DSI* Dipole Shear Sonic Imager

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Seismic Reflections Lecture Shot Receiver Seismic Record
Advertisements

Title Petrophysical Analysis of Fluid Substitution in Gas Bearing Reservoirs to Define Velocity Profiles – Application of Gassmann and Krief Models Digital.
Foundations of Medical Ultrasonic Imaging
SINTEF Petroleum Research The strength of fractured rock Erling Fjær SINTEF Petroleum Research 1.
Structural Geology Ch. 5 – Rheology
Lesson 20 Abnormal Pressure
3-D Fault Visualization with Fracture Swarms
Important for : Conversion from traveltime to depth Check of results by modeling Imaging of the data (migration) Classification and Filtering of Signal.
EAS 430: Petroleum Geology
Basic well Logging Analysis – Sonic Log
MRIL OVERVIEW Team One NUMAR / HALLIBURTON. Crucial Formation Evaluation Questions What is the storage capacity (  e and  t ) in a Complex Lithology.
Lecture items Neutron log * Definition. * Types
Engineering materials lecture #14
Should Horizontal Wellbores be Logged? An analytical approach to hydraulic fracturing entry positioning and completion equipment selection.
FORMATION EVALUATION PETE 321
Lecture 7 Mechanical Properties of Rocks §Rock properties: mass density, porosity, and permeability §Stress §Mohr's circle §Strain §Elasticity of rocks.
WELL LOG (The Bore Hole Image)
Lecture items Sonic log * Definition. * Types * Units & Presentation.
APPLIED MECHANICS Lecture 10 Slovak University of Technology
Seismic Reservoir Characterization of the Morrow A Sandstone Thomas L. Davis & Robert D. Benson CSM Scott Wehner, Chaparral Energy, and Michael D. Raines.
Integrated Drilling and Logging Program Approach in HPHT Environment: Successful Drilling of Deepwater Oberan Field, Nigeria, ENI Deepest Well in Deep.
GG 450 May 1, 2008 BOREHOLE LOGGING.
Borehole Seismic Introduction
Small is beautiful: AGL physical modeling and salt measurements N. Dyaur, R. Stewart, and L. Huang Houston May 16,
Lecture items Density log * Definition. * Types
Well Design PE 413.
Evaluating paleoseismic ground motions using dynamic back analysis of structural failures in archaeological sites Ronnie Kamai (1), Yossef Hatzor (1),
GG 450 March 19, 2008 Stress and Strain Elastic Constants.
International Shale Development Optimization
Geotechnology Fundamental Theories of Rock and Soil Mechanics.
Quantico Energy Solutions LLCConfidential1 DensityCompressionalShear Poisson’s Ratio Young’s Modulus Reservoir Quality TOCLithology Thermal Maturity Effective.
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Bode Omoboya 16 th May,  Introduction  Bakken Shale Case Study  Barnett Shale Case Study  Other Forward Modeling Projects.
Casing Integrity in Hydrate Bearing Sediments Reem Freij-Ayoub, Principal Research Engineer CESRE Wealth from Oceans.
Dr. Tark Hamilton Camosun College
DSLT Training.
Types of Traveling Waves
Borehole Stress Orientation  MIN  MAX Top View Drilling Induced Fracture Borehole Breakout Courtesy of Steve Hansen, Schlumberger.
FMI Fullbore Formation MicroImager Log.. Topics Applications Tool History Current Tool Theory Factors Affecting Log Results Log Quality Tool Setup & Operations.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 21 Apr 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Last Time: Magnetotellurics (MT) Some (relatively minor) applications in oil & mining.
Lecture 7 Mechanical Properties of Rocks
POROSITY DETERMINATION
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 23 Apr 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Last Time: Wireline Logging Wireline Logging is the practice of lowering a geophysical.
1 RPSEA Project – Facies probabilities from seismic data in Mamm Creek Field Reinaldo J Michelena Kevin Godbey Patricia E Rodrigues Mike Uland April 6,
Lesson 21 Prediction of Abnormal Pore Pressure
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS THE EXPLORATION TASK PLAN EXPLORATION APPROACH FOR A MATURE TREND GATHER DATA FOR A MATURE TREND DEVELOP PLAY PROSPECT FRAMEWORK.
A Petrophysically valid Xu- White Velocity Model Andy May March 19, 2014.
DSI* Dipole Shear Sonic Imager
Seismic Data Driven Reservoir Analysis FORT CHADBOURNE 3-D Coke and Runnels Counties, TX ODOM LIME AND GRAY SAND.
Seismic Petrophysics Andy May April 14, Rock Physics Determine the in-situ acoustic properties of the reservoir and surrounding rocks and their.
Sandy Chen*, L.R.Lines, J. Embleton, P.F. Daley, and L.F.Mayo
A Biot model describing wave propagation in a porous solid saturated by a three-phase fluid Juan E. Santos 1,2 and Gabriela B. Savioli Instituto.
Wave-Equation Waveform Inversion for Crosswell Data M. Zhou and Yue Wang Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Bacha Khan University Charsadda
Petro Data Mgt II- Drilling and Production Petroleum Professor Collins Nwaneri.
Wellbore Stability in Olmos Formation
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 20 Apr 2016
Erno Takacs 1, Zoltan Hajnal 1, Bhaskar Pandit 1 1 Department of Geological Sciences, U of S ______________________________________________________ Joint.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 18 Apr 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 Last Time: Magnetotellurics (MT) Some (minor but growing) applications in oil & mining;
University of Kerala, India.
Well Design - PE 413 Chapter 1: Fracture Pressure
Drilling & Measurements (D&M)
What is Well Logging?
Sonde Specifications Piezoelectric P wave transducer
Well Logging Gly 326.
Elements of 3D Seismology: Introduction to Interpretation
POROSITY DETERMINATION FROM LOGS Most slides in this section are modified primarily from NExT PERF Short Course Notes, However, many of the NExT.
VARIATION OF VELOCITY WITH LITHOLOGY
WELL LOG (The Bore Hole Image)
WELL LOG (The Bore Hole Image)
Presentation transcript:

DSI* Dipole Shear Sonic Imager

13 ft Cartridge 18 ft Receiver section 42 in. 3.5 ft 16.5 ft 9 ft to monopole transmitter 11 ft to upper dipole 11.5 ft to lower dipole Transmitter section 16.5 ft 3.5 ft 18 ft 13 ft 42 in. 6 in. Cartridge

Wave Propagation At Rest Compressional Shear

Sin 1 = C1 / C2 Sin 1 = Vmud / VFormation

Hard Formation — Monopole Wellbore Compressional wave Hard Formation — Monopole Head waves Formation Shear wave Fluid wave Omnidirectional source Compressional wave Shear wave Stoneley wave

Fast Formation —Monopole 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Compressional body wave Fast Formation —Monopole Compressional head waves Shear head wave Shear body wave Compressional: 76 sec/ft Shear: 139 sec/ft Fluid: 200 sec/ft Borehole diameter: 10 in. Time: 1 msec Source: 12-kHz monopole 0.0 0.5 1.0

Soft Formation — Monopole Wellbore Formation Soft Formation — Monopole Compressional wave Head wave Fluid wave Omnidirectional source Shear wave Compressional wave Stoneley wave

Slow Formation— Monopole 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Compressional body wave Slow Formation— Monopole Compressional head wave Fluid modes Compressional head wave Fluid head wave Shear head wave absent Compressional: 157 sec/ft Shear: 300 sec/ft Fluid: 200 sec/ft Borehole diameter: 12 in. Time: 2 msec Source: 12-kHz monopole Sin 1 = Vmud / VFormation 0.0 0.5 1.0

DSI Transducer Propagation Borehole Mud Mud Transmitter Flexural Wave Displacement

Soft Formation — Dipole Wellbore Formation Compressional wave Soft Formation — Dipole Head wave Shear wave Flexural wave Directional source Compressional wave Shear wave Flexural wave

