Adaptive Optimal Control of Nonlinear Parametric Strict Feedback Systems with application to Helicopter Attitude Control OBJECTIVES  Optimal adaptive.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
University of Karlsruhe September 30th, 2004 Masayuki Fujita
Advertisements

 (x) f(x,u) u x f(x,  (x) x. Example: Using feed-forward, what should be canceled?
L OUISIANA T ECH U NIVERSITY Department of Electrical Engineering and Institute for Micromanufacturing INTRODUCTION PROBLEM FORMULATION STATE FEEDBACK.
Robust control Saba Rezvanian Fall-Winter 88.
Automotive Research Center Robotics and Mechatronics A Nonlinear Tracking Controller for a Haptic Interface Steer-by-Wire Systems A Nonlinear Tracking.
Exponential Tracking Control of Hydraulic Proportional Directional Valve and Cylinder via Integrator Backstepping J. Chen†, W. E. Dixon‡, J. R. Wagner†,
1 Adaptive Neural Network Control of Nonlinear Systems S. Sam Ge Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering National University of Singapore Singapore.
IAAC International Symposium in Systems & Control, 7-8 October 2013, Technion, Haifa, Israel P-O Gutman: Constrained control of uncertain linear time-invariant.
Study of the periodic time-varying nonlinear iterative learning control ECE 6330: Nonlinear and Adaptive Control FISP Hyo-Sung Ahn Dept of Electrical and.
Claudia Lizet Navarro Hernández PhD Student Supervisor: Professor S.P.Banks April 2004 Monash University Australia April 2004 The University of Sheffield.
A De-coupled Sliding Mode Controller and Observer for Satellite Attitude Control Ronald Fenton.
עקיבה אחר מטרה נעה Stable tracking control method for a mobile robot מנחה : ולדיסלב זסלבסקי מציגים : רונן ניסים מרק גרינברג.
Chapter Summer 2. Comparator 3. Block Blocks in Series
Controller Tuning: A Motivational Example
February 24, Final Presentation AAE Final Presentation Backstepping Based Flight Control Asif Hossain.
Feedback Control Systems
EE 685 presentation Optimization Flow Control, I: Basic Algorithm and Convergence By Steven Low and David Lapsley Asynchronous Distributed Algorithm Proof.
Digital Control Systems STATE OBSERVERS. State Observers.
CH 1 Introduction Prof. Ming-Shaung Ju Dept. of Mechanical Engineering NCKU.
MODEL REFERENCE ADAPTIVE CONTROL
Chapter 1 Introduction to Adaptive Control
Introduction to estimation theory Seoul Nat’l Univ.
A Shaft Sensorless Control for PMSM Using Direct Neural Network Adaptive Observer Authors: Guo Qingding Luo Ruifu Wang Limei IEEE IECON 22 nd International.
Adaptive Critic Design for Aircraft Control Silvia Ferrari Advisor: Prof. Robert F. Stengel Princeton University FAA/NASA Joint University Program on Air.
A Framework for Distributed Model Predictive Control
1  (x) f(x,u) u x f(x,  (x) x Example: Using feed-forward, what should be canceled?
Optimal Nonlinear Neural Network Controllers for Aircraft Joint University Program Meeting October 10, 2001 Nilesh V. Kulkarni Advisors Prof. Minh Q. Phan.
Neural Network Based Online Optimal Control of Unknown MIMO Nonaffine Systems with Application to HCCI Engines OBJECTIVES  Develop an optimal control.
1 Adaptive, Optimal and Reconfigurable Nonlinear Control Design for Futuristic Flight Vehicles Radhakant Padhi Assistant Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering.
FULL STATE FEEDBAK CONTROL:
Huixian Liu and Shihua Li, Senior Member, IEEE
Time-Varying Angular Rate Sensing for a MEMS Z-Axis Gyroscope Mohammad Salah †, Michael McIntyre †, Darren Dawson †, and John Wagner ‡ Mohammad Salah †,
1 Chapter 2 1. Parametric Models. 2 Parametric Models The first step in the design of online parameter identification (PI) algorithms is to lump the unknown.
To clarify the statements, we present the following simple, closed-loop system where x(t) is a tracking error signal, is an unknown nonlinear function,
1 Adaptive Control Neural Networks 13(2000): Neural net based MRAC for a class of nonlinear plants M.S. Ahmed.
CHAPTER 5 S TOCHASTIC G RADIENT F ORM OF S TOCHASTIC A PROXIMATION Organization of chapter in ISSO –Stochastic gradient Core algorithm Basic principles.
Research Heaven, West Virginia Verification and Validation of Adaptive Systems Bojan Cukic, Eddie Fuller, Marcello Napolitano, Harshinder Singh, Tim Menzies,
September Bound Computation for Adaptive Systems V&V Giampiero Campa September 2008 West Virginia University.
Low Level Control. Control System Components The main components of a control system are The plant, or the process that is being controlled The controller,
Feedback Linearization Presented by : Shubham Bhat (ECES-817)
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Observer Based Control of Decentralized Networked Control Systems Ahmed M. Elmahdi, Ahmad F. Taha School.
Akram Bitar and Larry Manevitz Department of Computer Science
1 Chapter 11 Compensator Design When the full state is not available for feedback, we utilize an observer. The observer design process is described and.
Model Reference Adaptive Control
Review: Neural Network Control of Robot Manipulators; Frank L. Lewis; 1996.
Aims To use the linear fractional transformations (LFT) modelling framework to reconstruct an existing state-space model of the cochlea in terms of a stable.
Feedback Stabilization of Nonlinear Singularly Perturbed Systems MENG Bo JING Yuanwei SHEN Chao College of Information Science and Engineering, Northeastern.
Eduard Petlenkov, TTÜ automaatikainstituudi dotsent
Stochastic Optimal Control of Unknown Linear Networked Control System in the Presence of Random Delays and Packet Losses OBJECTIVES Develop a Q-learning.
A Dissertation Proposal Presentation By Sukumar Kamalasadan
Chapter 8: Adaptive Networks
Hazırlayan NEURAL NETWORKS Backpropagation Network PROF. DR. YUSUF OYSAL.

