TTF - ECAL Plenary in CMS week ECAL Stability Contacts: Marc Dejardin, Julie Malcles (laser)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INFN Milano, Universita` degli Studi Milano Bicocca Siena IPRD May Testbeam results of the CMS electromagnetic calorimeter Alessio Ghezzi.
Advertisements

Technische Universität München Status report on SADC feature extraction.
US CMS H1/H2 Issues1 H C A L Dan is interested in the calibration of the HCAL for jets. He defines “R” as the measured energy of a pion, probably in ADC.
ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Performance Henric Wilkens (CERN), on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
Adil Khan Kyungpook National university Korea-Japan Joint ScECAL Group Meeting kobe University Japan 3 rd September 2010.
ADC Performance and Calibration of MDT Chambers
ECAL Spike Plot Approval ECAL Anomalous Signal Plots Approval Adi Bornheim for ECAL
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group 10th ICATPP Conference on Astroparticle,
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group High-resolution, high-granularity.
CMS Physics Meeting, Dec. 6, Analysis Note on the Validation of the ORCA Simulation of the Endcap Muon CSC Front-end Electronics S. Durkin -- Ohio.
ECAL Testbeam Meeting, Rome 28 March 2007 Toyoko Orimoto Adolf Bornheim, Chris Rogan, Yong Yang California Institute of Technology Lastest Results from.
1 Laser Monitoring: Offline Transparency Correction in CMSSW Toyoko Orimoto Caltech 13 July 2007.
ECAL TIMING. 20/04/092 Ratios’ Method Basics Position of pulse maximum parameterized using the ratio of two consecutive samples, i.e., R = A(t)/A(t+1)
ECAL electronics Guido Haefeli, Lausanne PEBS meeting 10.Jan
TTU Group MeetingMarch 20, HF Radiation Damage Evaluation (What, how, what to do about it, and what is next?) *Phil Dudero (TTU)‏ Nural Akchurin.
Intercalibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Using Neutral Pion Decays 1 M. Gataullin (California Institute of Technology) on behalf of the.
CMS ECAL 2006 Test Beams Effort Caltech HEP Seminar Christopher Rogan California Institute of Technology May 1, 2007.
Tests with JT0623 & JT0947 at Indiana University Nagoya PMT database test results for JT0623 at 3220V: This tube has somewhat higher than usual gain. 5×10.
W  eν The W->eν analysis is a phi uniformity calibration, and only yields relative calibration constants. This means that all of the α’s in a given eta.
XIS FM sensors cal. report Hiroshi Nakajima XIS
HCAL1 Status 2003 Oleg Gavrishchuk, JINR, Dubna 1. HCAL1 performance 2003 General design High Voltage system LED monitoring 2. Tests in muon halo beam.
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
Monitoring system of the LHCb electromagnetic calorimeter NEC’2007, Varna, Bulgaria Ivan Korolko (ITEP Moscow)
The MPPC Study for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Introduction Measurement of basic characteristics –Gain, Noise Rate, Cross-talk Measurement of uniformity.
David BAILLEUX US CMS on behalf of the Caltech group Laser Monitoring System - Electronics review 20 March Overview Overview Laser control Laser.
MPPC update including plastic connector T2K experiment collaboration meeting 2007/4/18 (Wed) S.Gomi T.Nakaya M.Yokoyama ( Kyoto University ) T.Nakadaira.
M.D. Nov 27th 2002M0' analysis workshop1 Monitoring system : lessons from M0’  Contents : Monitoring electronics Laser APD electronics Conclusions & requirements.
1 xCAL monitoring Yu. Guz, IHEP, Protvino I.Machikhiliyan, ITEP, Moscow.
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with first LHC data
1 Development of Multi-Pixel Photon Counters (1) S.Gomi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, M.Taguchi, (Kyoto University) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura, (KEK) Oct
NA62 Gigatracker Working Group Meeting 23 March 2010 Massimiliano Fiorini CERN.
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group High-resolution, high-granularity.
Uniformity in ATLAS EM Calo measured in test beams  Constraints on the EM calorimeter constant term  Energy reconstruction  Uniformity results with.
