
Energy Spectrometer for the ILC Alexey Lyapin University College London.
Analysis of TBTS high-gradient testing and breakdown kick measurements Overview of on-going studies Preliminary results 2012 Feb. 291 RF structure development.
An RF & High-Speed Acquisition Systems for High-Gradient Tests at CLIC Test Facility Raquel Fandos.
R. Corsini, CLIC Project Meeting October 24, 2012 CTF3 Experimental program for end 2012 R. Corsini for the CTF3 Team 1.
The beam-based alignment and feedback systems, essential operations of the future colliders, use high resolution Beam Position Monitors (BPM). In the framework.
Tests of AWAKE spectrometer screen and camera at PHIN Introduction Layout Procedure Setup, results (runs 1 – 5) Conclusions L. Deacon, S. Mazzoni, B. Biskup.
Two-beam Test Stand Status and Results Roger Ruber & Igor Syratchev for the TBTS team.
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
A simple formula for calculating the momentum spread from the longitudinal density distribution and RF form Recycler Meeting March 11, 2009 A. Shemyakin.
FONT Hardware Processing electronics and current beam tests Stephen Molloy Queen Mary, University of London.
J.L. Navarro (CERN), for the CLIC/CTF3 collaboration.
1 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle.
PETS TESTING ANALYSIS 4 th X-band Structure Collaboration Meeting 3 rd May 2010 Alessandro Cappelletti for CLIC collaboration.
Some quick news about X-Box1 data processing for BD location.
Andreas Jansson, "Quadrupole Pick-ups", LHC BI-Review, November 19-20, Quadrupole Pick-ups  What is a quadrupole pick-up?  PS pick-ups and experimental.
1 R. Corsini – CLIC Project Meeting CTF3 Update CTF3 Update R. Corsini for the CTF3 Team 1.
KCS and RDR 10 Hz Operation Chris Adolphsen BAW2, SLAC 1/20/2011.
#3205 Summary 6 th Nov 2012 Studying beam instabilities along bunch train 3 observables – INJ-BPM-01 fast bunch electronics – INJ FCUP-01 – Laser pulse.
D. Lipka, V. Vogel, DESY Hamburg, Germany, Oct Optimization cathode design with gun5 D. Lipka, V. Vogel, DESY Hamburg, Germany.
DaMon: a resonator to observe bunch charge/length and dark current. > Principle of detecting weakly charged bunches > Setup of resonator and electronics.
ON/OFF news. Reflected Transmitted Stroke 8.0 mm RF power, dB Piston position (gap width), mm ON OFF Compact design of the high RF power variable (mechanically)
Status of high gradient experiments at Nextef Kazue Yokoyama, Toshiyasu Higo, Yasuo Higashi, Shuji Matsumoto, Shigeki Fukuda Accelerator Laboratory, KEK.
Two-Beam Test Stand results 5th Collaboration Meeting on X-band Accelerator Structure Design and Test Program SLAC, Stanford, CA, USA Erik Adli, University.
Some Results and Analysis from CTF3 1HG2012-April-18 Some Results and Analysis from CTF3 W. Farabolini - A. Palaia.
Electron Spectrometer: Status July 14 Simon Jolly, Lawrence Deacon 1 st July 2014.
Comparison of breakdown behavior between klystron and beam driven structure W. Farabolini With the support of J. Kovermann, B. Woolley, J. Tagg 1HG2013.
Development of a High Resolution Cavity BPM for the CLIC Main Beam
Oleksiy Kononenko CERN and JINR
High gradient test results from X-BOX1 Ben Woolley XBOX Team CERN, Switzerland December 2013.
CLIC Workshop 2008 TBTS status. PETS testing program and installation status. Igor Syratchev & Germana Riddone for the CLIC team.
Accelerating structure prototypes for 2011 (proposal) A.Grudiev 6/07/11.
Experience with Novosibirsk FEL Getmanov Yaroslav Budker INP, Russia Dec. 2012, Berlin, Germany Unwanted Beam Workshop.
FLASH RF gun developments. Sven Pfeiffer for the LLRF team FEL Seminar Hamburg,
C/S band RF deflector for post interaction longitudinal phase space optimization (D. Alesini)
30GHz system improvements Jan Kovermann RF meeting
11th February th CTF3 Committee - Wilfrid Farabolini1 Status and progress of the CTF3 probe beam 1.
CTF3 PROBE BEAM LINAC COMMISSIONG AND OPERATIONS
First Year of Operation at the Two-beam Test Stand
Status and progress of the CTF3 probe beam
Breakdown position analysis
News from TBTS International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders,
CLIC RF Structure Development Mtg, Alexey Dubrovskiy and CTF team
CLIC Workshop 2016: Main Beam Cavity BPM
Have a chance to operate your own beam at CERN
Physics design on Injector-1 RFQ
Review of rf structure test results
9/10/2018 News on operation Second commissioning phase from 30th of March to 9th of April Aline Curtoni, Claire Simon, Franck Peauger, Wilfrid Farabolini.
NanoBPM Status and Multibunch Mark Slater, Cambridge University
Performance test of ACEM-detector (Aluminum Cathode Electron Multiplier) Marcus Palm AB-ATB-EA M. Palm, CERN.
Modified Beam Parameter Range
Slope measurements from test-beam irradiations
Positive Ion Current – Hot Coulomb Explosion?
CLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3
Presentation transcript:

