Assessing Student Needs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Inclusive Services: An Overview
Advertisements

Assessment Adapted from text Effective Teaching Methods Research-Based Practices by Gary D. Borich and How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed Ability.
SPEECH AND LANGUAGE SUPPORT SERVICES IN THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA 1.
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Services Special Factors/Considerations.
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
Fall 2002Northeast Regional Education Cooperative A Look at Inclusion and the Least Restrictive Environment Best Practices For Collaboration and Co-Teaching.
NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
IDEA and NCLB Accountability and Instruction for Students with Disabilities SCDN Presentation 9/06 Candace Shyer.
Bilingual Special Education Interface Developing IEPs for Exceptional Language Minority Students.
YOUR IEP By Anita Breen. What is an IEP? I ndividualized E ducation P lan.
Everything you need to know before the Annual Review March 16, 2011 The New State Mandated IEP.
1 ADVOCACYDENVER Special Education 101 Pamela Bisceglia Advocate for Children and Inclusive Policy Implementation August 31, 2011.
Understanding the IEP Process
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
The Special Education Process 1 Connecting Research to Practice for Teacher Educators.
The Role of the Educator in the IEP Process. A Little History… The 70’s 1. Public Law : Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
Inclusion: Helping All Students Succeed “Children that learn together, learn to live together Irene Elliott Director, Pupil Personnel Services Encinitas.
No Child Left Behind The Basics Of Title 1 Every Child - Now! Focus on the critical nature of doing what’s right and what’s needed – today - to help every.
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-1 Chapter 2 Planning and Providing Special Education Services.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
Resource Rooms Resource Room is a special education program for a student with a disability who is registered in either a special class or regular education.
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
Understanding your child’s IEP.  The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is intended to help students with disabilities interact with the same content.
PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT. 11/10/05 22 Parent Involvement2 A parent is… (300.30)  Natural or adoptive parent of a child  A foster parent  A guardian but.
Special Education Review & Update for Regular Educators.
Chapter 2 Ensuring Progress in the General Curriculum Through Universal Design for Learning and Inclusion Each Power Point presentation can be viewed as.
SPED Referral and IEP Process Guide Ginger Alonzo & Emily Disbennett.
Inclusion or Mainstreaming Jenn Combest and Liz Raymer.
The 411 on IEPs and Section 504s Claudia Otto, Ph.D. Oklahoma Department of Career & Technology Education March 10, 2015.
Academic Intervention Services: Deepening the Conversation District 75 NYCDOE.
Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.
Response to Intervention. Background Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004 Changes to align with No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Allows districts.
University of Connecticut Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Families As Partners Training Steps in the Special Education Process.
Getting Oriented to Exceptionality and Special Education There is no single accepted theory of normal development, so relatively few definite statements.
12/4/2014ECSE 602 Dr. Y. Xu1 ECSE 602 Instructional Programming for Infants and Young Children with Disabilities This session will cover:  Child Activity.
Schools, Families, Communities and Disabilities Rebecca Durban and Jessica Martin.
The IEP: Individual Education Plan. The IEP Team  (1) The parents of the child;  (2) At least one regular education teacher of the child (if the child.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
“I long to accomplish a great and noble task, but it is my chief duty to accomplish humble tasks as though they were great and noble. The world is moved.
Placement ARC Chairperson Training 1 Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) To the maximum extent appropriate, children with disabilities, including children.
Instructional Support Team (IST) By Kelli Reisinger Unit 13 Presentation.
Inclusion: Effective Practices for All Students, 1e McLeskey/Rosenberg/Westling © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved What.
Exceptional Lives: Special Education in Today’s Schools, 6e ISBN: © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 Ensuring Progress.
Developed and implemented by the multidisciplinary team (MDT)
Your Exceptional Child Kaily Osborne. We will cover… IDEA IEP Inclusion RTI.
Catholic College at Mandeville Assessment and Evaluation in Inclusive Settings Sessions 3 & /14/2015 Launcelot I. Brown Lisa Philip.
IUSD Special Education Department October 14, 2015.
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
R esponse t o I ntervention E arly I ntervening S ervices and.
IDEA 1997 P.L The Facts. IEP Must explain how the child’s disability affects their ability to participate in the general education classroom Must.
Diana Dinzey Educational Placement. General Education Paraprofessional Residential Treatment Center Alternative H.S Self Contained Resource Room I nclusion.
Collaboration. © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2  Collaboration refers to “ongoing participation of two or more individuals who are.
Designing Inclusive Unit and Lesson Plans. Things to keep in mind when adapting unit and lesson plans What follows will help to remind you of issues we’ve.
Department of Exceptional Student Education The School District of Palm Beach County.
“Inclusion" is a buzz word that you hear thrown around quite often. Inclusion is the preferred method of placement for students with special needs whenever.
Special Education Tier 4 Levels of Support Inclusive Services Educational Support Services 2015.
…program and placement decisions are based on students strengths, potential, and needs?
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
Understanding the IEP Process
American Institutes for Research
Exceptionalities Guideline
Chapter 2 Planning and Providing Special Education Services
Department of Exceptional Student Education
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Presentation transcript:

Assessing Student Needs An Informational PowerPoint By: Jared Stutzman

In Special Education… Assessment is much more than evaluating student performance. It is a continuous procedure that includes: Screening and Identification of student issues Diagnosis and Eligibility for special services under the law IEP Development and Child Placement in the curriculum Instructional Planning and Development Progress Evaluation

Proper Assessment Is Your Responsibility and It’s the Law! The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) mandates several protocols that must be followed when assessing and providing for student needs. Title 34 CFR §300.307 of IDEA states that: A State must adopt criteria for determining whether a child has a specific learning disability (SLD) and public agencies must use the State-adopted criteria. Title 34 CFR §300.114 of IDEA states that: To the maximum extent appropriate, children with disabilities, including children in public or private institutions or other care facilities, are educated with children who are nondisabled. Title 34 CFR § 300.320 of IDEA states that: An Individualized Education Program (IEP) be developed for each child that includes: the child’s present academic achievement, the child’s disability and its effect on performance, a statement of measurable annual goals, how the child’s needs will be met vis-à-vis his disability, and how the child is progressing toward meeting the annual goals.

