Overview of US Work on Simulation and Reconstruction Frederick Luehring August 28, 2003 US ATLAS Computing Meeting at BNL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TYPE TEXT HERE On July 4, 2012, scientists at CERN announced the discovery of an essential part of the Standard Model of particle physics: the Higgs.
Advertisements

ATLAS ATLAS PESA Meeting 25/04/02 B-Trigger Working Group Work-plan This talk:
Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS Andrea Dell’Acqua - CERN PH/SFT on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
DSP online algorithms for the ATLAS TileCal Read Out Drivers Cristobal Cuenca Almenar IFIC (University of Valencia-CSIC)
U.S. ATLAS Software WBS 2.2 S. Rajagopalan July 8, 2003 DOE/NSF Review of LHC Computing.
The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.
TB & Simulation results Jose E. Garcia & M. Vos. Introduction SCT Week – March 03 Jose E. Garcia TB & Simulation results Simulation results Inner detector.
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
Jet Reconstruction and Calibration in Athena US ATLAS Software Workshop BNL, 27/08/03 Ambreesh Gupta, for the JetRec Group University of Chicago Outline:
Algorithm / Data-flow Interface
Hadron Calorimeter Readout Electronics Calibration, Hadron Calorimeter Scintillator Upgrade, and Missing Transverse Momentum Resolution due to Pileup Zishuo.
An Executive Summary of US ATLAS workshop on Beyond The Standard Model Physics Time & Place: Thursday 3/30 +Friday 4/1, Columbia University Topics: Beyond.
Simulation Calor 2002, March. 27, 2002M. Wielers, TRIUMF1 Performance of Jets and missing ET in ATLAS Monika Wielers TRIUMF, Vancouver on behalf.
Event Data Model in ATLAS Edward Moyse (CERN) On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration CHEP 2004, Interlaken.
The Region of Interest Strategy for the ATLAS Second Level Trigger
ATLAS, U.S. ATLAS, and Databases David Malon Argonne National Laboratory DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS and CMS Computing Projects Brookhaven National Laboratory.
DOE Rev of Run IIb Sep 24-26, 2002  Silicon software and simulation Scope:  Design and/or modify software tools for Run IIb silicon tracker simulation.
5 May 98 1 Jürgen Knobloch Computing Planning for ATLAS ATLAS Software Week 5 May 1998 Jürgen Knobloch Slides also on:
June 02 John Huth, LHC Computing 1 U.S. ATLAS Overview  Project ManagementJ. Huth  SoftwareT.Wenaus  ArchitectureD. Quarrie  PhysicsI. Hinchliffe 
19 November 98 1 Jürgen Knobloch ATLAS Computing ATLAS Computing - issues for 1999 Jürgen Knobloch Slides also on:
Fabiola Gianotti, 31/8/’99 PHYSICS and SOFTWARE ATLAS Software Week 31/8/’99 Fabiola Gianotti Software requirements of physics groups What should Detector.
Andreas Morsch, CERN EP/AIP CHEP 2003 Simulation in ALICE Andreas Morsch For the ALICE Offline Project 2003 Conference for Computing in High Energy and.
24/06/03 ATLAS WeekAlexandre Solodkov1 Status of TileCal software.
ATLAS Data Challenges US ATLAS Physics & Computing ANL October 30th 2001 Gilbert Poulard CERN EP-ATC.
U.S. ATLAS Software WBS 2.2 S. Rajagopalan July 8, 2004 DOE-NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS Computing.
Progress report on Muon Reconstruction based on Kalman filter Y. Fisyak, BNL.
November 2013 Review Talks Morning Plenary Talk – CLAS12 Software Overview and Progress ( ) Current Status with Emphasis on Past Year’s Progress:
ATLAS Simulation/Reconstruction Software Reported by S. Rajagopalan work done by most US Institutes. U.S. ATLAS PCAP review Lawrence Berkeley National.
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern On behalf of the ATLAS Physics and Event Selection Architecture Group 1 ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens, May
8 June 2006V. Niess- CALOR Chicago1 The Simulation of the ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimetry V. Niess CPPM - IN2P3/CNRS - U. Méditerranée – France On.
Cosmic Rays for ATLAS Commissioning Commissioning Meeting ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens May 2003 Halo+Cosmics group: M.Boonekamp, F.Gianotti, R.McPherson,
