A Rare Severe Weather and Tornado Event in Central New York and Northeast Pennsylvania: July 8, 2014 Presented by Mike Evans 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The 4 Sep 2011 Tornado in Eastern New York: An Example for Updating Tornado Warning Strategies Brian J. Frugis NOAA/NWS Albany, NY NROW XIII 2-3 November.
Advertisements

SPC Input – EMC GFS Satellite Data Denial Experiment April 2011 Tornado Outbreak Examination of Day 7 and Day 4 Guidance for SPC Severe Weather Outlooks.
Analysis of Rare Northeast Flow Events By Joshua Beilman and Stephanie Acito.
Aspects of 6 June 2007: A Null “Moderate Risk” of Severe Weather Jonathan Kurtz Department of Geosciences University of Nebraska at Lincoln NOAA/NWS Omaha/Valley,
A Convective Wind Event over Southeastern Alberta on 15 July 2008 Stephen Knott and Chris Wielki Prairie and Arctic Storm Prediction Centre - Edmonton.
Mike Evans / NWS Binghamton, NY. Outline Large-scale pattern / meso-analysis Radar data High resolution model output Summary.
Article By: Charles Doswell III Donald V Baker Charles A Liles Presentation By: Jason Tiffany Recognition of Negative Mesoscale Factors for Severe-Weather.
An Overview of Environmental Conditions and Forecast Implications of the 3 May 1999 Tornado Outbreak Richard L. Thompson and Roger Edwards Presentation.
Northeast Convective Flash Floods: Helping Forecasters Stay Ahead of Rising Water Joe Villani - National Weather Service, Albany, NY Derek Mallia - University.
Dr. Scott M. Rochette Department of the Earth Sciences The College at Brockport.
Case Study of the May 7, 2002 Tornadic Supercell Outbreak Kathryn Saussy San Francisco State University Department of Geosciences.
Kansas Severe Thunderstorm Outbreak May 7, 2002 Christopher Medjber Meteorology 503 Department of Geosciences SFSU Christopher Medjber Meteorology 503.
6/26/2015 Examination of the low level polarimetric radar parameters associated with the Aug southern Ontario tornadic supercells Mike Leduc Sudesh.
An Examination of the Tropical System – Induced Flooding in Central New York and Northeast Pennsylvania in 2004.
Severe Squall Line over Quebec August 18th 2008 Robert Michaud QSPC – Montreal October 29th 2008.
Synoptic, Thermodynamic, Shear Setting May 7, 2002 Tornadic Thunderstorm in Southwestern Kansas Michele Blazek May 15, 2005.
The 4 August 2004 Central Pennsylvania Severe Weather Event – Environmental and Topographical Influences on Storm Structure Evolution Joe Villani NOAA/NWS,
Determining Favorable Days for Summertime Severe Convection in the Deep South Chad Entremont NWS Jackson, MS.
Corfidi, et al – convection where air parcels originate from a moist absolutely unstable layer above the PBL. Can produce severe hail, damaging.
Bow Echoes By Matthieu Desorcy.
© Craig Setzer and Al Pietrycha Supercell (mesocyclone) tornadoes: Supercell tornado environments Developed by Jon Davies – Private Meteorologist – Wichita,
Use of TAMDAR Data in a Convective Weather Event Saturday, May 21, 2005.
Mike Evans NWS / WFO BGM. CSTAR V – Severe convection in scenarios with low-predictive skill SUNY Albany researchers are examining SPC forecasts and associated.
Severe Weather Operations. Severe Weather Staffing (Positions in orange are minimum needed) Severe Weather Coordinator – oversees the operations of the.
National Weather Service Weather Forecast Office – Taunton, MA (BOX)
A Study on the Environments Associated with Significant Tornadoes Occurring Within the Warm Sector versus Those Occurring Along Boundaries Jonathan Garner.
19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and Lessons Learned from this Event Ron W. Przybylinski, James E. Sieveking, Benjamin D. Sipprell NOAA.
Preliminary Radar Observations of Convective Initiation and Mesocyclone Interactions with Atmospheric Waves on 27 April 2011 Todd A. Murphy, Timothy A.
Chad Entremont Daniel Lamb NWS Jackson, MS
THE DRAMATIC EFFECT OF TORNADIC SEVERE WEATHER ON A RAPIDLY GROWING URBAN INTERFACE IVORY J. SMALL, TED MACKECHNIE, AND STEVEN VANDERBURG National Weather.
Mike Evans NWS Binghamton, NY. Outline The checklist Example – April 28, 2011 Verification Summary / Conclusion.
