PLASMA SCIENCE ADVANCED COMPUTING INTITUTE PROGRAM ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING W. M. TANG and V. S. CHAN 3 June 2004.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 NNSAs ICF Strategy Presented to Fusion Power Associates 34th Annual Meeting and Symposium Washington, DC December 11, 2013 Kirk Levedahl NNSA NATIONAL.

Advertisements

Moving toward a Communications Plan for American Magnetic Fusion Fusion Power Associates Meeting December 5 – 6, 2012 Kitta MacPherson, Director of Communications.

Extension of IEA Implementing Agreement on Large Tokamak Facilities Presented to Committee on Energy Research Technologies October 18-19, 2005 Paris, France.

Briefing to the Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories (CRENEL) Joseph McBrearty, Deputy Director for Field Operations.

SWIM Meeting, Tech-X, October 2010 The Fusion Simulation Program presented at the SWIM meeting on October 28, 2010 JR Cary Tech-X on behalf of the FSP.

U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee Dr. Daniel A. Hitchcock October 21, 2003

Burning Plasma Bringing a Star to Earth Final Report of the Burning Plasma Assessment Committee John F. Ahearne Sigma Xi, Duke University Raymond Fonck.

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Advanced Scientific Computing Research Program NERSC Users Group Meeting Department of Energy Update June 12,

FES International Collaboration Program: Vision and Budget Steve Eckstrand International Program Manager Office of Fusion Energy Sciences U.S. Department.

Presented by Suzy Tichenor Director, Industrial Partnerships Program Computing and Computational Sciences Directorate Oak Ridge National Laboratory DOE.

NPSS Field of Interest History and Discussion. 2 The fields of interest of the Society are the nuclear and plasma sciences. The Society shall devote itself.

VLT Report the fusion trend line Stan Milora (ORNL) and Richard Nygren (SNL) FNST/PFC/MASCO Meeting Aug 2-6, UCLA.

Community Input on Plasma Materials Interactions Rajesh Maingi (PPPL), chair Steve Zinkle (UTK), co-chair Pete Pappano, FES program POC FESAC meeting Gaithersburg,

This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

1 Mathematical, Information and Computational Sciences Computer Science PI Meeting June 26-27, 2002 Fred Johnson.

Lunar Advanced Science and Exploration Research: Partnership in Science and Exploration Michael J. Wargo, Sc.D. Chief Lunar Scientist for Exploration Systems.

Status Report FESAC Panel on Priorities Status Report FESAC Panel on Priorities For further information, please access FESAC Priorities Panel website at:

Summary and Closing Remarks Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego Presentation to: ARIES Program Peer Review August 18, 2000 UC San Diego.

1 NERSC User Group Business Meeting, June 3, 2002 High Performance Computing Research Juan Meza Department Head High Performance Computing Research.

ARIES-General Page 1 Summary of Findings of Lehman Committee to Assess ITER Costing L. Waganer The Boeing Company 8-10 January 2003 ARIES Meeting at UCSD.

Office of Fusion Energy Sciences (OFES) Perspective Gene Nardella, Acting Associate Director of Science for Fusion Energy Sciences

PRESENTATION OF AWARDS Stephen O. Dean, President Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting and Symposium December 16-17, 2014.

Safety Implementation Update AASHTO RAC Meeting, July 22, 2014 Ann Brach, TRB, Director, SHRP 2 Debra Elston, Director of Corporate R&T, FHWA.

The Climate Prediction Project Global Climate Information for Regional Adaptation and Decision-Making in the 21 st Century.

PLASMA SCIENCE ADVANCED COMPUTING INITIATIVE BUDGET PLANNING MEETING W. M. TANG Status Report Future Opportunities Timetable Germantown, Maryland 6 APRIL.

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Advanced Scientific Computing Research Program NERSC Users Group Meeting Department of Energy Update September.

Systems Studies Program Peer Review Meeting Albert L. Opdenaker III DOE Program Manager Holiday Inn Express Germantown, Maryland August 29, 2013.

Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Stan Milora, ORNL Director Virtual Laboratory for Technology 20 th ANS Topical Meeting on the Technology.

ExCo Meetings of IEA Large Tokamak Facilities and Poloidal Divertor IAs GA, San Diego; Jan 2-3, 2008 Dr. Erol Oktay Acting Director ITER and International.