Anders Kirleis Stony Brook University The Design Of A Detector For The Electron Ion Collider.
GDB Meeting - 10 June 2003 ATLAS Offline Software David R. Quarrie Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
TRT Offline Software DOE Visit, August 21 st 2008 Outline: oTRT Commissioning oTRT Offline Software Activities oTRT Alignment oTRT Efficiency and Noise.
The CMS Simulation Software Julia Yarba, Fermilab on behalf of CMS Collaboration 22 m long, 15 m in diameter Over a million geometrical volumes Many complex.
The Status of the ATLAS Experiment Dr Alan Watson University of Birmingham on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
Argonne National Laboratory Tom LeCompte1 Testbeam Requirements and Requests ATLAS Software Week Tom LeCompte Argonne National Laboratory
ATLAS Simulation/Reconstruction Software James Shank DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS and CMS Computing Projects Brookhaven National Laboratory NOVEMBER 14-17,
Aspects of LAr Reconstruction S. Rajagopalan ATLAS Week June 4, 2001.
David Adams ATLAS DIAL: Distributed Interactive Analysis of Large datasets David Adams BNL August 5, 2002 BNL OMEGA talk.
Muon Reconstruction with Moore and MuonIdentification The Moore/MUID group Atlas Physics Workshop Athens, May 2003.
Atlas Computing Planning Helge Meinhard / CERN-EP Atlas Software Workshop Berkeley, 11 May 2000.
Development of Digital Hadron Calorimeter Using GEM Shahnoor Habib For HEP Group, UT Arlington Oct. 12, 2002 TSAPS Fall ’02, UT Brownsville Simulation.
Status of the LAr OO Reconstruction Srini Rajagopalan ATLAS Larg Week December 7, 1999.
MOORE MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) Track reconstruction in the Muon Spectrometer MuonIdentification MuonIdentification Reconstruction and.
India in DØ Naba K Mondal Tata Institute, Mumbai.
ATLAS Trigger Development
S t a t u s a n d u pd a t e s Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) & the group Moore … in the H8 test-beam … in the HLT(Pesa environment) … work in progress.
1 OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS Michela Biglietti Univ. of Naples INFN/Naples Atlas offline software MuonSpectrometer reconstruction (Moore) Atlas combined.
Introduction S. Rajagopalan August 28, 2003 US ATLAS Computing Meeting.
Introduction to the Athena Software Hong Ma BNL Athena Tutorial USATLAS Software Workshop.
Object Oriented reconstruction of the CMS muon chambers CHEP February, Padova Annalina Vitelli - INFN Torino.
The ATLAS Electromagnetic and Hadronic End-Cap Calorimeter in a Combined Beam Test Tamara Hughes University of Victoria WRNPPC 2004.
Software Week - 8/12/98G. Poulard - CERN EP/ATC1 Status of Software for Physics TDR Atlas Software Week 8 December 1998 G. Poulard.
18 –20 January 2000, DOE Germantown ATLAS Sub-detector Software James Shank DOE/NSF Review of LHC Software + Computing Projects.
UK LVL1 Meeting, RAL, 31/01/00Alan Watson 1 ATLAS Trigger Simulations Present & Future? What tools exist? What are they good for? What are the limitations?
CHEP03 San Diego, 24 – 28 March 2003 adele rimoldi University of Pavia & INFN, Italy The full detector simulation for the ATLAS.
Detector SimOOlation activities in ATLAS A.Dell’Acqua CERN-EP/ATC May 19th, 1999.
L. Perini DATAGRID WP8 Use-cases 19 Dec ATLAS short term grid use-cases The “production” activities foreseen till mid-2001 and the tools to be used.
Living Long At the LHC G. WATTS (UW/SEATTLE/MARSEILLE) WG3: EXOTIC HIGGS FERMILAB MAY 21, 2015.
ATLAS Simulation/Reconstruction Software Reported by Jim Shank, work done by most US Institutes. DOE/NSF review of LHC Software and Computing Projects.
EPS HEP 2007 Manchester -- Thilo Pauly July The ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Overview and Status Report including Cosmic-Ray Commissioning Thilo.
Muon identification in ATLAS Peter Kluit (NIKHEF).
Measuring the B+→J/ψ (μμ) K+ Channel with the first LHC data in Atlas
S. Rajagopalan August 28, 2003 US ATLAS Computing Meeting
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
From Hadronic Energy Scale to Jet Energy Scale
OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
Detector parameters and modelling
Presentation transcript:

Overview of US Work on Simulation and Reconstruction Frederick Luehring August 28, 2003 US ATLAS Computing Meeting at BNL

August 26, 2003F. Luehring - US Simu/Recon Work2 Introduction This talk is a catalog of US ATLAS work on reconstruction and simulation (officially “Application Software”) where I am the level 3 manager. The information contained in the talk was obtained by two surveys of the groups working in this area: –In June, I contacted groups asking who was working in this area in order to help Srini fill out a revised WBS of US effort on ATLAS software. –In July, I again contacted the groups asking for help in filling out the quarterly report of US group activities. I greatly thank everyone for your cooperation with my requests for information. –I do realize that you are all very busy. Please correct an mistakes or oversights.

August 26, 2003F. Luehring - US Simu/Recon Work3 WBS Areas Simulation and reconstruction fall into the third level WBS item which is designated “Application Software”. This category is divided into the following fourth level topics: – Simulation – Subsystem Reconstruction – Combined Reconstruction – Analysis (currently inactive?) – Trigger – Combined Testbeam Software So this category actually encompasses more than simulation and reconstruction.

August 26, 2003F. Luehring - US Simu/Recon Work4 Groups I asked the following groups for information: –ANL –Arizona –Boston –BNL –Chicago –Harvard –Indiana –LBL –Michigan –MSU –Nevis –Pittsburgh –SMU –Wisconsin

August 26, 2003F. Luehring - US Simu/Recon Work5 ANL Personnel: LeCompte Major work area is: –A database that provide calibrations and a cabling map to simulate the tile calorimeter. Previous work area was: –Extensive work on the detector description of the tile calorimeter.

August 26, 2003F. Luehring - US Simu/Recon Work6 Arizona Personnel: Loch, Rutherfoord, Savine, Shupe –Peter Loch is the coordinator of the LAr reconstruction software. –Mike Shupe was the major responsible for the code used by the Radiation Task Force. Major work areas are: –Simulation of radiation levels in the ATLAS experimental cavern. Many shielding designs were studied and a report is being written. –Development of an object navigation system for LAr reconstruction. –Simulation of the FCAL in GEANT4 using Athena. –Writing software for jet reconstruction and calibration of hadronic energy deposition in the calorimeters. –Monitoring and reconstruction sw for the FCAL testbeam.

August 26, 2003F. Luehring - US Simu/Recon Work7 Boston Personnel: Shank. –Jim will give a talk on Muon reconstruction in this session. Major work area is: –Development of an object oriented muon reconstruction package called Moore..

August 26, 2003F. Luehring - US Simu/Recon Work8 BNL Personnel: Assamagan, Fisyak, Ma, Nevski, Paige, Rajagopalan –Pavel Nevski is the ATLAS GEANT3 simulation coordinator Major work areas are: –Generation of GEANT3 (Zebra) datasets for data challenges. –Overall coordination of LAr software and database. –LAr calorimeter reconstruction and calibration algorithms. –Development of e/gamma reconstruction algorithms. –Development of jet calibration and reconstruction software. –Standalone muon reconstruction and combined (with the Inner Tracker) muon reconstruction.

August 26, 2003F. Luehring - US Simu/Recon Work9 Chicago Personnel: Gupta, Merritt, Oreglia, Teuscher –Ambreesh Gupta is the package coordinator for JetRec. Ambreesh will present a talk on jet reconstruction in this session. Major work areas are: –Extensive work on jet reconstruction. Development of Missing Et algorithm. Development of a calibration algorithm for hadronic energy. –Development of the tile calorimeter Event Data Model (EDM) used to digitize the tile calorimeter simulated hits. –Production of SUSY DC1 data.

August 26, 2003F. Luehring - US Simu/Recon Work10 Harvard Personnel: Huth, Karhif Major work areas are: –Using Moore to understand reconstruction issues when running in a distributed environment.

