Managing and Leading an Instructionally Driven School Culture Part 2 January 2011 Rebekah Marler Consultant, Replications Inc.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Five -Year Strategic Title I School Plan. Session Objectives Review the five year components utilizing the rubric Organize actions steps to meet the requirements.
Advertisements

Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
A Guide to Implementation
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
What is a Structured Learning Environment?. The Typical Cedar Lane Classroom Personal care opportunities limited due to schedule Limited Mobility opportunities.
Understanding By Design: Integration of CTE and Core Content Curriculum Michael S. Gullett.
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Using Data Effectively or Why Weigh the Hog If You Aren’t Going To Feed It? Presented by Ronni Ephraim, Chief Instructional Officer Los Angeles Unified.
Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.
The Blueprint Your SIP (School Improvement Plan) A living, breathing, document.
School Improvement Team (SIT)
Year 1 School Based Training Have experience across all three key stages; Develop an understanding of the multiplicity of roles within the primary school;
Principal Leadership Academy Basic Leadership Training November 2012.
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System
Collaboration and continuous learning are the focus.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
E FFECTIVE CURRICULUM COACHING Meredith Dunn Principal, Northern Elementary Melody Gallenstein Curriculum Coach, Northern Elementary September 2010.
August Professional Development 1 Janise Lane, Interim Executive Director of Teaching and Learning Linda Chen, Chief Academic Officer August 25 – 28, 2015.
Differentiated Supervision
Sharon Walpole University of Delaware Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia Literacy Coaches in Action: Strategies for Crafting Building- Level Support.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
Building Teacher Effectiveness A Lab School Protocol.
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
5-Step Process Clarification The 5-Step Process is for a unit, topic, or “chunk” of information. One form should be used for the unit, topic, etc. The.
Glendale Elementary School District Professional Development August 15, 2012.
OAC Principals Collaborative Professional Learning Opportunities What can one teacher do? What can one administrator do? What can one school do? Fall Webinar.
PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Implementing Formative Assessment Online Professional Development What Principals Need to know.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
1 Archdiocese of New York Academic Initiatives.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Ipod Project Welcome Back Session September 27, :30- 4:30 PM (SEA # NA–Credit) Lenoir County Public Schools Preparing all students to be competitive.
STAR3 Project for WS/FCS. STAR3 All students deserve and thrive under a great teacher that cares for their well being. Our responsibility is to provide.
Medicine Hat School District #76 PLC’s Building Capability Through Collaborative Learning Developing tomorrow’s citizens through improved learning, living.
Bremerton School District ACT System. OVERVIEW OF THE INTER ACT IVE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT MODEL.
Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
1 NH PACE Tier 2 Leadership PLC Session 1 September 28, 2015.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Managing and Leading an Instructionally Driven School Culture Rebekah Marler Consultant, Replications Inc.
PSRC FOCUSED INTERVENTION T EAM P ROCESS January 17, 2013 HAPPY NEW YEAR.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
Berkeley County Schools
“ Let us not be content to wait and see what will happen, but give us the determination to make the right things happen”- Horace Mann 2014 MCAS Overview.
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning DeeDee Washington, Associate Superintendent of Academics Elementary.
“. BEAR VALLEY ELEMENTARY API: OVERALL AYP : ELA % of students scoring prof or adv on CST.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
Dawn Wenzel Spring Great Leadership “What really makes education effective is well- leveraged leadership that ensures great teaching to guarantee.
APR 2014 Report: Data, Analysis and Action Plan for Full Accreditation.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
Support for (rather than Evaluation of) Administrators Delaware Academy for School Leadership.
Module 6: Coaching System
By: Alice Tackett and Jill Maynard
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
Jeff McCoy, Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology
Targeted District Review Report
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Targeted District Review Report
Differentiated Supports in Special Education
Mentor-Principals February Webinar
Implementing Race to the Top
February 21-22, 2018.
Presentation transcript:

Managing and Leading an Instructionally Driven School Culture Part 2 January 2011 Rebekah Marler Consultant, Replications Inc.

