Proposed Amendments to the AB 32 Cost of Implementation Fee Regulation October 20, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jfkdlsafjkdljflkajfklasjfkldsjflkjflksdjflkdsjfldsjfl kjflkjflkdsajflkdsjflkdsjflkdsjflksjfdlksjfdkslfjkl dsjfkldsjfldksjdsklfjkdlsfjdklsjaflkdjskdjfkdlsjk.
Advertisements

G LASGOW R EGIONAL L ANDFILL M ETHANE R ECOVERY TO E LECTRIFICATION P ROJECT GOVERNOR’S ENERGY CONFERENCE By Mayor Rhonda Riherd Trautman.
State and Local Initiatives to Combat Global Warming AB A Framework for Change James N. Goldstene California Air Resources Board October 22, 2008.
Federal Cap-and-Trade Policy: Overview of Design Options Ray Hammarlund, KCC Energy Programs Division Director Presentation to Kansas Energy Council Greenhouse.
Update: National Ambient Air Quality Standards Association of California Airports September 15, 2010 Phil DeVita.
1 AB 32: The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 The Transportation Connection AB 32: The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 The.
1 AB 32 Scoping Plan Energy Action Plan Meeting Mike Scheible Deputy Executive Officer California Air Resources Board California Public Utilities Commission.
KEC Policy Forums - September 26, 2007 Kansas Energy Council Public Forum on Draft Policy Recommendations Liz Brosius KEC Director.
Breaking Down the Numbers.  Personal Income Taxes for and are $10 billion higher than projected by the Governor’s Jan 2011 no-tax increase.
Oregon Climate Change Regulatory Activities and Policy Initiatives Bill Drumheller -- Oregon Department of Energy University of Oregon School of Law Climate.
GILES COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS REAL ESTATE TAX RATE HEARING APRIL 21, 2005.
1 Southern California Water Dialogue April 23, 2008 Jon Costantino Climate Change Planning Manager California Air Resources Board AB 32 California Global.
Data interaction between the National Emission Inventory and EU ETS in Ireland Workshop on data consistency between National GHG inventories and Annual.
How the State of California Can Play A Greater Role in Addressing Global Warming Leonard Robinson – Chief Deputy Director California Department of Toxic.
Roadmap to a Sustainable Waste Management Future Waste Diversion Strategies in the Unincorporated Communities of Los Angeles County Throughout the Region.
STATE WATER EFFICIENCY AND ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM Jenny Lester Moffitt Deputy Secretary.
August 4, 2011 Heather Ceron US EPA Region 4 1. Greenhouse Gases 2.
1 Public Hearing to Consider Proposed Amendments to the Emission Inventory Criteria and Guidelines Regulation for the AB 2588 Air Toxics “Hot Spots” Program.
FEDERAL CLIMATE CHANGE LEGISLATION Overview of Key Provisions of House and Senate Bills for Industrial Energy Users John Clancy Godfrey & Kahn, S.C. 780.
HOW WILL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS BE TRANSFORMED IN OUR ENERGY FUTURE? GEORGE A. HUME April 28, 2006 Reference was made to the following internet sites in.
Proposed Amendments to Enhanced Vapor Recovery Regulations November 18, 2004 Monitoring and Laboratory Division Air Resources Board California Environmental.
Andy Engel and Andy Cook The Hamilton Consulting Group Hamilton-consulting.com.
1 Synergies Between Climate Change Financing Mechanisms: Options for China The PCF/CC Synergy Workshop.
California Cap on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Market-Based Compliance Mechanisms Edie Chang California Air Resources Board September 2015 California.
Diesel Risk Reduction Plan California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board.
California Climate Change Programs: An Overview Conference of the Reducers The Hague May 12, 2003 James D. Boyd California Energy Commission.
Senate Select Committee on Climate Change and AB 32 Implementation December 3, 2013.
Stationary and Area Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, D.C. Hall of the States 1.
Implementing AB 32: California’s Approach to Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions National Association of Clean Air Agencies Spring Membership Meeting May.
Public Workshop Airborne Toxic Control Measure (ATCM) for Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coatings Public Workshop Airborne Toxic Control Measure (ATCM)
Greenhouse Gas Policy Activities / Update Julie Fitch Public Utilities Commission Kevin Kennedy Energy Commission Joint Meeting May 22, 2007 Energy Action.
Senate Transportation and Housing Committee Providing Fuels of the Future Catherine Reheis-Boyd President October 24, 2011 WESTERN STATES PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION.
