CARNEGIE LEARNING SYSTEMS Middle/High School Mathematics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CREATING OR SELECTING AN INTERVENTION PROGRAM National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
Advertisements

Second Information Technology in Education Study (SITES) A Project of the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA)
Teachers, administrators and staff continuously seek and share learning and then act on what they learn. The goal of their actions is to enhance their.
Instructional Decision Making
Elementary. The District Heard Your Concerns In teachers requested that the following three documents be merged into one. Instructional Focus.
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
Assessment Adapted from text Effective Teaching Methods Research-Based Practices by Gary D. Borich and How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed Ability.
PORTFOLIO.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Common Core Standards and the Edmonds School District November 4, 2013.
Action Plan Mr. Ahmed Zaki Uddin Mathematics O-Level.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Teacher Leadership Initiative Trainings
Beyond the Core Curriculum: Gifted Education in an RtI Framework
Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products (EQuIP) Using the Tri-State Quality Rubric for Mathematics.
Introduction 1.How do you use technology now? 2.What helps? 3.What hinders? Definition of Technology Computers Software Internet Digital cameras and camcorders.
Overview of CompassLearning Odyssey. CompassLearning and Palm Beach Schools CompassLearning is partnering with the Palm Beach.
MATH INTERVENTION MATERIAL REVIEW: Number Worlds Grades Pre-K – 8 and Algebra Readiness SRA In December Laura Clarke shared that Campbell Ridge is using.
Intervention Resource Guide. Math Intervention Courses Address foundational math skills – Whole numbers – Addition, Subtraction, Multiplication, Division.
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
ITEC 7445: EMERGING TECHNOLOGY EMILY TOMS NOVEMBER 12, 2012
Interactive Science Notebooks: Putting the Next Generation Practices into Action
Lesson Design: An Overview of Key Tools for Flexible Math Instruction Think about Ms. Christiansen—the teacher in the video. What helps a teacher plan.
Standards Aligned System April 21, 2011 – In-Service.
1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.
SkillsTutor Providing Tools and Support for classroom instruction and RTI Implementation.
August 2011 Lesson Plans BCIU#22- Summer Induction.
Consortia of States Assessment Systems Instructional Leaders Roundtable November 18, 2010.
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
Day 6. Agenda Just how is this thing supposed to go? Math! Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement and reliability.
Jackson Public School District Holistic Accountability in Action.
Piedmont K-5 Math Adoption May 29, Overview What Elementary Math Looks Like Historical Perspective District Philosophy Process and Criteria Why.
 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 Mathematics MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Making Sense of Math Learning Progressions District Learning Day Friday, September 18, 2015.
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
District Learning Day August 5, 2015
D62 Response to Intervention
SASIT Thomas E. Gluck, Acting Secretary of Education Amy Morton, Deputy Secretary, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Ed Vollbrecht, Ph.D., Director,
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Making Sense of Math Learning Progressions High School
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Supports K–12 School Effectiveness Framework: A Support for School Improvement and Student Success (2010). The integrated process of assessment and instruction.
Mt. Diablo Unified School District Elementary Mathematics Adoption Buy Back Day Thursday, August 27, 2009.
Standards-Based Assessment Overview K-8 Fairfield Public Schools Fall /30/2015.
Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.
Developed and implemented by the multidisciplinary team (MDT)
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
Creating a Standards-Based Classrooms An Overview of Adapting and Adopting Research Based Instruction to Enhance Student Learning.
Connecting the Characteristics Margaret Heritage UCLA/ CRESST Attributes of Other Characteristics of Effective Instruction and Assessment for Learning.
MATH INTERVENTION MATERIAL REVIEW: Vmath (VOYAGER) Peggy Cunningham.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Using Standards Aligned System to Ensure 21 st Century Teaching and Learning Institute Pennsylvania Department of Education Upper Dublin School District.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
LaKenji Hastings, NWLC Assessment Program Specialist Georgia Milestones Parent Informational.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Spring 2015 Verona PARCC Results: Year One Wednesday, March 16 7:00-8:00 p.m. VHS Learning Commons.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
Introduction to Interacting with Peers in Math. What is Interacting with Peers? Interacting with peers—tutoring, giving feedback, collaborating—is a strategy.
ISBE Mathematics Foundational Services Training
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Presentation transcript:

CARNEGIE LEARNING SYSTEMS Middle/High School Mathematics

CARNEGIE LEARNING Mathematics publisher 20+ years of research Most tested and proven math solutions – Adaptive Software – Consumable Texts Serving 500,000+ students annually

COURSES Bridge to Algebra Algebra I Geometry Algebra II

RESULTS Research has shown that students using both the textbook and the software from the Cognitive Tutor Algebra I program: Perform 30% better on questions from the TIMSS assessment Demonstrate an 85% better performance on assessments of complex mathematical problem solving and thinking Have a 70% greater likelihood of completing subsequent Geometry and Algebra II courses Achieve 15-25% better scores on the SAT and Iowa Algebra Aptitude Test Experience equivalent results for both minority and non- minority students

What Works Clearing House The average improvement index for math achievement is +8 percentile points across the two studies, with a range of -1 to +16 percentile points across findings.

Tier 1 Model Implementation Model – Daily Instruction for all students – Student-centered – Collaborative – Problem Solving Context – Learn By Doing™ – Deepens conceptual understanding of math

Tier 1 Model Implementation Model Options – Textbook as primary source of instruction OR – Blended instruction model integrating texts and software.

Key Features and Benefits of Using the Textbook Materials Students like working cooperatively and become active participants in math class Students better relate to math when solving real- world problems Students make connections and understand key math concepts when they encounter multiple representations Teachers are better supported with materials and tips for facilitating a collaborative learning environment

Tier 2 Model Implementation Model 2-3 sessions on Adaptive Math Software per week 2-3 sessions on Supplemental Print Materials per week – problems solving exercises and skill practice Aligns to core instruction Supports small group instruction

A subscription to Carnegie Learning Adaptive Math Solutions includes the following: Student License for the Cognitive Tutor® software Access to Carnegie Learning™ Teacher’s Toolkit, a simple to use learning management system for enrolling students and monitoring their progress. Additionally, teachers have access to Carnegie Learning™ Resource Center for materials like correlation documents, implementation guides, etc.

Carnegie Learning Adaptive Math Solutions Students must show mastery of each discrete skill required to solve math problems prior to progressing through the software Offers continuous, formative assessment throughout curriculum. Also includes summative assessments. Students can view their progress via the Skillometer which motivates them to do their best work and master skills. Offers immediate feedback, positive reinforcement, and help if needed at each step within a problem. Re-sequence units of curricula to complement the core curriculum or provide targeted intervention. Plus automatically generate matching assessment tests. Review Mode offers students the option to review and practice skills prior to exams. Easily generate reports to analyze student progress and plan for adjustments if needed. New administrative reports help identify trends in student software usage.

ADAPTIVE INSTRUCTION – Target areas of weakness – Multiple representations – Engaging, real-world problems – Guided, Interactive Examples – Just-in-time feedback – Hints

Cognitive Tutor ® Differentiated Instruction Multiple Skills AssessedDifferentiated Instruction

ADAPTIVE MATH SOLUTIONS Gives administrators the ability to build a custom curriculum to meet the special needs of districts or schools. Units can be re-ordered, added and deleted, and new sequences can be named and published for use in the classroom.

SOFTWARE ASSESSMENTS Delivers pre- and post-tests that automatically tie to custom sequenced curricula. The pretest may be configured to be diagnostic, in which case results are used to set pacing for students in the instructional software.

TEACHER’S TOOLKIT

Carnegie Learning Print Materials Problem SolvingSkills Practice

Tier 3 Model Differentiates instruction to meet individual learning needs 4-5 sessions on Adaptive Math Software per week 4-5 sessions on Supplemental Print Materials per week – problems solving exercises and skill practice Aligns to core instruction

TRAINING Initial Development sessions for teachers are available in three formats Regional: Attending a Regional session is a cost-effective solution for schools and districts requiring Professional Development for a lower number of teachers. Educators from many schools come together, and as they learn about Cognitive Tutor curricula, have the opportunity to collaborate and learn from one another. The Onsite option gives you greater flexibility and the opportunity to customize portions of the Professional Development to meet the specific needs of your school. Webcast Conference: This Professional Development option is available for supplemental software implementations or if you add an additional subject for previously trained teachers.

