The Newtonian contributions from the Moon, Sun and Planets Basis for a native relativistic software integrating the motion of satellites Sophie PIREAUX.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Physics 55 Friday, December 2, Quiz 7 (last quiz) 2.Relativistic mass, momentum, energy 3.Introduction to General Relativity 4.Einstein’s equivalence.
Advertisements

Developing a Theory of Gravity Does the Sun go around the Earth or Earth around Sun? Why does this happen? Plato } Artistotle } Philosophy Ptolemy }& Models.
The fundamental astronomical reference systems for space missions and the expansion of the universe Michael Soffel & Sergei Klioner TU Dresden.
July 2005 Einstein Conference Paris Thermodynamics of a Schwarzschild black hole observed with finite precision C. Chevalier 1, F. Debbasch 1, M. Bustamante.
Coordinate-systems and time. Seeber 2.1. NON INERTIAL SYSTEM CTS: Conventional Terrestrial System Mean-rotationaxis Greenwich X Y- Rotates.
General Relativity Physics Honours 2006 A/Prof. Geraint F. Lewis Rm 557, A29 Lecture Notes 5.
General Relativity Physics Honours 2007 A/Prof. Geraint F. Lewis Rm 557, A29 Lecture Notes 4.
Physics 151: Lecture 28 Today’s Agenda
Gravitation Applications Lecturer: Professor Stephen T. Thornton
General-Relativistic Effects in Astrometry S.A.Klioner, M.H.Soffel Lohrmann Observatory, Dresden Technical University 2005 Michelson Summer Workshop, Pasadena,
Modelling and scientific programming. Objectives To learn to develop computer programs that are  Correct  Efficient  Adaptable  Portable.
Feb. 2, 2011 NEWS: Exoplanets from Kepler.
1 The Origin of Gravity ≡ General Relativity without Einstein ≡ München 2009 by Albrecht Giese, Hamburg The Origin of Gravity 1.
3. The solar system is held together by gravity A gravitational field is a field surrounding a massive object, within which any other mass will experience.
1 Samara State Aerospace University (SSAU) Modern methods of analysis of the dynamics and motion control of space tether systems Practical lessons Yuryi.
Determination of the Geodetic Rotation of the Solar System Bodies by means of Spectral Analysis Method G.I. Eroshkin and V.V. Pashkevich Central (Pulkovo)
Kinetics of Particles:
Physics 201: Lecture 25, Pg 1 Lecture 25 Jupiter and 4 of its moons under the influence of gravity Goal: To use Newton’s theory of gravity to analyze the.
Universal Gravitation
Chapter 26 Relativity. General Physics Relativity II Sections 5–7.
Essential Idea:  The Newtonian idea of gravitational force acting between two spherical bodies and the laws of mechanics create a model that can be.
1 Ephemerides in the relativistic framework: _ time scales, spatial coordinates, astronomical constants and units Sergei A.Klioner Lohrmann Observatory,
MAGE Mid-term review (23/09/04): Scientific work in progress « Integrating the motion of satellites in a consistent relativistic framework » S. Pireaux.
Edmund Bertschinger MIT Department of Physics and Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research web.mit.edu/edbert/Alexandria General Relativity.
Chapter 12 Universal Law of Gravity
3. The solar system is held together by gravity
General Relativity Physics Honours 2005 Dr Geraint F. Lewis Rm 557, A29
A Relativistic and Autonomous Navigation Satellite System Pacôme Delva SYRTE / Observatoire de Paris Uroš Kostić Andrej Čadež Faculty of Mathematics and.
Crash Course of Relativistic Astrometry Four Dimensional Spacetime Poincare Transformation Time Dilatation Wavelength Shift Gravitational Deflection of.
Fundamental Principles of General Relativity  general principle: laws of physics must be the same for all observers (accelerated or not)  general covariance:
Gravitational Field Historical facts Geocentric Theory Heliocentric Theory – Nicholas Copernicus (1473 – 1543) Nicholas Copernicus – All planets, including.
Sect. 13.4: The Gravitational Field. Gravitational Field A Gravitational Field , exists at all points in space. If a particle of mass m is placed at.
On the geodetic rotation of the major planets, the Moon and the Sun G.I. Eroshkin and V.V. Pashkevich Central (Pulkovo) Astronomical Observatory of the.
Relativity and Space Geodesy S. Pireaux UMR 6162 ARTEMIS, Obs. de la Côte d’Azur, Av. de Copernic, Grasse, France IAU.
