Proposed by Japan GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WLTP Elaborated by the WLTP downscaling issues task force OIL #5 Proposal for modifications of the calculation parameter/coefficients.
Advertisements

Further modifications on the gearshift calculation tool
Informal document No. GRPE (63rd GRPE, Jan. 2012, agenda item 3(a)) 1 1 Progress Report of World-wide Light-duty Test Cycle Prepared by DHC.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Test procedure
Working paper number WLTP-DHC Application of the development approach described in WLTP-DHC on ACEA’s EU database By H. Steven
The ARTEMIS tools for estimating the transport pollutant emissions Artemis project - EC DG Tren COST346 - Heavy duty vehicles emissions M. André, INRETS,
Informal document No. GRPE (62nd GRPE, 9-10 June 2011, agenda item 3(a)) 1 Summary of 8 th WLTP-DHC Meeting 9 June 2011 Palais des Nations, Geneva.
WLTP-DHC Current status of WLTP-DHC & Mode Construction Prepared by Japan the 16 th DHC group under GRPE/WLTP informal group 15 th Jan Palais.
1 Proposal for a downscaling procedure for the extra high speed phases of the WLTC for low powered vehicles within a vehicle class Technical justification.
2012/1/13 1 Gear shift analysis ~ Further Review on original JPN gear shift points ~ Prepared by Japan 13 January 2012.
WLTP-DHC Validation Phase I Results and Recommendations by India
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Modification of WLTC Ver.5 Prepared by Japan 13 th DHC group under GRPE/WLTP informal group 5 June.
WLTP-DHC Current status of WLTP-DHC & Mode Construction Prepared by DHC Secretary the 18 th DHC meeting under GRPE/WLTP informal group 5 th Jun.
Assessment Criteria for the Acceptability of Cycle and Testing Procedure Informal working document DTP Subgroup LabProcICE slide 1 Assessment Criteria.
XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute 1 Study on cycle modification ~ Reflect validation test 1 result ~ 10 th DHC sub-group meeting under GRPE/WLTP.
under GRPE/WLTP informal group
1 Discussion paper on Mode Construction during Validation 2 Prepared by Japan DHC group under GRPE/WLTP informal group November 2011 WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-108.
WLTC* methodology Proposed by Japan
1 Mr H A Nakhawa, ARAI, Pune, India 13 th DHC Informal Group Meeting 64 th GRPE Session, June 2012 Geneva Validation 1 results of Indian Vehicles on LPVC.
WLTP-DHC WLTC* Methodology ~ Initial Analysis Results & Modification on proposed methodology ~ Presented by Japan GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup 14.
1 Comments on the Ste 3 gearshift calculation tool from validation 2 participants Heinz Steven WLTP WLTP-DHC
WLTP-DHC14-05 WLTP- Validation Phase 2 Results and Recommendations by India 11 th DTP and 14 th DHC Meeting 24 th – 26 th Sept 2012, JRC, Ispra.
Japanese proposal on R51 limit values JASIC 1 Informal document GRB Rev.1 (55th GRB, 7-9 February 2012, agenda item 3(b))
1 Analysis of in-use driving behaviour data delivered by vehicle manufacturers By Heinz Steven
Brussels, 22 September 2009 – 101st MVEG 1 WLTP – DHC Results of Validation Phase 1.b
WLTP validation test results for BEV(i-MiEV) & OVC-HEV (Prius PHV)
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-081 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
Aspray – Leyland Truck (LF45) ISB4.5E5140 Euro 5 Ben Kilpatrick Graduate – Application Engineer 04/05/2011.
WLTP-DHC Development of World-wide Light- duty Test Cycle -- Proposal for the threshold vehicle speed of Low/Middle/High(/extra-High) phase --
12 April th DTP Meeting WLTP-DHC Secretary WLTP-DTP DHC Progress Report 12 April 2011 EMPA, Duebendorf, Switzerland WLTP-DHC Secretary N.
WLTP-DHC Analysis of in-use driving behaviour data, influence of different parameters By Heinz Steven
WLTP-DHC Gear shift analysis Proposed by Japan DHC group under GRPE/WLTP informal group 6-7 July 2011 Stockholm, Sweden.
Submitted by the expert from Japan the secretariat
Progress Report of World-wide Light-duty Test Cycle
4. Activity Data – Beginner’s Guide
Position paper on Mode Construction during Validation 2
Proposed by Japan GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup
Progress Report of World-wide Light-duty Test Cycle
WLTP Modelling of fuel consumption and detection of driveability problems for “borderline” cars with different maximum speed caps. Heinz Steven
RDE Regulation Commission Meeting
In-use Data Conversion Technique ( Re-Categorization of in-use data )
Development of the Japan’s RDE (Real Driving Emission) procedure
Comparison of different gearshift prescriptions
Pems route and parameters
Weighting Factors impact on WLTP CO2 emissions
Current status of WLTP-DHC
JAMA position on RDE Boundary Condition
Development of World-wide Light-duty Test Cycle
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 1/2/2019.
WLTP Validation2 for RLD ~ Validation test plan by Japan ~
Emissions testing in the laboratory and on the road: Preliminary results for one Euro 6 diesel vehicle Pierre Bonnel Martin Weiss Joint Research Centre.
Position paper on Mode Construction during Validation 2
HD FE Harmonization - Introduction - OICA HD-FE Workshop
Pilot project: Analysis of the relevance of influencing factors when determining CO2 emissions and fuel consumption during type approval of passenger cars.
Japanese Fuel Efficiency Standard for Heavy Duty Vehicles
HDV CO2 Regulation in REPUBLIC OF KOREA
November 20, 2013 Hino Motors, Ltd. Y. Takenaka
GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup
WLTP/DHC meeting on 29th March 2012 at Ispra, Italy.
WLTP Modelling of fuel consumption and detection of driveability problems for “borderline” cars with different maximum speed caps. Heinz Steven
In-use Data Conversion Technique ( Re-Categorization of in-use data )
Mode Construction during Validation2
GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup
Discussion paper on Applicable Test Cycle and Mode Construction
Discussion paper on Applicable Test Cycle and Mode Construction
Discussion document on Mode Construction
WLTP/DHC meeting on 29th March 2012 at Ispra, Italy.
Palais des Nations, Geneva
GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup
Presentation transcript:

Proposed by Japan GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup WLTC* Construction Proposed by Japan GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup 14 October 2010 *) WLTC : Worldwide harmonized Light-duty driving Test Cycle

Cold/Hot Start Weighting Gear Shift Points Table of Contents Contents Cycle Construction Cold/Hot Start Weighting Gear Shift Points

Cycle Construction 1.1. Current Test Cycle in EU, US and Japan 1.2. Requirement on Test Cycle 1.3. Proposed Cycle Construction 1.4. Justifications

1.1. Current Cycle Construction Urban / Rural Motorway Aggressive mode AC test US Cold start Hot Hot start EU Cold start NA JAPAN Cold start and 10 min.soak (independent test with preconditioning) According to WLTP-DHC-05-04, Urban/Rural/Motorway phase will be converted to Low/Middle/High phase respectively.

1.2. Requirement on Test Cycle Representativeness Driving characteristic Cold start (e.g. 6 or 12 hours soak) Hot start intermediate soak (e.g. 10 min. soak) warm up (e.g. 15 min. drive @ 60kph) Performance Emission Fuel consumption/GHG Target Area Flexibility Unique test procedure HEV Regeneration system EV range Unique Vehicle City commuter Low power vehicle Test effectiveness Equipment restriction Chassis dynamometer Bag analysis duration Minimum sample volume Test flexibility Human respect

1.3. Proposed Cycle Construction Cold start TL + TM = equal to or less than 1372 sec. Low phase Middle phase TL : TM = TL TM Hot start Middle phase High phase Low phase TH= equal to or less than 765 sec. can be skipped if same condition as cold start phase High phase test can be conducted after middle phase or independently

1.4. Justifications Current longest cycle duration is first step. Independent high phase test is inevitable. Representativeness Driving characteristic Cold start Hot start intermediate soak (e.g. 10 min. soak) warm up (e.g. 15 min. drive @ 60kph) Performance Emission Fuel consumption/GHG Either condition is acceptable by adjusting the Cold/Hot weighting factor. The “warm up” condition is more effective for testing flexibility. Test effectiveness Equipment restriction Chassis dynamometer Bag analysis duration Minimum sample volume Test flexibility Human respect Flexibility Unique test procedure HEV Regeneration system EV range Unique Vehicle City commuter Low power vehicle No WF in each phase is best solution. Each phase duration should be based on the traffic volume ratio. Low phase should be first

2. Cold/Hot Start Weighting 2.1. How to obtain real-world emissions ? 2.2. Average Emission per Trip 2.3. Cold Start Trip Ratio 2.4. Calculation of Cold Weighting Factor 2.5. Summary 2.6. Required Data

2.1. How to obtain real-world emissions ? ◆Requirements Emission that should be evaluated Average emission per trip = ◆Detail of average emission per vehicle trip Emission under cold condition Emission during cold start trip Emission under hot condition Average emission per trip Emission during hot start trip Emission under hot condition