August 26, 2003F. Luehring - US Simu/Recon Work11 Indiana Personnel: Luehring –FL in the TRT Software Coordinator. –FL is the Inner Detector Simulation Coordinator Major work areas are: –Simulation of the TRT using GEANT3. IU has the full responsibility for maintaining the TRT GEANT3 simulation. –Providing assistance to the groups, doing the GEANT4 simulation of the TRT, the simulation of transition radiation (TR), and the C++ digitization. –Reconstruction studies of the ATLAS Inner Tracker using xKalman.

August 26, 2003F. Luehring - US Simu/Recon Work12 LBL Personnel: Costanzo, Dobbs, Hinchliffe –Davide Costanzo is the Inner Detector responsible for the GEANT4 simulation –Davide Costanzo is ATLAS-wide responsible for digitization. Major work areas are: –Full responsibility for the GEANT4 pixel simulation. –Development the C++ digitization for the pixels and made it compatible with the Athena framework. This digitization is also used by the SCT. Previous work area were: –Development of the Pixel testbeam simulation. –Development of the Moore.

August 26, 2003F. Luehring - US Simu/Recon Work13 MSU Personnel: Abolins, Brock, Ermoline, Hauser –Reiner Hauser will speak in this session on the HLT TDR. Major work areas are: –Work on the Level 2 trigger supervisor software. The software issues instructions to the Level 2 processors based on inputs from the region of interest builders. –DAQ Software for the data flow from Readout System (ROS) to Level 2 and the event filter. –DAQ & Trigger software for the testbeam. –Studies of trigger performance for the HLT TDR. –“Paper Model” of the trigger and data acquisition systems. –Monte Carlo studies of “Single Top” events. –Monte Carlo studies of production and reconstruction of tau events.

August 26, 2003F. Luehring - US Simu/Recon Work14 Michigan Personnel: Diehl, Goldfarb, Levin, McKee, Neal, Thun, Zhengguo, Zhou –Steve Goldfarb is the Muon Software Coordinator. –Steve Goldfarb is the Atlas Muon Database Task Leader. Major work areas are: –Coordination of the core software of the Muon Spectrometer database. –Detector Description of the muon spectrometer. –Development of Moore. –Michigan has also worked on simulations of staging the muon chambers and Higgs searches. –Work on reconstruction of testbeam data.

August 26, 2003F. Luehring - US Simu/Recon Work15 Nevis Personnel: Dodd, Leltchouk, Negroni, Parsons, Seligman –Bill Seligman will speak in this session on GEANT4 simulation of the LAr calorimeter. Major work areas: –Development of the GEANT4 LAr code both on the geometry and the use of parametric models for shower generation. –Worked on using GeoModel with LAr simulation. –Testing various releases of the LAr GEANT4 simulation and on material identifiers for the LAr simulation. –Reconstruction of top-quark events.

August 26, 2003F. Luehring - US Simu/Recon Work16 Pittsburgh Personnel: Boudreau, new hire –Joe Boudreau is ATLAS detector description coordinator. Major work areas are: –Full responsibility for the GeoModel package used to provide a geometrical description of the ATLAS detector (detector description). While not strictly in the WBS work area of this talk GeoModel will used to supply the geometrical description of the entire ATLAS detector for both the simulation and reconstruction. –Specific work on using the very complex muon spectrometer geometry to test GeoModel. –Assist all of the ATLAS subdetector systems with getting their geometries described in GeoModel.

August 26, 2003F. Luehring - US Simu/Recon Work17 SMU Personnel: Barberio, Gao, Lu, Stroynowski Major work areas are: –Development of a fast simulation model that for the electromagnetic showers in the LAr calorimeter for use with the ATLAS GEANT4 simulation Time per event is reduced from hours to minutes. –Work on e-pi separation in LAr testbeam data.

August 26, 2003F. Luehring - US Simu/Recon Work18 Wisconsin Personnel: Gonzalez, Mellado, Wiedenmann, Wu, Zobernig Major work area are: –PESA steering software. –HLT control software.

August 26, 2003F. Luehring - US Simu/Recon Work19 Conclusions If your list is not on the list, please let me know. –Possible additional institutes working in this area are: Hampton, New Mexico, Oklahoma, UTA. There are a lot of areas of work. There is a lot of work to do.