Prompt: Take a position on the effects of advertising.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Socratic Seminar. Debate and Dialogue Dialogue is collaborative: multiple sides work toward shared understanding. Debate is oppositional: two opposing.
Advertisements

APUSH DBQ vs. AP Language Synthesis Essay: Face off.
Writing the Synthesis Essay on the AP Lang Exam Created by Megan Pankiewicz, on behalf of The English Teacher’s Friend Fall 2011.
Writing with Sources Effective Integration of Research.
Socratic Seminar “The unexamined life is not worth living.”
There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance. - Socrates
Socratic Seminar #1 WHY ETHNIC STUDIES?
Standards  Writing  1.0 Writing Strategies: Students write coherent and focused texts that convey a well-defined perspective and tightly reasoned argument.
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
What does Socratic mean? Socratic comes from the name Socrates Socrates Classical Greek philosopher who developed a Theory of Knowledge.
Introduction to Socratic Seminar. What does Socratic mean? Socratic comes from the name Socrates. Socrates (ca B.C.) was a Classical Greek philosopher.
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
SOCRATIC SEMINARS Socrates - 470/469 BC – 399 BC Greek Philosopher.
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
Socratic Seminar. What does Socratic mean? Socratic comes from the name Socrates Classical Greek philosopher who developed a Theory of Knowledge.
AP Language and Composition Mr. Eble
 “Know Thyself”.  Classical Greek Athenian philosopher B.C.  Generally regarded as one of the wisest philosophers of all time. He held discourses.
 A Socratic Seminar is a collaborative, intellectual dialogue about a text, facilitated with open-ended questions.
Summary-Response Essay Responding to Reading. Reading Critically Not about finding fault with author Rather engaging author in a discussion by asking.
Socratic Seminar Socrates (June 4, ca. 470 BC – May 7, 399 BC) (Greek Σωκράτης Sōkrátēs; invariably anglicized as IPA: /'s ɒ k ɹ əti ː z/ S ǒ cratēs) was.
Socratic Seminar Socrates (June 4, ca. 470 BC – May 7, 399 BC) (Greek Σωκράτης Sōkrátēs; invariably anglicized as IPA: /'s ɒ k ɹ əti ː z/ S ǒ cratēs) was.
The Socratic Seminar. Debate and Dialogue Dialogue is collaborative: multiple sides work toward shared understanding. Debate is oppositional: two opposing.
AP English Language and Composition
The Socratic Seminar. Debate and Dialogue Dialogue is collaborative: multiple sides work toward shared understanding. Debate is oppositional: two opposing.
Medical Ethics: A Pinwheel Discussion— Jamie D. Arney Franklin-Simpson High 2014 “Rappacini’s Daughter”—Nathaniel Hawthorne “The Case of the Red Leg”—
The Socratic Seminar. Debate and Dialogue Dialogue is collaborative: multiple sides work toward shared understanding. Debate is oppositional: two opposing.
“THE UNEXAMINED LIFE IS NOT WORTH LIVING…”
1 “I have little/no clue” 2 “I need Some More practice” 3 “I can do it” 4 “I can teach it” Annotation Coding symbols are either missing or seem random,
Socratic Seminar By participating in Scholars will practice academic behavior and language that will be expected in a 21 st century classroom & worksplace.
Writing 1 and Writing 2—January 8, 2016
Socratic Seminar Notes. Socratic Seminar Notes …which means you should take some.
Medical Ethics: A Pinwheel Discussion— Jamie D. Arney Franklin-Simpson High 2014 “Rappacini’s Daughter”—Nathaniel Hawthorne “The Case of the Red Leg”—
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
Socratic Seminars 9 Guidelines for Participants in a Socratic Seminar 1. Refer to the big idea during the discussion. 2. It's OK to pass when asked to.
Synthesis Essay Source stack with icing on top. What is it? O Develop and support a stance on an issue using provided sources. O You must take a side.
Chapter 2: Thinking and Reading Critically ENG 113: Composition I.
Socratic Seminar Socrates (June 4, ca. 470 BC – May 7, 399 BC) was a Greek (Athenian) philosopher.June 4470 BCMay 7399 BCAthenianphilosopher.
Asking a Good Question Does it always come down to apples and oranges?
The Socratic Seminar. Debate and Dialogue Dialogue is collaborative: multiple sides work toward shared understanding. Debate is oppositional: two opposing.
How to approach the synthesis exam (Think of it as a research essay with all of the research done)
THE SOCRATIC SEMINAR Guidelines Roles Responsibilities.
2007 AP Synthesis—MakinG the sources talk to each other
Socratic Seminar Socrates (June 4, ca. 470 BC – May 7, 399 BC) (Greek Σωκράτης Sōkrátēs; invariably anglicized as IPA: /'sɒkɹətiːz/ Sǒcratēs) was a Greek.
“THE UNEXAMINED LIFE IS NOT WORTH LIVING…”
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
Socratic Seminar What it is and isn’t.
Socratic Seminar By participating in
Lesson 13 I can participate in collaborative discussion and support my analysis of a text with evidence.
Socratic Seminar Day! Warm Up: (5 Minutes)
Essay 4: Response Essay Responding to Reading.
Narratives in Contemporary Issues
“THE UNEXAMINED LIFE IS NOT WORTH LIVING…”
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
Thursday Seminars Guidelines & Grades.
The Socratic Seminar.
How to approach the synthesis exam
Narratives in Contemporary Issues
The Socratic Seminar.
AP Language and Composition Mr. Eble
A brief glimpse into the looking glass
Socratic Seminars.
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
The Socratic Seminar.
Socratic seminar.
APUSH DBQ vs. AP Language Synthesis Essay:
AP English Language and Composition
TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD.
Presentation transcript:

Prompt: Take a position on the effects of advertising.

 Critics=propaganda  Advocates=prosperity and free trade

Speak loudly and clearly? Cite reasons and evidence for their statements? Use the text to find support? Listen to others respectfully? Stick with the subject? Talk to each other, not just to the leader? Paraphrase accurately? Ask for help to clear up confusion? Support each other? Avoid hostile exchanges? Question others in a civil manner? Seem prepared?

NameQuestionExtensionFollow/Clar ify Text. Refs.

 Participant offers enough solid analysis, without prompting, to move the conversation forward  Participant, through her comments, demonstrates a deep knowledge of the text and the question  Participant has come to the seminar prepared, with notes and a marked/annotated text  Participant, through her comments, shows that she is actively listening to other participants  Participant offers clarification and/or follow-up that extends the conversation  Participant’s remarks often refer back to specific parts of the text.

 Participant offers solid analysis without prompting  Through comments, participant demonstrates a good knowledge of the text and the question  Participant has come to the seminar prepared, with notes and marked/ annotated text  Participant shows that he/she is actively listening to other and offers clarification and/or follow-up

 Participant offers some analysis, but needs prompting from the seminar leader  Through comments, participant demonstrates a general knowledge of the text and question  Participant is less prepared, with few notes and no marked/annotated text  Participant is actively listening to others, but does not offer clarification and/or follow-up to others’ comments  Participant relies more upon his or her opinion, and less on the text to drive her comments

 Participant offers little commentary  Participant comes to the seminar ill- prepared with little understanding of the text and question  Participant does not listen to others, offers no commentary to further the discussion  Participant distracts the group by interrupting other speakers or by offering off topic questions and comments.  Participant ignores the discussion and its participants

 How can you…?  Why would you…?  When would you…?  When would you expect…?  Why do you think…?  What would you suggest…?  What is the problem with…?  What can you infer…?  How could you verify…?  What changes would you make to revise…?  Predict the outcome if…  Elaborate on the reason you…  Devise a way to…  How would you generate a plan to…?  What ideas validate…?

 Begin with a preface or qualifier  1. In Source C Culpa  2. In Source E Deception Detection Schrank writes  3. In Source A the visual text Strong ACTION Verb Quotation from source embedded here Strong ACTION verb FOLLOWED by Paraphrase

 Choose a side for this commercial and justify whether you view it as propaganda or prosperity/free trade. h8cBjUeM

 How would a critic/advocate of advertising respond to this Super Bowl 49 commercial? Be sure to include a vocabulary word in your answer.

 Choose 2 sources to correspond with the following visual text, and then, take a position on the effects of advertising. This may mean that you choose to directly quote the sources or simply paraphrase their claims as a part of yours. REMEMBER: Use one new vocabulary word in your claim.

 Synthesis Essay  1. Use sources to support a thesis  2. Must cite sources  3. Read for 15 minutes (suggested)  4. Do not simply paraphrase -- no "laundry list"  5. Must "enter into a conversation"  6. Consider the author's purpose, audience, and point of view  7. Must develop a clear, organized argument  Document-Based Question  1. Use documents to support a thesis  2. Must cite sources  3. Read for 15 minutes (suggested)  4. Do not simply paraphrase -- no "laundry list"  5. Must understand the complexity of the historical issue to "enter into a conversation"  6. Consider the author's purpose, audience, and point of view  7. Must develop a clear, organized argument

 1. Sources provided  2. Primary and secondary sources used  3. Suggested writing time: 40 minutes  4. Outside information not required  5. Must use a minimum of three sources  6. Prompt in three parts: directions, introduction, and assignment  1. Documents provided  2. Only primary sources used  3. Suggested writing time: 45 minutes  4. Outside information required  5. Expected to use more than half of the documents (not specifically stated in the directions)  6. Directions with statement or question