A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Nuclear Engineering Division Argonne National Laboratory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Euradwaste04 – Partitioning and transmutation - Panel discussion Transmutation and partitioning Fast neutron spectrum Critical Heterogeneous Homogeneous.
Advertisements

Argonne National Laboratory is managed by The University of Chicago for the U.S. Department of Energy Advanced Fuel Cycles and Repositories Dr. Phillip.
Fuel Cycle Subcommittee: Overview and Status Fusion-Fission Hybrid Workshop Gaithersburg, MD September 30, 2009 Robert N. Hill Department Head – Nuclear.
Text optional: Institutsname Prof. Dr. Hans Mustermann Mitglied der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft Partitioning & Transmutation Combined with Molten Salt.
Nuclear Power. Source: Uranium-235 Process: – An unstable uranium nucleus is bombarded with a neutron and splits into two smaller nuclei and some neutrons.
Nuclear Fuel Production Fissile Nuclei Uranium and Plutonium 235 U 239 Pu.
Nuclear Fuel Production Fissile Nuclei Uranium and Plutonium 235 U 239 Pu.
Nucular Waste A Technical Analysis Ian Baird 5/12/08.
The Future of Nuclear Waste Management, Storage, and Disposal Thanassi Lefas 26 November 2008 ChE 359 Energy Technology and Policy.
Spent Nuclear Fuel Timothy Pairitz. Nuclear Power 101 Uranium-235 is enriched from 0.7% to 3-5%. Enriched fuel is converted to a uranium oxide powder.
The Way Forward in the US: Nuclear Waste Management Allison Macfarlane AAAS San Diego February 19, 2010.
Recycling Nuclear Waste: Potentials and Global Perspectives Mikael Nilsson Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science University of California,
High Level waste Radioactive Waste Management and Disposal NUCP 2311.
Fundamentals of Neutronics : Reactivity Coefficients in Nuclear Reactors Paul Reuss Emeritus Professor at the Institut National des Sciences et Techniques.
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, 1 st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Nuclear Fission Q for 235 U + n  236 U is MeV. Table 13.1 in Krane:
Nuclear Waste By: Suhani Ray, Sunita Prasla, Sibnish Ali, Rachael Milne, Jessica Chou.
Fusion-Fission Hybrid Systems
Why are you trying so hard to fit in, when you were born to stand out?
Chapter 4 Nuclear Energy. Objectives Describe how nuclear fuel is produced. List the environmental concerns associated with nuclear power. Analyze the.
Types of reactors.
The Nuclear Fuel Cycle Dr. Okan Zabunoğlu Hacettepe University Department of Nuclear Engineering.
Logo. ﴿قَالُواْ سُبْحَانَكَ لاَعِلْمَ لَنَا إِلاَّ مَاعَلَّمْتَنَا إِنَّكَ أَنتَ الْعَلِيمُ الْحَكِيمُ﴾ بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
The Fission-Fusion Hybrid At last! A solution that has found a problem Jeff Freidberg MIT.
Can Thermal Reactor Recycle Eliminate the Need for Multiple Repositories? C. W. Forsberg, E. D. Collins, C. W. Alexander, and J. Renier Actinide and Fission.
The environment is everything that isn’t me. Albert Einstein Albert Einstein.
MA and LLFP Transmutation Performance Assessment in the MYRRHA eXperimental ADS P&T: 8th IEM, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA November 9-11, 2004 E. Malambu, W.
Antineutrino Monitoring of Reactors Theoretical Feasibility Studies Antineutrino Monitoring of Reactors Theoretical Feasibility Studies Michael Nieto,
Plutonium and Neptunium Conversion Using Modified Direct Denitration L. K. Felker Nuclear Science and Technology Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
Nuclear Fuels Storage & Transportation Planning Project Office of Fuel Cycle Technologies Nuclear Energy Criticality Safety Assessment for As-loaded Spent.
Nuclear Fuel Cycle.  According to World Nuclear Association:  The nuclear fuel cycle is the series of industrial processes which involve the production.
Synergistic Relationships of Advanced Nuclear Fuel Cycles Jordan Weaver Technology Report Presentation.
Reprocessing in the U.S.: A Waste of Time Edwin S. Lyman Senior Staff Scientist Union of Concerned Scientists July 20, 2009.
3. Core Layout The core loading pattern for the proliferation resistant advanced transuranic transmuting design (PRATT) was optimized to obtain an even.
