Permanency.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Strategies for addressing challenges around Termination of Parental Rights. Presenters: Bill Stanton, Consultant, ICF Consulting Mary Coogan, Esq. Advocates.
Advertisements

Overview of Child Protection Process Presented to: Task Force on Child Protection August 3, 2007 Bill Navas Office of Attorney General 13 th Judicial Circuit.
 Federal Dollars for Assurances Which Protect Children Who are in Foster Care.
Alliance for Child Welfare Excellence CFWS In-Service.
117_PAT_CM_ Putting It All Together During this review course, you will apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities learned during your training.
Subsidized Guardianship Permanency Initiative. SG Introduction Focuses on improving permanency outcomes for children in out-of-home care through a comprehensive.
The Path to Permanency Melissa D. Carter Committee on Justice for Children Parent Attorney Conference May 8-9, 2007.
Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs). 2 Child Welfare Final Rule (excerpt from Executive Summary) The child and family services reviews … [focus]
JUDY NORD STAFF ATTORNEY, STATE COURT ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGER, CHILDREN’S JUSTICE INITIATIVE Permanency Timeline.
Dependency Court – A Team Approach Presen Presented by: Judge Brantley S. Clark and Carol A. Dunaway, M.S. 1.
AN OUTLINE OF IT’S ROLES AND STRUCTURE IN MATTERS OF CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES RI’s Family Court System.
Treatment Plans and Administrative Case Reviews In a Nutshell.
Child Welfare Services Family centered services to achieve well- being through ensuring self-sufficiency, support, safety, and permanence. Dual tracks-
PERMANENCY PLANNING. Permanency Planning  How is it defined?  What does it mean for parents? For children?
Return to Parent (Reunification) AdoptionPLC Fit and Willing Relative APPLA
A court dedicated to protecting children and promoting families
Adoption S 10A of the Children and Young Persons (care and Protection) Act S46(2)(B) of the Adoption Act.
Adoption & Safe Families Act
1 Agency/Court Collaboration in the CFSR: ENGAGING COURTS AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM The National Child Welfare Resource Center For Organizational Improvement.
Minnesota and Wisconsin CHIPS processes
1 Lessons Learned about the Service Array from the First Round of Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs) The Service Array Process National Child Welfare.
Jennifer Renne Resource Center on Legal and Judicial Issues ABA Center on Children and the Law Permanency Goal: Another Planned Permanent Living Arrangement.
JUVENILE COURT: CONTEXT AND OVERVIEW Janet Mason March 8, 2006 Institute of Government UNC at Chapel Hill.
2005 Children’s Code Amendments: Delinquency Act.
Findings From the Initial Child and Family Service Reviews
Bethanie Barber Assistant Guardian ad Litem Program Coordinator Legal Aid Society of the O.C.B.A. 100 E. Robinson Street Orlando, Fl (407)
FTMs and Foster Care Policy Kenny A: FTMs are to be held within 3-9 days after a child comes into care Held to make any key decisions regarding placement.
Pennsylvania Indian Child Welfare Handbook Developed By The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program University of Pittsburgh, School of Social Work.
Understanding DCBS Custody & Medical Consent for Services Todd MeadeDebbie Acker, RN CPS Specialist Nurse Service Administrator Child Safety BranchMedical.
VISITATION 1. Competencies  SW Ability to complete visitation plans that underscore the importance of arranging and maintaining immediate, frequent,
