 Where should the idea come from? ◦ The researcher !

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
International Programs Office Faculty Senate Presentation Feb 26, 2013 by Susan Bender Executive Director.
Advertisements

Outcome mapping. Outcome Mapping Developed by the evaluation unit of Developed by the evaluation unit of
New Faculty: Self- Assessment Tools Positioning Yourself as a Scholar.
Broader Impacts: Meaningful Links between Research and Societal Benefits October 23, 2014 Martin Storksdieck I Center for Research on Lifelong STEM Learning.
 Introductions  Webinar etiquette ◦ Please place your phone on MUTE if you are not asking a question or not responding to the presenters. ◦ If you encounter.
A.M.Tammaro Ottobre 2005 IT profiles and curricula Anna Maria Tammaro.
Developing Winning proposals and beyond ∞. Developing a fundable concept involves innovative, engaged and knowledgeable inquisitors as faculty. A support.
The Purpose of Action Research
NSF Merit Review Criteria Revision Background. Established Spring 2010 Rationale: – More than 13 years since the last in-depth review and revision of.
Goal 1: Define marketing and the marketing process.
The IGERT Program Preliminary Proposals June 2008 Carol Van Hartesveldt IGERT Program Director IGERT Program Director.
Research Methods for Business Students
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
Expanding the Evidence Base for Consumer Policies A project in partnership with: The European Commission DG Environment BIO Intelligence.
Formulating an important research question Susan Furth, MD, PhD Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research
UAMS Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Prof. A. Taleb-Bendiab Room 605 A. Taleb-Bendiab, Module: Research Methods,
Tips for Writing a Successful Grant Proposal Diana Lipscomb Associate Dean for Faculty and Research CCAS.
Developing Winning proposals and beyond ∞. Developing a fundable concept involves innovative, engaged and knowledgeable inquisitors as faculty. A support.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Integrating Diversity into.
A Roadmap to Success Writing an Effective Research Grant Proposal Bob Miller, PhD Regents Professor Oklahoma State University 2011 Bob Miller, PhD Regents.
Grant Research Basics. Asking the Question  Before you start, you must have both clearly stated research question and primary outcome measure.  What.
Research Project Grant (RPG) Retreat K-Series March 2012 Bioengineering Classroom.
NSF GRFP Workshop Sept 16, 2016 Dr. Julia Fulghum
NSF IGERT proposals Yang Zhao Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Wayne State University.
1 Ideas of Problem-based Learning As a learner-centred process, problem- based learning meets the learners' interests and as such gives room for developing.
I know of no more encouraging fact than the unquestionable ability of man to elevate his life by conscious endeavor. Henry David Thoreau.
Ch. 3 StudyCast SarahBeth Walker. NETS-T Standard 1  Teachers use their knowledge of subject matter, teaching and learning, and technology to facilitate.
 Where should the idea come from? ◦ The researcher !
Grant writing Ken Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania State University.
Applying for Grants and Fellowships: Advice for SLA Graduate Students (Fall 2015) Christopher Rodning, Associate Professor, Anthropology Kevin Gotham,
Committee Meeting, June 9, 2008 Strategic Institutional Research Plan.
Tips on Fellowship Writing A Reviewer’s Perspective Wendy Havran.
Gain an interdisciplinary perspective on how faculty from other units approach teaching and learning Expand knowledge of teaching strategies Acquire the.
Early Childhood Transition Part C Indicator C-8 & Part B Indicator B-12 Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports.
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BOARD TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD TRB’s Vision for Transportation Research.
1Mobile Computing Systems © 2001 Carnegie Mellon University Writing a Successful NSF Proposal November 4, 2003 Website: nsf.gov.
Results of WP 4: Implementation, experimentation of teacher training actions Open University of Catalonia - From November 4th to December 19th.
Insider Guide to Peer Review for Applicants Dr. Valerie Durrant Acting Director CSR Division of Neuroscience, Development and Aging.
Toolkit for Finding Grants: Elements for a Successful Grant Search Office of Sponsored Programs Raubinger Hall, Room 309 William Paterson University
1 Grant Applications Rachel Croson, PhD Dean, College of Business UT Arlington (formerly DD SES/SBE NSF)
Middle Years Programme The unique benefits of the MYP.
Connect2Complete Theory of Change Development for Colleges and State Offices November 10, 2011 OMG Center for Collaborative Learning.
 Elements of a Research Proposal. Goals of a research proposal  guideline and “security blanket” for yourself  contract between you and your thesis.
NSF Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Program February 25, 2016.
Transforming Good Ideas into Funded Research:
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2016
Competency Based Learning and Project Based Learning
Types of Community Engagement Forms among Participating Institutions
Applying for Grants and Fellowships: Advice for SLA Graduate Students (Fall 2016) Christopher Rodning, Associate Professor, Anthropology Kevin Gotham,
MUHC Innovation Model.
Applying for Grants and Fellowships: Advice for SLA Graduate Students (Fall 2017) Christopher Rodning, Professor, Anthropology Kevin Gotham, Associate.
Supported by DHHS/HRSA/BHPr/Division of Nursing Grant#D62HP06858
SCHOLARLY BEHaVIORS HOW ARE YOU A SCHOLAR ?.
Applying for Grants and Fellowships: Advice for SLA Graduate Students (Fall 2018) Christopher Rodning, Professor, Anthropology Kevin Gotham, Associate.
Transforming Good Ideas into Funded Research:
FISH 521 Further proceedings Peer review
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2018
Stakeholder Summit Session 4: Aspirations
Well-Being Research Collaborative: The Planning Webinar
Preparing Research Proposals for NSF and NIH April 20, 2018
Dr. Lani (Chi Chi) Zimmerman, UNMC Dr. Bill Mahoney, IS&T
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2017
SCHOLARLY BEHaVIORS HOW ARE YOU A SCHOLAR ?.
SCHOLARLY BEHaVIORS HOW ARE YOU A SCHOLAR ?.
UAMS Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
SCHOLARLY BEHaVIORS HOW ARE YOU A SCHOLAR ?.
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
Early findings from the Academy’s Rapporteur: Dr Theo Gavrielides
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2019
Presentation transcript:

 Where should the idea come from? ◦ The researcher !

 What questions should you answer when approaching the development of a research or sponsored topic?

 1) Is there a need to answer your question? Is it your passion to find the answer?  2) What is its intellectual merit? Does it advance knowledge and understanding within its own field or across fields?  3) What research already exists in the literature? How does your research differ or how is it innovative?

 4) What goals and objectives will you set?  5) What are the activities or strategies that will help you achieve them?  6) What are the anticipated outcomes?  7) Who will benefit from these outcomes and what will it contribute on a broader scale?

 8) Are you qualified to do the work proposed or should you seek collaborators?  9) Is your topic well conceived and organized?  10) Do you/the institution have the necessary resources to complete the research?  11) How will you evaluate or measure the success of your research?  12) Who will benefit from the outcomes of your research?

 In friendlier economic times, research for the sake of research and the development of knowledge was enough  Today research and sponsored programming needs to do more than grow knowledge as a goal or objective  Systemic, Transformational, Potential for Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer (i.e. Economic Development) are all areas of focus for both the federal and private sponsor.

 Evaluating Your Idea Exercises: ◦ What, Why, Who, Where? ◦ Themes of your concept-keep marketing in the back of your mind. The truth is you are selling something and someone will decide to buy or not. ◦ Measureable Goals and Objectives are what you are selling along with your ability to get there. Keeping this in the forefront of your mind while developing your agenda is elemental. ◦ Specific Aims are testable hypothesis with long-term goals.

 What this means is that sponsors are looking for collaborative, multi or inter-disciplinary proposals.  More perspectives and a variety of “eyes” on content, direction and methods.  External Evaluators are critical! They provide an objective, systematic method of evaluating your project, its progress and outcomes. Your OSP has a listing of evaluators for your reference.

 Next Steps: ◦ Seek advice from peers and mentors ◦ Consider sponsors- current areas funding trends may guide the development of your concept ◦ Reflect on potential collaborators ◦ Work with your Dean and Chair ◦ Come to OSP early and often!!!