Northeast Convective Flash Floods: Helping Forecasters Stay Ahead of Rising Water Joe Villani - National Weather Service, Albany, NY Derek Mallia - University.
SPC Ensemble Applications: Current Status, Recent Developments, and Future Plans David Bright Storm Prediction Center Science Support Branch Norman, OK.
Using Ensemble Probability Forecasts And High Resolution Models To Identify Severe Weather Threats Josh Korotky NOAA/NWS, Pittsburgh, PA and Richard H.
ORIGINAL PRESENTATION – 11 MAR 2010 NBGSA CONFERENCE – SAN DIEGO UPDATED – 5 APR THIS IS A SAMPLE PRESENTATION KINEMATIC STRUCTURE.
August 4, 2015: Two Rare High End Severe Weather Events Inside 12 Hours In Southern New England Hayden Frank NOAA/National Weather Service Taunton, MA.
Analysis of the 2 April 2006 Quasi-Linear Convective System (QLCS) over the Mid- Mississippi Valley Region: Storm Structure and Evolution from WSR-88D.
The 1925 Tri-State Tornado What If It Happened Today? Pat Spoden NOAA/NWS WFO Paducah, Kentucky John Hart NOAA/NWS Storm Prediction Center Norman, Oklahoma.
Updated Radar-Based Techniques for Tornado Warning Guidance in the Northeastern United States Brian J. Frugis & Thomas A. Wasula NOAA/NWS Albany, New York.
BP-31 Updated Radar-Based Techniques for Tornado Warning Guidance in the Northeastern United States Brian J. Frugis and Thomas A. Wasula NOAA/National.
Tornado Warning Skill as a Function of Environment National Weather Service Sub-Regional Workshop Binghamton, New York September 23, 2015 Yvette Richardson.
A Review of the March 28, 2007 Tornado Event Teresa Keck NWS North Platte, Nebraska Courtesy of Mike Hollingshead.
The July 19, 2015 “Non Severe” Event in Southern New England What Happened? NROW XVI – November, 2015 Frank Nocera NOAA/NWS Taunton MA.
A Case Study of Two Left-Moving Mesoanticyclonic Supercells on 24 April 2006 Chris Bowman National Weather Service – Wichita, KS.
2. Basic Characteristics and Forecast The 500-hPa pattern for this event featured a deep low centered over Idaho. A composite analysis of past tornado.
THE MARCH 2006 MID-SOUTH TORNADO OUTBREAK... WHY IT NEVER OCCURRED Dan Valle National Weather Service Memphis, TN.
Kenneth R. Cook James Caruso Mickey McGuire National Weather Service, Wichita, KS.
The April 9 th Tornado Outbreak Across the Four-State Region By Nick Fillo & Ismari Ramos WFO Shreveport, LA 4 th Regional Severe Storms/Radar and Hydrology.
The 1 November 2004 tornadic QLCS event over southwest Illinois Ron W. Przybylinski Science and Operations Officer National Weather Service – St. Louis.
The Effect of Downdraft Strength on Tornado Intensity and Path Length Dylan R. Card and Ross A. Lazear Department of Atmospheric & Environmental Sciences,
WSR - 88D Characteristics of Significant Tornadoes in New York and New England Lance Franck University of Massachusetts Hayden Frank NOAA/NWS/Weather.
The 22 May 2014 Duanesburg, NY, Tornadic Supercell
August 4, 2015: Two Rare High End Severe Weather Events Inside 12 Hours In Southern New England Hayden Frank and Joe DelliCarpini NOAA/National Weather.
Northeast US Tornadoes and Tornado Debris Signatures
The November 26, 2014 banded snowfall case in southern NY
Zdr/Kdp Behavior in Potentially Tornadic Storms
Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. and Christopher Gitro
CAE Tornado Cases Hunter Coleman Anthony Petrolito Michael Cammarata
Hiding under a freeway overpass will protect me from a tornado.
Bow Echo Workshop March 2017
Case Study A Tornadic Thunderstorm Near Dodge City, KS on May
Case Jan Squall line moves through early afternoon...leaving stable conditions, stratus and low LCLs over region through early night hours.
CSTAR HSLC Case Study Feb. 18, 2009 NWS Peachtree City, GA (FFC)
Zdr/Kdp Behavior in Potentially Tornadic Storms
VERIFICATION – DAY CLD: 6.5/10.
Outline Large-scale / meso-scale pattern Precipitation type forecasts
Improving Tornado Detection and
Differences Between High Shear / Low CAPE Environments in the Northeast US Favoring Straight-Line Damaging Winds vs Tornadoes Michael E. Main, Ross A.
Forecast Verification time!
Supercell tornado environments
Presentation transcript:

A Rare Severe Weather and Tornado Event in Central New York and Northeast Pennsylvania: July 8, 2014 Presented by Mike Evans 1

A Rare Severe Weather and Tornado Event in Central New York and Northeast Pennsylvania: July 8, Tornadoes and numerous severe reports. 6 Tornadoes and numerous severe reports. First tornado fatalities in our county warning area since First tornado fatalities in our county warning area since A mix of tornadic and non-tornadic supercells. A mix of tornadic and non-tornadic supercells. Fatalities occurred with a relatively subtle Bookend Vortex Signature. Fatalities occurred with a relatively subtle Bookend Vortex Signature. 2 Damage near Smithfield, NY

Forecasting and warning factors New tools helped forecasters to anticipate the evolution and magnitude of the event. New tools helped forecasters to anticipate the evolution and magnitude of the event. Dual polarization data may have been helpful to discriminate between tornadic vs. non-tornadic storms. Dual polarization data may have been helpful to discriminate between tornadic vs. non-tornadic storms. 3 Damage near Smithfield, NY

Synoptic Setup Trough and cold front approach from the west. Trough and cold front approach from the west. Large low-level wind anomalies. Large low-level wind anomalies. Degree of instability was in question. Degree of instability was in question h RAP sounding valid 21z at ITH SREF 500 mb hts (top), 850 v wind (left) and 850 moisture flux (right) and anomalies valid 21z (courtesy WFO CTP  )

Instability forecast trends Potential limit to instability: dense cloud cover ahead of the cold front. Potential limit to instability: dense cloud cover ahead of the cold front. Mean 03Z SREF MLCAPE at BGM ~1200 J/kg with lots of spread. Mean 03Z SREF MLCAPE at BGM ~1200 J/kg with lots of spread. Mean 15Z SREF MLCAPE at BGM increased to over 1500 J/kg with less spread. Mean 15Z SREF MLCAPE at BGM increased to over 1500 J/kg with less spread. 5 SREF MLCAPE plume at BGM (03Z run left, 15Z run right) Visible satellite and surface plot at 18Z

WFO Binghamton Severe Weather Analog System 6

Use MLCAPE = 1300 J/kg 7

Use MLCAPE = 1700 J/kg 8

Comparison 9

SPC Storm-scale ensemble of opportunity NSSL WRF-ARW – 4 km NSSL WRF-ARW – 4 km EMC HRW WRF-ARW – 5.15 km EMC HRW WRF-ARW – 5.15 km EMC HRW WRF-ARW – 5.15 km (time lagged 12 h) EMC HRW WRF-ARW – 5.15 km (time lagged 12 h) EMC WRF-NMM – 4 km EMC WRF-NMM – 4 km EMC HRW NMMB – 4 km EMC HRW NMMB – 4 km EMC HRW NMMB – 4 km (time lagged 12 h) EMC HRW NMMB – 4 km (time lagged 12 h) NAM CONUS Nest – 4 km NAM CONUS Nest – 4 km 10

SPC Storm-scale ensemble 11

SPC Storm-scale ensemble 12

Tornado Tracks Six Tornadoes occurred in BGM CWA. Six Tornadoes occurred in BGM CWA. Two tornadoes were rated EF2. Two tornadoes were rated EF2. The tornado with 5 fatalities occurred in Madison county. The tornado with 5 fatalities occurred in Madison county. 13 Tornado tracks and EF ratings from July 8, 2014

Tornadic vs. non-tornadic supercells A small supercell produced an EF2 tornado in northeast Pennsylvania. (top) A small supercell produced an EF2 tornado in northeast Pennsylvania. (top) Another impressive supercell near Syracuse produced no tornadoes. (bottom) Another impressive supercell near Syracuse produced no tornadoes. (bottom) degree reflectivity (left) and SRM (right) for a tornadic storm in Pennsylvania (top) and non-tornadic storm in New York (bottom). The tornado path is annotated by the black line in upper figures.

