NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Critical Design Review 15 Janurary2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL 60201.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UF Hybrid Rocket Teams Mile High Club Brought to you by Chris Leonard, Ty Morton, Sam Darr, and Josh Childs.
Advertisements

BYU Rocket Team Special thanks to:
Preliminary Design Review. Rocket & Payload Schematic.
Northwestern University Space Technology and Rocketry Society (NUSTARS) NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review March 16, 2015.
UAA Rocketry PDR Presentation NASA Student Launch
University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015.
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB PDR PRESENTATION 1.
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA T HE M OST I NTERESTING R OCKET IN THE W ORLD.
P RELIMINARY D ESIGN R EVIEW University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Rockety Team.
“ The Other Woman ” National Association of Rocktry Level Three Certification Project By Steve Laird NAR #86948.
Critical Design Review NASA University Student Launch Initiative University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Student Launch Project Preliminary Design Review January 10, 2014.
Launch Lug – helps to guide the rocket upward until it reaches enough velocity for the fins to engage. Parachute – assists in the safe recovery of the.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI CDR Presentation.
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA PDR P RESENTATION. O UTLINE Project Organization Vehicle Design Payload Design Recovery System Simulations Future Work.
Project Λscension. Vehicle Dimensions Weight: 19.6 Ib Length: in (9 ft. 4.5 in) Diameter: 6 in Fin Semi-Span: 6 in.
NASA CDR Presentation Spring Grove Area High School.
St. Vincent – St. Mary FRR Presentation NASA Student Launch Initiative.
UAA Rocketry Critical Design Review Presentation.
NASA SLI 2010 Mulberry Grove High School Flight Readiness Review Measurement of UVB Radiation Absorption by Cloth Material at Different Altitudes and Measurement.
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Flight Readiness Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 47 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude 5203’- RockSim.
Critical Design Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 45 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude RockSim.
November 7,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6.00 inches  Mass: oz. / 17.34lbs.  Span: inches  Center of Gravity: inches.
Flight Readiness Review Atomic Aggies. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Critical Design Review of “Mach Shock Reduction” Phase II January 2008 Statesville, NC.
Launch Vehicle  Launch Vehicle Summary  The length of the rocked is inches, and the mass is ounces.  We have a dual Deployment Recovery.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI FRR Presentation.
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Student Launch Project Flight Readiness Review April 21, 2014.
 Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications  Static stability margin  Plan for vehicle safety verification and testing  Baseline motor selection.
Flight Readiness Review Team Hawaii. Vehicle Properties Diameter (in)6 inches Length (in)127 inches Gross Liftoff Weight (lb)50.25 lb Launch Lug/button.
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom.
University of Arkansas Senior Project- When Pigs Soar.
The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
Flight Readiness Review Student Launch Initiative SCS Rocket Team Statesville Christian School April 2, 2008.
The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.
University of Florida Rocket Team Critical Design Review Presentation.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
Atomic Aggies CDR. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Flight Readiness Review “Analysis of Atmospheric gamma radiation as a Function of Altitude by means of Scintillator Probe” St. Thomas High School, Houston,
Project Ares University of Central Florida NASA Student Launch 1/28/2015.
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom Body Tube Length-
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB PDR PRESENTATION 1.
HARDING UNIVERSITY FLYING BISONS A Study of Atmospheric Properties as a Function of Altitude Flight Readiness Review.
University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Team Rocket.
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Preliminary Design Review 6 November 2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
January 14,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6 inches  Mass: oz. / lbs.  Span: 22 inches  Center of Gravity: inches 
Critical Design Review Presentation Project Nova.
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB CDR PRESENTATION 1.
Critical Design Review Presentation Alabama Rocket Engineering Systems (ARES) Team The University of Alabama.
Flight Readiness Review UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA CONNER DENTON, JOHN FAULK, NGHIA HUYNH, KENT LINO, PHILLIP RUSCHMYER, & ANDREW TINDELL MENTOR : RICHARD.
UCF_USLI Preliminary Design Review David Cousin Freya Ford Md Arif Drew Dieckmann Stephen Hirst Mitra Mossaddad University of Central Florida.
Preliminary Design Review Clear Lake High School Team Rocket.
Preliminary Design Review Presentation
College of Engineering
Critical Design Review Presentation
2018 First Nation Launch - Flight Readiness Review
Critical Design Review February 2, 2015
November 7, 2014.
November 7, 2014.
Critical Design Review
Final Readiness Review
Plantation High SL team 1
University of Iowa USLI
2019 First Nation Launch – Oral Presentation
Presentation transcript:

NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Critical Design Review 15 Janurary2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL 60201

Launch Vehicle OverviewLaunch Vehicle Overview Requirements: 5280 foot apogee Sealing of vehicle Safe Recovery Specifications: Length: 106 in Diameter: 98 mm Mass: 18.2 lbs Stability: 4.25 cal

Materials Fiberglass Body tube, bulkheads Centering Rings Fins Nylon (1) 60” Main parachute (1) 12” drogue parachute Shock Cord Kevlar Recovery harness Steel Quick links Welded eyebolts Nomex Deployment bag Parachute Protectors Adhesive RocketPoxy West Systems

Key FeaturesKey Features Fins Trapeziodal Three fins Thickness: 0.125” Nose Cone Ogive design 24 inches long

Motor Cesaroni Technology K570 Exit rail velocity of 73.8 ft/s lbft-sec total impulse Thrust to weight ratio: 7.1:1 54 mm diameter

Recovery Apogee Deployment Drogue charges go off Drogue deploys Pieces tethered 700 feet deployment: Main parachute charges go off Main deploys with all pieces tethered Dual Deployment Main Altimeter: Missile Works RRC 3 Redundant Raven 3 Black Powder ejection charges

Mass StatementMass Statement Nose Cone: 556g Payload Section: 1007g Body Tube: 573g Eye bolts and coupler: 321g Payload: 113g Upper Body Section: 1578 g Body Tube: 859g 60” Parachute: 340g Eye bolts and hardware: 113g Shock Cord: 265g Avionics Bay: 494.7g Body Tube: 53.7g Coupler: 271g Avionics Hardware: 170g Booster: 4542g Body Tube: 1468g Trapezoidal Fin set: 341g Motor Mount (including motor): 1994g 3 x Centering Ring: 134.7g 12” Parachute: 55g Epoxy, Reinforcing: 200g Shock Cord + Hardware: 349g The total mass of the launch vehicle is 8258 grams (18.2 pounds). There is a margin of 160 grams before the projected altitude goes below the projected altitude.

Kinetic EnergiesKinetic Energies Launch Vehicle SectionMassTerminal VelocityKinetic Energy Drogue configuration (12” parachute) 7.225kg = slugs m/s = ft/s 950 J = 701 ft-s Payload/Nosecone (60” parachute) 7.225kg = slugs 3.14 m/s = ft/s J = ft-s

Wind DriftWind Drift Wind Drift Simulations 0 mph5 mph10 mph15 mph20 mph 6.5 feet470 feet1,046 feet1,648 feet2,215 feet

Subscale Launch PredictionsSubscale Launch Predictions

Subscale Launch ResultsSubscale Launch Results Prediction of Launch Actual Raven 3 Altimeter Data

RocketFlight StabilityRocket Flight Stability The design of the rocket is currently overstable to compensate for possible changes in mass of components once fabrication occurs CP (inches)CG (inches)Static Margin Subscale Fullscale

K570 Thrust to weight ratio of 7.1 Rail exit velocity of 45 ft/s

PayloadDesign OverviewPayload Design Overview Magnetically sealed with rare earth magnets: 33.7lb paired with 75.28lb magnetic pull force Polyethylene to cushion and secure payload Bulkhead and aluminum brace for extra support

AGSE InformationAGSE Information Critical FOS: 2.55 to yield Dimensions 1.5 ft. wide ft. high May extend to provide more stable mechanical locking position ft. long May shorten to save mass since rail is longer than necessary 35.6 cubic feet is well below requirement Mass Prediction: 130 lb

AGSE Information – Electronics No changes since PDR except the motor drivers, which now have 15 amp capacity to accommodate the new linear actuators Igniter integration to AGSE by second week of February to allow lift testing

AGSE Information – Payload Retrieval Current base: Lynxmotion AL-5D (right) Mounting position: vertical beam of AGSE Projected specifications: Max. reach: 20” Arm lengths (first and second): 10” Base motor torque: ~500 oz-in Midpoint motor torque: ~300 oz-in Structural component material: carbon fiber Electrical: Arduino Uno R3, Pololu Mini Maestro servo controller Power: Independent, 7.2 V NiMH rechargeable Weight: < 50 oz

Payload Arm: Movement StepsPayload Arm: Movement Steps Rest position: First segment vertical, second placing gripper over payload bay Payload grasp: Both segments extended maximally toward payload Drop position: Identical to rest position; payload dropped into bay Bay closing: Arm moves upward along LV contour to close payload door

Question s?

BACKUP SLIDESBACKUP SLIDES