Part I: Introduction to SHARPn Normalization Hongfang Liu, PhD, Mayo Clinic Tom Oniki, PhD, Intermountain Healthcare.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMRLD A RIM-based Data Integration Approach Pradeep Chowdhury Manager, Data Integration.
Advertisements

Building FHIR Servers on Existing Applications
CIMI Modelling Taskforce Report Dr Linda Bird 11 th April 2013.
VXQFQ2 Monday June 3, 2013Trillium Bridge Negotiations Meeting1.
1 caAdapter Jan 24, caAdapter The caAdapter is an open source tool that facilitates HL7 version 3 message building, parsing and validation based.
MDHT Update MDHT Next Steps MDHT MDMI Update MDMI Update MDMI Next Steps.
Data Standards The use of data structures and OpenEHR Richard Kavanagh, Head of Data Standards, HSCIC.
Data Normalization Milestones. Data Normalization  Goals –To conduct the science for realizing semantic interoperability and integration of diverse data.
©2013 MFMER | slide-1 Building A Knowledge Base of Severe Adverse Drug Events Based On AERS Reporting Data Using Semantic Web Technologies Guoqian Jiang,
Guoqian Jiang, MD, PhD Mayo Clinic
Implementing a Clinical Terminology David Crook Subset Development Project Manager SNOMED in Structured electronic Records Programme NHS Connecting for.
AHCCCS/ASU Clinical Data Project March 17 th, 2009 Arizona Health Care Cost Containment Health System Medicaid Transformation Grant Program.
CIMI/IHTSDO DCM tooling ecosystem thoughts
FEBRUARY 4, 2015 STANLEY M. HUFF, MD CHIEF MEDICAL INFORMATICS OFFICER INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE Modeling and Terminology.
A Model Driven Approach for Cross Paradigm Interoperability using OMG’s MDMI Standard Cross Paradigm Working Group.
FHIRFarm – How to build a FHIR Server Farm (quickly)
AUGUST 21, 2014 STANLEY M. HUFF, MD CHIEF MEDICAL INFORMATICS OFFICER INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE HSPC Meeting Introduction.
Harmonization of SHARPn Clinical Element Models with CDISC SHARE Clinical Study Data Standards Guoqian Jiang, MD, PhD Mayo Clinic On behalf of CDISC CEMs.
SHARPn Data Normalization November 18, Data-driven Healthcare Big Data Knowledge Research Practice Analytics Domain Pragmatics Experts.
Initial Prototype for Clinical Data Normalization and High Throughput Phenotyping SHARPn F2F June 30,2011.
HL7 Clinical Genomics – Implementation Roadmap The HL7 Clinical Genomics SIG Amnon Shabo (Shvo), PhD HL7 Clinical Genomics SIG Co-chair and Modeling Facilitator.
Public Health Data Element Standardization - A Framework for Modeling Data Elements Used for Public Health Case Reporting Case Reporting Standardization.
Document Standards Faced and Lessons Learned Calvin Beebe, Tom Oniki, Hongfang Liu, Kyle Marchant.
LexEVS 6.0 Overview Scott Bauer Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota February 2011.
December 15, 2011 Use of Semantic Adapter in caCIS Architecture.
Modeling Tools for Healthcare Technical Overview April 8, 2009.
Strategic Health IT Advanced Research Projects (SHARP) Area 4: Secondary Use of EHR Data SHARPfest June 2-3, 2010 PI: Christopher G Chute, MD DrPH.
Kaiser Permanente Standards Summit September 7-8, 2011 Stanley M. Huff, MD Huff # 1 We Are on the Right Path! SHARPn Face-to-Face June 11, 2012 Stanley.
Modeling Options HSPC Meeting June 17, 2015 Washington DC.
HIT Standards Committee Clinical Operations Workgroup Report Jamie Ferguson, Chair Kaiser Permanente John Halamka, Co-chair Harvard Medical School 20 August,
Dave Iberson-Hurst CDISC VP Technical Strategy
Clinical Document Architecture. Outline History Introduction Levels Level One Structures.
Value Set Resolution: Build generalizable data normalization pipeline using LexEVS infrastructure resources Explore UIMA framework for implementing semantic.