2.2. Average Emission per Trip and Cold Weighting Factor Total Emission Etotal (g/km) formula is as following. Cold start trip Hot start trip Cold start emission under cold condition Cold start emission under hot condition ×Rcold + ×(1 - Rcold) Hot start emission EC (g/km) EH (g/km) EH (g/km) EHT (g/km) 0 km Dcycle Dtrip 0 km = Dtrip ECT (g/km) (*) ECT = (EC * Dcycle + EH * (Dtrip – Dcycle))/ Dtrip WFc: Cold start weighting Rcold: Cold start trip ratio Dtrip: Average one trip distance (km) Dcycle: Cycle distance (km) ECT: Cold start trip emission (g/km) EHT: Hot start trip emission (g/km) EC: Cold start emission (g/km) EH: Hot start emission (g/km) Etotal = ECT * Rcold + EHT * (1 – Rcold) = (Dcycle*Rcold/Dtrip) * EC + (1-Dcycle* Rcold/Dtrip) * EH = WFC * EC + (1 - WFC) * EH WFC = Dcycle * Rcold / Dtrip

Coolant temp. drop ratio 2.3. Cold Start Trip Ratio Generate the cold start trip ratio by multiplying the soak time distribution and the coolant temperature drop ratio as the emission increase ratio ◆Frequency of soak time Cold start trip ratio Rcold : Frequency Fsoak(i) Soak time ◆Cold start factor Where, Rcold: Cold start trip ratio (= Average cold start emission increment ratio) Fsoak: Frequency of soak time Fcold: Cold start factor (Coolant temp. drop ratio ) Fcold(i) Coolant temp. drop ratio Coolant temp. Ambient temp. i Soak time

★Low/Mid. cold + Low/Mid hot + High hot 2.4.1. Calculation Sample ★Low/Mid. cold + Low/Mid hot + High hot Cold Start Trip Low/Mid. Cold Low/Mid. Hot High Hot WF WLM WH Distance (km) Dtrip Dtrip * WLM Dtrip * WH DC,LM Dtrip * WLM – DC,LM Emission (g/km) ECT EC,LM EH,LM EH,H Mass (g) MCT DC,LM * EC,LM (DT * WLM – DC,LM) * EH,LM (Dtrip * WH) * EH,H ◆Emission during cold start trip ECT (g/km) ECT = MC,T / Dtrip = (DC,LM * EC,LM + (Dtrip * WLM – DC,LM) * EH,LM + (Dtrip * WH) * EH,H) / Dtrip

★Low cold + Low hot + Middle hot + High hot (conti.) 2.4.2 Calculation Sample ★Low cold + Low hot + Middle hot + High hot (conti.) ◆Emission during hot start trip EHT (g/km) Dtrip * WLM Dtrip * WH Low/Mid. Hot High Hot EHT = WLM * EH,LM + WH * EH,H EH,LM (g/km) EH,H (g/km) ◆Total emission Etotal (g/km) Etotal = ECT * Rcold + EHT * (1 – Rcold) = (DC,LM * Rcold / Dtrip) * EC,L + (WLM – DC,LM * Rcold / Dtrip) * EH,L + WH * EH,H = WFLM,C * EC,L + WFLM,H * EH,L + WFH,H * EH,H ◆Cold/Hot weighting factor WFLM,C = DC,LM * Rcold / Dtrip WFLM,H = WLM – DC,LM * Rcold / Dtrip WFH,H = WH

◆Required information/data 2.5. Summary ◆Calculation process Calculate cold start trip ratio Generate the cold start ratio by multiplying the soak time distribution and the coolant temperature drop ratio Calculate cold start WF Generate the cold start WF based on average one trip distance cold start trip ratio and test cycle distance ◆Required information/data Investigate the following two items based on actual vehicle usage Distribution of soak time Driving distance per trip Investigate the following based on engine bench test Coolant temperature drop ratio Other factors Test cycle distance The ratio of traffic volume in each phase (L/M/H) In Japan, these figures are obtained based on survey and traffic senses.

