Freya’s favourite teacher was Mrs Poole: Freya always remembers the interesting lesson when Mrs Poole told them “H 2 O is water” and it started her interest.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
To By- Md. Abdul Makaddus Asst. Teacher Govt. Jubilee High School sunamganj.
Advertisements

The ontological argument is based entirely upon logic and reason and doesn’t really try to give a posteriori evidence to back it up. Anselm would claim.
Locke v. Leibniz on innate knowledge
© Michael Lacewing A priori knowledge Michael Lacewing
Empiricism on a priori knowledge
TALKING ABOUT DAILY ACTIVITIES AND EVENTS
Today’s Outline Hume’s Problem of Induction Two Kinds of Skepticism
Direct and Indirect Speech. Direct Speech In direct speech, the original speaker's exact words are given and are indicated by quotation marks. "I don't.

Knowledge innatism Michael Lacewing
Probability Abney Elementary.
RATIONALISM AND EMPIRICISM: KNOWLEDGE EMPIRICISM Epistemology.
Rationalism and empiricism: Key terms.  You will learn the meaning of various key terms related to rationalism and empiricism.
Knowledge empiricism Michael Lacewing
Philosophy of Science Science is the study of alternative explanations. What is an explanation?
Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference.
The Problem of Knowledge. What new information would cause you to be less certain? So when we say “I’m certain that…” what are we saying? 3 things you.
Epistemology Revision
Knowledge Belief and Truth By Prof.Dr Shadia Abd Elkader Prof.Dr Shadia Abd Elkader.
MA 110: Finite Math Lecture 1/14/2009 Section 1.1 Homework: 5, 9-15, (56 BP)
Pink Dolch Book Sight Phrases
Sight Words List 1 Mr. Matthews Grade One can.
  Beta version.
Horse.
A Priori vs. A Posteriori If I know something, I must have justification. If justification essentially relies on sensory experience, then it is a posteriori.
District 200 High frequency words
Sense of Properties and Stereotypes
Proof and Probability (can be applied to arguments for the existence of God)
Bike. are at can big cannot am book books.
High Frequency Words August 31 - September 4 around be five help next
Sight Words.
KNOWLEDGE IS A PRIORI AND A POSTERIORI By: Fatima Fuad Azeem.
Knowledge rationalism Michael Lacewing
Загадки о животных (Animals). My name is Jack. I'm very big. My name is Jack. I'm very big. I am white. I have four legs. I am white. I have four legs.
Certainty and Truths.
Tuesday March 24 th Lesson 25, Day 2. Objective: To listen and respond appropriately to oral communication. Question of the Day: What are the names of.
Topic Week 4. A: Jenny, who’s that over there? B: Which one? A: The woman with curly blonde hair and she is drinking now. B: Oh, that’s Miss Sun. A: Really?
Simple Present Present Continuous Form, Use, Examples.
My Philosophy teacher wants to kill me! Ellie: I think Karen is going to kill me. Rosie: She doesn’t seem that bad to me; she never acts like she hates.
Unit 4 Integrated skills 大丰市西团初级中学 吕文友 May
High Frequency words Kindergarten review. red yellow.
剑桥国际少儿英语 (第 4 册) Lesson 1, Introductory Unit Warmer name your what's? old you how are? you where do live? many people family your in how are there? got.
How are you? I’m fine. What’s your name? I’m (Lucy) Who’s this? She’s … Here’s …, can I borrow… Hello, goodbye Please, thank you Scooter, robot, doll,
Rationalism Focus: to be able to explain the claims of rationalism, looking in particular at Descartes To begin to evaluate whether Descartes establishes.
KNOWLEDGE AND CERTAINTY (Part 1)
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
Knowledge Empiricism 2.
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
The ontological argument
Introduction to the Religion, Philosophy & Ethics A Level
O.A. so far.. Anselm – from faith, the fool, 2 part argument
Other versions of the ontological argument
The Ontological Argument
The Ontological Argument: An Introduction
The Ontological Argument Ontological
Philosophy of Mathematics 1: Geometry
Empiricism.
Grades K-2 Reading High Frequency Words
Rationalism.
Rationalism –versus- Empiricism
Remember these terms? Analytic/ synthetic A priori/ a posteriori
The Ontological Argument
In pairs, write a list of all the reasons people believe in God.
On your whiteboard (1): 1. What is innate knowledge? 2. What were Plato’s arguments for innate knowledge? 3. Was he right? Explain your answer.
Testing for Validity and Invalidity
The Ontological Argument
Rene Descartes Father of Modern Philosophy b. March in La Haye France wrote Meditations in 1641 d. February
The. the of and a to in is you that with.
An example of the “axiomatic approach” from geometry
Rationalism –versus- Empiricism
Presentation transcript:

Freya’s favourite teacher was Mrs Poole: Freya always remembers the interesting lesson when Mrs Poole told them “H 2 O is water” and it started her interest in chemistry. Mr Leake, however, was an awful teacher: Freya will never forget when he said “Water is water” – as if that was useful knowledge! Are Mrs Poole and Mr Leake saying anything different from each other?