RF break-down studies in the CTF3 TBTS Accurate measurements on TBTS RF Break-Down Studies in the CTF3 TBTS 29 Jan Wilfrid Farabolini 1

The newly installed structures RF Break-Down Studies in the CTF3 TBTS 29 Jan Wilfrid Farabolini 2 Franck Peauger - IRFU Germana Riddone Since September 2012

New setup with 2 accelerating structures Roger Ruber 2 phase shifters 1 variable splitter 15 RF channels (Diodes and IQ) 7 BPMs on PB 2 screens 1 Flash box Thermal probes and flow rate 3 PMTs 16 WFMs channels Franck’s talk 1 FCU Alexey’s talk Andrea’s talk RF Break-Down Studies in the CTF3 TBTS 29 Jan Wilfrid Farabolini 3

Accurate Energy measurement It is no longer possible with the energy gained with 2 ACS to track simultaneously on the same spectrum line screen both accelerated and non accelerated beams (dipole strength change is required) Califes beam energy fluctuates by +/- 2 MeV with a period around 150 s (temperature ?) A fit with a sinusoidal function is valid at least for a duration up to 30 minutes Energy [MW] Time RF Break-Down Studies in the CTF3 TBTS 29 Jan Wilfrid Farabolini 4 For stabilization see Tobias Persson talk, Wednesday

Procedure to determine the maximum energy gain Extrapolated Califes energy is subtracted to measured accelerated beam energy gain. During RF power cut magnet is set to measure Califes energy and check extrapolation RF powers from couplers is logged as well Califes / Drive beam phase is scanned over 360 deg of 12 GHz Upstream / downstream phase was previously adjusted to identical phase vs. beam RF Break-Down Studies in the CTF3 TBTS 29 Jan Wilfrid Farabolini 5

Upstream / downstream phase optimization Inter-structures phase shifter is moved up to the point where no acceleration is measured whatever the Drive Beam / Califes phase. At this phase the 2 structures act oppositely. From this point we move the phase by 180 deg in order to place the 2 structures at the same phase vs. the probe beam. Due to this phase shifter lack of repeatability no systematic scan was performed after this setting Califes phase scan with ACS’s phase set in opposition constant energy = Califes energy (195 MeV) Input phases when ACSs in opposition RF Break-Down Studies in the CTF3 TBTS 29 Jan Wilfrid Farabolini 6

Energy gain as function of RF power Since both the ACS measured power are not equal, an averaged value is computed for the RF power coordinate. With this representation the maximum measured acceleration constantly failed to reach its nominal value by 4 MeV approx. Energy gain versus root mean power during two records of phase scan Phase scan Power fluctuations RF Break-Down Studies in the CTF3 TBTS 29 Jan Wilfrid Farabolini 7

Structure tuning frequency check LO = MHz LO = MHz LO = MHz Down mixing the RF output signal produced by a short probe beam pulse (6 bunches) allows to measure the ACS resonant frequency. Very well tuned (better than 1 MHz). The RF produced last 65 ns (structure filling time) RF output frequency is now forced by the probe beam pulse frequency RF output rising time = ACS filling time (65 ns) RF output rising time + sustain time = pulse length RF output falling time = ACS filling time (65 ns) Short pulse: 4 ns LO = MHz Long pulse: 150 ns Long pulse: 194 ns LO = MHz Alexandra Andersson RF Break-Down Studies in the CTF3 TBTS 29 Jan Wilfrid Farabolini 8

Water temperature method to derive the deposited mean RF power Upstream Downstrea m File Datetime starttime stop moy time start moy time stopPower RF Power TempRatioTemp inTemp outPower RF Power TempRatioTemp inTemp out 2012_11_ _11_ _11_30_a flow rate change 2012_12_ _12_ _12_ _12_ Average : From thermal method and averaging on a lot of runs, it appears that the RF power is overestimated by a factor 1.35 for the Upstream ACS and 1.08 for the Downstream ACS RF Break-Down Studies in the CTF3 TBTS 29 Jan Wilfrid Farabolini 9

Energy gain vs. power after recalibration Applying the correction factor derived by the thermal method allows to plot an acceleration vs. power chart much closer to the nominal ACS performances. However, an accurate recalibration of the RF couplers lines as well as the diodes crates has been done during this winter shutdown and sensitivity has been improved. The correction factors computed by integrating power cannot reveal the diode calibration linearity default (automatic calibration procedure installed) Energy gain versus root mean corrected power RF Break-Down Studies in the CTF3 TBTS 29 Jan Wilfrid Farabolini 10