Agenda / Logistics John J. Barnard Twelfth US - Japan Workshop on Heavy Ion Fusion and High Energy Density Physics September 7-8, 2009 Intercontinental.

AES, ANL, Boeing, Columbia U., CTD, GA, GIT, LLNL, INEEL, MIT, ORNL, PPPL, SNL, SRS, UCLA, UCSD, UIIC, UWisc FIRE Collaboration FIRE.

Recruiting an Associate Director of Science for Biological and Environmental Research Dr. Raymond L. Orbach Under Secretary for Science U.S. Department.

1 Update on Run Schedule R. Raman NSTX Team Meeting PPPL, Princeton, NJ, 08 February, 2006 Work supported by DOE contract numbers DE-FG02-99ER54519 AM08,

Keith O. Hodgson SSRL Director Brief Update on the Linac Coherent Light Source - LCLS February 26, 2002 Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee Undulator.

D.P. BRENNAN DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS AND ENGINEERING PHYSICS THE UNIVERSITY OF TULSA PRESENTED AT THE HPC USER FORUM HOUSTON, TEXAS WEDNESDAY, APRIL 6, 2011.

ASCAC-BERAC Joint Panel on Accelerating Progress Toward GTL Goals Some concerns that were expressed by ASCAC members.

National Collaboratories Program Overview Mary Anne ScottFebruary 7, rd DOE/NSF Meeting on LHC and Global Computing “Infostructure”

PRESENTATION OF AWARDS Stephen O. Dean, President Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting and Symposium December 1-2, 2010.

The New Physical Sciences Complex A state-of-the-art center for cutting-edge research in some of the most exciting & promising areas of science: Condensed.

Supported by NSTX Team Meeting June17, 2004 Columbia U Comp-X GA INEL JHU LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics NYU ORNL PPPL PSI SNL UC Davis UC Irvine.

U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science 20 th Meeting of the IEA Large Tokamak ExCo, May th Meeting of the IEA Poloidal Divertor ExCo, May.

NSDL Collections Based on DOE User Facilities Christopher Klaus 10/05/03.

Fusion Fire Powers the Sun Can we make Fusion Fire on earth? National FIRE Collaboration AES, ANL, Boeing, Columbia U., CTD, GA, GIT, LLNL, INEEL, MIT,

NSTX-U Program Update J. Menard NSTX-U Team Meeting B318 May 7, 2013 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto.

Fusion Energy Sciences Program Department of Energy Perspective February 23, E xcellent S cience in S upport of A ttractive.

Overview of the Physics R&D Roadmap for Innovative Confinement Concepts S. Woodruff 14th July 2005 Presenting at the PSI-Center Kick-Off Meeting.

1 DOE Office of Science October 2003 SciDAC Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing Alan J. Laub.

Workshop to Plan Fusion Simulation Project (Tokamak Whole Device Modeling) Presented by Arnold H. Kritz Lehigh University Physics Department Bethlehem,

U.S. Fusion Energy Sciences Program Fusion Program Summary for Program Leaders February 7, 2005 E xcellent S cience in S upport of A ttractive E nergy.

Bob Lucas University of Southern California Sept. 23, 2011 Transforming Geant4 for the Future Bob Lucas and Rob Roser USC and FNAL May 8, 2012.

J.-N. Leboeuf V.K. Decyk R.E. Waltz J. Candy W. Dorland Z. Lin S. Parker Y. Chen W.M. Nevins B.I. Cohen A.M. Dimits D. Shumaker W.W. Lee S. Ethier J. Lewandowski.

Summary CDBM IMAGE meeting, 07 IMAGE SUMMARY IMAGE set up to provide a venue for discussion between the different Integrated Modelling (IM) activities.

1 OFFICE OF ADVANCED SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING RESEARCH The NERSC Center --From A DOE Program Manager’s Perspective-- A Presentation to the NERSC Users Group.

U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Dr. Raymond L. Orbach Director, Office of Science April 29, 2004 PRESENTATION FOR THE BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL.

Future Direction of the U.S. Fusion Materials Program Dr. Pete Pappano US Department of Energy Fusion Energy Sciences Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting.

HEP and NP SciDAC projects: Key ideas presented in the SciDAC II white papers Robert D. Ryne.

Steady State Discharge Modeling for KSTAR C. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory US-Korea Workshop - KSTAR Collaborations, 5/19-20/2004.

