Magnetic Reconnection in Plasmas; a Celestial Phenomenon in the Laboratory J Egedal, W Fox, N Katz, A Le, M Porkolab, MIT, PSFC, Cambridge, MA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Progress and Plans on Magnetic Reconnection for CMSO For NSF Site-Visit for CMSO May1-2, Experimental progress [M. Yamada] -Findings on two-fluid.
Advertisements

Magnetic Turbulence in MRX (for discussions on a possible cross-cutting theme to relate turbulence, reconnection, and particle heating) PFC Planning Meeting.
Multiple reconnections and explosive events and in MST and solar flares Gennady Fiksel CMSO workshop, Princeton, NJ, Oct 5-8, 2005.
Anomalous Ion Heating Status and Research Plan
Progress and Plans on Magnetic Reconnection for CMSO M. Yamada, C. Hegna, E. Zweibel For General meeting for CMSO August 4, Recent progress and.
Dynamical plasma response during driven magnetic reconnection in the laboratory Ambrogio Fasoli* Jan Egedal MIT Physics Dpt & Plasma Science and Fusion.
Ion-Induced Instability of Diocotron Modes In Magnetized Electron Columns Andrey Kabantsev University of California at San Diego Physics Department Nonneutral.
The scaling of LWFA in the ultra-relativistic blowout regime: Generation of Gev to TeV monoenergetic electron beams W.Lu, M.Tzoufras, F.S.Tsung, C. Joshi,
Particle acceleration in a turbulent electric field produced by 3D reconnection Marco Onofri University of Thessaloniki.
PIII for Hydrogen Storage
Numerical investigations of a cylindrical Hall thruster K. Matyash, R. Schneider, O. Kalentev Greifswald University, Greifswald, D-17487, Germany Y. Raitses,
William Daughton Plasma Physics Group, X-1 Los Alamos National Laboratory Presented at: Second Workshop on Thin Current Sheets University of Maryland April.
INTRODUCTION OF WAVE-PARTICLE RESONANCE IN TOKAMAKS J.Q. Dong Southwestern Institute of Physics Chengdu, China International School on Plasma Turbulence.
Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection J. F. Drake University of Maryland Magnetic Reconnection Theory 2004 Newton Institute.
Alfvén-cyclotron wave mode structure: linear and nonlinear behavior J. A. Araneda 1, H. Astudillo 1, and E. Marsch 2 1 Departamento de Física, Universidad.
Five Spacecraft Observations of Oppositely Directed Exhaust Jets from a Magnetic Reconnection X-line Extending > 4.3 x 10 6 km in the Solar Wind Gosling.
RFP Workshop, Stockholm 9-11 /10/ 2008 Numerical studies of particle transport mechanisms in RFX-mod low chaos regimes M.Gobbin, L.Marrelli, L.Carraro,
Institut für Plasmaforschung Universität Stuttgart Long-distance correlation of fluctuations under strong ExB shear in TJ-K P. Manz, M. Ramisch, U. Stroth.
The Structure of the Parallel Electric Field and Particle Acceleration During Magnetic Reconnection J. F. Drake M.Swisdak M. Shay M. Hesse C. Cattell University.
Kinetic based fluid model. J Egedal, W Fox, N Katz, A Le, A Vrublevskis, J Bonde, A Soane & M Porkolab MIT, PSFC, Cambridge, MA Thanks to: M Øieroset,
Role of trapped electrons in pic-code simulations of reconnection J Egedal, MIT, PSFC, Cambridge, MA Thanks to W Daughton & J F Drake.
Forced reconnection studies in the MAST spherical tokamak M P Gryaznevich 1, A Sykes 1, K G McClements 1 T Yamada 2, Y Hayashi 2, R Imazawa 2, Y Ono 2.
Magnetic Reconnection in the Solar Wind Gosling, Phan, et al.
In-situ Observations of Collisionless Reconnection in the Magnetosphere Tai Phan (UC Berkeley) 1.Basic signatures of reconnection 2.Topics: a.Bursty (explosive)
A Fermi Model for the Production of Energetic Electrons during Magnetic Reconnection J. F. Drake H. Che M. Swisdak M. A. Shay University of Maryland NRL.
Magnetic Reconnection Rate and Energy Release Rate Jeongwoo Lee 2008 April 1 NJIT/CSTR Seminar Day.
EBIT – Electron Beam Ion Trap
Non-collisional ion heating and Magnetic Turbulence in MST Abdulgader Almagri On behalf of MST Team RFP Workshop Padova, Italy April 2010.
MMFW Madison, Wisconsin 6 May 2011 D.J. Den Hartog, R. M. Magee, S.T.A. Kumar, V.V. Mirnov (University of Wisconsin–Madison) D. Craig (Wheaton College)
D. Borba 1 21 st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu China 21 st October 2006 Excitation of Alfvén eigenmodes with sub-Alfvénic neutral beam ions in.
Tuija I. Pulkkinen Finnish Meteorological Institute Helsinki, Finland
T. Hellsten IEA Burning Plasma Workshop, July 2005 Tarragona Spain Integrated Modelling of ICRH and AE Dynamics T. Hellsten, T. Bergkvist, T. Johnson and.
N EOCLASSICAL T OROIDAL A NGULAR M OMENTUM T RANSPORT IN A R OTATING I MPURE P LASMA S. Newton & P. Helander This work was funded jointly by EURATOM and.