Gravimetry Geodesy Rotation
Franz Hofmann, Jürgen Müller, Institut für Erdmessung, Leibniz Universität Hannover Institut für Erdmessung Hannover LLR analysis software „LUNAR“
Chapter 13 Gravitation Newton’s Law of Gravitation Here m 1 and m 2 are the masses of the particles, r is the distance between them, and G is the.
LAW OF UNIVERSAL GRAVITATION F G gravitational force (in two directions) G universal gravitation constant 6.67x Nm 2 kg -2 r distance between the.
Developing the Science of Astronomy (Chapter 4). Student Learning Objectives Compare ancient and modern theories of the solar system Apply Kepler’s Laws.
Space-Time coordinates are not fundamental,
Hirophysics.com PATRICK ABLES. Hirophysics.com PART 1 TIME DILATION: GPS, Relativity, and other applications.
LLR Analysis – Relativistic Model and Tests of Gravitational Physics James G. Williams Dale H. Boggs Slava G. Turyshev Jet Propulsion Laboratory California.
Physics 211 Force and Equilibrium Hookes Law Newtons Laws Weight Friction Free Body Diagrams Force Problems 4: Classical Mechanics - Newtons Laws.
The Solar System Missions. planets not shown to scale >> MercuryVenusEarthMarsJupiterSaturnUranusNeptunePluto Mean Distance from the Sun (AU)
Satellite geodesy (ge-2112) Introduction E. Schrama.
The Solar System Missions. Comparative Planetology * The study of the similarities and dissimilarities of the constituents of the solar system. * Provides.
Measured by accelerometers Newtonian contributions from the Moon, Sun and Planets A semi-classical relativistic motion integrator (SCRMI), to model the.
Celestial Mechanics I Introduction Kepler’s Laws.
Celestial Mechanics IV Central orbits Force from shape, shape from force General relativity correction.
Taking RELATIVITY back from Principles to Physical Processes by Albrecht Giese Hamburg, Germany London The Physical Causes of Relativity.
Gravity and Motion. Kepler’s Theory of Planetary Motion 1. Paths are ellipses and sun at the focus 2. Planets move faster when closer 3. Relationship.
Chapter 13 Gravitation In this chapter we will explore the following topics: -Newton’s law of gravitation that describes the attractive force between two.
The Science of Orbits (Power Point 04) Image Credit: NASA.
Introduction.
Lunar Trajectories.
MAGE Mid-term review (23/09/04): network report
CE 102 Statics Chapter 1 Introduction.
Introduction.
Universal Gravitation
Introduction.
Quantum Two.
Introduction.
Introduction.
Gravity and Motion.
Chapter 13 Gravitation In this chapter we will explore the following topics: -Newton’s law of gravitation that describes the attractive.
Chapter 13 Gravitation In this chapter we will explore the following topics: -Newton’s law of gravitation, which describes the attractive force between.
The fundamental astronomical reference systems for space missions and the expansion of the universe Michael Soffel & Sergei Klioner TU Dresden.
The Science of Motion & Orbits
Physics 319 Classical Mechanics
Introduction.
Presentation transcript:

The Newtonian contributions from the Moon, Sun and Planets Basis for a native relativistic software integrating the motion of satellites Sophie PIREAUX UMR 5562, Observatoire Midi-Pyrénnées, Toulouse, France - tel. +33 (0) – Fax +33 (0) INTRODUCTION We introduce here a relativistically consistent software called RMI (Relativistic Motion Integrator). We compare it with the GINS software [2] as an example of the classical approach consisting in the Newtonian formalism plus relativistic corrections. GINS is a software routinely used to evaluate the gravity potential (GRIM5, EIGENS 1-2) from the determination of orbit perturbations, or for precise orbit determinations around the Earth (CHAMP, GRACE...) and around Mars (MGS, modeling of future missions). It is based upon the usual formalism used in spatial geodesy, i.e. it relies upon the classical Newtonian description of motion, to which relativistic corrections are added. The number/type of corrections needed depends upon the precision in the measurements (Clock precision/stability). The relativistic corrections on the forces already taken into account in GINS are: the Schwarzschild effect, function of the position and speed of the satellite; the Lens-Thirring effect, due to the rotation of the attracting body; the geodetic precession, function of the chosen coordinate system and due to the non inertial motion of the gravitational source in the solar system. Corrections are also applied on the measurements: a datation correction, which stems from the transformation between the Universal Time Coordinate and the International Atomic Time, or the time referred to in the ephemeris; a relativistic time delay correction, due to the curvature of space-time through which light travels. Figure 1Figure 2Figure 3 THE RELATIVISTIC APPROACH: RMI Method: GINS provides template orbits to validate the RMI orbits: - simulations with 1) Schwarzschild metric => validate Schwarzschild correction 2) (Schwarzschild + GRIM4-S4) metric => validate harmonic contributions 3) Kerr metric => validate Lens-Thirring correction 4) GCRS metric with(out) Sun, Moon, Planets => validate geodetic precession (other bodies contributions) (…) RMI goes beyond GINS capabilities: - includes 1) IAU 2000 standard GCRS metric [6,7] 2) IAU 2000 time transformation prescriptions [6,7] 3) IAU 2000/IERS 2003 new standards on Earth rotation [5,6] - separate modules allow to easily update for metric, potential model (EGM96)… prescriptions. REFERENCES: [1] GRGS. Descriptif modèle de forces: logiciel GINS. Note technique du Groupe de Recherche en Géodesie Spatiale (GRGS), (2001). [2] X. Moisson. Intégration du mouvement des planètes dans le cadre de la relativité générale (thèse). Observatoire de Paris (2000). [3] A. W. Irwin and T. Fukushima. A numerical time ephemeris of the Earth. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 338, (1999). Observatoire Midi-Pyrennees And finally, a correction on the clock frequency, owing to the presence of a gravitational field, is considered, leading to a relativistic Doppler effect. This is a natural consequence of the distinction between proper time and coordinate time in relativistic theories. The classical Newton plus relativistic corrections method briefly described here faces three major problems. First of all, it ignores that in General Relativity time and space are intimately related, as in the classical approach, time and space are separate entities. Secondly, a (complete) review of all the corrections is needed in case of a change in conventions (metric adopted), or if precision is gained in measurements. Thirdly, with such a method, one correction can sometimes be counted twice (for example, the reference frequency provided by the GPS satellites is already corrected for the main relativistic effect), if not forgotten. For those reasons, a new approach was suggested. In this relativistic approach, the geodesic equations of motion are directly numerically integrated for a chosen metric. 1 1 The gravitational potential model for the Earth THE CLASSICAL APPROACH: GINS Relativistic corrections on the forces Figure 5Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 4 Financial support provided through the European Community's Improving Human Potential Program under contract RTN , MAGE where Newton’s 2nd law of motion with [1] is due to satellite colliding with residual gas molecules (hyp: free molecular flux);is due to change in satellite momentum owing to solar photon flux;is the Earth tide potential due to the Sun and Moon, corrected for Love number frequencies, ellipticity and polar tide;is the ocean tide potential (single layer model); and is a gravitational acceleration induced by the redistribution of atmospheric masses (single layer model). Figure 1-9: The following graphs were plotted by selecting only certain gravitational contributions. Those examples show the correction to tangential/ normal/ radial directions on the trajectory of LAGEOS 1 satellite, due to the selected effect, after one day. Integration is carried out during one day, from JD17001 to JD The corresponding induced acceleration on JD17000 is given below each graph. We clearly see the orbital periodicity of revolution/day in each figure, as well as the additional periodicities due to J2 (Fig.2) and higher orders in the gravitational potential (Fig.3). Capital letters are used for geocentric coordinates and velocities; while lower cases are used for barycentric quantities. Name of planets/Sun are shown by indices; no index is used in case of the satellite. Figure 8Figure 9 For the appropriate metric, the geodesic equation of motion, contains all needed relativistic effects.(For a massive particle, the affine parameter the proper time) withand (…) withthe normalizedsemi-major axis of the Earth, harmonic coefficients, given in GRIM4-S4 model TAI J2000 (“inertial”) INTEGRATOR GCRS (“inertial”) INTEGRATOR TAI J2000 (“inertial”) ORBIT TCG GCRS (“inertial”) ORBIT PLANET EPHEMERIS DE403 for in and TDB PLANET EPHEMERIS DE403 for in TDB GRAVITATIONAL POTENTIAL MODEL FOR EARTH GRIM4-S4 GRAVITATIONAL POTENTIAL MODEL FOR EARTH GRIM4-S4 Earth rotation model ITRS (non inertial) Earth rotation model METRIC MODEL IAU2000 GCRS metric ITRS (non inertial) [4] SOFA homepage. The SOFA libraries. IAU Division 1: Fundamental Astronomy. ICRS Working Group Task 5: Computation Tools. Standards of Fundamental Astronomy Review Board. ( 2003) [5] D. D. McCarthy and G. Petit. IERS conventions (2003). IERS technical note 200?. (2003). [6] IAU 2000 resolutions. IAU Information Bulletin, 88 (2001). Erratum on resolution B1.3. Information Bulletin, 89 (2001). [7] M. Soffel et al. The IAU 2000 resolutions for astrometry, celestial mechanics and metrology in the relativistic framework: explanatory supplement. astro-ph/ v1 ( 2003). [5]