ComPASS Summary, Budgets & Discussion Panagiotis Spentzouris, Fermilab ComPASS PI.

By David P. Schissel and Reza Shakoori Presented at DOE Office of Science High-Performance Network Research PI Meeting Brookhaven National Lab September.

Martin Peng NSTX Program Advisory Committee Meeting (PAC-14) January 21 – 22, 2003 PPPL Princeton, NJ PAC-13 Action Items Supported by Columbia U Dartmouth.

Argonne Accelerator Institute Activites Rod Gerig Argonne May 18, 2007 Presentation to the Fermilab-Argonne Directors’ Collaboration Meeting.

Center for Extended MHD Modeling (PI: S. Jardin, PPPL) –Two extensively developed fully 3-D nonlinear MHD codes, NIMROD and M3D formed the basis for further.

Nigel Lockyer Fermilab Operations Review 16 th -18 th May 2016 Fermilab in the Context of the DOE Mission.

Boundary Physics Breakout Session was a Good Start Breadth of topics: many issues pointed out in three plenary talks: pedestal, SOL/div/PFC, and technology,

Presented by SciDAC-2 Petascale Data Storage Institute Philip C. Roth Computer Science and Mathematics Future Technologies Group.

NSTX Team Meeting April 5, 2006 Supported by Office of Science College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL.

U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Presentation to the Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee (BESAC) Dr. Raymond L. Orbach, Director November.

Status and plans for FESAC TEC report

Updating the Regulation for the JINR Programme Advisory Committees

PRESENTATION OF AWARDS

Presentation transcript:

PLASMA SCIENCE ADVANCED COMPUTING INTITUTE PROGRAM ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING W. M. TANG and V. S. CHAN 3 June 2004

PSACI Program Advisory Committee William Kruer, PAC Chairman, Chief Scientist for Inertial Fusion Plasma Physics, LLNL James Callen, Professor of Engineering Physics, U. of Wisconsin Ronald Cohen, Head, MFE Theory Program, LLNL Ronald Davidson, Professor of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton U. Patrick Diamond, Professor of Physics, UCSD James Drake, Professor of Physics & Astronomy, U. of Maryland *Brian Gross, Deputy Director and Head of Computing, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory *Robert Harrison, Chief Scientist for Computational Chemistry, ORNL Russell Hulse, Nobel Laureatte and Distinguished Laboratory Fellow, PPPL *Kai Li, Professor of Computer Sciences, Princeton U. *William McCurdy, Senior Faculty Scientist, LBNL *Steven Orszag, Professor of Mathematics and Chairman, Applied Math Department, Yale U. *Malcolm Stocks, Corporate Fellow & Co-Director of Computational Science & Materials Research Institute, ORNL

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS (1) Challenge is for Fusion SciDAC projects to effectively utilize terascale computing to produce significant new scientific insights/conceptual breakthroughs that are well appreciated by the FES as well as the general scientific community (2) Need to clearly demonstrate how the partnerships with CSET (e.g., in the OASCR-funded Fusion SciDAC Collaboratory) is delivering new capabilities -- collaboratively building the necessary software, visualization, networking, etc. to enable effective use of hardware to accelerate scientific progress (3) Fusion SciDAC Program should demonstrate how it can play a key role in helping to make case for future experimental facilities such as ITER -- cost-effective assessment of new ideas and operating scenarios -- impact real decision-making in the large “scientific options space”

CHARGE FOR PSACI PAC MEETING _________________________________________ Assessment of the accomplishments of the Fusion SciDAC Projects –How has each project made tangible progress toward achieving scientific targets proposed by Fusion SciDAC centers/projects? –How have high-end computing resources been effectively utilized to accelerate progress toward achieving these goals? –Are productive collaborative activities evident within each project and with other SciDAC activities (including relation between projects and enabling technology resource centers)?