Disturbance rejection control method
Chance Constrained Robust Energy Efficiency in Cognitive Radio Networks with Channel Uncertainty Yongjun Xu and Xiaohui Zhao College of Communication Engineering,
1 Lu LIU and Jie HUANG Department of Mechanics & Automation Engineering The Chinese University of Hong Kong 9 December, Systems Workshop on Autonomous.
Optimization-based Cross-Layer Design in Networked Control Systems Jia Bai, Emeka P. Eyisi Yuan Xue and Xenofon D. Koutsoukos.
Virtual Gravity Control for Swing-Up pendulum K.Furuta *, S.Suzuki ** and K.Azuma * * Department of Computers and Systems Engineering, TDU, Saitama Japan.
11-1 Lyapunov Based Redesign Motivation But the real system is is unknown but not necessarily small. We assume it has a known bound. Consider.
DIRECT ADAPTIVE NEURO CONTROL OF ELECTROMAGNETIC SUSPENSION (EMS) SYSTEM Anan Suebsomran Department of Teacher Training in Mechanical Engineering, Faculty.
EE611 Deterministic Systems State Observers Kevin D. Donohue Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Kentucky.
A few illustrations on the Basic Concepts of Nonlinear Control
Digital and Non-Linear Control
Student: Hao Xu, ECE Department
Controller Tuning: A Motivational Example
Autonomous Cyber-Physical Systems: Dynamical Systems
Master Thesis Presentation
Learning Control for Dynamically Stable Legged Robots
Chapter 7 Inverse Dynamics Control
Akram Bitar and Larry Manevitz Department of Computer Science
Presentation transcript:

Adaptive Optimal Control of Nonlinear Parametric Strict Feedback Systems with application to Helicopter Attitude Control OBJECTIVES  Optimal adaptive control of nonlinear parametric strict feedback systems in continuous-time is considered when the system internal dynamics has uncertainties.  A new approach to use the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation online for obtaining the optimal control is developed. The closed loop stability of the overall system will be shown.  The forward-in-time optimal control approach is applied to a underactuated helicopter attitude control system by minimizing a cost function. Student: Hassan Zargarzadeh, PhD Student, ECE Department BACKGROUND  Several optimal control approaches for linear and nonlinear systems are presented with offline techniques since  In the field of optimal control of nonlinear affine systems, a neural network- based (NN) online approach (Dierks and Jagannathan 2010) is proposed without an initial stabilizing controller.  Lewis et al. (2010) have used an actor-critic approach with an initial stabilizing controller to attain an optimality. Full dynamics are required.  Motivated by the helicopter dynamics which has system uncertainties, this work assumes that the internal dynamics of the nonlinear system are unknown and without an initial stabilizing controller. The Problem Statement  The nonlinear parametric strict feedback system can be expressed as  The objective is to minimize the cost function.  To this end, the controller should guarantee the stability while the control input satisfies the HJB equation: Faculty Advisor: Prof. Jag Sarangapani, ECE Department Application to the Helicopter Dynamics  The helicopter system is an example of a parametric strict feedback system whose parameters are uncertain and are given by  A brief discretion of the system parameters are given below.  The simulation results are given in the following figures. DISCUSSION Discussion  For proving the overall closed-loop stability, Lyapunov analysis is utilized and demonstrated (not shown here).  Fig. 1 Provides a 3-D view of the helicopter performing a landing maneuver, but in this case shows the actual versus desired trajectory throughout the maneuver.  Fig. 2 Shows the convergence of the tracking error.  Fig. 3 Demonstrates the helicopter's ability to follow a trajectory in two dimensions while hovering.  Fig. 4 Shows the helicopter's ability to track a the desired trajectory.  Fig. 5 Shows a block diagram for the control scheme of the system. CONCLUDING REMARKS  Proposed online optimal control of uncertain parametric strict feedback system provides an accurate and acceptable control performance.  The stability of the closed loop system is shown under the assumption that an admissible controller not required whereas it is required in many previous works.  The optimal controller is proven to be stable both analytically and on Trex500 helicopter model. Two neural networks are employed: 1) the cost function approximation neural network; 2) the internal dynamics estimator.  The simulation results show a significant optimal performance when the optimal controller is applied. FUTURE WORK  The tracking performance should be improved by asymptotic results.  In order to have more applicable control scheme, improving the cost function estimation update law to simpler version is suggested.  The admissibility of the updated control law should be investigated as a possible future step. This can be a very challenging problem in adaptive dynamics programming.  The authors acknowledge the technical support and assistance of Dr. Dierks (Missouri S&T alumni 2009). Acknowledgements Control Signal Attitude: Position: NN-Based Optimal Adaptive Controller Design  The optimal adaptive controller in this approach is comprised of two neural networks, one for learning the cost function and the other one for estimating the unknown parameters. The unknown parameters are estimated  The cost function can be estimated through the following NN-based adaptive scheme:.  Therefore, the estimation of the optimal adaptive controller can be represented as:  The cost function parameters are estimated by using the update law  It is shown that the above control law guarantees the overall stability of system. Unknown Parameter Fig.1. 3-D Perspective of position during landing. Fig.2. The absolute attitude error Fig.3. 3-D Perspective of position during take-off and circular maneuver. Fig.4. Helicopter Position vs. time for tracking. Fig.5. The proposed online optimal controller. TREX500