Addressing the Oklahoma DEQ v. EPA D.C. Circuit Decision: Implementation Plans in Indian Country National Tribal Forum – May 2015 EPA Outreach and Information.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Indian Environmental General Assistance Program (GAP) Guidance on the Award and Management of General Assistance Agreements for Tribes and Intertribal.
Advertisements

Environmental Justice in Indian Country Joseph Myers Executive Director National Indian Justice Center 5250 Aero Drive Santa Rosa, CA P: (707)
Research Integrity and Assurance Protections and Support Human Subjects Animal Care and Use Biosafety Conflicts of Interest Export Controls Responsible.
Tribal Permit Training Fond du Lac Reservation June 11, 2013.
Tribal Authority Rule (TAR): Historical Overview David LaRoche.
Laura McKelvey, U.S. EPA. 2  CAA Implementation Authority [Section 301(d)] ◦ 1990 CAA Amendments ◦ Tribal air management authority ◦ TAS / TIP.
Session Objectives Provide a basic overview of key principles of federal Indian law (with focus on jurisdictional issues) Discuss application of legal.
Executive Order 13175, “Strengthening our Federal Partnership with Tribal Nations.” E.O ‟ s purpose is to improve governmental services and programs.
Environmental Review: NEPA, TEPA and Tribes. NEPA – good and bad for Tribes Tribes can use as tool to slow, examine, participate in process and urge changes.
& The Questions It Raises Over Taxation On Indian Reservations By: Jennifer C. Klein, Deputy County Counsel Sonoma County Counsel’s Office May 30, 2013.
Air Grants Monika Lacka U.S. EPA Region 5
Public Review vs “affected state” Review: advantages of TAS for section 505 Reviewing NSR and Title V Permits Natalene Cummings Forest County Potawatomi.
NCMA Workshop March 24, 2015 Booker Pullen Supervisor, Permitting Section North Carolina Division of Air Quality, Raleigh, NC (919) Permitting.
Opportunities for RAC Participation. Three Part discussion General presentation; Example of oil and gas decision making; and Panel Discussion of RAC involvement.
Green Recovery And Reconstruction: Training Toolkit For Humanitarian Aid Environmental Impact Assessment Tools and Techniques Session 2: Tools for Conducting.
Overview of the Tribal New Source Review (NSR) Rule U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) Research.
Tribal Benefits from State Implementation Plan (SIP) Process Involvement Rosanne Sanchez New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
Update on EPA Oil and Gas Activities Greg Green, Outreach and Information Division, OAQPS.
1 OAQPS Guidance on -- “Consulting with Indian Tribal Governments” November 28, 2007.
1 OAR Guidance on -- “Consulting with Indian Tribal Governments” May 21, 2012.
Tribal Authority Rule (TAR) Overview
Session Objectives Provide a basic overview of key principles of federal Indian policy and federal government relationship with tribes Provide a basic.
Cooperating Agencies & Coordination Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) and BLM Regulations Federal Coordination with Local Government Hosted.
What is the purpose of the Class I Redesignation Guidance? Provides guidance for tribes who are considering redesignating their areas as Class I areas.
TURTLE MT BAND OF CHIPPEWA Ray Reed – Brownfield Coordinator EPA-TRP.
Working together for clean air Tacoma Clean Air Performance Commitment May 2010.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Distinguishing: Clean Air Act, EPA Rules, Regulations and Guidance David Cole U.S. EPA, OAQPS Research Triangle Park, NC.
NEW MEXICO CRIME DATA PROJECT Prepared and Presented by Ada Pecos Melton, MPA American Indian Development Associates th St., NW, Suite 212 Albuquerque,
Clean Air Act and New Source Review Permits EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park NC March
Carcieri v. Salazar – IRA Question Sec. 5. The Secretary of the Interior is hereby authorized, in his discretion, to acquire through purchase, relinquishment,
Tier 1 Module 4 CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Element 3: Public Participation.
Designations for 24-Hour PM2.5 NAAQS: Overview and Guidance Amy Vasu PM2.5 Workshop June 20-21, 2007.
Options for Tribes to Manage Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister Hobbs, Straus, Dean & Walker Laura McKelvey EPA Office of Air Quality.
Managing Air Quality in Indian Country with TIPs, SIPs and FIPs Rich McAllister Hobbs, Straus, Dean & Walker
Achieving Indoor Environmental Risk Reduction for Tribal Communities (April, 2007) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Indoor Environments Division, Washington,
The Third Annual Medical Device Regulatory, Reimbursement and Compliance Congress 1 How to Implement a Private Payer Reimbursement Strategy Barbara Grenell.
Welco EPA TRIBAL PROGRAMS Cathy Villa, EPA Tribal Coordinator EPA’s Tribal Programs leads the effort to protect human health and the environment of federally.
Research Integrity and Assurance Protections and Support Human Subjects Animal Care and Use Biosafety Conflicts of Interest Export Controls Responsible.
Lumbee Federal Recognition Termination Policy of the 1950s In the 1950s, the U.S. government decided that the best way to deal with all Indian tribes.
TRIBAL DECISION ON IMPLEMENTATION TAS/DELEGATION/TIP TIP/TAS Training December 3, 2012.
NSR—Minor New Source Review Darrel Harmon U.S. EPA Office of Air and Radiation.
TAS and TIP Swinomish Tribe and the Incremental Approach.
Applying for Treatment in the Same Manner as a State for Sections of the Clean Air Act National Tribal Forum May 12, 2014.
Lonora Graves, Caltrans Native American Liaison Branch December 2, 2015.
PM2.5 NAAQS Implementation Interactive Session NACAA Annual Meeting May 8, 2013 St. Louis, MO 1.
OAQPS Update WESTAR April 3,  On March 12, 2008, EPA significantly strengthened the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ground-level.
Interstate Transport National Tribal Forum Air Quality Track April 30,
EPA Proposed Ground-level Ozone (O 3 ) NAAQS Rich McAllister National Tribal Air Association Policy Advisory Committee Hobbs Straus Dean & Walker.
Virginia’s Brownfield Program - An Attitude of Success Presented by: Delegate Terrie Suit Member - Virginia House of Delegates 81st District & Chris Evans.
TIP Overview Darrel Harmon U.S. EPA. 2 Purpose Provide a broad definition –Explain elements –Describe effect of TAR on CAA requirements –Explore relationship.
Air Quality Work in Indian Country National Tribal Air Association.
ICC roundtable Istanbul, 30 April 2010 Procedural Fairness: Update on Recent OECD Activities Antonio Capobianco OECD Competition Division
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
New Source Review (NSR) Program Basics
American Indian and Alaska Native 2020 Decennial Census
Welcome to Community Solutions: NEPA & EJ: Leveraging Federal Resources to Advance Community Environmental, Economic and Health Vitality “A Focus on.
Monte Mills Alexander Blewett III School of Law University of Montana
Creating a P.L Plan.
Tribal Roles in Minor NSR by: Joy Wiecks, Fond du Lac Band
Bill Harnett USEPA NACAA Membership Meeting October 21, 2008
Overview of New Source Review (NSR)
Tribal Authority Rule (TAR) Overview
American Indian Rights and Claims Course Sequence Flowchart
Designations for Indian Country
Cooperative Federalism 2
Environmental Protection Agency
Ground-level Ozone (O3)
Regional Haze SIP Status Report
Presentation transcript:

Addressing the Oklahoma DEQ v. EPA D.C. Circuit Decision: Implementation Plans in Indian Country National Tribal Forum – May 2015 EPA Outreach and Information Division – RTP, North Carolina

Objectives 2  Familiarize you with the court’s decision.  Describe issues arising from the decision.  Get your thoughts regarding these issues.

“Indian country” 3  Reservations: both formal and informal reservations/ Trust lands  Allotments  Dependent Indian Communities The D.C. Circuit decision impacts non-reservation Indian country, i.e., allotments and dependent Indian Communities.

Key Elements of Decision 4  January 2014 D.C. Circuit adverse decision; April 2014 rehearing denied; Dept. of Justice and EPA did not seek Supreme Court review.  Vacates EPA’s Indian country NSR rule for non- reservation areas. Under CAA sec. 107(a), states, not EPA or tribes, have initial primary responsibility for, and jurisdiction over, non-reservation Indian country for purposes of implementation plans.  The court noted that state jurisdiction can be displaced by a demonstration by EPA or a tribe that a tribe has jurisdiction over a particular non-reservation area.

Key Elements of Decision (continued) 5  A few key points regarding the reach of the decision:  Does not apply to reservations.  Does apply to non-reservation Indian country throughout the U.S., not just lands in Oklahoma.  In EPA’s view, applies to SIPs under CAA sec. 110; does not apply to other statutes or other parts of CAA such as Title V, 111(d).  Oklahoma believes it applies to all programs under the CAA  To the extent that states are aware of the decision, some are comfortable with it while others may have concerns.  States cannot waive responsibility for CAA implementation plan coverage of non-reservation areas within their borders.

180 o Reversal of Initial Primary Responsibility 6 State EPA Tribe State EPA Pre-decisionPost-decision

Principles 7  Ensure air quality is protected – no gaps.  Protect tribal sovereignty consistent with the Federal Trust responsibility and Federal and EPA policy.  Minimize burden wherever possible on tribes, states, sources, and EPA.  Provide regulatory certainty to sources that would like to locate in non-reservation areas.

Implementing the Decision 8 Issues We Particularly Need Your Thoughts On: 1. Information gathering/scoping: Where is non- reservation Indian country and what sources exist (or would like to locate) there? 2. Managing tribal consultations for future SIP approvals since many now apply to parts of Indian country. Additional Issues Are there other issues related to the decision that you would like to raise?

Issue 1 - Information Gathering/Scoping 9  Significant information gaps exist:  Where are the non-reservation areas of Indian country?  What sources exist (or would like to locate) there?  What is said about Indian country in prior SIP approvals and SIPs?  Some gap-filling efforts are underway at EPA and at Dept. of the Interior.  Complete answers to these questions are unlikely in the near future (or even long-term?)

Issue 2 - Offering Consultation on SIP Actions 10  As a result of the court’s decision, SIP actions (under CAA sec. 110) in states with non-reservation areas of Indian country could affect tribes.  E.O “Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments” and EPA’s Tribal Consultation Policy are considerations.  EPA processes hundreds of SIP actions each year, some of which are substantive (e.g., an attainment SIP), and others of which are more administrative in nature.  Ideally a process for offering consultation would (1) enable tribes to engage in a meaningful way, (2) minimize burden on tribes and EPA, and (3) minimize delay.

Issue 2 – Offering Consultation on SIP Actions (continued) 11 What ideas do you have for how EPA might offer consultation to tribes regarding upcoming SIP actions? Do you think your tribe would want to consult with EPA on SIP actions? If so, what kinds of SIP actions may be of interest? Opportunity To Provide Feedback

Discussion and Next Steps Gregory Green U.S. EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (919)