Températures à 5000 m de profondeur

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chuck Kutscher National Renewable Energy Laboratory Geothermal Power Potential Energy and Climate Mini-Workshop November 3, 2008.
Advertisements

Prepared by Betsy Conklin for Dr. Isiorho
Physical models for seismicity triggered during hydrofracture experiments Asaf Inbal Spatiotemporal distribution of induced seismicity in hydrofracture.
Porosity network and transfer properties of geothermal formation : Importance of damage zones around faults and fractures Géraud Yves, Rosener Michel,
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P. O. Box 808, Livermore, CA This work performed under the auspices.
Geology of the Lithosphere 2. Evidence for the Structure of the Crust & Upper Mantle What is the lithosphere and what is the structure of the lithosphere?
E. Putra, Y. Fidra and D.S. Schechter
GEOWISSENSCHAFTLICHES ZENTRUM GÖTTINGEN Hannover-Messe 2005 Geothermal Energy: Unlimited, Environmental-Friendly, and Economic.
04 October 2004New and Classical Uses of Heat Flow Studies, Aachen1 Geothermal Resource Mapping of Northern Switzerland Thomas Kohl, Nathalie Andenmatten-Bertoud,
Chapter 1 RESERVOIR.
Small is beautiful: AGL physical modeling and salt measurements N. Dyaur, R. Stewart, and L. Huang Houston May 16,
Geothermal Power The specification states that you need to be able to: Explain about geothermal energy from volcanic sources around the world and potential.
The governing equation for groundwater flow can be written using total head (h) or pressure (p). Why do we typically use head (h) as the dependent variable?
Geologic Structure & Seismic Analysis Trenton–Black River Research Consortium October 5, 2005 Pittsburgh, PA Kentucky Geological Survey John B. Hickman.
Science Questions By: Emma L.. 2a Defining What is a convection current? The movement of a fluid, caused by differences in temperature, that transfers.
Alexey V. Kiryukhin 1 Leonid K. Moskalev Institute of Volcanology and Seismology FEB RAS 2 - SC “Geotherm”
The - and Prometheus-Project: Concepts for the Extraction of Heat from Deep and Tight Sedimentary Rock Jens Orzol (1), F. Rummel (2), R. Jung (1) (1):
ENGINE Leiden Combining Areal Underground and Infrastructure Data to Minimize Exploration and Economic Risks Thomas Kohl, GEOWATT AG Clément Baujard,
Discrimination of P-Wave Interval in Time-Quefrency Analysis for Proximity Microseismic Doublets Koji Nagano Muroran Institute of Technology Muroran, Hokkaido,
Induced Slip on a Large-Scale Frictional Discontinuity: Coupled Flow and Geomechanics Antonio Bobet Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN Virginia Tech,
Geothermal Development in the Caribbean and EGS Perspectives ENGINE Launching Conference – Orléans, Feb. 12 th to 15 th, 2006 H. Traineau, B. Herbrich,
Improved Recovery Demonstration for Williston Basin Carbonates DE-FC22-93BC14984 Luff Exploration Company Mark Sippel, Consulting Engineer.
GRQ Ltd. – Oct DTI Spindrift bidding. slide 1 Investigation of fracture & fault populations in analogue outcrops for use in the Spindrift subsurface.
INTRODUCING GEOWATT AG Geothermal Energy utilization Engineering Hydrogeology Numerics Resource Evaluation Generic studies High- and Low-Enthalpy Systems.
 One 1 km³ of 200°C hot granite cooled by 20°C... ...delivers about 10 MW of electric power... ...for a period of 20 years.
David Bridgland – Finance Director UNITED DOWNS DEEP GEOTHERMAL PROJECT 17 th November 2011.
THE SOULTZ EGS PROJECT AND ITS SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT: HOW TO REDUCE THE RISK OF PUBLIC OPPOSITION Nicolas CUENOT & Daniel FRITSCH GEIE “Exploitation Minière.
Physical interpretation of DC and non-DC components of moment tensors Václav Vavryčuk Institute of Geophysics, Prague.
Numerical simulation of the Alum lakes geothermal outflow J. Newson and M. J. O’Sullivan.
GAPSS Geothermal Area Passive Seismic Sources Sismicità associata allo sfruttamento del campo geotermico di Larderello-Travale G. Saccorotti, D. Piccinini.
1:1 scale wellbore experiment for a better understanding of well integrity in the context of CO 2 geological storage, Mont Terri underground rock laboratory.
INDUCED SEISMICITY IN PETROLEUM FIELDS: RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION, SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT M. Nafi Toksöz Earth Resources Laboratory, Massachusetts.
© NERC All rights reserved Potential geothermal opportunities in Scotland Martin Gillespie British Geological Survey.
Fluid conducting chimneys: Mechanism of formation and implications for fluid injection operations Viktoriya Yarushina (1) Ludovic Räss (2), Nina Simon.
Ecosystems and Communities. Interactions What organisms would live in this community? What are their interactions?
Bed Contained Tectonic Fold-Related Fractures Flank of Teton Anticline Sawtooth Mnts. W. Montana Miss. Madison Ls.
Creep, compaction and the weak rheology of major faults Norman H. Sleep & Michael L. Blanpied Ge 277 – February 19, 2010.
Drilling, stimulation and reservoir assessment for EGS and UGR projects Thomas Kohl, GEOWATT AG Sverrir Thorhallsson, ISOR.
12-15 February 2006 EGS Resource in France and Europe Albert Genter, L. Guillou-Frottier, N. Debeglia, Ch. Dezayes BRGM Engine Launching Conference
Indications of an Underground “River” beneath the Amazon River: Inferences from Results of Geothermal Studies Elizabeth Tavares Pimentel-UFAM/ON Supervisor:
Seismic and Aseismic Slip During Hydraulic Fracturing Stephen Perry.
Dynamics of mantle rock metasomatic transformation in permeable lithospheric zones beneath Siberian craton V.N. Sharapov, K.E. Sorokin, Yu.V. Perepechko.
February 13-15, 2006 Hydromechanical modeling of fractured crystalline reservoirs hydraulically stimulated S. Gentier*, X. Rachez**, A. Blaisonneau*,
Program topic: Geothermal Technology
Temperature profiles in geothermal systems L. Guillou-Frottier, BRGM, France Engine Launching Conference, February 14 th, 2006.
Homework 1 Solutions. Problem One Use Clausius-Clapeyron Curve From 0 o C to 3 o C – Change of ~1mb From 25 o C to 28 o C – Change of ~5mb (8)
Explain the structure and processes within the hydrosphere. 1.
EARS5136slide 1 Theme 6: INTEGRATION OF STRUCTURAL DATA AND RESERVOIR MODELS.
Groundwater Geol 1110 Newell guest lecture 3/28/16.
Earth’s Layers Geology Unit.
Results of Federal Cost-Shared Research: Better Understanding of Geothermal Resources Marshall J. Reed USGS, Menlo Park, CA U.S. Department of the Interior.
Geothermal Energy Renewable Resources. Introduction to Geothermal Energy OjV26Q
GEOTHERMAL ASSESSMENT Geophysical Techniques M. Batzle, Colorado School of Mines.
Structure of the Earth.
PowerPoint slides to accompany the activity –
Marcell Lux, hydrogeologist engineer
Induced seismicity for geothermal energy production: a new synthesis
Unit 2 – Earth’s Structure
Convective Thermo-Poroelasticity in Non-Boiling Geothermal Reservoirs
MONITORING AND INTERPRETATION OF MICROSEISMS INDUCED BY FLUID INJECTION N. R. Warpinski Sandia National Labs.
Chapter 20 Section 2: The Sun
by A. Belaidi, D. A. Bonter, C. Slightam, and R. C. Trice
Fluids derived from the compaction and
Intrusive Igneous Activity
Convective Thermo-Poroelasticity in Non-Boiling Geothermal Reservoirs
Hydraulic stimulation of EGS: Comparison of the HDR-project Soultz
Earth and Space Science
How does the geothermal energy work ?
Presented in The 5th ITB International Geothermal Workshop Thursday, March 31, 2016 ON THE FEASIBILITY OF GEOTHERMAL HEAT PRODUCTION FROM A HOT SEDIMENTARY.
EoCoE – Results of the geothermal energy part
Presentation transcript:

Températures à 5000 m de profondeur Soultz Project Concept HDR Températures à 5000 m de profondeur <60°C 60-80 80-100 100-120 120-140 140-160 160-180 180-200 200-240 >240°C Fracture Permeability - Petrophysics Identification of hydraulic geothermal transfer zones Caracterization of the reservoir life time J.J. Royer – J. Sausse

A pilote power station of 6MW in order to build a prototype of 25 MW Final Soultz Project GPK4 GPK2 200°C 200°C 70°C 50 l/s 50 l/s 5000 m 100 l/s A pilote power station of 6MW in order to build a prototype of 25 MW

High Surface Heat Flow Anomaly Geothermal Heat Flow of 80 mW/m2 within the graben Anomaly explained by several convective cells from East to West Anomal Surface Heat Flow

(Renard and Courrioux, 1994) Data 93 94 95 96 2000 Vertical Section Geology and seismic sections, Wells, Logings, faults, Micro-seismic cloud (93, 94, 95, 96, 2000, 2003, 2004) Objectives : to predict the permeability To estimate the yield and life time of the geothermal reservoir (Renard and Courrioux, 1994) Top view Microseismicity Utilisee pour la modelisation : 3 outils

GPK1 Interpretating flow logs and logings permeability clear evidences cumulated electric ARI apertures (microns) Q (l/s) 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300 3400 3500 Sausse and Genter, 2005 clear evidences GPK1 subvertical and progressive evolution of the curve thin structures regularly spaced  connected network of fractures (pervasive alteration of the granite matrix) smaller fraction of the flows during injection Flow log discontinuous curve drains or clustered structures  isolated percolation features GPK1 depth (m)

Fracture Opening during Hydrofracturation

Shearing Model

Coupling thermo-hydraulic modeling of fractured porous mediums. GPK1 GPK2 100m N 100m GPK1 GPK2 East View Vertical Section Top View V=cst, Stml inchangees pdt resolution tracer et temp 300m Pressure Field Double permeability Model Thermo-mechanical Model 360 streamlines – 125.000 cells - Soultz Liad © 2005

3D Numerical Modeling of the Reservoir at 5000m Modeling the life time of the geothermal reservoir 3D Numerical Modeling of the Reservoir at 5000m Bottom well temperature Top View Time (in year) Total power at well bottom Animation at Soultz (France): Cool fluid invading the hot deep (5000m) rocks Temperature of injection 70°C Temperature at production vs time 500m Time (in year)

Total power at well bottom Results Characterization of fluids circulation in low permeable fractured medium Poro-elastic medium Interaction fluid rock (weathering, precipitation) Thermo-mechanical effects Exchange sediment basement Bottom well temperature Time (in year) Total power at well bottom Time (in year)