Marking/Second Marking & Feedback Dr Robert Hamilton AD(T) Loughborough University.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

PGCE Secondary Programmes Awarding Ofsted Attainment Grades.

Advertisements

Summary Input – process – output model. Input Written Oral Observational.

Assessment Policy ntPolicy.htm.

How External Examining Works in Practice John Malcolm BA (Oxon) MSc (Econ)

EXTERNAL EXAMINERS’ INDUCTION 20 NOVEMBER 2013.

Teaching Enhancement Scheme - Pilot in Mathematics School TSEC agree on a list of TES themes. Teaching staff asked to identify their top three choices.

WJEC GCSE Geography A Marking the Fieldwork Enquiry Lessons from the moderation of controlled assessment in 2013.

Internal verification and external standards moderation.

Brunel University Briefing for External Examiners February 2013

Hospitality - Practical Cake Craft CPD Presentation.

WJEC Geog GCSE Spec B – Marking the Fieldwork Enquiry The PPT is designed to: Look back  taking lessons from the 2013 moderation exercise,

Consistency of Assessment

Blind double marking Aim: to raise some issues contingent on the introduction of blind double marking of essay exams.

UEL Guidelines for External Examiners Philip Brimson Quality Manager (Validation & Review)

Access to HE Diploma Grading and Assessment University of the Arts London.

Principles of Assessment

Feedback Geraint Owen (Geography, Geology)

Religious Moral and Philosophical Studies CPD Presentation.

ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION. Copyright Keith Morrison, 2004 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT... Concerns direct reality rather than disconnected.

Using the Foundation Phase Child Development Assessment Profile Training for Assessment.

Verification: Quality Assurance in Assessment Verification is the main quality assurance process associated with assessment systems and practice - whether.

Key messages from Verification  Use valid and reliable assessments  SQA-produced Unit Assessment Support Packs  Centre devised assessments.

UEL Guidelines for External Examiners Philip Brimson Quality Manager (Validation & Review)

Marking Leslie Croxford & Kevin Millam. Purpose To help you to… mark consistently assess consistently develop robust assessment systems …in line with.

Information for External Examiners involved in Academic Collaborative Provision - 12 Nov 2014.

External examiner induction Alison Coates QA Manager (Validation & Review)

PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW Introduction  Alternative and performance-based assessment  Characteristics of performance-based assessment  Portfolio.

Moderation. What it’s not Moderation can provide: Insights into the standards attained by different pupils: progress (learning over time) rate of learning.

DRAMA MODERATION PROTOCOL FET Drama. Introduction n Circular 128/2002 n Protocol to take effect 2003 n UMALUSI tasked with quality assuring provision.

Practical Craft Skills CPD Presentation Unit Specifications and Unit Assessment Support Packs (UASP) National 3, 4 and 5.

Applying for HEA Fellowship What happens after you’ve submitted your application.

Consistency of Moderation Languages What is moderation? Moderation is a process where teachers compare judgements to either confirm or adjust them.

Development of the Egyptian Code of Practice for Student Assessment Lamis Ragab, MD, MHPE Hala Salah, MD.

Different Models for Student Assessment under Egyptian Constraints Dr Robert Schofield Advisor to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic.

Supporting Internal Standardisation and Moderation  Introduction  Purposes of Session:  Overview of Statutory Assessment Arrangements 2013/14  Planning.

Academic Registry External Examiner Seminar 24 January 2011 Summary of 2009/10 External Examiner Reports Ian Shell, Sally Iles, Liz Morrow Quality Support.

The Role of the Internal and External Evaluators in Student Assessment Arthur Brown Advisor to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic.

ASSESSMENT LITERACY AND SELF-ASSESSMENT STRATEGIES Dr Tina Kendall ALSS, Department of English & Media Course Leader for Film Studies/Film & Media Studies.

 Summary Report from 2010/11; key actions  Issues arising from 2011 / 12 reports  SLE initiatives  Borderline Regulations – 67%

Phase 1 Examination Purpose of the exam Drive factual learning Confirm trainees’ ability to apply learning Assess ability to think on the spot.

EXTERNAL EXAMINERS’ INDUCTION February - March 2017

An Introduction to External Examining Procedures at Bangor University

Expectations of Our External Examiners

School – Based Assessment – Framework

UEL Guidelines for External Examiners

Applying for HEA Fellowship

ASSESSMENT STRATEGY – INFORMATION FOR STUDENTS

Assessment and Feedback – Module 1

Their role within Schools and Colleges

A department-wide approach to Feedback

An Introduction to External Examining Procedures at Bangor University

Director of Quality and Educational Development

Roles and Responsibilities of an External Examiner

Guide 3: Examining Procedures at Liverpool Hope

UEL Guidelines for External Examiners

A department-wide approach to Feedback

Dr Sarah Alix, Deputy Head of Education (Chelmsford)

ASSESSMENT AND MODERATION: IN PRACTICE

Their role within Schools and Colleges

Centre Standardisation Training

Their role within Schools and Colleges

External Examiners Induction Edge Hill University

External Examiners Briefing Session Friday 14th December 2018

Role of the External Examiner

External Examiners Induction Academic Regulations

UEL Guidelines for External Examiners at The University of East London

Examinations Council of Zambia

Brunel University Briefing for External Examiners March 2014

Session 1: Academic Practice

Presentation transcript:

Marking/Second Marking & Feedback Dr Robert Hamilton AD(T) Loughborough University

Marking/Second Marking

Marking (EE Comments) Poor coursework marking High marks being awarded Overly harsh or inconsistent marking

Second Marking (EE’s Comments) Awarding identical marks No evidence of moderation How has the marking been reconciled? Disagreement over marks resolved through 3 rd marking

Definition of Second Marking 3 Different terms: -Internal Moderation -Double/Second Marking -Blind Double/Second Marking

Internal Moderation i.e. a sample of scripts is scrutinised by a second internal examiner to check that the assessment criteria have been applied consistently (and where applicable that the marking scheme has been followed) and the outcomes of the assessment are fair and reliable. The sample should include examples of scripts from across the mark range and borderline cases. e.g. examination scripts (and coursework worth 50% or more) should be subject to internal moderation:

Double/Second Marking i.e. every piece of work is independently assessed by more than one internal examiner. Each marker keeps a record of all marks awarded, together with his/her rationale for awarding each mark. In this case, second markers have sight of the first marker's marks and/or comments. The two markers subsequently confer to arrive at a set of agreed marks and the discussion/agreement is recorded. e.g. ALL final year projects and dissertations should be subject to at least double/second marking (i.e. in some cases BLIND double/second marking would be more appropriate).

Feedback

Feedback (EE’s Comments) More constructive feedback required More detailed (effective) feedback required Generally feedback was at least satisfactory More (all) staff should use the Department’s feedback form

Feedback Commonly used terms include: -Effective -Timely -Constructive -Developmental -Detailed

Feedback Types of feedback typically used: -Annotation on student’s work -Feedback form (linked with the Statement of Integrity) -Generic feedback on the eLearning platform -Verbal feedback (various) -Student Enquiry Form

Thank you