SPC Mesoanalysis SPC Mesoanalysis showed a favorable environment for tornadoes across CWA. SPC Mesoanalysis showed a favorable environment for tornadoes across CWA. Strong low-level shear and low LCL heights. Strong low-level shear and low LCL heights. Can dual pol data be used to provide an improved assessment of tornado potential? Can dual pol data be used to provide an improved assessment of tornado potential? 15 SPC Mesoanalysis of 0-1 km shear (top) and LCL height (bottom) valid at 21z

Recent Studies - Conceptual Model ZDR arc around the edge of the inflow ZDR arc around the edge of the inflow Small drops / low ZDR in the hook echo region of the storm. Small drops / low ZDR in the hook echo region of the storm. 16 Conceptual model of ZDR patterns in a tornadic supercell. (from Kumjian et. al. 2011).

Tornadic Storm ZDR arc developed north of the tornado. ZDR arc developed north of the tornado. Low ZDR in the tornadic hook echo. Low ZDR in the tornadic hook echo. 17 Reflectivity and ZDR for a tornadic supercell over northeast Pennsylvania at 2213z. Tornado path is annotated.

Non-Tornadic Storm ZDR pattern was more disorganized. ZDR pattern was more disorganized. No clearly defined ZDR arc. No clearly defined ZDR arc. Areas of large ZDR values also found in the hook near the location of the potential tornado. Areas of large ZDR values also found in the hook near the location of the potential tornado. 18 Reflectivity and ZDR in a non-tornadic supercell over central New York at 2152z

EF-2 with 5 fatalities A subtle radar signature associated with a bookend vortex. A subtle radar signature associated with a bookend vortex. The storm was associated with a strong, highly curved rear inflow jet. The storm was associated with a strong, highly curved rear inflow jet. Forecasters more focused on supercells. Forecasters more focused on supercells degree Reflectivity (top) and SRM (bottom) for a tornadic storm at 23z. Tornado path is annotated.

EF-2 with 5 fatalities The velocity signature developed very suddenly. The velocity signature developed very suddenly. A severe thunderstorm warning was in effect for Madison county (no tornado warning). A severe thunderstorm warning was in effect for Madison county (no tornado warning) degree Reflectivity (top) and SRM (bottom) for a tornadic storm at 23z. Tornado path is annotated.

EF-2 with 5 fatalities ZDR enhanced on the leading edge of the convective system. ZDR enhanced on the leading edge of the convective system. Lower ZDR in the tornadic area of the storm. Lower ZDR in the tornadic area of the storm ° Reflectivity (top) and ZDR (bottom) for the tornadic storm in New York at 23Z.

EF-2 with 5 fatalities TDS developed between 23z and 2306z – just after tornado touchdown. TDS developed between 23z and 2306z – just after tornado touchdown. TDS extended up through 0.9 degrees (~ 7000 feet). TDS extended up through 0.9 degrees (~ 7000 feet). 22 Correlation coefficient for a tornadic storm from 2300 – 2306Z. Tornado path annotated.

Summary A rare severe weather and tornado event in central New York and northeast Pennsylvania occurred on July 8, A rare severe weather and tornado event in central New York and northeast Pennsylvania occurred on July 8, New tools showed promise helping forecasters to anticipate the occurrence and magnitude of the event. New tools showed promise helping forecasters to anticipate the occurrence and magnitude of the event. Dual polarization radar products have potential to help discriminate between tornadic and non- tornadic storms. Dual polarization radar products have potential to help discriminate between tornadic and non- tornadic storms. 23

A rare severe weather and tornado event in central New York and northeast Pennsylvania: July 8, 2014 Contact: Mike Evans 24