1 JUVENILE COURT PROTECTION CASES: THE PLAYERS POVERTY LAW Irene M. Opsahl.
1 Using Title IV-E in the Juvenile Justice System ABA Center on Children and the Law National Child Welfare Resource Center on Legal and Judicial Issues.
Handling a CHIPS Case in FCPC Tribal Court Law Day April 30, 2015.
ICWA: Purposes, Procedures & Practice Implications Prepared by: Jerry R. Foxhoven, Executive Director, Drake Legal Clinic Director, Middleton Center for.
AB490 + San Francisco County’s Interagency Agreement.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
1 G-FORCE MEETING Division of Family & Children Services September 25, 2009.
I am for the child ™ A new initiative to fight for the rights of neglected and abused children. I am for the child ™ A new initiative to fight for the.
Individualized Service Plan Who attends the ISP?
2012 Child Welfare Legislative Update Ann Ahlstrom
Disposition Hearing Juvenile Law Cle Oct 17, 2014.
1 Using Title IV-E in the Juvenile Justice System ABA Center on Children and the Law National Child Welfare Resource Center on Legal and Judicial Issues.
P RESENTED BY : T RACY S HEEHAN, C IRCUIT C OURT J UDGE & J ON J OHNSON, G ENERAL M AGISTRATE T HE T HIRTEENTH J UDICIAL C IRCUIT T AMPA, F LORIDA I N.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
1 Child in Need of Protection or Services Proceedings Poverty Law II Irene M. Opsahl.
Implementing Fully Every Tool in the Child Welfare Toolbox Chuck Johnson President and CEO National Council For Adoption.
CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES PLAN and REVIEW. CFSP Child and Family Service Plan.
Concurrent Permanency Planning. Concurrent Permanency Planning (CPP) The process of working towards reunification while at the same time planning an alternative.
Maine DHHS, Office of Child and Family Services 1 Reinstatement of Parental Rights Policy Effective 2/1/2012.
Permanency Planning From Day One. Every child is born with the beautiful potential to become wonderful human beings who experience love, joy, growth and.
Adoption in the US Congress Kathleen Strottman March 4, 2011.
DISPOSITION. Dispositional Hearing  What is it?  A dispositional hearing is required whenever a petition for dependency or neglect has been sustained.
Kamala H. Shugar Assistant Attorney in Charge Oregon Department of Justice Child Advocacy Section.
 Child in need of Protection or Services (CHIPS) › Reasonable efforts to reunite › Timelines › Permanency petition  Egregious harm › Can move right.
Child In Need of Care (CINC) Code Guardians ad litem Nuts and Bolts October 2015.
1 CHILDREN SAFE AND THRIVING WITH FOREVER FAMILIES, SOONER DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES Isabel Blanco, Deputy Director of Field Operations September.
Case Planning Jeopardy! Tick-Tock The Main Course It’s the Law Practice Paradise GO TO FINAL OUTCOMES JEOPARDY!
Overview of Crawford County Children and Youth Services.
Juvenile Legislative Update 2013 Confidential Records and Protected Disclosures.
Completing the circle: concurrent planning and the use of Family Finding, Blended perspective meetings, and family group decision making processes.
Educational Advocacy And The CASA Volunteer.
Hon. Karen R. Carroll February 12, 2018
Presented by Hill Country CASA
Confidential Records and Protected Disclosures
Ongoing Assessment and Permanency
Pathways to Permanency: Safety, Permanency and Well-Being
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
Process, Including Appeals Current Trends/Challenges
Child Abuse and Neglect Institute
Presentation transcript:

Permanency

Permanency K.S.A. 38-2202 (w) “Permanency goal” means the outcome of the permanency planning process which may be reintegration, adoption, appointment of a permanent custodian or another planned permanent living arrangement.

Permanency Planning K.S.A. 38-2263. Permanency planning. “(a) The goal of the permanency planning is to assure, in so far as is possible, that children have permanency and stability in their living situations and that the continuity of family relationships and connections is preserved. In planning for permanency, the safety, and well- being of the children shall be paramount.”

Permanency Planning (cont.) The initial permanency planning (also referred to as the case plan) “shall be developed for the child and submitted to the court within 30 days of the initial order of the court.” Prepared by the secretary, agency, or person having custody. Typically adopted by the court at either the adjudication or dispositional hearings, there is a place on both JE forms to mark accepting the permanency plan.

Permanency Planning (cont.) The PP is preferably written with the assistance of the parent and describes the permanency goal of the case at hand which will most likely result in a permanent and safe placement for the child(ren). Specifics for a PP are sited in KSA 38-2263 (c). a. describes child(ren)'s level of physical, mental and emotional health b. assesses the needs of child(ren) and family c. describes services for child(ren), parents and foster parents as appropriate d. describes tasks and responsibilities for the aforementioned e. includes measurable objectives and time frames

Permanency Planning (cont.) if child(ren) is in OOH placement PP must include a plan for reintegration (or a viable alternative). If not reintegration, the court must find on the record a basis for an alternative plan. Other alternatives include adoption, permanent custodianship, APPLA.

38-2257. Permanency planning at disposition "If a child is placed outside the child's home at the dispositional hearing (or prior) and no permanency plan is made a part of the record of the hearing, a written permanency plan shall be prepared pursuant to K.S.A. 38-2263 and amendments thereto." A finding of reasonable efforts must be made regarding the acceptance by the court after adopting the permanency plan. To make a finding that the Court accepts the permanency plan. Permanency plan may be titled "Case plan" but essentially it is the plan of the case, reintegration, adoption, APPLA, guardianship.

KSA 38-2264. Permanency hearing "(a) A permanency hearing is a proceeding conducted by the court ... for the purpose of determining progress toward accomplishment of a permanency plan established under KSA 38- 2263.” The court must make a finding that reasonable efforts have been made by appropriate agencies to rehabilitate the family and achieve the permanency goal. A permanency hearing shall be held within 12 months of the date the court authorized the child's removal from the home and not less frequently than every 12 months thereafter.

Permanency Hearing (cont.) if the court determines, at any time other than during a permanency hearing, that reintegration may not be a viable alternative for the child, a permanency hearing shall be held no later than 30 days following that determination. This coincides with the filing of a motion to terminate parental rights which shall be filed within 30 days of such a finding of reintegration is no longer viable. Court finds reintegration no longer viable THEN prosecutor shall file a motion to terminate or appoint a permanent custodian within 30 days THEN the court shall set a termination hearing with in 90 days from the motion to terminate.

Reintegration is no longer a viable goal If reintegration is no longer a viable option, the court must find: Whether the child is in a stable placement with a relative; Whether services set out in the case plan necessary for a safe return of the child have been made available to the parent with whom reintegration was planned; and Whether adoption or permanent custodianship might be in the best interest of the child and the county/district attorney or designee should file a pleading to terminate parental rights or a pleading to establish a permanent custodianship within 30 days; or Permanent custodianship and adoption have been considered, but are not in the child’s best interest at this time, and a new plan should be prepared and submitted to the court with measurable goals, objectives, and time frames to achieve another planned permanent living arrangement. If the court enters an order terminating parental rights to a child or an agency has accepted a relinquishment pursuant to K.S.A. 59-2124, and amendments thereto, the requirements for permanency hearings shall continue until an adoption or appointment of a permanent custodian has been accomplished.

Permanency in Juvenile offender cases KSA 38-2365(b) CM shall prepare a PP and submit to the court within 30 days of OOH placement, (temp JS custody or JS custody, for placement OOH, YRCII or PRTF, foster home) PP hearing shall be heard every 12 months while the juvenile is OOH KSA 38-2361(a)(12) Court receives notice of release 21 days prior to release of juvenile from JCF. Court must have permanency hearing within seven days of release, and every 12 months thereafter that the juvenile remains in JS custody.

Resources “Making it Permanent,” Cecilia Fiermonte and Jennifer Renne, ABA “Achieving Permanency for Adolescents: A Guide for Legal Professionals,” ABA “Learning Curves: Education Advocacy for Children in Foster Care,” Kathleen M. McNaught, ABA

Permanency Measurement How are we doing? The Administration for Children and Families requires states to monitor their performance in the area of permanency. Permanency Measurement National Standard Statewide Performance Permanency of children in care 24 months or longer 25.0% 32.6% Permanency for all children with TPR (SFY 2015) 96.8% 91.2% Permanency for all Children in Care 3+ Years (SFY2015) 47.8% 32.8% Data from Kansas Department for Children and Families FACTS