California Integrated Waste Management Board Tire Flow Study Along the California-Mexico Border Region Special Waste Committee Meeting California Integrated.
2014 Program Priorities January 23, Outline Major 2014 Goals 2013 Accomplishments Major 2014 Activities Partnerships 2.
Industrial Strategies Division Transportation Fuels Branch September 24-25, 2015 Sacramento, CA PROPOSED RE-ADOPTION OF THE LOW CARBON FUEL STANDARD Hearing.
Discussion Draft October 24, Required by AB 32 Outlines State’s strategy to achieve 2020 GHG goal Built on a balanced mix of strategies 2 Initial.
California Air Resources Board April 25, 2014 PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE CAP-AND-TRADE REGULATION California Air Resources Board 1.
California Public Utilities Commission CPUC Climate Change Activities Paul Clanon Executive Director August 28, 2007 Presentation to the Senate Energy,
PM 2.5 Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #1 South Coast Air Quality Management District June 8, 2006.
1 Public Meeting to Update the Board on Mandatory Commercial Waste Recycling October 21, 2011.
1/9/2004CIWMB - SB 20 Implementation - Payment System Workshop1 Proposed Phase 1 System for Covered Electronic Devices (CEDs) Authorized Recycler Waste.
James Goldstene California Air Resources Board AB 32: The Global Warming Solutions Act of th LEA/CIWMB Partnership Conference October 16, 2007.
Item #11 Alternative Approaches for Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital.
AB 32 Implementation Nuts and Bolts IEP Annual Meeting September 22, 2008 Kevin Kennedy Office of Climate Change California Air Resources Board.
California Public Utilities Commission Why a Load-Based Emissions Cap for California? Julie Fitch CPUC Director of Strategic Planning April 19, 2007 Presentation.
Pasadena Water and Power Public Hearing Date Water Capital Improvement Charge Pasadena City Council Meeting November 16, 2015 Agenda Item #13.
Transforming Transit in California October 22, 2015 CalACT Fall Conference and Bus Show Rohnert Park, CA Tony Brasil, Chief Heavy Duty Diesel Implementation.
California Energy Commission Global Climate Change: Trends and Policy Issues Susan J. Brown California Energy Commission March 3, 2005.
11 AB 32 Climate Change Scoping Plan Progress Report October 21, 2010 California Air Resources Board.
Energy Efficiency Update Before the Senate Energy, Utilities & Communications Committee Part 2 May 17, 2011 – State Capitol Robin Smutny-Jones Assistant.
1 Proposed Final Opinion on GHG Strategies in the Energy Sectors Key Findings and Recommendations October 16, 2008.
1 Draft Landfill Methane Control Measure California Air Resources Board April 22, 2008.
1 Proposed Regulation for Reducing Sulfur Hexafluoride Emissions from Gas Insulated Switchgear California Air Resources Board February 25, 2010.
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE REGULATION FOR THE MANDATORY REPORTING OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS California Air Resources Board California Air Resources Board.
1 Public Workshop to Discuss Amendments to the AB 2588 “Hot Spots” Emission Inventory Criteria and Guidelines Regulation California Air Resources Board.
Proposed Amendments to the AB 32 Cost of Implementation Fee Regulation September 18, 2014 California Air Resources Board.
Climate Action Team CIWMB Update CIWMB Board Meeting November 15, 2005.
AB 118 Air Quality Improvement Program (AQIP) Proposed 2011 Funding Plan Air Resources Board Meeting July 21, 2011 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.
1 City of Cocoa Michael Burton - President Andrew Burnham - Senior Vice President Ashley Venturoni – Project Consultant Presented by: FY 2013 Water, &
1 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Management An introduction Tim Holmes, P.E. Kenwood Energy Energy Consulting Services Kenwood Energy P.O.Box 692 Kenwood, CA
MPCA Citizens’ Board Meeting: United States Steel Corporation-Keetac Air Emissions Permit Owen Seltz Industrial Division September 13, 2011.
John Davis Mojave Desert and Mountain Recycling Authority.
Butte County Climate Action Plan Contract for Services December 11, 2012 Butte County Department of Development Services Tim Snellings, Director.
The Greenhouse Gas Connection to Sustainable Resource Management
Proposed Draft Financial Plan April 10, 2017
The Florida Energy and Climate Commission (FECC)
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
FY Proposed Budget and Rates
City Council April 30, 2018 Item 13
Effective Off-Site Air Quality Mitigation
Presentation transcript:

Proposed Amendments to the AB 32 Cost of Implementation Fee Regulation October 20, 2011

Today’s Presentation Introduction AB 32 Fee Revenue AB 32 Fee Regulation Details Proposed Amendments Potential Impacts Suggested Modifications Recommendation 2

Introduction 3

AB 32 established a comprehensive, multi-year program to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions AB 32 provides ARB authority to adopt a fee schedule to be paid by GHG emissions sources Fee Regulation originally endorsed by the Board in September

AB 32 Fee Revenue 5

State’s annual AB 32 implementation costs Repay loans, with accrued interest, that were utilized in the first three years of the program (FYs through ) 6

AB 32 Fee Revenue Fee applied to approximately 80 percent of statewide GHG emissions Approximately 300 fee payers (such as oil refineries, utilities, cement producers) Loan repayment during for the first four years of fee collection only −Loans will be paid off in two more years; which should lower revenue needs by > 40 percent AB 32 implementation costs are approved by the Legislature in the State budget 7

AB 32 Fee Revenue 8 State Agencies Receiving AB 32 Fee Funding FY 2011/2012 in Thousands (rounded) ARB$32,930 Cal/EPA$590 Dept. of Resources Recycling and Recovery$500 Dept. of Public Health$320 State Water Resources Control Board$540 Dept. of Water Resources$320 Dept. of Housing and Community Development$100 TOTAL$35,300

AB 32 Fee Revenue Collection Status: ARB sent out invoices for fiscal year (FY) to collect $62.1 million total required revenue −$35.2M in program costs, $26.9M in loan repayment −Top 10 fee paying entities provide about 75 percent of fees collected; invoices range from approx. $100 to $7M/year Recently mailed FY invoices to collect $61 million total required revenue 9

AB 32 Fee Regulation Details 10

AB 32 Fee Regulation Details AB 32 Fee Revenue Sources Sources of GHG emissions “upstream” from widely used fossil fuels, including: - Gasoline- Petroleum coke - Diesel- Catalyst coke - Coal- Refinery gases - Natural gas Non-combustion GHG process emissions from refineries and cement manufacturers GHG emissions associated with the generation of both in-state and imported electricity 11

AB 32 Fee Regulation Details Fees are based on annual fuel and GHG emissions data Data is reported using ARB’s Online GHG Reporting Tool Fee liability is determined as follows: (loan repayment + annual program cost) (emissions + reported fuel data) Fee rate currently about $0.17/metric ton CO 2 12

Proposed Amendments 13

Proposed Amendments Align with the Regulation for the Mandatory Reporting of GHG Emissions (MRR), where feasible Consulted with the public and regulated entities Public workshop held on January 21, 2011 Amendments are technical in nature and do not significantly change applicability or fee calculation Several proposed changes are clarifications Overall program framework unaffected 14

Proposed Amendments Applicability −Conform with MRR on applicability threshold for electricity generating facilities (EGFs) from 2,500 MTCO 2 to 10,000 MTCO 2 e −Between EGFs will no longer be subject to fee Definitions Minor adjustments to the calculation of fees Minor changes to Reporting Requirements 15

Potential Impacts 16

Potential Impacts Environmental Impacts −No potential significant environmental impacts identified Economic Impacts −No net change in collected revenue −Between facilities no longer pay fees on electricity generation −Several factors contribute to slight variations in fees assessed for 2011 and subsequent report years 17

Suggested Modifications 18

Suggested Modifications Modifications to conform with recent MRR and Cap-and-Trade 15-day Changes −Definitions −Align calculation of fees for electricity delivered into California Response to stakeholder comments −Clarify reporting requirements for natural gas deliveries 19

Recommendation 20

Recommendation Staff recommends that the Board approve the proposed amendments and suggested modifications to the AB 32 Cost of Implementation Fee Regulation 21