Slow Formation— Dipole Compressional: 157 sec/ft Shear: 300 sec/ft 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Slow Formation— Dipole Compressional body wave Shear body wave Flexural mode Compressional: 157 sec/ft Shear: 300 sec/ft Fluid: 200 sec/ft Borehole diameter: 12 in. Time: 2 msec Source: 12-kHz monopole 0.0 0.5 1.0

Slow Formation— Monopole Fast Formation —Monopole 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Compressional body wave Compressional body wave Compressional body wave Compressional head wave Compressional head waves Fluid modes Compressional head wave Shear head wave Shear body wave Fluid head wave Shear body wave Shear head wave absent Slow Formation— Monopole Fast Formation —Monopole Flexural mode Slow Formation— Dipole 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0

Dipole Waveforms—Fast Formation Shear Flexural Mode

Principal tool combinations AIT* Array Induction Imager Tool ARI* Azimuthal Resistivity Imager tool Auxiliary Measurements Sonde Compensated Neutron Log FMI* Fullbore Formation MicroImager tool Gamma Ray General Purpose Inclinometry Tool (GPIT) IPL* Integrated Porosity Lithology tool Phasor* Induction tool UBI* Ultrasonic Borehole Imager tool USI* UltraSonic Imager tool DSI Tool 13 ft Cartridge 18 ft Receiver section 42 in. 6 in. 11 ft to upper dipole transmitter Isolation joint 9 ft to monopole transmitter 3.5 ft 11.5 ft to lower dipole transmitter 16.5 ft Transmitter section

Tool Combinations AIT* Array Induction Imager Tool ARI Azimuthal Resistivity Imager tool Auxiliary Measurements Sonde FMI Fullbore Formation MicroImager tool Gamma ray General Purpose Inclinometry Tool (GPIT) IPL Integrated Porosity Lithology tool Phasor Induction tool UBI UltraSonic Borehole Imager tool USI UltraSonic Imager tool

Tool Specifications Temperature rating 350°F [175°C] Pressure rating 20,000 psi [138 MPa] Tool diameter 35/8 in. [9.2 cm] Minimum hole size 51/2 in. [13.9 cm] Maximum hole size 21 in. [53.3 cm] Tool length 51 ft [15.5 m] Maximum logging speed One eight-waveform set 3600 ft/hr (single mode) All six modes simultaneously, 900 ft/hr without 6-in. Dt Digitizer precision 12 bits Digitizer sampling interval limits Variable from 10 to 32,700 µsec per sample Digitized waveform duration limits Up to 15,000 samples/ all waveforms Acoustic bandwidth Dipole and Stonely 80 Hz to 5 kHz High-frequency monopole 8 to 30 kHz Combinability All MAXIS tools, any resistivity tool

Tool Operating Modes Upper and lower dipole modes Crossed dipole mode (BCR) Stoneley mode P and S mode First motion mode

STC Computation Varying moveout Varying time

(Semblance Contour Plot) STC Contour Plot STC Dot Log Comp Shear ST Plane (Semblance Contour Plot) Depth Z Depth Slowness Z Arrival time Slowness

STC Planes 0.5 to 1.5 kHz 1 to 2 kHz Slowness (sec/ft) Time (sec) 800 Slowness (sec/ft) 100 14,000 14,000 Time (sec) Time (sec)

Slowness Time Plane Projection Poisson's Ratio Delta-T Comp. .25 .50 100 200 Gamma Ray Delta-T Shear 0 100 100 500 Caliper Dtc Coherence Dts Slowness Time Plane Projection Log Quality Indicators 6 16 0 1. 1. 0 10200 10250 10300 10350

Slowness Bias Bias Before Filtering 320 Bias After Filtering 300 Bias After Filtering Flexural Mode Slowness Formation Shear Slowness 0 2 4 6 8 10 Slowness Bias Frequency (kHz) STC Filter Response Unfiltered Amplitude Spectrum Filtered Amplitude Spectrum 1 0.5 Noise Amplitude Spectrum 0 2 4 6 8 10 Frequency (kHz)