OpenHIE Improving health for the underserved. The Open Health Information Exchange (OpenHIE) Community: A diverse community enabling interoperable health.
CTAKES The clinical Text Analysis and Knowledge Extraction System.
MDHT Architecture Diagram Rama Ramakrishnan 1. Introduction The intent is to capture the high level architecture of the MDHT. The following diagrams are.
Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 5b Health Data Interchange Standards.
Clinical Collaboration Platform Overview ST Electronics (Training & Simulation Systems) 8 September 2009 Research Enablers  Consulting  Open Standards.
The data standards soup … Is the most exciting topic you can dream of.
Introduction to HL7 Version 3 W. Ed Hammond February 25, 2008.
A Semantic-Web Representation of Clinical Element Models
# 1 Clinical Element Models (CEMs) SHARP F2F Meeting Mayo Clinic June 21, 2010 Stanley M Huff, MD.
© 2012 HL7 ® International. Licensed under Creative Commons. HL7 & Health Level Seven are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International. Reg.
HIT Standards Committee Clinical Operations Workgroup Jamie Ferguson Kaiser Permanente John Halamka Harvard University February 24, 2010.
Page 0 12/26/2015 Welcome to the VMCoP Meeting August 17th, 2010.
Ontology-Based Interoperability Service for HL7 Interfaces Implementation Carolina González, Bernd Blobel and Diego López eHealth Competence Center, Regensurg.
Clinical research data interoperbility Shared names meeting, Boston, Bosse Andersson (AstraZeneca R&D Lund) Kerstin Forsberg (AstraZeneca R&D.
CIMI/IHTSDO DCM tooling ecosystem thoughts Thomas Beale Stan Huff.
Source IT System ( LIS) Consumer IT System (Certified * Ambulatory EHR) Pre-Condition: The Source has received an Order from the Consumer (either Manually.
Subject Registrations Adverse Events Subject Registrations Biospecimens Lab Results IN: 1. Lab Results OUT: 1. Subject Registrations 2. Clinical Notes.
Rule Engine for executing and deploying the SAGE-based Guidelines Jeong Ah Kim', Sun Tae Kim 2 ' Computer Education Department, Kwandong University, KOREA.
SNOMED CT Vendor Introduction 27 th October :30 (CET) Implementation Special Interest Group Tom Seabury IHTSDO.
CDA Overview HL7 CDA IHE Meeting, February 5, 2002 Slides from Liora Alschuler, alschuler.spinosa Co-chair HL7.
Tung Tran, Ph.D. What is the EMR? Computerized legal medical record created by healthcare organizations Enables storage and retrieval of patient information.
Mapping International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP) and SNOMED CT Submitted by the ICNP Programme Team to IHTSDO Nursing Special Interest.
3M Health Information Systems 1© 3M All Rights Reserved. 3M Health Information Systems Data Standardization Interoperability.
Presented for discussion with Implementation SIG Heather Grain.
Healthcare-oriented Modeling Environment ( HoME ) Managed jointly by: Veterans Health Administration (VHA) IBM modeling-mdt.projects.openhealthtools.org.
HSPC Terminology and Information Model Initiative Susan Matney, PhD, RNC-OB, FAAN (Initiative Lead) Stan Huff, MD, FACMI, FHL7 11/6/2016.
Dave Iberson-Hurst CDISC VP Technical Strategy
Pharmacogenomics Data Standardization using Clinical Element Models
Research on FHIR Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources
SHARP: Secondary Use Project 1: Data Normalization
Electronic Health Record
Data Normalization Architecture
Electronic Health Information Systems
The Mighty Filter Introducing Filter Node Filtering config settings
Undergraduate Courses
Clinical Element Models
Anonymized HL7 message, which would be sent from an LIS to an HIS
Presentation transcript:

Part I: Introduction to SHARPn Normalization Hongfang Liu, PhD, Mayo Clinic Tom Oniki, PhD, Intermountain Healthcare

Data Normalization  Goals –To conduct the science for realizing semantic interoperability and integration of diverse data sources –To develop tools and resources enabling the generation of normalized EMR data for secondary uses

Data Normalization  Information Models Target Value Sets Raw EMR Data Tooling Normalized EMR Data Normalization Targets Normalization Process

Normalization Targets  Clinical Element Models –Intermountain Healthcare/GE Healthcare’s detailed clinical models  Terminology/value sets associated with the models –using standards where possible

CEM Models  Different models for different use cases  “CORE” models

“Core” Models CORE Lab CEM model CORE Lab CEM model attribute 1 attribute 2 attribute 3 attribute 4 CEM A CEM C CEM B CEM D

“Core” Models CORE Lab CEM model CORE Lab CEM model attribute 1 attribute 2 attribute 3 attribute 4 Secondary Use Lab CEM model CEM A CEM C CEM B CEM D attribute 1 attribute 2 attribute 3 attribute 4 CEM A CEM C CEM B CEM D

“Core” Models CORE Lab CEM model CORE Lab CEM model attribute 1 attribute 2 attribute 3 attribute 4 Secondary Use Lab CEM model CEM A CEMC CEM B CEMD attribute 1 attribute 2 attribute 3 attribute 4 Clinical Trial Lab CEM model Clinical Trial Lab CEM model CEMA CEM C CEM B CEM D attribute 1 attribute 2 attribute 3 attribute 4 CEM A CEM C CEM B CEM D

“Core” Models CORE Lab CEM model CORE Lab CEM model attribute 1 attribute 2 attribute 3 attribute 4 Secondary Use Lab CEM model CEM A CEMC CEM B CEMD attribute 1 attribute 2 attribute 3 attribute 4 Clinical Trial Lab CEM model Clinical Trial Lab CEM model CEM A CEM C CEM B CEM D attribute 1 attribute 2 attribute 3 attribute 4 CEM A CEM C CEM B CEM D EMR Lab CEM model EMR Lab CEM model CEM A CEM C CEM B CEM D attribute 1 attribute 2 attribute 3 attribute 4

CEM Models  Different models for different use cases  “CORE” models –CORENotedDrug -> SecondaryUseNotedDrug –COREStandardLab -> SecondaryUseStandardLab (+ 6 data type- specific models) –COREPatient -> SecondaryUsePatient

Generating XSDs Secondary Use Lab CEM model CEM A CEM C CEM B CEM D attribute 1 attribute 2 attribute 3 attribute 4

Generating XSDs Secondary Use Lab CEM model CEM A CEM C CEM B CEM D attribute 1 attribute 2 attribute 3 attribute 4 SHARP “reference class” SHARP “reference class” attribute 5 attribute 6 attribute 7 attribute 8 CEM E CEM G CEM F CEM H

Generating XSDs Secondary Use Lab CEM model CEM A CEM C CEM B CEM D attribute 1 attribute 2 attribute 3 attribute 4 SHARP “reference class” SHARP “reference class” attribute 5 attribute 6 attribute 7 attribute 8 CEM E CEM G CEM F CEM H COMPILE Secondary Use Lab XSD attribute attribute attribute attribute attribute attribute

Terminology/Value Sets  Terminology value sets define the valid values used in the models  Terminology standards are used wherever possible

Terminology/Value Sets  Terminology value sets define the valid values used in the models  Terminology standards are used wherever possible Secondary Use Patient CEM model Secondary Use Patient CEM model CEM B CEM A CEM C administrativeGender attribute X attribute Y attribute Z Gender CEM Gender Value Set: HL7 AdminGender {M, F}

CEM Request Site and Browser

Normalization Process  Prepare Mapping  UIMA Pipeline to transform raw EMR data to normalized EMR data based on mappings

Mappings  Two kinds of mappings needed: –Model Mappings –Terminology Mappings

Model Mappings HL7CEM Secondary Use Patient CEM model CEM A CEM C CEM B CEM D attribute 1 attribute 2 attribute 3 attribute 4 MSH PID 1 2 … OBR OBX … Secondary Use Lab CEM model CEM A CEM C CEM B CEM D attribute 1 attribute 2 attribute 3 attribute 4

Model Mappings

Terminology Mappings HL7 from MayoCEM Local Gender Codes 1 = MALE 2 = FEMALE HL7 AdministrativeGender M = MALE F = FEMALE

Terminology Mappings CEM FieldsLocalCodeTargetCodeTargetCodeSystem GenderMMHL7 Gender GenderFFHL7 Gender Race CDC Race RaceW2106-3CDC Race RouterMethodDeviceORALPOHL7 Route DoseFreqBID &0800, SNOMED DoseFreqBID &0800, SNOMED DoseFreqDAILY & SNOMED DoseFreqQ24HRS SNOMED DoseFreqONE TIME ORDER SNOMED DoseUNITPuff SNOMED DoseUNITTABLET SNOMED DoseUNITtsp SNOMED DoseUNITCAPSULE (HA SNOMED DoseUNITpatch SNOMED DoseUNITgr SNOMED DoseUNITmL SNOMED

Pipeline  Implement in UIMA (Unstructured Information Management Architecture)  Configurable –Data sources – HL7, CCD, CDA, and Table format –Model mappings (different EMR systems may have different formats) –Terminology mappings –Inference mappings – infer ingredients from clinical drugs