Present Fusion SciDAC Projects Computation of Wave Plasma Interactions ORNL, PPPL, MIT, Lodestar, CompX R (m) 2.0 Wave Field Plasma Microturbulence LLNL, GA, PPPL, U. Maryland, U. Texas, U. Colorado, UCLA PPPL, SAIC, U. Wisconsin, NYU, U. Colorado, MIT, Utah State U., GA, LANL, U. Texas N=1 Plasma Instability Turbulent Eddies in Plasmas Extended MHD Modeling

Present Fusion SciDAC Projects   (a) time=0 (b)time=100 Substorm in the Magnetotail Current J Terascale Atomic Physics Auburn University Rollins College Oak Ridge National Laboratory Magnetic Reconnection Physics University of Iowa University of Chicago University of Texas

THE NATIONAL FUSION ENERGY SCIENCES COLLABORATORY (involves 40 US sites in 37 states) Collaboratory Goals: -- enable more efficient use of experimental facilities by developing more powerful between pulse data analysis -- enable better access by researchers to analysis & simulation codes, data, and visualization tools -- create standard tool set for remote data access, security, and visualization Collaboratory Partners: -- 3 large fusion experiments* * C-MOD, DIII-D, NSTX -- 4 computer science centers ** ** ANL, LBNL, Princeton U., U. of Utah

CHARGE FOR PSACI PAC MEETING _________________________________________ Consider and provide guidance on the key areas targeted in the next 3-year phase of the FES SciDAC Program (beginning in June of ‘04) –What is the likelihood of timely delivery of significant new scientific insights/conceptual breakthroughs enabled by the FES SciDAC Program? –What is the likelihood of timely delivery of reliable computational modeling capabilities addressing burning plasma physics issues relevant to ITER? –How can the FSP (Fusion Simulation Project) component of the FES SciDAC Program best be organized to successfully achieve the targeted goals of this new effort.

INTEGRATED MODELING: U.S. Fusion Community has proposed “Fusion Simulation Project” (FSP) Endorsed by US Fusion Energy Science Advisory Committee (FESAC) and DOE Proposed $20M/yr with start-up planning activity in FY ‘05 at about $2M Plan to leverage results from SciDAC Program for fundamental physics foundations and on Applied Math/Computer Science communities for needed algorithms Fusion Simulation Project is a potentially valuable US contribution to ITER

PLASMA SCIENCE ADVANCED COMPUTING INSTITUTE (PSACI) PROGRAM ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA THURSDAY, JUNE 5 9:00 AM -- 10:00 AM Welcome from Rob Goldston followed by CLOSED SESSION: PAC discussions of charge, updates on the latest developments/issues at DOE and for PSACI involving the PSACI PAC, DOE Management, R. Goldston, W. Tang, and V. Chan 10:00 AM -- 10:15 AM Coffee Break 10:15 AM -- 12:30 PM OPEN SESSION Presentations from Fusion SciDAC PI's *Magnetic Reconnection (A. Bhattacharjee) 30 minutes presentation; 15 minutes discussion *Wave-Particle Interaction (D. Batchelor) 30 minutes presentation; 15 minutes discussion *Atomic Physics for the Plasma Edge (D. Schultz) 30 minutes presentation; 15 minutes discussion

12:30 PM -- 1:15 PM LUNCH 1:15 PM -- 3:30 PM OPEN SESSION Presentations from Fusion SciDAC PI's *Extended MHD (S. Jardin) 30 minutes presentation; 15 minutes discussion *Microturbulence (W. Nevins) 30 minutes presentation; 15 minutes discussion *Fusion SciDAC Collaboratory (D. Schissel) 30 minutes presentation; 15 minutes discussion 3:30 PM -- 3:45 PM Coffee Break 3:45 PM -- 4:15 PM Current Strategy and Status for Establishing the Fusion Simulation Project (FSP) 20 minutes presentation followed by 10 minutes discussion led by Doug Post, FSP Planning Committee Chair 4:15 PM - 5:30 PM CLOSED SESSION PAC begins formulation of recommendations and poses additional questions to SciDAC PI’s

5:30 PM -- 6:30 PM OPEN SESSION Additional questions and requests for clarifications from PI's 7:00 PM Dinner for Meeting Attendees FRIDAY, JUNE 6 9:00 AM -- 10:15 AM OPEN SESSION Responses from Fusion SciDAC PI's to PAC questions & associated discussions 10:15 AM -- 10:30 AM Coffee Break 10:30 AM -- 12:30 PM Introduction of new SciDAC Projects including discussion of selection process (OFES) Presentations of Executive Summary and Plans for the new FES SciDAC Projects (PI’s) 12:30 PM -- 3:00 PM CLOSED SESSION (extending over lunch) PAC drafts report with comments/recommendations 3:00 PM -- 3:30 PM CLOSED DEBRIEF SESSION & ADJOURNMENT