IAEA Sources of Radiation Fuel Cycle - Reprocessing Day 4 – Lecture 8 (2) 1.
1 Massimo SALVATORESiemtp 8 – November th Information Exchange Meeting on Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation University.
The amount of carbon dioxide released (Kg CO 2 /kWh) annually in the UK. Do we need Nuclear Reactors?
Nuclear Energy.
Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactors Martin W. Metzner November 19, 2007.
THERMODYNAMICS What the high school science student should know to better understand nuclear energy Fred Gunnerson, Ph.D. University of Idaho
D J Coates, G T Parks Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, UK Actinide Evolution and Equilibrium in Fast Thorium Reactors UNTF 2010 University.
Critical and Source Driven Subcritical Systems for: - Waste Transmutation - Fuel Breeding Phillip Finck Associate Laboratory Director for Nuclear Science.
Regional Strategies Concerning Nuclear Fuel Cycle and HLRW in Central and Eastern European Countries Z. Hózer (AEKI, Hungary), S. Borovitskiy (FCNRS, Russia),
Rouanet Maxime.The confining matrice : how to protect the world to radiations of high-activity radioactive waste.
Ch. 16 Environmental Science.  All matter is made of atoms  Atoms have Proton Electron Neutrons Nucleus contains protons and neutrons has most of the.
Advanced Heavy Water Reactor Amit Thakur Reactor Physics Design Division Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, INDIA.
FAST MOLTEN SALT REACTOR –TRANSMUTER FOR CLOSING NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE ON MINOR ACTINIDES A.Dudnikov, P.Alekseev, S.Subbotin.
Unit 1 Physics Detailed Study 3.3 Chapter 12.3: Nuclear Fissions Reactors.
4/2003 Rev 2 I.4.9h – slide 1 of 24 Session I.4.9h Part I Review of Fundamentals Module 4Sources of Radiation Session 9hFuel Cycle – Spent Fuel IAEA Post.
Characteristics of Transmutation Reactor Based on LAR Tokamak Neutron Source B.G. Hong Chonbuk National University.
Chapter 11 Nuclear Power  Energy released in combustion reactions comes from changes in the chemical bonds that hold the atom together.  Nuclear Energy.
In your notes… What are the four ways we harness solar energy? What are the limitations of solar energy (at least 2)? What approach should we take with.
Effective Application of Partitioning and Transmutation Technologies to Geologic Disposal Joonhong Ahn Department of Nuclear Engineering University of.
Potential role of FF hybrids Massimo Salvatores CEA-Cadarache- France Fusion-Fission Hybrids have a potential role (in principle and independently from.
1/12 VUJE, Inc., Okružná 5, SK Trnava, Slovakia Plutonium and MA Management in VVER-440 and FR P. Dařílek, R. Zajac – VUJE Trnava
International Atomic Energy Agency Reprocessing, Waste Treatment and Disposal Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel Seminar on Nuclear Science and Technology.
2016 January1 Nuclear Options for the Future B. Rouben McMaster University EP4P03_6P03 Nuclear Power Plant Operation 2016 January-April.
D J Coates, G T Parks Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, UK 3 rd Year PhD student Actinide Breeding and Reactivity Variation in a Thermal.
Spent fuel Management The case for Hardened On-Site Storage (HOSS) Arjun Makhijani President, IEER
Nuclear Fuel Production Fissile Nuclei Uranium and Plutonium 235 U 239 Pu.
1Chemistry 2C Lecture 25: May 28 th, )Binding Energy Revisited 2)Fission 3)Fusion Lecture 25: Nuclear Power.
D J Coates, G T Parks Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, UK Actinide Evolution and Equilibrium in Thorium Reactors ThorEA Workshop Trinity.
25.3 Fission and Fusion > 1 Copyright © Pearson Education, Inc., or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 25 Nuclear Chemistry 25.1 Nuclear Radiation.
Chapter 12 Nuclear Energy.
Chapter 12 Nuclear Energy.
New radiochemical technologies of spent nuclear fuel reprocessing
Management of Radioactive Waste
Pebble Bed Reactors for Once Trough Nuclear Transmutation
Nuclear Reactions 1-3,6-7,17-23 E = mc2.
The Future of Nuclear Waste Management, Storage, and Disposal
Improvements of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Simulation System (NFCSS) at IAEA
Presentation transcript:

A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Nuclear Engineering Division Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, Illinois Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy By Roald A. Wigeland and Theodore H. Bauer Repository Benefits of Partitioning and Transmutation (Neutronic Analyses by T. H. Fanning, T. K. Kim, and J. A. Stillman) Eighth Information Exchange Meeting on Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation, 9-11 November 2004, Las Vegas, NV

R. A. Wigeland & T. H. Bauer- Eighth Information Exchange Meeting on Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation, 9-11 Nov. 2004, Las Vegas, NV Pioneering Science and Technology 2 Outline/ Goals Examine spent fuel treatment options that could allow the loading density of a geologic repository to be increased (with potential benefits of increased area loading or smaller repository sites with reduced environmental impact). Identify the partitioning and transmutation strategies that result in large repository loading benefits. Quantify repository loading benefits achievable through limited recycling in LWRs Use the proposed Yucca Mountain Repository as a specific example for quantitative studies.

R. A. Wigeland & T. H. Bauer- Eighth Information Exchange Meeting on Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation, 9-11 Nov. 2004, Las Vegas, NV Pioneering Science and Technology 3 The Yucca Mountain Repository (From Yucca Mountain Project Reports)

R. A. Wigeland & T. H. Bauer- Eighth Information Exchange Meeting on Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation, 9-11 Nov. 2004, Las Vegas, NV Pioneering Science and Technology 4 Proposed layout (From Yucca Mountain Project Reports)

R. A. Wigeland & T. H. Bauer- Eighth Information Exchange Meeting on Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation, 9-11 Nov. 2004, Las Vegas, NV Pioneering Science and Technology 5 Repository Cross-Section Design: High-Temperature Operating Mode- (HTOM) Drifts (tunnels) assumed cooled by forced-air ventilation for ~75 years before closure. Repository loading limits are determined by temperature limits at various locations and times and the heat source from stored waste. (Figure 2-6 in the Final Environmental Impact Statement)

R. A. Wigeland & T. H. Bauer- Eighth Information Exchange Meeting on Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation, 9-11 Nov. 2004, Las Vegas, NV Pioneering Science and Technology 6 Temperature Limits Ensure Integrity of Barriers to Radionuclide Release Most restrictive HTOM temperature limits: -Peak rock temperature midway between adjacent drifts must remain below the local boiling point (96 o C). -Peak rock temperature at drift walls must remain below 200 o C. Loading limits determined by calculating temperatures generated in the drift and mountain before and after closure. -A detailed thermal model was developed describing a “unit cell” slice of Yucca Mountain surrounding a storage drift. -Yucca Mountain thermophysical properties assumed throughout -Parameter uncertainties not included in these studies. -Focus is on relative assessments of maximum drift loading for different chemical separation options.

R. A. Wigeland & T. H. Bauer- Eighth Information Exchange Meeting on Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation, 9-11 Nov. 2004, Las Vegas, NV Pioneering Science and Technology 7 Geometry and Node Structure of the Thermal Model’s “Unit Cell”

R. A. Wigeland & T. H. Bauer- Eighth Information Exchange Meeting on Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation, 9-11 Nov. 2004, Las Vegas, NV Pioneering Science and Technology 8 Characteristics of the Spent Fuel Heat Source Discharged PWR fuel assumed representative of the majority of spent fuel destined for geologic disposal. Decay heat drops rapidly after discharge from the reactor. -First 60 years of decay heat predominantly from fission products barium and yttrium as decay products of cesium and strontium. -After 60 years, decay heat predominantly from actinide elements, plutonium and americium. After ~200 years, decay heat drops much more slowly. -Heating almost entirely from plutonium and americium, out to at least 10,000 years. -The much slower decrease with time is due to the relatively long half- lives of the isotopes 241 Am, 238 Pu, 239 Pu, and 240 Pu.

R. A. Wigeland & T. H. Bauer- Eighth Information Exchange Meeting on Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation, 9-11 Nov. 2004, Las Vegas, NV Pioneering Science and Technology 9 Characteristics of the Spent Fuel Heat Source (Cont.)

R. A. Wigeland & T. H. Bauer- Eighth Information Exchange Meeting on Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation, 9-11 Nov. 2004, Las Vegas, NV Pioneering Science and Technology 10 Repository Benefit: Quantified by Comparing Maximum Drift Loadings to PWR Baseline Values. The thermal model calculates a baseline maximum linear loading of waste in a drift of ~1.1 MTIHM/m or ~55 GWd/m. -Limited by the 96 ºC peak maximum temperature midway between adjacent drifts at ~1600 years. With key actinide elements Am and Pu removed calculated maximum linear loading is ~5.9 MTIHM/m or ~295 GWd/m. -Limited by the 200 ºC peak temperature allowed at the drift wall shortly after repository closure. With key fission product (Cs & Sr) and actinide (Am & Pu) elements removed calculated maximum linear loading is ~47 MTIHM/m or ~2350 GWd/m. -Limited by the 200 ºC peak temperature allowed at the drift wall at the time of emplacement.