Today we will learn what is meant by: Actually possible Logically possible Logically impossible Necessary truth Contingent truth Analytic truth Synthetic truth A priori A posteriori

Actually possible: it could genuinely happen with the laws of physics as we know them Logically possible: you can conceive of it (it may or may not be actually possible) Logically impossible: you can’t conceive of it; it’s a contradiction

Actually possible Logically (but not actually) possible Logically impossible A cow runs across a field A cow jumps over the moon A cow is not a cow

Actually possibleLogically (but not actually) possible Logically impossible

A 3 sided triangle Karen can change into a lion by clicking her fingers Karen eats her own leg Karen eating 4 bags of crisps in one sitting Fish swimming on the surface of the sun Karen marries a goblin Karen travels through time to meet Socrates Karen eats 4 aeroplanes in one sitting A cube which is 1- dimensional Karen exists and doesn’t exist at the same time = 4 Two parallel lines crossing over = 5A 4 sided triangle Karen wins the lottery this week

Actually possibleLogically (but not actually) possible Logically impossible A 3 sided triangleKaren can change into a lion by clicking her fingers Karen exists and doesn’t exist at the same time Karen eating 4 bags of crisps in one sitting Fish swimming on the surface of the sun A 4 sided triangle = 4Karen eats 4 aeroplanes in one sitting = 5 Karen eats her own leg Karen travels through time to meet Socrates Two parallel lines crossing over Karen wins the lottery this week Karen marries a goblinA cube which is 1- dimensional

Analytic truths are true as a result of their meaning. If you know the meanings (definitions) of the words, you know it is true Synthetic truths are true, but you need to understand the meanings of the words AND something about the world

AnalyticSynthetic TrueVixens are female foxes (analytically true) Vixens might bite people when cornered (synthetically true) FalseVixens are male pigs (analytically false) Vixens are capable of ballroom dancing (synthetically false) The definition of a vixen is that it’s a female fox

AnalyticSynthetic True(analytically true)(synthetically true) False(analytically false)(synthetically false)

Dogs are descended from wolves Prince William is a bachelor Karen owns a dog Most dogs are able to speak Polish Triangles have three sidesTriangles have 5 sides Bachelors are unmarried men We are in the canteenWe are in room C is a number Dogs are not descended from wolves Justin Bieber is a bachelor Bachelors are baby girls7 is a colour There are 7 dwarves in Snow White

AnalyticSynthetic True (analytically true) Dogs are descended from wolves Triangles have three sides Bachelors are unmarried men 7 is a number (synthetically true) Karen owns a dog We are in room C.1.12 Justin Bieber is a bachelor There are 7 dwarves in Snow White False (analytically false) Dogs are not descended from wolves Triangles have 5 sides Bachelors are married 7 is a colour (synthetically false) Most dogs are able to speak Polish We are in the canteen Prince William is a bachelor There are 7 counties in England Dog = a pet descended from wolves Triangle = 3-sided shape Bachelor = unmarried man 7 = the number between 6 and 8

Can analytic truths tell us anything useful or interesting about the world?

Something is necessarily true if it is true by definition, or it couldn’t have been any other way. Analytic and mathematical truths are usually necessary Something is contingently true if it is true, but it could have been otherwise.

NecessaryContingent True(necessarily true)(contingently true) False(necessarily false)(contingently false)

There are some yellow cubes Prince William has 2 children Karen is the genetic product of her father and her mother There are no yellow cubes AS Philosophy is taught in room C.1.12 at Bilborough = 4 AS Philosophy is taught in the car park at Bilborough Karen is the genetic product of a hippo and a giraffe Karen has blue hair A cube is 3-dimensionalLittle things are enormousLittle things are little Prince William has 4 children Karen has long hair A cube is round = 6

NecessaryContingent True(necessarily true) Little things are little Karen is the genetic product of her father and her mother A cube is 3 dimensional = 4 (contingently true) AS Philosophy is taught in room C.1.12 at Bilborough Karen has long hair There are some yellow cubes Prince William has 2 children False(necessarily false) Little things are enormous Karen is the genetic product of a hippo and a giraffe A cube is round = 6 (contingently false) AS Philosophy is taught in the car park at Bilborough Karen has blue hair There are no yellow cubes Prince William has 4 children

Do necessary truths – such as mathematics – tell us anything useful about the world? Are there any ambiguous examples? Philosophy of religion link: is God a necessary being (does he have to exist)?

A priori knowledge can be known without any experience (pronounced ay-pry-OR-eye) A posteriori knowledge requires experience to know if it’s true (pronounced ay-pos-teer-ee-OR-eye)

Generally speaking… Analytic and necessary truths can be know a priori Synthetic and contingent truths can only be known a posteriori ANALYTIC NECESSARY A PRIORI SYNTHETIC CONTINGENT A POSTERIORI

Fill in this table with ticks Logically possible Actually possible Actually true Necessarily true Contingently true Analytically true Synthetically true This topic is part of AS Philosophy It’s snowing in Bilborough right now The sky is blue = = 5 ‘Chair’ is a noun You can travel back in time I exist I am purple 2006 is a number Complete this table with ticks as appropriate

Fill in this table with ticks Logically possible Actually possible Actually true Necessarily true Contingently true Analytically true Synthetically true This topic is part of AS PhilosophyYYY Y Y It’s snowing in Bilborough right nowYY The sky is blueYYY Y Y = 4YYY Y Y = 5 ‘Chair’ is a nounYYYY Y You can travel back in timeY I existYYY Y? I am purpleY 2006 is a numberYYYY Y

Look on moodle links and do a mind map on Empiricism For Friday 20 November