Protein interactions: main methods for detection (all organisms) Two-hybrid8,446 (Co-)Immunoprecipitation567 Interaction adhesion assay225 In vitro binding138.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DNAStructureandReplication. Transformation: Robert Griffith (1928)
Advertisements

The chemical Basis of Inheritance. Chromatin / Chromosomes.
Biological networks Bing Zhang Department of Biomedical Informatics Vanderbilt University
PPI network construction and false positive detection Jin Chen CSE Fall 1.
First release of HOGENOM, a database of homologous genes from complete genome Equipe Bioinformatique et Génomique Evolutive Laboratoire de Biométrie et.
A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Article by Peter Uetz, et.al. Presented by Kerstin Obando.
Biological networks Bing Zhang Department of Biomedical Informatics Vanderbilt University
Protein domains vs. structure domains - an example.
Introduction to biological networks. protein-gene interactions protein-protein interactions PROTEOME GENOME Citrate Cycle METABOLISM Bio-chemical reactions.
1 Protein-Protein Interaction Networks MSC Seminar in Computational Biology
Protein-Protein Interactions Networks  “ A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae ” P.Utez et al, Nature 2000.
Sequence-Structure-Function Sequence Structure Function Threading Ab initio BLAST Folding: impossible but for the smallest structures Function prediction.
Introduction to Systems Biology. Overview of the day Background & Introduction Network analysis methods Case studies Exercises.
4 September, 2006 Chapters Methods: Proteins, Model Systems I.
Marcotte EM, Pellegrini M, Ng HL, Rice DW, Yeates TO, Eisenberg D. (1999). Detecting protein function and protein-protein interactions from genome sequences.
Protein-Protein Interaction Screens. Bacterial Two-Hybrid System selectable marker RNA polymerase DNA binding protein bait target sequence target.
Affinity chromatography/mass spec Bait protein GST Page 252.
Protein-protein Interactions June 18, Why PPI?  Protein-protein interactions determine outcome of most cellular processes  Proteins which are.
MCB 317 Genetics and Genomics MCB 317 Topic 10, part 5 A Story of Transcription.
Comparative Genomics of the Eukaryotes
LUMIER-Assays Dr. Manfred Koegl Protein Interaction Unit
A highly abbreviated introduction to proteomics
Protein-protein interactions Chapter 12. Stable complex Transient Interaction Transient Signaling Complex Rap1A – cRaf1 Interface 1310 Å 2 Stable complex:
Protein protein interactions
MN-B-WP II (BInf 2) Bioinformatische Datenbanken Kay Hofmann – Protein Evolution Group Woche 4: Interaktionsdatenbanken.
Protein analysis and proteomics (Part 2 of 2). Many of the images in this powerpoint presentation are from Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics by Jonathan.
Using The Gene Ontology: Gene Product Annotation.
Genome Biology and Biotechnology 10. The proteome Prof. M. Zabeau Department of Plant Systems Biology Flanders Interuniversity Institute for Biotechnology.
Interactions and more interactions
BASys: A Web Server for Automated Bacterial Genome Annotation Gary Van Domselaar †, Paul Stothard, Savita Shrivastava, Joseph A. Cruz, AnChi Guo, Xiaoli.
Finish up array applications Move on to proteomics Protein microarrays.
Introduction to Proteomics 1. What is Proteomics? Proteomics - A newly emerging field of life science research that uses High Throughput (HT) technologies.
Discovering Macromolecular Interactions. An experimental strategy for identifying new molecular actors in a process candidate approach general screen.
CZ5211 Topics in Computational Biology Lecture 6: Biological Pathways I: Molecular Interactions Prof. Chen Yu Zong Tel:
Gene Disruption (cont) & Protein-Protein Interactions October 4, 2006 Outline Recap Gene Disruption and Drug Discovery RNAi Two Hybrid Affinity Purification.
Inferring strengths of protein-protein interactions from experimental data using linear programming Morihiro Hayashida, Nobuhisa Ueda, Tatsuya Akutsu Bioinformatics.
Proteome and interactome Bioinformatics.
1 Having genome data allows collection of other ‘omic’ datasets Systems biology takes a different perspective on the entire dataset, often from a Network.
Functional Genomics Functional genomic datasets Biological networks Integrating genomic datasets BIO520 BioinformaticsJim Lund.
Lecture 9. Functional Genomics at the Protein Level: Proteomics.
TAP(Tandem Affinity Purification) Billy Baader Genetics 677.
Genomics II: The Proteome Using high-throughput methods to identify proteins and to understand their function.
Central dogma: the story of life RNA DNA Protein.
MCB 7200: Molecular Biology Biotechnology terminology Common hosts and experimental organisms Transcription and translation Prokaryotic gene organization.
Biol 729 – Proteome Bioinformatics Dr M. J. Fisher - Protein: Protein Interactions.
Announcements: Note that there will be presentations and associated paper summaries for both Thursday and Tuesday classes. The Exam II mean is 81.6 and.
1 Protein-Protein Interactions High-throughput strategy –Prediction from sequence In silico analysis –Protein A from species A: domain 1 and 2 –Protein.
How many interactions are there? ~6,200 genes ~6,200 proteins x 2-10 interactions/protein ~12, ,000 interactions Yeast.
Biochemically characterizing the Soluble guanylyl cyclase intrinsically disordered region By: Candice Benally and Colleen Kelley University of Massachusetts.
Gene models and proteomes for Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Sc), Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Sp), Arabidopsis thaliana (At), Oryza sativa (Os), Drosophila melanogaster.
Chapter 11 Meiosis & Genetics What do you think meiosis makes?
1 Having genome data allows collection of other ‘omic’ datasets Systems biology takes a different perspective on the entire dataset, often from a Network.
Network Analysis Goal: to turn a list of genes/proteins/metabolites into a network to capture insights about the biological system 1.Types of high-throughput.
PROTEIN INTERACTION NETWORK – INFERENCE TOOL DIVYA RAO CANDIDATE FOR MASTER OF SCIENCE IN BIOINFORMATICS ADVISOR: Dr. FILIPPO MENCZER CAPSTONE PROJECT.
MICROBIOLOGIA GENERALE Prokaryotic genomes. The prokaryotic genome.
Affinity chromatography based strategies “Fishing for partners” Immunoprecipitation approaches The TAP TAG system Two hybrid assay.
Protein-protein Interactions
MICROBIOLOGIA GENERALE Prokaryotic genomes. The Escherichia coli nucleoid.
Ito et al. Genome-Scale In Vivo Protein Interaction Testing
Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes Presented by Nathalie Kirshman and Xinyi Ma.
Yeast Two-Hybrid Screening: The Principles
Evolution of Biochemical Pathways
Hypothetical example of co‐complex interactions being scored by weighted matrix model Hypothetical example of co‐complex interactions being scored by weighted.
Protein Complex Discovery
Modeling cells with protein networks
Bioinformatics, Vol.17 Suppl.1 (ISMB 2001) Weekly Lab. Seminar
Protein Complex Discovery
Computational genomics
Proteomic analysis of human transcription factors Disease correlation of 19 TFs and 4 well‐studied FOX family members, based on their GO annotations. Proteomic.
Brandon Ho, Anastasia Baryshnikova, Grant W. Brown  Cell Systems 
Presentation transcript:

Protein interactions: main methods for detection (all organisms) Two-hybrid8,446 (Co-)Immunoprecipitation567 Interaction adhesion assay225 In vitro binding138 Affinity Column120 Copurification85 Immunoblotting83 Other Biophysical73 All interactions10,432 Source: The Database of Interacting Proteins (DIP)

Protein interactions: top 8 organisms Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae)7,881 Helicobacter pylori1,418 Man (Homo sapiens )595 Worm (Caenorhabditis elegans)~500 Mouse (Mus musculus )130 Fly (Drosophila melanogaster)81 Escherichia coli56 Rat (Rattus norvegicus )48 All interactions10,432 Source: The Database of Interacting Proteins (DIP)

Up to 6,200 Protein interactions reported in 5 papers: Fromont-Racine et al.1997, 2000 ~300 Uetz et al./Drees et al. 2000, 2001 ~1,200 Ito et al. 2000, /~4,700 ========== ~2, ,200

Mass spectrometry Protein chips (arrays) Biochemical proteomics Extented by recent contributions from Up to 6,200 Protein interactions reported in 5 papers: Fromont-Racine et al.1997, 2000 ~300 Uetz et al./Drees et al. 2000, 2001 ~1,200 Ito et al. 2000, /~4,700 ========== ~2, ,200

Two-hybrid-Array (rich media) HIS3 DBD B AD ORF HIS3 DBD B HIS3 DBD B ORF AD ORF AD

HIS3 DBD B AD ORF HIS3 DBD B HIS3 DBD B ORF AD ORF AD Two-hybrid-Array (-His media) bait: PCF11

Details in Cagney & Uetz, Methods Enzymol. 328: 3 (2000); Current Protocols in Protein Science 19.6 (2001) rich- Histidine Insert movie 1 here Insert movie 2 here

Analysis of Yeast Protein Complexes by Mass spec Gavin et al. (2002) Nature 415: epitope-tagged proteins (include human orthologues) 1167 clones expressed the tagged protein 589 successful purifications 232 distinct complexes identified 134 new complexes 16,830 protein bands identified (corresponding to 1440 proteins) Note: The probability to detect the same protein in a complex twice is 70% Conclusion: there are about 700 complexes in yeast

Analysis of Yeast Protein Complexes by Mass spec How many protein interactions are there based on mass spec data? On average 12 proteins per complex, Minimum: 11 interactionsMaximum: 55 interactions  8,000  38,500 interactions total

Analysis of Yeast Protein Complexes by Mass spec Our two-hybrid array (!) screens for comparison ~650 baits screened against whole-genome array 330 baits yielded ~1200 reproducible interactions of those 1200 only ~100 showed up in complexes 76 proteins used as both baits/“entry points” by Gavin et al. yielded 227 interactions in our two-hybrid screens (i.e. 2.9 on average) 76 purifications = complexes would contain ~900 proteins with x interactions

Cdc53 Cep3 Eft1 Hrt1 Rav1 Rav2 Rcy1 (F) YBR280 (F) YJL149 (F) YMR258C (F) MS1 Seol et al Nature Cell Biol. 3: 384 MS3 (Aebersold et al., pers. comm.) Grr1 (F) YLR097C (F) Bdf1 Cdc4 Ctf13 (F) Met30 (F) Rub1 Sgt1 YLR224W (F) YLR352W (F) YLR368W (F) Two-Hybrid Uetz et al Nature 403: 623 Skp1

A B C D E F G H I J K L M protein pulled down with epitope-tagged protein B protein pulled down with epitope-tagged protein E two-hybrid interactions Two-hybrid…vs. mass spec

Limitations of current network graphs - static - no localization data - no or limited integration with other compounds - no or limited data on experimental conditions - no or limited data on expression levels

Predicting Protein Interaction Domains Based on Sprinzak & Margalit, J. Mol. Biol. 311: 681 [2001] Protein 1Protein 2 Protein pairs Domain information from the Interpro database (Apweiler et al., Nucl. Acids Res. 29; 37 [2001]) Conclusion:

Predicting Protein Interaction Domains Based on Sprinzak & Margalit, J. Mol. Biol. 311: 681 [2001] domain combinations 4 log-odds score: log 2 ( ) observed frequency of pair frequencies of domains P ij PiPjPiPj

Summary (sort of…) Protein interactions in the Database of Interacting Proteins (DIP) All interactions10,432 PDB entries~1900 one domain mapped252 both domains mapped175 Dissociation constant available26 Source: The Database of Interacting Proteins (DIP) as of late 2001