Screening and Identification The process of determining whether a student's academic performance differs enough from his peers to merit assessment. Issues are usually first identified by a student’s general education teacher in a specific academic subject. Probes are chosen to measure student performance compared to normal levels to determine the achievement gap. Probes are research-based and universal. Ex. DIBELS, AIMSWEB, PALS. If a large gap is measured, the child will proceed to diagnosis.

Diagnosis and Eligibility Determining whether a child has a disability and is eligible for special education services, and diagnosing the specific nature of the student's problems or disability. If a child qualifies under the screening process, a child must be then tested for a specific disability. In order to qualify under IDEA for special education, a child must fall under one of the 13 disability. categories outlined in the law. If the child qualifies under IDEA, the nature and extent of the disability is determined in order to develop the child’s IEP (Individualized Education Program).

IEP Development and Child Placement The information is collected so that an Individualized Education Program (IEP) may be developed and appropriate decisions may be made about the child's educational placement. The student’s IEP is the document that outlines the services the student will receive. Placement determines where the child will receive these services: in the general education environment or outside of it. IDEA mandates children be placed in a general classroom whenever possible.

Instructional Planning Developing and planning instruction commensurate to a child’s needs and deciding at which level to begin instruction. Determines what classes a student should take, at what level, what text books they should use, even what types of testing they receive. As IDEA requires, one of the main factors of instructional planning is making sure a student has as much access to the general education curriculum as possible.

Progress Evaluation Constant Evaluation Is Critical! Based on student progress monitoring. Includes effectiveness evaluation of instructional procedures enacted with the student, as well as evaluation of the entire program’s effectiveness. Measuring of program effectiveness takes into account: Student’s meeting general education curriculum benchmarks Student’s attaining goals laid out in their IEP. Special education student’s education plans are altered based on the student either meeting, or failing to meet, their goals. Constant Evaluation Is Critical!

Assessment Directly Controls Services As a general education teacher, it is primarily your responsibility to identify student learning issues. Student’s need a diagnosis to be entitled to special services. Student’s need an effective plan to benefit from special services. Effective plans are developed by educated professionals who use best practices techniques and constantly monitor the progress of those practices. You are the fundamental piece of the puzzle that creates student success!

Hiccups In Beneficial Assessment IDEA’s Balancing Act The goal of assessment is clear; to best serve the needs of all students. But what are their needs and how are they best met? IDEA mandates detailed assessment including progress monitoring and intensive interventions, while at the same time mandating least restrictive environment (LRE) and inclusion. But is the first aided or hindered by the second?

Assessment: Best Practices vs Assessment: Best Practices vs. Inclusive Practices Is our instructional planning serving competing goals? Best Practices Methods that consistently shows results. Are usually evidence-based, although not always. Must be followed correctly, and practiced intensively to get results. Designed to help student’s succeed academically. Inclusive Practices Student’s with disabilities should be placed in the same classroom as peers without disabilities. Relationships between disabled and non-disabled students should be fostered. All students should be taught in the same curriculum with accommodations to help all student’s succeed.

The Noble Goal of Inclusion Inclusion attempts to remedy the past; special education students were often isolated from their peers in specialized classes or via individualized instruction. Special education classes were sometimes little more than holding areas for disabled students where little to no education occurred. If education occurred, it was often in manual skills, as special education students were often deemed incapable of learning. As a result of these practices, the idea of inclusion grew as a way to bring special students back into the education community.

What Does Inclusion Mean? Inclusion means that ALL LEARNERS are welcome members are their schools and in their classrooms. Inclusion states that all teachers should strongly prefer for all students to be educated together regardless of disability. Inclusion hopes that by teaching all learners together, learners without disabilities will learn to tolerate and respect special learners through contact and interaction But, does inclusion best serve all students? Does it always work to advance student assessed learning goals, or can it hinder them?

The Mission The goal of assessment is to identify student’s with special needs, identify their learning issues, and then mitigate or correct these issues so that these children do not lag behind their peers. Do inclusive practices serve this goal? To make inclusion work, accommodations often take on the form of one-on-one paraprofessionals that help maintain the child in the classroom. Although unintended, these tools sometimes simply help student’s pass classes instead of enabling them to learn at the same rate as their peers. Accommodations are only helpful when they contribute to children meeting their learning goals. A child in the general education setting often struggles to receive intensive instruction when competing for attention from teachers with other students. The general education classroom can be a distracting place; surrounded by peers of varying ability, a struggling child can be intimidated and preoccupied by these interactions.

Merging Assessed Learning Goals with Inclusion Thoughtful and realistic application of inclusive practices allows us to meet our sacred demand—educating all children—while still including them in the social fabric of the school as much as possible. Inclusion should be a means to improve learning, not an end in itself. When inclusion demonstrably benefits a child’s pursuit of his learning goals it is best practice. The use of one-on-one paraprofessionals and accommodations should help children learn, not just get them through school. Focus on student strengths, not just weaknesses. If a child is struggling in English, but excelling in math, do not focus all of that child’s time on their struggles; enable their talents, as well. End approaches that drag children along with the group, focus on tangible student learning and development regardless of venue. Inclusion is only a benefit to children if it does not come at the expense of learning. When they are weighed against each other, student development must always win.