Expected Outcomes 1/25/11 Check-in: Jan. and Feb. schedule confirmed including overview of training and support-Over lunch /5 Review of E-Myth and connection to Leadership/Management Indicators-5 minutes Assessment and reflection of current practices that ensure progress towards overall goal using rubric for indicator min. Complete a RUBRIC together for indicator 2 (Feedback to staff) utilizing coaching and commitment tool. 25 min. Overview/demonstration of SMART goals within each indicator and schedule time with administrator to complete for February during this week's visit. 20 min. Preparation /protocol for practicing the process of effective feedback using the coaching and commitment tool. 10 min.

Sequence of Training and Support: September: framing the work of managing and leading, initial site visits October: Launching process maps and time management tools to support instructional focus November: Polarity mapping and action planning for emphasis on instructional culture through development of tools December: Instructional Team planning/launch of coaching and commitment tools. January: Assess, reflect, establish SMART goals for work through February visit, develop use of tool through practice and immediate feedback using technology February: Review and re-vision of new SMART goals, standards for professional learning March: Review and revision of SMART goals, creating differentiated Professional learning based on results of tool.

Anticipated range of work for April-June 2011: Deepening rigor through higher level questioning ( all content areas) Content specific work (Reading/Writing) Special Education Support/Co- teaching, inclusive practices RTI/differentiation Assessment practices

E-Mything Education: The core philosophy behind the E-Myth Point of View on Management is the idea that businesses should be systems-dependent, NOT people-dependent. The secret of successful business management--successful people management--is systemization. Systems free your people to pay attention to the things that matter while all the routine things take care of themselves. Systems raise the level of performance of your people. The E-Myth management strategy is the same for companies with 2 employees, with 25 employees, or with 150 employees ! THE HOW DO WE DO IT HERE m ust be developed, documented in operations manuals, taught,trained,practiced, lived, revised, AND most importantly:. Principals must be lead-directors in creating "an environment for these systems in which doing it is more important to your people than NOT doing it. A place where doing it well becomes a way of life for them. "- Michael Gerber -Michael Gerber, The E-Myth Revisited, Chapter 16

THE # 1 System to Free Your Time and Your Team's Time to focus on "WHAT MATTERS" IS SCHEDULING EACH DAY/WEEK/MONTH with specific activities and outcomes AND making commitments to follow through NO MATTER WHAT!

Leadership and Management Indicators ( Observable practices that demonstrate evidence of continuous progression toward achieving student performance and leadership/management goals): 80% of principal’s time spent on Instructionally Focused Training, Development and support of all staff Feedback to staff meets the following criteria: regular, equitable, transparent, immediate, actionable, concrete, managed actively, data driven, based on established indicators, and designed to ensure teacher commitment and follow through.

Indicators, cont. Professional Development Plan is based on established indicators of practice, and an ongoing and consistent review of all available data: (Lesson plans, observations, Interim Assessments, Benchmarks, Conferencing Notes, etc.) as well as established criteria for creating effective adult learning experiences* (See Quality PD Checklist). Students in all “Tiers” are supported through effective delivery of all the above indicators, and students in Tiers 2 and 3 are supported by the creation of individualized goals/action plans for their progress AND the strategic support and management for all providers of Tier 2 and 3 interventionsStudents in all “Tiers” are supported through effective delivery of all the above indicators, and students in Tiers 2 and 3 are supported by the creation of individualized goals/action plans for their progress AND the strategic support and management for all providers of Tier 2 and 3 interventions.Efficient “back-office” procedures are managed by principal according to network/district guidelines, procedures, and protocols which ensure adherence to all financial, administrative, and compliance related expectations..

Complete rubric/self-evaluation and survey- Create rubric for effective feedback (Indicator # 2) Overview of sample SMART Goals and creating time in schedule to complete with leader during this week's visit Setting the stage to use the tool during this week's visit (establishing protocol/process).