Energy spread vs. accelerating phase Energy spread (  of Gaussian fit and FWHM) is maximum when energy gain is null And is minimum when energy gain is extreme (pos. or neg.) RF Break-Down Studies in the CTF3 TBTS 29 Jan Wilfrid Farabolini 11

Energy spread and bunch length measurement An efficient method of deriving bunch length and even slice energy… 12 GHz = 83.3 ps: fast slope and high accelerating field Ex.  ES min = 1.1 MeV,  ES max = 9.05 MeV,  = 8.98 MeV ->  length = Asin(  E gain max) = 16.2 deg ->  length = 3.7 ps -> FWHM gauss = 8.7 ps Resolution approx. 0.8 ps FWHM A model should be developed taking into account the energy and charge distribution within the bunch Sinus fit period should be ¼ T 3GHZ for energy gain and 1/8 T 3GHZ for energy spread. Phase shifter linearity seems poor on its lower range. RF Break-Down Studies in the CTF3 TBTS 29 Jan Wilfrid Farabolini 12

RF and BDs detection signal monitoring Pulses main parameters are continuously data logged 6 hours RF Break-Down Studies in the CTF3 TBTS 29 Jan Wilfrid Farabolini 13

Accurate BD detection Two criteria used: Reflected Power and Missing Energy Miss = Ener in – Ener out x attenuation Data are post processed with adapted thresholds. Thresholds = mean  [ P Gauss (X>3.72  ) = ] Compromise between Detection prob. and False Alarm prob. RF Break-Down Studies in the CTF3 TBTS 29 Jan Wilfrid Farabolini 14

BD count evolution and BD rate What to do with the periods of high activity ? (clusters) RF Break-Down Studies in the CTF3 TBTS 29 Jan Wilfrid Farabolini 15

BDR as function of RF Power But conditioning is still under progress previous structure:  RF pulses theses structures:  RF pulses ? 1 day of Stand alone Test Stand:  RF pulses RF Break-Down Studies in the CTF3 TBTS 29 Jan Wilfrid Farabolini 16 Date Mean power [MW] sigma power [MW] Pulse number BD ACS up BD ACS down 2012_11_ _11_ _11_ _11_ _12_ _12_ _12_ _12_

BDR as function of Power (2) Fitting the Power distribution when BD by a power law of the power distribution of all pulses provide an exponent between 12 and 18. RF power density of Probability of all RF pulses (blue), of RF pulse with BD (red) and power law fit of BD probability (green) Previous ACS Upstream new ACS RF Break-Down Studies in the CTF3 TBTS 29 Jan Wilfrid Farabolini 17

BD location inside the structures Reflected rising edge Transmitted falling edge 1 st method (transmission): looking at BD position when BD strikes Input falling edge Reflected falling edge 4 th method (echo): looking at BD position when RF pulse stops Reflected rising edge 2 nd and 3rd methods (combining previous signals with FCU): Transmitted falling edge FCU edge RF Break-Down Studies in the CTF3 TBTS 29 Jan Wilfrid Farabolini 18 First 3 methods give consistent results, method 4 seems to show a BD drift toward the structure input coupler BD with precursor BD w/o precursor

Hot spot at cell #6 in the previous structure 29 Jan Wilfrid Farabolini RF Break-Down Studies in the CTF3 TBTS19 Previous ACS compilation

No hot spot in the 2 present structures RF Break-Down Studies in the CTF3 TBTS 29 Jan Wilfrid Farabolini 20 Present ACSs compilation

Summary New ACSs are still in conditioning (not yet at 100 MV/m). Accurate procedures have been developed to assess their characteristics (energy gain, RF power, BD detection). Energy spread at zero crossing allows to measure the bunch length. BDR are presently on the same curve than for the previous structure. BD locations show no hot spot for whatever structures. 29 Jan Wilfrid Farabolini RF Break-Down Studies in the CTF3 TBTS21

Back-up slides 29 Jan Wilfrid Farabolini RF Break-Down Studies in the CTF3 TBTS22

FCU and PM FCU signals reliability When RF transmitted power is low (early BD), BD produced electrons are not likely to reach the FCU (not accelerated towards the FCU) Also when RF reflected power is low FCU signal is often weak (why ?) OTR light seen on FCU mirror surface is current and energy dependent but not saturated. (Blue dots correspond to low reflected power) Alexandra A. CTF3 days - 11 October W. Farabolini FCU max output [V] PM on FCU max output [V] Max Transmitted Power [MW] Max Reflected Power [MW] Max Transmitted Power [MW]

Coupled BDs 29 Jan Wilfrid Farabolini RF Break-Down Studies in the CTF3 TBTS24 Reflected power Transmitted power Input power