Local Structures of Electron Temperature and Electrostatic Potential during ST Merging Startup *Boxin Gao, Akihiro Kuwahata Inomoto Lab The University.
Excitation of ion temperature gradient and trapped electron modes in HL-2A tokamak The 3 th Annual Workshop on Fusion Simulation and Theory, Hefei, March.
Multiscale issues in modeling magnetic reconnection J. F. Drake University of Maryland IPAM Meeting on Multiscale Problems in Fusion Plasmas January 10,
Experimental Study of Magnetic Reconnection and Dynamics of Plasma Flare Arc in MRX Masaaki Yamada August SHINE Meeting at Nova Scotia Center.
Anomalous resistivity due to lower-hybrid drift waves. Results of Vlasov-code simulations and Cluster observations. Ilya Silin Department of Physics University.
Reconnection rates in Hall MHD and Collisionless plasmas
2 The Neutral Particle Analyzer (NPA) on NSTX Scans Horizontally Over a Wide Range of Tangency Angles Covers Thermal ( keV) and Energetic Ion.
Complications to Electron Landau Damping in the Solar Wind Waves of interest have v phase|| ≈ v A v A ≈ 54 km/s 0.5m e v A 2 ≈ 8×10 -3 eV  Very very low-energy.
1 Confinement Studies on TJ-II Stellarator with OH Induced Current F. Castejón, D. López-Bruna, T. Estrada, J. Romero and E. Ascasíbar Laboratorio Nacional.
(National Institute for Fusion Science, Japan)
Electron inertial effects & particle acceleration at magnetic X-points Presented by K G McClements 1 Other contributors: A Thyagaraja 1, B Hamilton 2,
Ion pickup and acceration in magnetic reconnection exhausts J. F. Drake University of Maryland M. Swisdak University of Maryland T. Phan UC Berkeley E.
Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection J. F. Drake University of Maryland presented in honor of Professor Eric Priest September 8, 2003.
Simulation Study of Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetotail and Solar Corona Zhi-Wei Ma Zhejiang University & Institute of Plasma Physics Beijing,
A. Vaivads, M. André, S. Buchert, N. Cornilleau-Wehrlin, A. Eriksson, A. Fazakerley, Y. Khotyaintsev, B. Lavraud, C. Mouikis, T. Phan, B. N. Rogers, J.-E.
Laboratory Study of Spiky Potential Structures Associated with Multi- Harmonic EIC Waves Robert L. Merlino and Su-Hyun Kim University of Iowa Guru Ganguli.
Weixing Ding University of California, Los Angeles,USA collaborators: D.L. Brower, W. Bergerson, D. Craig, D. Demers, G.Fiksel, D.J. Den Hartog, J. Reusch,
FEC 2006 Reduction of Neoclassical Transport and Observation of a Fast Electron Driven Instability with Quasisymmetry in HSX J.M. Canik 1, D.L. Brower.
GOLEM operation based on some results from CASTOR
of magnetized discharge plasmas: fluid electrons + particle ions
Role of thermal instabilities and anomalous transport in the density limit M.Z.Tokar, F.A.Kelly, Y.Liang, X.Loozen Institut für Plasmaphysik, Forschungszentrum.
52nd Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , 2010, Chicago, Illinois Non-symmetric components were intentionally added to the.
Electron-Scale Dissipations During Magnetic Reconnection The 17th Cluster Workshop May 12-15, 2009 at Uppsala, Sweden Hantao Ji Contributors: W. Daughton*,
Helically Symmetry Configuration Evidence for Alfvénic Fluctuations in Quasi-Helically Symmetric HSX Plasmas C. Deng and D.L. Brower, University of California,
Nonlinear Simulations of Energetic Particle-driven Modes in Tokamaks Guoyong Fu Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton, NJ, USA In collaboration.
53rd Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , 2011, Salt Lake City, Utah When the total flow will move approximately along the.
Plan V. Rozhansky, E. Kaveeva St.Petersburg State Polytechnical University, , Polytechnicheskaya 29, St.Petersburg, Russia Poloidal and Toroidal.
二维电磁模型 基本方程与无量纲化 基本方程. 无量纲化 方程化为 二维时的方程 时间上利用蛙跳格式 网格划分.
NIMROD Simulations of a DIII-D Plasma Disruption S. Kruger, D. Schnack (SAIC) April 27, 2004 Sherwood Fusion Theory Meeting, Missoula, MT.
A Global Hybrid Simulation Study of the Solar Wind Interaction with the Moon David Schriver ESS 265 – June 2, 2005.
54th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, October 29 – November 2, 2012, Providence, Rhode Island 5-pin Langmuir probe measures floating potential.
48th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, October 30 – November 3, 2006, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Energetic-Electron-Driven Alfvénic Modes.
N. D’Angelo, B. Kustom, D. Susczynsky, S. Cartier, J. Willig
Magnetic fluctuation measurements in HSX and its impact on transport
Studies of Bias Induced Plasma Flows in HSX
Magnetic reconnection
Influence of energetic ions on neoclassical tearing modes
Presentation transcript:

Magnetic Reconnection in Plasmas; a Celestial Phenomenon in the Laboratory J Egedal, W Fox, N Katz, A Le, M Porkolab, MIT, PSFC, Cambridge, MA

The problem of magnetic reconnection Reconnection in the Versatile Toroidal Facility –Experimental setup –Experimental observation –Electron kinetic effects Wind satellite data from the deep magnetotail –Kinetic effects The new closed configuration in VTF Conclusions Outline

The Versatile Toroidal Facility (VTF) 3.5 m

The Versatile Toroidal Facility (VTF)

A new closed cusp by internal coil. Passing electrons & spontaneous reconnection events. Two different magnetic configurations A open cusp magnetic field. Fast reconnection by trapped electrons.  Wind observation Both configurations have B guide and toroidal symmetry  2d

VTF open configuration plasmas have a trapping potential Typical Parameters: n e ~ m -3 T e ~ 12 eV T i ~ 1 eV B t ~ 80 mT (800 G) B c ~ 0-10 mT Open field lines intersect the vessel wall. Electrons stream faster than ions, so plasma charges positive Thermal electrons are electrostatically trapped

Reconnection drive – Electric field induced by a central solenoid – The solenoid is driven by an LC circuit – V loop ~ 100 V

Plasma response to driven reconnection

The electrostatic potential Experimental potential,   +70 V -70 V Electron flow:

The electrostatic potential Frozen in law is broken where E  B  0  Ideal Plasma:

J Egedal et al., PRL 90, (2003) The electrostatic potential Frozen in law is broken where E  B  0  Ideal Plasma: The size of the electron diffusion region is δ δ (cm) ρ cusp

Why is the experimental current density so small? Liouville/Vlasov’s equation: df/dt=0 For a given (x 0,v 0 ), follow the orbit back in time to x 1 Particle orbits calculated using electrostatic and magnetic fields consistent with the experiment. Massively parallel code evaluates f(x 0,v 0 ) = f  (|v 1 |). Kinetic modeling (1) Computer Physics Communications, (2004)

0 – 12 kA/m 2 The current is calculated as Theory consistent with measurements (B-probe resolution: 1.5cm) Kinetic modeling (2) Theory Experiment

The problem of magnetic reconnection Reconnection in the Versatile Toroidal Facility –Experimental setup –Experimental observation –Kinetic effects Wind satellite data from the deep magnetotail –Kinetic effects The new closed configuration in VTF Conclusions Outline

M. Øieroset et al. Nature 412, (2001) M. Øieroset et al. PRL 89, (2002) Wind satellite observations in distant magnetotail, 60R E Measurements within the ion diffusion region reveal: Strong anisotropy in f e.

