October 2008RMC Research Corp.1 Effective Science Instruction: What does Research Tell Us? Horizon Research, Inc. Center on Instruction, RMC Research.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School John D. Bransford, Ann L. Brown, and Rodney R. Cocking, editors.
Advertisements

How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School John D. Bransford, Ann L. Brown, and Rodney R. Cocking, editors.
“TRANS”FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT 10 Key Points
Economic Education and How People Learn Scott Simkins, Interim Director Academy for Teaching and Learning (ATL) North Carolina A&T State University Acknowledgements:
Theme-based Curriculum and Task-based Activities: A Language Teacher’s Reflection Yan Zhao.
Integrated Middle School Science Partnership
Jeff C. Marshall, PhD Clemson University ASTE Paper Presentation January, 2011.
COSIA 2010 Communicating Ocean Sciences to Informal Audiences Week 5: Constructing knowledge, Building understanding.
January 2009RMC Research Corp. 1 Effective Science Instruction: What Does Research Tell Us? Dave Weaver RMC Research Corporation.
Mathematics Reform The Implications of Problem Solving in Middle School Mathematics.
Strategies to Bridge the Hands-on Minds-on Gap Feb 21, 2008 Inquiry Series Michelle Shafer Assistant Director,COSMOS, Bowling Green State University Northwest.
July 2001Mara Alagic: Teaching for Effective Learning 1 Teaching for Effective Learning: Teaching for Understanding.
Chapter 13: Planning a Science Unit Objectives: 1. Review science education reform 2. Become aware of science education resources 3. Critique a science.
What Makes a Good Activity? Lessons from research and experience Cathy Manduca Science Education Resource Center Carleton College.
Activating Prior Knowledge and Interest
Lesson Planning Educ 3100.
WELCOME TO TEACHING PEDAGOGY Issam Abi-El-Mona, PhD Rowan University ECT Workshops July 14, 2009 Issam Abi-El-Mona, PhD Rowan University ECT Workshops.
What are some instructional strategies that support inquiry?
High Quality Science Instruction: Findings from Research.
Constructivism in Science Education Focus on learning and what we know about how people learn.
DISCOVERY LEARNING THEORY. Definition  Discovery learning method : *Content is not given by the teacher. *Independently discovered by the learner. *Learner.
VaNTH and The Legacy Cycle: Bioengineering and Problem Based Instruction Cherie McCollough Graduate Research Assistant – VaNTH ERC University of Texas.
Meaningful Social Studies & Meaningful Learning
Lessons Learned from Evaluating Science Education Projects Dave Weaver RMC Research Corporation 111 SW Columbia, Suite 1200 Portland, Oregon 97201
Math Instruction What’s in and What’s out What’s in and What’s out! Common Core Instruction.
Argumentation in Middle & High School Science Victor Sampson Assistant Professor of Science Education School of Teacher Education and FSU-Teach Florida.
Contributions of Contextual Teaching to Improved Student Learning Richard L. Lynch, PI University of Georgia (706)
Engaging Learners and Realizing the Development of Mathematical Practices ALM Conference July 15, 2015 Trena L. Wilkerson Professor, Mathematics Education.
1 National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Illustrating the Standards for Mathematical Practice: Getting Started with the Practices Investigations.
Content Area Reading Strategies Before, During, and After Reading.
Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.
1.  Connections › Diploma › Standards › Essential Skills › Mathematical Practices › Effective Instruction  Putting it All Together 2.
SEISMIC Whole School and PLC Planning Day Tuesday, August 13th, 2013.
Slides 2-4 are from Tamara Wondering if we also want something from principles to action (for the math view) And/or what I have on slide 5 that I always.
1 Duschl, R & Osborne, J ”Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education” in Studies in Science Education, 38, Ingeborg.
National Science Foundation PD Led Workshops – Session B: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering Louis Everett Susan Finger Don Millard Russ.
Some theoretical considerations of project based learning by Lau Kwok Chi.
COSEE California Communicating Ocean Sciences Session 3: Teaching and Learning.
1 What Are We Doing Here Anyway? Vision for our Work: Effective Science Learning Experiences Dave Weaver RMC Research Corp.
PEDAGOGICAL LEARNING BICYCLE Assessing Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Future Elementary Teachers CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS PCK of future elementary teachers.
Supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. EHR Before we begin….. Take a few minutes to reflect on impacts of the NCOSP project.
Teaching for Understanding Appalachian Math Science Partnership
Scientific Inquiry by:. Icebreaker “Scientific Inquiry refers to the diverse ways in which scientists study the natural world and propose explanations.
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
How People Learn – Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 1999) Three core principles 1: If their (students) initial understanding.
Imagine science classrooms in which: The teacher pushes a steel needle through a balloon and the balloon does not burst. The teacher asks the students.
Lecture # 32 SCIENCE 1 ASSOCIATE DEGREE IN EDUCATION Professional Standards for Teaching Science.
Learning Cycle. a method of planning a sequence of lessons and a unit that is consistent with research on how people learn.
Introduction to STEM Integrating Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math.
Using edTPA Data for Program Design and Curriculum Mapping Mary Ariail, Georgia State University Kristy Brown, Shorter University Judith Emerson, Georgia.
Learning and Transfer This is Chapter 3 in the very useful book: National Research Council (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School.
High Quality Instruction: Findings from Research.
Digging Deep into Reading Informational Text CCSS Standards 1-3.
HANDS-ON SCIENCE IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS. WHY AND HOW.
Take a few minutes to complete the survey on your desk.
This module was developed by Amy Hillen, Kennesaw State University; DeAnn Huinker, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; and Victoria Bill, University of.
An Approach to Science and Other Content Areas Prepared by Martha Havens Associate Director for Elementary Pacific Union Conference Designed by Kimberly.
Principles to Actions Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices The Case of Wobberson Torchon and the Calling Plans 1 Task Algebra I Principles to Actions.
Session Outcome Review the benefits & rationale for using notebooks as sense-making tools for students. Review the 4 “essences” of science notebooks Explore.
Conceptual Change Theory
Using Cognitive Science To Inform Instructional Design
Lesson 3: The Roles of Technology
STEM Learning Module PISA- Summer 2007
Formative Assessment Classroom Techniques (FACTs)
Professor of Education
Reflecting on Practice: Making Connections that Support Learning
Using the 5-E Model to Design Creative Inquiry Lessons in Science
Reflecting on Practice: Making Connections that Support Learning
A Challenge: The Cultural Landscape
CONSTRUCTIVISM Submitted To: Ma’am Misbah Yasmeen BPGCW (Air University)
Presentation transcript:

October 2008RMC Research Corp.1 Effective Science Instruction: What does Research Tell Us? Horizon Research, Inc. Center on Instruction, RMC Research

October 2008RMC Research Corp.2 Reform vs. Traditional Traditional instruction –Teacher delivered information and independent student work Reformed instruction –Small groups of students participating in hands-on activities

October 2008RMC Research Corp.3 Debating Which Is Best Misses The Point “Current learning theory focuses on students’ conceptual change, and does not imply that one pedagogy is necessarily better than another.” “Research suggests that students are most likely to learn if teachers encourage them to think about ideas aligned to concrete learning goals and relate those ideas to real-life phenomena.”

October 2008RMC Research Corp.4 Elements of Effective Instruction Motivation Eliciting Prior Knowledge Intellectual Engagement Use of Evidence Sense-Making

October 2008RMC Research Corp.5 Motivation Extrinsic Motivation –Deadlines, Competition, Tests, Grades –May actually be detrimental Intrinsic Motivation –Stems from intellectual curiosity, personal interest or experiences, desire to resolve discrepant events or cognitive dissonance

October 2008RMC Research Corp.6 Eliciting Students’ Prior Knowledge Students come with ideas and beliefs that can either facilitate or impede learning Instruction is most effective when it: –Elicits students’ initial ideas, –Provides them with opportunities to confront those ideas in light of new evidence, –Helps them formulate new ideas based on the evidence, and –Encourages students to reflect upon how their ideas have evolved

October 2008RMC Research Corp.7 Intellectual Engagement Students must do the intellectual work and the thinking Must involve meaningful experience that engage students intellectually with important science content Activities must be explicitly linked to learning goals Students must understand the purpose of the instruction Must engage with ideas, not just the materials

October 2008RMC Research Corp.8 Use of Evidence Lessons must provide multiple opportunities (discourse) for students to: –Make claims and conjectures –Back up their claims with evidence –Use evidence to critique claims made by other students

October 2008RMC Research Corp.9 Sense-Making Lesson must provide opportunities for students to make sense of the ideas with which they have been engaged in order to draw appropriate conclusions –Closure –Reflection –Meta-cognition –Application to new situations

October 2008RMC Research Corp.10 Conclusion Considerable evidence from research shows that instruction is most effective when it elicits students’ initial ideas, provides them with opportunities to confront those ideas, helps them formulate new ideas based on evidence, and encourages students to reflect upon how their ideas have evolved. Without these opportunities, students “may fail to grasp the new concepts and information that are taught, or they may learn them for purposes of a test but revert to their preconceptions outside the classroom” –(National Research Council, 2003, p. 14)

October 2008RMC Research Corp.11 Reference Banilower, E., Cohen, K., Pasley, J., & Weiss, I. (2008). Effective science instruction: What does research tell us? Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction. National Research Council. (2003). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, & R. R. Cocking (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.