Light duty commercial vehicle 2.6. Required Data -1 ◆Distribution of soak time Soak time Frequency Passenger Car Light duty commercial vehicle (hour) (%) 0 – 0.25 10.0 0.25 – 0.5 11.0 0.5– 0.75 7.0 0.75 – 1.0 12.0 1.0 – 2.0 2.0 – 3.0 5.0 3.0 – 4.0 3.0 4.0 – 5.0 2.0 5.0 – 6.0 6.0 – 9.0 6.0 9.0 – 12.0 18.0 12.0 – 24.0 24.0 -48.0 48.0 - 4.0 Total 100.0

Light duty commercial vehicle 2.6. Required Data -2 ◆Cold start factor Soak time Passenger car Light duty commercial vehicle Coolant temp. Cold start factor (hour) (℃) (-) 110 0 – 0.25 73 0.41 0.25 – 0.5 47 0.70 0.5– 0.75 40 0.78 0.75 – 1.0 36 0.82 1.0 – 2.0 29 0.90 2.0 – 3.0 25 0.95 3.0 – 4.0 22 0.98 4.0 – 5.0 20 1.0 5.0 – 6.0 6.0 – 9.0 9.0 – 12.0 12.0 – 24.0 24.0 -48.0 48.0 -

Gear Shift Points 3.1. Analysis Method 3.2. How to define the gear position ? 3.3. Definition of Shift Change 3.4. Factor Analysis / Frequency Distribution 3.5. Regression Analysis 3.6. Analysis Sample (JC08)

3.1. Analysis Method Developed gear shift points based on in-use survey to represent the real driving behavior. In-use data collection Factor analysis Frequency distribution ex. 2nd Gear Analysis Regression Analysis Develop Shift point equation G(x)=a*V+b*A+・・・・ Validation

3.2. How to define the gear position ? In case of manual gear shift, the formula for calculating vehicle speed would be the following if the clutch was engaged. Consequently, gear position can be defined by calculating gear ratio during driving where, V: Vehicle speed (km/h) Ne: Engine speed (1/min) r: radius of tire it: Gear ratio if: final reduction ratio

3.3. Definition of Shift Change Shift up_1: Clutch release point for up-shifting Shift up_2: Clutch engage point after putting in higher gear Shift down_1: Clutch release point for down-shifting or neutral

3.4. Factor Analysis / Frequency Distribution Calculate the vehicle speed in each gear position (both up-shift and down-shift), then generate various frequency distribution by each vehicle category and analyze the factors that effect shift operation. Vehicle speed frequency distribution (0 ≤ V ≤ 100 km/h,1km/h step) Vehicle acceleration frequency distribution (-10 ≤ a ≤ 10 km/h/s, 1km/h/s step) Engine speed frequency distribution (600 ≤ r ≤ 6000 rpm, 100rpm step) Standardized engine speed frequency distribution (0 ≤ r ≤ 100 %, 10 % step)

Develop the shift point equation by Stepwise selection method 3.5.1. Regression Analysis Develop the shift point equation by Stepwise selection method Dependent variable Explanatory variable Remark Gear position Vehicle speed (km/h) Engine speed (1/min) Normalized engine speed (%) Acceleration (km/h/s) Vehicle category 1: M1, 2: N1, 3: N2,,, Fuel type 1: Petrol, 2: Diesel, 3: LPG,,, No. of gear Curb weight (kg) Maximum pay load (kg) Gross vehicle weight (kg) Displacement (cc) Maximum power (kW) Maximum torque (Nm) Power to mass ratio (kW/t) Torque to mass ratio (Nm/t) Normalized vehicle weight Wn = Curb weight / GVW Drive train coefficient (DTC) Refer slide 3.5.2

3.5.2. Drive Train Coefficient (DTC) y = DTC * G(x) Final reduction gear 2πr / (im * if)  : running distance per engine speed (m)  r  : tire radius (m)  im  : gear ratio  if  : final reduction gear ratio  V  : vehicle speed (km/h)  Ne  : engine speed (rpm) G(x) DTC : Drive Train Coefficient

3.6.1. Analysis Sample (JC08) - shift up speed

3.6.2. Analysis Sample (JC08) - downshift speed

3.6.3. Analysis Sample (JC08) - Explanatory variable of shift up After completion of all data acquisition, the explanatory variable will be determined based on stepwise selection method.

3.6.4. Analysis Sample (JC08) - Explanatory variable of downshift After completion of all data acquisition, the explanatory variable will be determined based on stepwise selection method.

3.6.5. Analysis Sample (JC08) - Gearshift equation Shift up Shift down G(x) :Gearshift equation V :Speed in km/h A :Acceleration in km/h/s Wn :Normalized vehicle weight (Curb weight / GVW) E :Engine speed in rpm DTC :Drive train coefficient After completion of all data acquisition, the gearshift equation for WLTC will be developed.

3.6.6. Analysis Sample (JC08) – Final Shift Points Vehicle Categorization Passenger Car Light Duty Commercial Vehicle Average of LDCV Wn=0.58, DTC=0.09 Average of PC Wn=0.80, DTC=0.11 ◆for Passenger cars ◆for Light duty commercial vehicles