08-June-2006 / Mayda M. VelascoCALOR Chicago1 Initial Calibration for the CMS Hadronic Calorimeter Barrel Mayda M. Velasco Northwestern University.
DOE Review Adi Bornheim California Institute of Technology July 25, 2007 CMS ECAL Status, Test Beams, Monitoring and Integration.
MPPC status M.Taguchi(kyoto) T2K ND /7/7.
1 Yu. Guz HCAL status 22/06/ Yu. Guz HCAL 137 Cs calibration The 3 rd run in 2011 was performed at the technical stop, May-09. Two source passages,
Calo preparation for 2015 Goals: -Trigger stability -Good calibration for HLT2 processing -Improved calibration ( timing, e/gamma response) for all calo.
CMS ECAL End Cap WACH4, 28 Nov 2002 D Cockerill - RAL (1) - Yield, e/MeV with production crystals and production VPTs - Pre-calibration precision using.
1 Calorimeters LED control LHCb CALO meeting Anatoli Konoplyannikov /ITEP/ Status of the calorimeters LV power supply and ECS control Status of.
Georgios Daskalakis On behalf of the CMS Collaboration ECAL group CALOR 2006 – Chicago,USA June 5-9, 2006 CMS ECAL Calibration Strategy.
10-Dec-2008 / S.KunoriHCAL Noise Identification and Monitoring1 HCAL Noise Identification and Filtering (HPD behavior and noise identification) Shuichi.
Performance of new MPPC Nov. 21 Korea-Japan joint meeting Takashi Maeda Hideki Yamazaki Yuji Sudo (University of Tsukuba) --- Contents ---
Muons at CalDet Introduction Track Finder Package ADC Corrections Drift Points Path Length Attenuation Strip-to-Strip Calibration Scintillator Response.
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with LHC collision data Maria Margherita Obertino on behalf of the CMS Collaboration Introduction The.
1 ECAL/PRS quality check with LED system Outline  Introduction, how to use LED time scan data for a detector quality check;  Last collected data of the.
WACH4 26/11/2002Julien Cogan CERN/EP/CMA-1- THERMAL STEPS ANALYSIS Goals & Means : –apply a “step function” on the cooling water –look at : APD response.
Testbeam analysis Lesya Shchutska. 2 beam telescope ECAL trigger  Prototype: short bars (3×7.35×114 mm 3 ), W absorber, 21 layer, 18 X 0  Readout: Signal.
Report on the Beam Test Analysis Satoru Uozumi Apr GLDCAL meeting Topics of this talk are: Comparison of various MIP calibration methods Some problems.
HCAL1 Status 2004 Oleg Gavrishchuk, JINR, Dubna 1. HCAL1 performance in 2004 General design High Voltage system LED monitoring 2. Stability in 2003 Led.
Sergey BarsukElectromagnetic Calorimeter for 1 Electromagnetic Calorimeter for the LHCb experiment Perugia, Italy March 29 – April 2, 2004 ECAL CALO Sergey.
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with LHC collision data Maria Margherita Obertino on behalf of the CMS Collaboration Introduction The.
1 XCAL LED quality check and time alignment consideration CALO meeting Anatoli Konoplyannikov [ITEP / LAPP] Outline  CALO sub-detector status.
M.D. Nov 27th 2002M0' workshop1 M0’ linearity study  Contents : Electronic injection Laser injection Beam injection Conclusion.
28/11/02Guy Dewhirst1 Ultra Light Weights Method Guy Dewhirst Imperial College London.
3/06/06 CALOR 06Alexandre Zabi - Imperial College1 CMS ECAL Performance: Test Beam Results Alexandre Zabi on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group CMS ECAL.
11 june 2002 CMS ECAL : Patrick Jarry ( Saclay) 1 Pulse shape reconstruction : CMS ECAL Introduction –the problem –the tools –experimental pulse shape.
Laser System Status and Plans November 20 th, 2008 R.Febbraro / S. Viret LPC TileCal Operations 1. Diode 4 study 2. Stability preliminary results 3. Next.
Performance of 1600-pixel MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Jan. 30(Tue.) Korea-Japan Joint Shinshu Univ. Takashi Maeda ( Univ. of Tsukuba)
Calibration of the Electromagnetic Calorimeter of the CMS detector
Carlos Vergel-Infante May 17th, 2017
Pulse Shape Fitting Beam Test September, October CERN
CMS ECAL Calibration and Test Beam Results
Problems with the Run4 Preliminary Phi->KK Analysis
Status ECAL Laser Monitoring
Beam Tests data vs Matlab simulations
Slope measurements from test-beam irradiations
Stability of Calibration Data
Beam Tests data vs Matlab simulations
The MPPC Study for the GLD Calorimeter Readout
Presentation transcript:

TTF - ECAL Plenary in CMS week ECAL Stability Contacts: Marc Dejardin, Julie Malcles (laser) nfId= nfId= /1/2016

Laser Stability: context 2/1/20162  APD/PN corrected for (see CMS DN-2008/001 for more detail): PN linearity Laser pulse variation  Selection criteria: 100 < number of events < < laser FWHM < ADC < amplitude < 4000 ADC 3 < signal maximum sample < 8 max amplitude r.m.s.: 10% max amplitude m3: 40% max amplitude/PN r.m.s.: 3% max amplitude/PN m3: 40% 0.8(0.7) < laser pulse correction < 0.9(0.95) for barrel(endcap)  Two periods have been considered on 2010 data (only the second period shown in this talk, results are comparable): ! , 500 h, 500 sequences, red laser and blue laser ! , 350 h, 800 sequences, blue laser only

Blue laser APD/PN stability: barrel 2/1/20163 Stability of the ECAL laser monitoring system. RMS deviation of the quantity APD/PN for the blue laser for EB channels with nominal data quality cuts applied. The most stable of the two reference PNs was used in each light monitoring region.

Blue laser VPT/PN stability: endcap 2/1/20164 Stability of the ECAL laser monitoring system. RMS deviation of the quantity VPT/PN for the blue laser for EE channels with nominal data quality cuts applied. The most stable of the two reference PNs was used in each light monitoring region. Right half of EE+ has only 1 active PN (instead of 2) for the considered period, this is why there are less stable regions (also seen in PN stability)

Red laser APD/PN stability: barrel (only) 2/1/20165 Stability of the ECAL laser monitoring system. RMS deviation of the quantity APD/PN for the red laser for EB channels with nominal data quality cuts applied. The most stable of the two reference PNs was used in each light monitoring region.

Test pulse stability: APD 2/1/20166 Stability of the APD electronics response to a fixed charge injection. RMS deviation of the response for EB channels with nominal data quality cuts applied.

Test pulse stability: PN 2/1/20167 Barrel approval pendind: need to understand PN regions which do not seem to correlate to the APD/PN stability map Stability of the PN electronics response to a calibrated charge injection. RMS deviation of the response with nominal data quality cuts applied.

History plot for one typical channel 2/1/20168 History plot of the quantity APD/PN for the blue laser and one typical channel.

Laser pulse correction for one typical channel 2/1/20169 Due to different shaping time of the APD and PN, the APD/PN ratio depends on the laser signal variations. With the information of the laser pulse shape and the SPR signal response we can calculate a correction factor exactly correlated with APD/PN ratio. The colour of the points gives their time ordering. Correlation between the measured variation of the quantity APD/PN with the expected correction factor computed using the electronics Single Pulse Response and the laser pulse shape information. The colour of the points indicate their time ordering.