R. A. Wigeland & T. H. Bauer- Eighth Information Exchange Meeting on Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation, 9-11 Nov. 2004, Las Vegas, NV Pioneering Science and Technology 11 Baseline Thermal Analysis for Direct Disposal of Spent PWR Fuel

R. A. Wigeland & T. H. Bauer- Eighth Information Exchange Meeting on Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation, 9-11 Nov. 2004, Las Vegas, NV Pioneering Science and Technology 12 Thermal Analysis with Pu & Am Removed

R. A. Wigeland & T. H. Bauer- Eighth Information Exchange Meeting on Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation, 9-11 Nov. 2004, Las Vegas, NV Pioneering Science and Technology 13 Thermal Analysis with Pu, Am, Cs, & Sr Removed

R. A. Wigeland & T. H. Bauer- Eighth Information Exchange Meeting on Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation, 9-11 Nov. 2004, Las Vegas, NV Pioneering Science and Technology 14 Repository Loading Benefits from Separations

R. A. Wigeland & T. H. Bauer- Eighth Information Exchange Meeting on Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation, 9-11 Nov. 2004, Las Vegas, NV Pioneering Science and Technology 15 Requirements for Large Repository Loading Benefits All waste streams from processing spent fuel should have ≥99% Pu, Am, Cs, and Sr removed before being sent to the geologic repository. -It is practical to store separated Cs and Sr for several hundred years without a geologic repository. The inventory of separated long-lived Pu and Am actinide isotopes can only be reduced by transmutation. Transmutation is possible by recycle in either “fast neutron” or “thermal neutron” reactors.

R. A. Wigeland & T. H. Bauer- Eighth Information Exchange Meeting on Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation, 9-11 Nov. 2004, Las Vegas, NV Pioneering Science and Technology 16 Loading Benefits from Near-Term Recycle in LWRs Recycle of actinides in thermal neutron systems reduces inventories of both heat-generating and fissile isotopes. Three schemes were examined that differ in the way that fissile content is provided to recycled assemblies. -MOX: Within a UO 2 matrix, recycled Pu, Am, and Np from multiple assemblies at each step provides the needed fissile content for a single next step assembly; fertile UO 2 breeds more fissile during irradiation. -IMF: Same as “MOX”, but within an inert (non-fertile) ZrO 2 matrix. -CORAIL-PNA (MOX-UE): In a UO 2 matrix, recycled Pu, Am, and Np from a single assembly supplemented by higher enriched UO 2 provides the needed fissile content for a single next step assembly. Number of recycles was a parameter in the study. Calculated benefit compares maximum drift loadings in GWd/m to the PWR baseline.

R. A. Wigeland & T. H. Bauer- Eighth Information Exchange Meeting on Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation, 9-11 Nov. 2004, Las Vegas, NV Pioneering Science and Technology 17 Calculated Repository Benefit vs Number of LWR Recycles Two waste streams assumed sent to the repository: (1) Recycle process waste containing  1% of generated Pu, Am, Np, Cs, & Sr. (2) Untreated spent fuel from the last recycle step.

R. A. Wigeland & T. H. Bauer- Eighth Information Exchange Meeting on Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation, 9-11 Nov. 2004, Las Vegas, NV Pioneering Science and Technology 18 Results and Implications By itself, the process waste stream yields a large (≥40) repository loading benefit. But direct disposal of “hot” spent fuel from the last recycle reduces net loading benefits down to factors ~2 at most. Thus, large repository benefits require that: -Separation and recycling of selected actinides and fission products be continued, and… -Untreated spent fuel should never be sent to the repository. Note that fast reactors are capable of recycling continuously- but not all LWR schemes. -“MOX” and “IMF”– probably not. -“CORAIL-PNA (MOX-UE)” –yes, but requires enriched uranium feed.

R. A. Wigeland & T. H. Bauer- Eighth Information Exchange Meeting on Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation, 9-11 Nov. 2004, Las Vegas, NV Pioneering Science and Technology 19 Continuous Actinide Recycle - Needed for Large Loading Benefit

R. A. Wigeland & T. H. Bauer- Eighth Information Exchange Meeting on Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation, 9-11 Nov. 2004, Las Vegas, NV Pioneering Science and Technology 20 Conclusions Large repository loading benefits result if ≥99% of Pu, Am, Cs, and Sr is removed from spent fuel waste streams. A similar result should apply to loading any geologic repository where heat load is an issue - not just Yucca Mountain. Large repository loading benefits can be available immediately by: -Processing spent fuel. -Providing temporary storage for selected elements prior to recycling. -Sending only the process waste to the repository. Limited recycling in LWRs can provide a useful lead-in to continuous recycling in future fast spectrum reactors.