Asbestos Personal Injury Litigation in the Federal Courts: MDL-875: Past, Present & Future Eduardo C. Robreno, Presiding Judge United States District Court.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE DEEPWATER HORIZON OIL SPILL MULTI-DISTRICT LITIGATION UPDATE Rhon E. Jones Environmental Section Head Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles,
Advertisements

USDA Imagery Planning & Coordination Meeting MAPPS Lawsuit Overview Geoff Gabbott USDA, FSA, Aerial Photography Field Office.
5/4/ The Federal Court System: An Introductory Guide.
The Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Bankruptcy Proceedings * *Portions reprinted by permission of JAMS.
MEDIATION IN THE HIGH COURT 5 MARCH MEDIATION IN THE HIGH COURT Court Accredited Mediation as an option for alternative dispute resolution, was.
Alternative, Judicial, and E-Dispute Resolution
Vocabulary Indictment- Determines if there is enough evidence for a defendant to go to trial Arraignment- Defendant is officially informed of charges and.
CHAPTER 4 THE AMERICAN LEGAL SYSTEM AND COURT JURISDICTION DAVIDSON, KNOWLES & FORSYTHE Business Law: Cases and Principles in the Legal Environment (8.
Copyright © 2008 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 2 The Court System and Dispute Resolution Twomey Jennings Anderson’s.
By Richard A. Mann & Barry S. Roberts
Slides developed by Les Wiletzky Wiletzky and Associates Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. Traditional, Alternative, and.
© 2007 by West Legal Studies in Business / A Division of Thomson Learning CHAPTER 3 Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution.
Introduction to Legal Process in the United States (1) Sources of law (2) Court system (3) Judicial process Alan R. Palmiter – Jan
Types of Courts American Government. Standing  In order for a case to be heard in our legal system, the plaintiff must have standing to sue  This means.
History, Structure and Function of the American Legal System
MDL-875: Past, Present and Future Eduardo C. Robreno, Presiding Judge United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania 1 © June 12,
Unit 3 Conflict Resolution l Adversary system l Inquisitorial system l Alternative dispute resolution.
Diversity of citizenship action: A civil lawsuit in which the parties are residents of two or more different states. Can be heard by a federal court even.
THE COURT SYSTEM & DISPUTE RESOLUTION Used by permission. For Educational purposes only.
MDL-875: Past, Present and Future Eduardo C. Robreno, Presiding Judge United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania 1 © June 12,
1. 2 There is only one good kind of legal dispute -- The one that is prevented!
ARE 309Ted Feitshans04-1 Unit 4 Conflict Resolution Adversary system Inquisitorial system Alternative dispute resolution.
Chapter 4 Alternative, Judicial, and E- Dispute Resolution.
Chapter 2 The Court System and Dispute Resolution Twomey, Business Law and the Regulatory Environment (14th Ed.)
CHAPTER 3 Court Systems 3-1 Forms of Dispute Resolution
The American Legal System
Introduction to Legal Process in the United States
Chapter 3 Judicial, Alternative, and E-Dispute Resolution
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION TRIAL-SETTING PROCEDURES.
American Law Court System and Procedures. HYbn5chttps:// HYbn5c
LAW FOR BUSINESS AND PERSONAL USE © SOUTH-WESTERN PUBLISHING Chapter 4 Slide 1 The Court System Dispute Resolution and the Courts Federal.
Click to edit the outline text format Second Outline Level  Third Outline Level Fourth Outline Level  Fifth Outline Level  Sixth Outline Level  Seventh.
©2005 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning Fundamentals of Business Law 6 th Edition Chapter 2 Traditional and Online Dispute.
Print your Name Print your Street Address Print your City, State, and Zip Code Self-Represented Print Courthouse Street Address Print Courthouse City,
1 CHAPTER 18 The Federal Court System Creation Article III Supreme Court Congress may create inferior courts Dual Courts Federal State.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning BUSINESS LAW Twomey Jennings 1 st Ed. Twomey & Jennings BUSINESS LAW Chapter 2 The.
Section 1.2 The Court System and Trial Procedures.
U.S. District Court District of Minnesota Immigration Litigation in Federal Court January 30, 2015 Procedural Requirements in U.S. District Court.
The President, The Bureaucracy and the Judiciary PPT 9 pp The Judicial System.
Court System. Sources of Law Statutes: laws passed by state legislatures or Congress – Substantive & legal rights – Procedural rules Louisiana Code of.
The judicial branch of government is well established as an equal with the legislative and executive branches.
Chapter 7 Calendaring, Docket Control & Case Management.
History, Structure and Function of the American Legal System 1 Court Systems and Practices.
Foundations of United States Citizenship Lesson 5, Chapter 6, U.S. National Government 1 What is the function of the judicial branch? Federal courts make.
Dr. Roger Ward.  Trial Courts ◦ Place where case begins ◦ Jury hears cases and decides disputed issues of fact ◦ Single judge presides over case  Criminal.
The Courts AP US Government. Some Basic Legal Terms Litigant – Someone involved in a lawsuit. This includes both plaintiff (one bringing the charge) and.
Judicial Review The Supreme Court’s power to overturn any law that it decides is in conflict with the Constitution.
Chapter 18 The Federal Court System. Section 1, The National Judiciary Objectives: Objectives: 1. Explain why the Constitution created a national judiciary,
Chapter 11: The Federal Court System Section 1: Powers of the Federal Courts.
THE PARALEGAL PROFESSIONAL PA101 Unit 3 Seminar. Discussion Board Tips Most units have more than 1 DB assignment - posting to each DB assignment is required.
Resolution of Fraud FRAUD EXAMINATION ALBRECHT & ALBRECHT Legal Follow-Up Chapter 16.
Introduction to Legal Process in the United States (1) Sources of law (2) Court system (3) Judicial process.
Chapter 3 The U.S. Legal System Chapter 3: The U.S. Legal System
How nine people rule America
Many slides Copyright © 2008 by Delmar Learning
Venue Venue is concerned with the most appropriate location for the trial. Generally, proper venue is whether the injury occurred.
The jurisdiction of state and federal courts.
Venue Venue is concerned with the most appropriate location for the trial. Generally, proper venue is whether the injury occurred.
Unit B Customized by Professor Ludlum Nov. 30, 2016.
Court System.
The Judicial Branch And the Federal Courts.
The Court System Street Law.
The judicial branch of government is well established as an equal with the legislative and executive branches.
The Judicial Branch.
The Role of the Judicial Branch (courts)
The Courts AP US Government.
ARENA LAND & INV. CO., INC. v. PETTY 69 F.3d 547 (10th Cir. 1995)
Chapter 3 Judicial, Alternative, and E-Dispute Resolution
The Supreme Court of the
Overview of Legal Process in IP Cases
Presentation transcript:

Asbestos Personal Injury Litigation in the Federal Courts: MDL-875: Past, Present & Future Eduardo C. Robreno, Presiding Judge United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania 1 © June 12, 2009 As Amended September 20, 2011 Available at:

Status of MDL-875 as of 10/1/2008 About 122,000 plaintiffs, each of whom had sued, on average, over 50 defendants (land). Estimated number of open claims in excess of 10 million. Maritime Docket (MARDOC): a separate docket consisting of about 47,000 cases. 2

Voluntary /Involuntary Dismissal of Viable Defendants CASE IS LISTED FOR HEARING Involuntary Dismissal Contested Compliance with Admin. Ords. Plaintiff has complied with Admin. Ords. 11 & 12. Non-Viable Defendants  Bankruptcy docket Daubert Hearing/ other Evidentiary Hearing NOTE: A non-viable defendant is a party that is in bankruptcy proceedings Rule 26(f) Report/ Rule 16 Conference Settlement Conference Summary Judgment Motions Hearing before District Judge or three judge panel of Magistrate Judges Malignancy & Non-Malignancy Tracks Trial in E.D. Pa. or Remand to Transferor District (pursuant to Admin. Ord. 18) Settlement/Final Pretrial Conference 3

4

Status of MDL-875 as of 9/20/2011 Approximately 7,000 Land-Based Cases Maritime Docket (MARDOC): a separate docket consisting of about 4,300 cases. Most cases will be resolved (either dismissed, settled, or remanded) by December 31, 2011, except for the following four groups: 5

Groups of Cases that will Remain Pending in 2012 Eastern District of Virginia Cases 4,562 7 th Circuit Cases (IN, ILL, WI) 1,785 “Pipeline” (newly filed/trnsfd) 556 Total (land): 6,903 MARDOC 4,294 Grand Total: 11,197 6

Status of the Resolution of the Four 2012 Groups Eastern District of Virginia Cases: The cases are stayed pending the United States Supreme Court Decision in Kurns. Magistrate Judge Angell & Special Master Lassman designated. 7 th Circuit Cases (IN, ILL, WI): Cases have just begun to be put on scheduling orders that conclude December 31, Magistrate Judge Strawbridge designated. MARDOC: Scheduling orders will issue shortly for conclusion by December 31, Magistrate Judge Hey and Special Master Lassman designated. “Pipeline” (newly filed/transferred cases): Scheduling orders are issued as the cases are transferred. Set to conclude by December 31,

Hearing Dates for the Pipeline Cases DateJurisdictionNo. of Cases Nov. 8, 2011AK1 Nov. 22, 2011Various22 Dec. 6, 2011Various21 Dec. 20, 2011ME1 Jan. 10, 2012Various19 Jan. 24, 2012Various21 Feb. 21, 2012Various17 March 6, 2012Various2 March 20, 2012Various17 April 10, 2012Various4 April 20, 2012SC2 April 24, 2012Various20 May 22, 2012Various37 June 19, 2012Various5 July 24, 2012Various38 Aug. 14, 2012PA13 8

Future Hearings to be Scheduled Status & Scheduling Conference in Cascino Vaughn (“CVLO”) cases Status & Scheduling Conference in MARDOC cases Summary Judgment in CVLO and MARDOC cases Eastern District of Virginia cases Miscellaneous motions hearings 9

10 MDL-875 Legal Architecture

11 MDL-875 Legal Architecture Continued

12

13

Asbestos: A Health-Legal Crisis [?] Former Third Circuit Chief Judge Edward R. Becker described the social effect of Asbestos in Georgine v. Amchem Prods., Inc.: – The use of asbestos “is a tale of danger known about in the 1930s, [with] exposure inflicted upon millions of Americans in the 1940s and 1950s, injuries that began to take their toll in the 1960s, and a flood of lawsuits beginning in the 1970s.” 14