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Develop an understanding of the big idea in the curriculum materials Align supplemental materials to the core curriculum Develop implementation strategies for Tiers 1-3 Analyze data for instructional decision making

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COST Professional development costs $600 per teacher attending a regional training site or $2,000 a day for onsite training. 1 day of training for software, two days for textbook, and three days for the blended program $350 for a two-hour webcast session if only implementing supplemental software

TEXTBOOK COST students: $22.50 per student/per year* students: $18.00 per student/per year* 500+ students: $18.00 per student/per year* *State Math Textbook Adoption Price (6 year contract): – Student receives a new textbook every year – $76.00 per student for the six years (textbook is $12.67/student/year)

SOFTWARE COST students: $45.20/student/year (Software License = $40.00 per student/per year) (Software Support = $5.20 per student/per year) students: $33.20/student/year (Software License = $28.00 per student/per year) (Software Support = $5.20 per student/per year) 500+ students: $47.20/student/year (Software = $24.00 per student/per year) (Software Support = $5.20 per student/per year) Multi Year Software Subscription Discounts (in addition to volume discounts): 3 Year = 15% off Software Licenses 5 Year = 20% off Software Licenses 6 Year = 25% off Software Licenses

BLENDED: TEXTBOOK AND SOFTWARE NUMBER OF STUDENTS TEXTBOOK PER STUDENT/ YEAR SOFTWARE LICENSE PER STUDENT/ YEAR SOFTWARE SUPPORT PER STUDENT/YEAR TOTAL* 1-249$22.50$40.00$5.20$ $18.00$28.00$5.20$ $18.00$24.00$5.20$47.20 *State Math Textbook Adoption Price (6 year contract): - Student receives a new textbook every year = $76.00 per student for the six years (textbook is $12.67/student/year) *Multi Year Software Subscription Discounts (in addition to volume discounts): - 3 Year = 15% off Software Licenses - 5 Year = 20% off Software Licenses - 6 Year = 25% off Software Licenses *(6 year contract with student textbook and software is $47.87/student/year for students)

OVERVIEW extbookWalkthrough/KY/index.html extbookWalkthrough/KY/index.html DI_Animation/index.html DI_Animation/index.html web_docs/AMS_SECONDARY_2008 _SWTOC.pdf web_docs/AMS_SECONDARY_2008 _SWTOC.pdf

rstate_process.cfm?id=38 Samples from textbooks Testimonials from teachers using the material in Kentucky Testimonials from teachers using the material in Kentucky

CONTACT INFORMATION Steve Fain Regional Account Manager Carnegie Learning, Inc. Berea, KY ext

Creating or Selecting Intervention Programs NCTM Questions to Consider When Creating or Selecting an Intervention Program

1. Diagnostic assessment 1.1. Does the intervention program include diagnostic assessments that identify students’ specific strengths and weaknesses with respect to both conceptual understanding and procedures? 1.2. Do the assessments investigate students’ knowledge of fundamental mathematics concepts that are grade appropriate? 1.3. Does the content that is assessed align with the school’s prescribed curriculum? 1.4. Do the assessments communicate students’ strengths and weaknesses in ways that teachers and parents can understand?

2. Instructional activities 2.1. Does the intervention program include a series of instructional activities that are carefully linked with the diagnostic assessments? 2.2. Do the program’s instructional activities support and enhance, but not supplant or duplicate, regular classroom instruction? 2.3. Are tools for ongoing, formative assessment embedded in the instructional activities? 2.4. Is the mathematics in the instructional activities correct? 2.5. Do the instructional activities advance the school’s curriculum and promote reasoning and conceptual understanding? 2.6. Do the instructional activities contain challenging tasks that are appropriate for students’ interests and backgrounds?

3. Postassessment 3.1. Does the intervention program contain postassessments that indicate whether the instructional activities have been effective? 3.2. Are follow-up assessments administered in a timely fashion? 3.3. Do the assessments communicate students’ growth or need for further instruction in ways that teachers and parents can understand?

4. Organizational structure of the intervention 4.1. Is the structure of the intervention program feasible given the organizational structure of the school? 4.2. Does the school have the necessary resources to implement the intervention program as designed? 4.3. Does the intervention program include adequate and ongoing professional development to ensure effective implementation?

5. Research supporting the intervention 5.1. Have rigorous and appropriate methods been used to evaluate the intervention program and determined it to be successful? 5.2. Does theoretical and empirical evidence support the efficacy of the intervention program in a setting that is similar to your school?