Borehole Compensation Formation Interval Measured Receiver Array Pseudo Transmitter Array

DFMD First arrival Rc 8 Rc 7 Threshold crossing Rc 6 Rc 5 Rc 4 Rc 3

Applications Mechanical property analysis — Wellbore stability — fracture height — Sanding Analysis — Azimuthal Anisotropy Formation evaluation — gas detection — fractures Evaluation — permeability Geophysical interpretation — synthetic seismograms — VSP — AVO

Dynamic Elastic Properties Lateral strain 1/2 (DTS / DTC) 2 – 1 Longitudinal strain (DTS / DTC) 2 – 1 v Poisson’s Ratio G Shear Modulus E Young’s Modulus Kb Bulk Modulus Cb Bulk Compressibility (with porosity) Applied stress a b Shear strain DTS 2 Applied uniaxial stress Normal strain 2G (1 + v) [ ] Hydrostatic pressure Volumetric strain 1 4 DTC2 3DTS2 b x a Volumetric deformation Hydrostatic pressure 1 Kb Note: coefficient a = 1.34 x 1010 if pb in g/cm3 and DT in µs/ft.

[ ]   1 4 DTC2 3DTS2  K = b x a a b DTS2 G =  s E = 2G (1 + v) 1/2 (DTS / DTC) 2 – 1 (DTS / DTC) 2 – 1 v =

Combined Model Min. Safe Mud Weight/Shear 0 p.u. 100 IMPACT Log (Integrated Mechanical Properties Analysis Computation Technique) Max. Safe Mud Weight/Shear Poisson's Ratio Hole Profile 0 5 Young's Modulus Max. Safe Mud Weight/Tensile Depth 0 106 psi 10 Shear Modulus Mud Weight –25 in. 25 0 106 psi 5 1000 ft

Anisotropy

Cross Dipole Acquisition (BCR)

Anisotropy Processing Result

Gas Detection

3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 vp/vs versus Dtc Anthydrite 50 100 150 ²tc

vp/vs versus Dtc 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 50 100 150 Shales Unconsolidated sediments 40 35 vp/vs 30 90 ø Wet Wet sandstones 80 Dry gas Sxo Limestone Anhydrite Dolomite Salt Quartz 70 20 Gas 60 50 10 40 Dry (or gas sandstones 50 100 150 ²tc

Fracture Evaluation Hole Diameter 2 (IN) 7 Gamma Ray Stoneley Ref. Coef. STONELEY WF1 0 (GAPI) 150 0 0.15 0 (US) 20000 Fracture Evaluation 600 700 800

Fracture Evaluation

Fracture Evaluation

Fracture Evaluation (SonFrac)

Stoneley Permeability (StPerm)

Stoneley Permeability

Stoneley Energy Gamma Ray Resistivity 6300 6400 7100 Stoneley Density-Neutron Stoneley Energy Differential Energy

AVO Response OFFSET ANGLE (DEG) 2400 4.8 4.5 4.3 4.0 3.8 3.5 3.3 3.0 1 1 2 1 5 0 5 0 2400 4.8 4.5 4.3 4.0 3.8 3.5 3.3 3.0 2.8 2,5 2.3 2.0 1.8 1.5 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.5 0.3 2500 2600 2700 0 2 4 6 8 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8 GRADIENT INTERCEPT PRODUCT NOR POLARITY OFFSET ANGLE (DEG) HYDROCARBONS POROSITY MATRIX SHALE SPECIAL MINERAL

Synthetic Seismograms Compressional Shear 1.600 1.700 1.800 1.900 2.000 2.100 2.200 2.300 2.400 2.500 2.600 2.700 2.800 2.900 3.000 3.100 Synthetic Seismograms 8000 9000 10000 11000

DSI Dipole Shear Sonic Imager Monopole compressional and dipole shear measurements provide sonic data in hard and soft formations Applications — Mechanical property analysis — Formation evaluation — Geophysical applications