M. Øieroset et al. Nature 412, (2001) M. Øieroset et al. PRL 89, (2002) Wind satellite observations in distant magnetotail, 60R E Measurements within the ion diffusion region reveal: Strong anisotropy in f e. Log(f)

A trapped electron in the magnetotail The magnetic moment:

From Vlasov’s equation df/dt=0  f(x 0,v 0 ) = f  ( E exit ) Two types of orbits: Drift kinetic modeling of Wind data Passing: Trapped :  =mv  2 /(2B)+… is constant No coolingCooling

Applying f(x 0,v 0 ) = f  (|v 1 |) to an X-line geometry consistent with the Wind measurements A potential,   needed for trapping at low energies Ion outflow: 400 km/s, consistent with acceleration in   Drift kinetic modeling of Wind data   ~ -300V   ~ -800V   ~ -1150V TheoryWind Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, (2005)

Applying f(x 0,v 0 ) = f  (|v 1 |) to an X-line geometry consistent with the Wind measurements A potential,   needed for trapping at low energies Ion outflow: 400 km/s, consistent with acceleration in   Drift kinetic modeling of Wind data TheoryWind Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, (2005)   ~ -1150V f(x 0,v 0 ) = f  ( E 0 -q  0 ), passing = f  (  B  ), trapped Cluster Obs.

The problem of magnetic reconnection Reconnection in the Versatile Toroidal Facility –Experimental setup –Experimental observation –Kinetic effects Wind satellite data from the deep magnetotail –Kinetic effects The new closed configuration in VTF Conclusions Outline

New closed magnetic configurations

A new reconnection drive scenario

Spontaneous reconnection Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, (2007)

Sweet-Parker is out, E ≠  *j !

Current channel expelled,  J Magnetic energy released R BzBz v A ~ 10 km/s c/  pi ~ 1m,  s ~ 0.12m 4 -4

t [µs] d  /dt [V] What Triggers Reconnection? R [m] t [µs] Mode at f=50 kHz d  /dt [V] R

Plasma outflows

Rough energy balance Magnetic energy released ~ 0.5 × H × (500A) 2 ~ 0.8 J Electron energization ~ 500 A × 80V × 2  s ~ 0.8 J Ion flows: ~ 24 eV × 2  m -3 ×0.06m 3 ~ 0.48 J Strong energizations of the ions

Electrostatic (and magnetic) fluctuations observed during reconnection events Loop voltage (V) Fluctuation > 10 MHz (au) Spectrogram f (MHz) 0 1 t (ms) [Mar 22 shot 405, HPF 80kHz, scope B/W 150 MHz] f LH ~ 10 MHz f pi ~ 30 MHz (off scale) f pe ~ 10 GHz f ce ~ 1 GHz Plasma Current (A)

Conclusions –Fast, collisionless driven reconnection observed in the open cusp configuration –Classical Coulomb collisions are not important –The width of the diffusion region scales with  cusp –Solving Vlasov’s equation (using the measured profiles of E and B) provides current profiles consistent with the VTF measurements; the current is limited by electron trapping. –Wind observations consistent with fast reconnection mediated by trapped electrons –New closed configuration in VTF provides exciting new parameter regimes and boundaries for future study of collisionless magnetic reconnection & the trigger problem.

Thank you for your attention

Future studies with the new configuration Fast, bursty reconnection with closed boundaries and in the presence of guide magnetic field can be studied (for the first time) What controls the rate of reconnection? How is reconnection “triggered” Huge parameter regime available: Scans possible in B cusp, B guide, T e, N e, E rec. Spans collisional to collisionless regimes: e = 0.1 – 10 3 m High plasma pressure (compared to magnetic field):  ~ 1 Warm and magnetized ions. 3D magnetic geometries are easily implemented

Upgrade of open Cusp Existing configuration Fields of new in-vessel coils

Upgrade of open Cusp New total field Ionization region

Reconnection Experiments with a Guide Magnetic Field J Egedal, W Fox, N Katz, A Le and M Porkolab MIT, PSFC, Cambridge, MA