Bioscience – Aarhus University Measuring competitive interactions in natural plant populations Christian Damgaard Bioscience Aarhus University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
POPULATION ECOLOGY.
Advertisements

POPULATION ECOLOGY.
The Geography of Biological Diversity. Species-Area Curves S = species richness A = size of the sampling plot (eg. m 2 ) c and z are fitting parameters.
Topic 5.3 / Option G.1: Community Ecology 2 Populations and Sampling Methods Assessment Statements: , G.1.3-G.1.4.
CHAPTER 52 POPULATION ECOLOGY Copyright © 2002 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings Section A: Characteristics of Populations 1.Two.
Sensitivity Analysis of a Spatially Explicit Fish Population Model Applied to Everglades Restoration Ren é A. Salinas and Louis J. Gross The Institute.
Competition – Chapter 12. Competition Resource competition – occurs when a number of organisms utilize common resources that are in short supply. Interference.
Chapter 5 Populations.
Detecting Temporal Trends In Species Assemblages With Randomization Procedures And Hierarchical Models Nick Gotelli University of Vermont USA.
Levels of Ecological Organization in Freshwater Systems Population Community Ecosystem.
- Population: individuals of same species in same general area. Has geographic boundaries and population size. Key traits: density (individuals per unit.
Chapter #16 – Community Structure
9/17/071 Community Properties Reading assignment: Chapter 9 in GSF.
Chapter 52 Reading Quiz A group of individuals of the same species hanging out in the same area at the same time is called a ____. A bunch of nesting penguins.
Community Ecology I Competition I. Intro to Community Ecology A. What is a community? B. Types of interactions C. Regulation of population dynamics II.
3.3 Studying Organisms in Ecosystems
OUR Ecological Footprint …. Ch 20 Community Ecology: Species Abundance + Diversity.
Ecology: Populations. Characteristics of Populations 1.Geographic distribution 2.Density 3.Growth Rate 4.Age Structure.
1 Introduction Ecologists usually define a population as… – Characterized by the number of individuals and their density. Additional characteristics of.
Population Ecology Chapter 52. Slide 2 of 27 Ecology  Def – Study of the interactions of organisms with their physical environment & with each other.
Population Review.
Bioscience – Aarhus University Pin-point plant cover data Christian Damgaard Bioscience Aarhus University.
Species Abundance and Diversity
POPULATION ECOLOGY. ECOLOGY Study of living organisms as groups Interactions between living organisms (predator-prey, parasitism etc) Interactions between.
Science & Technology in the Environment Ecology – Summarize how ecology and the environment affect an organism’s ability to adapt or change.
Biodiversity – Chapter 22. Biodiversity Species richness – the total number of species in an area –Simplest measure of biodiversity Heterogeneity - higher.
Community Ecology. G.1.1 Outline the factors that affect the distribution of plant species, including temperature, water, light, soil pH, salinity, and.
A Local Ecosystem. Abiotic features of the environment Abiotic features are the non-living components of the environment. They include, Physical features:
1 Species Abundance and Diversity. 2 Introduction Community: Association of interacting species inhabiting some defined area.  Community Structure includes.
Bioscience – Aarhus University Measuring plant abundance and ecological processes with the pin-point method Christian Damgaard Department of Bioscience.
Option G: Ecology and Conservation Chpt. 18: pages
Chapter 52: Population Ecology Population ecology Study of populations in relationship to the environment Study of populations in relationship to the environment.
Plant Ecology - Chapter 10 Competition. Reduction in fitness due to shared use of a resource that is in limited supply Intraspecific Interspecific.
55.2 How Do Ecologists Study Population Dynamics? To understand population growth, ecologists must measure population processes as well as population traits.
Ecology II: Communities and Populations. Population: the total number of a certain species in a given area.
Bioscience – Aarhus University Integrating monitoring data across different data types, locations and habitat types Christian Damgaard Bioscience Aarhus.
Individual-based storage promotes coexistence in neutral communities.
Much of the best quantitative data measuring effects of competition comes from studies of plants. A paper by Palmbald (1968), for example, expressly deals.
LO’s - the meaning of ecology, population symbiotic relationships - can explain population demographics and ways in which population sizes are regulated.
Species Abundance and Diversity
Understanding Ecosystems!. Bell Work! What type of environmental problems do we face here in Northern Kentucky? What type of forests are found in Northern.
Chapter 8. What is a population? The given number of a given species in a given area at a given time.
Unit Living Things and the Environment Section 21.1 Organisms obtain food, water, shelter, and other things it needs to live, grow, and reproduce.
 Occupancy Model Extensions. Number of Patches or Sample Units Unknown, Single Season So far have assumed the number of sampling units in the population.
Combining pin-point and Braun-Blanquet plant cover data
An Optimization Model that Links Masting to Seed Herbivory Glenn Ledder, Department of Mathematics University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Bioscience – Aarhus University Modelling the joint abundance of more plant species - pin-point cover data Christian Damgaard Department of Bioscience Aarhus.
Population Ecology Photo Credit:
Ch. 54 Warm-Up (Review) Sketch an exponential population growth curve and a logistic population growth curve. What is an ecological footprint? What.
C5 Population Ecology National geographic celebrates 7 billionth person on October 31, 2011 Need 1.5 Earths to support current growing population 19th.
Ch. 40b Warm-Up (Review) Sketch an exponential population growth curve and a logistic population growth curve. What is an ecological footprint? What.
Population Ecology
Chapter 53 ~ Population Ecology
Department of Bioscience
Population Ecology Items that are BOLD, underlined, or a different color are MOST important to write down.
Abiotic: non-living.
7.EC.5A.3 Analyze and interpret data to predict changes in the number of organisms within a population when certain changes occur to the physical environment.
Factors that Change the Environment
Ch. 53 Warm-Up (Review) Sketch an exponential population growth curve and a logistic population growth curve. What is an ecological footprint? What.
Biodiversity: Diversity among and within plant and animal species in an environment. Note: The preservation of biodiversity is considered by environmentalists.
Ch. 53 Warm-Up (Review) Sketch an exponential population growth curve and a logistic population growth curve. What is an ecological footprint? What.
Ch. 53 Warm-Up Sketch an exponential population growth curve and a logistic population growth curve. What is an ecological footprint? What are ways.
Ch. 52 Warm-Up (Review) Sketch an exponential population growth curve and a logistic population growth curve. What is an ecological footprint? What.
Biology, 9th ed, Sylvia Mader
Ch. 53 Warm-Up (Review) Sketch an exponential population growth curve and a logistic population growth curve. What is an ecological footprint? What.
Chapter 19 Populations.
Ch. 53 Warm-Up (Review) Sketch an exponential population growth curve and a logistic population growth curve. What is an ecological footprint? What.
Ch. 40b Warm-Up (Review) Sketch an exponential population growth curve and a logistic population growth curve. What is an ecological footprint? What.
Population Ecology.
Warm-Up (Review) Sketch an exponential population growth curve and a logistic population growth curve. What is an ecological footprint? What are ways.
Presentation transcript:

Bioscience – Aarhus University Measuring competitive interactions in natural plant populations Christian Damgaard Bioscience Aarhus University

Bioscience – Aarhus University Evidence for competitive interactions in plant communities How often has the competitive interactions in a plant community been measured in a natural plant community compared to the times competition has been postulated to be an important ecological mechanisms? 1/1000 is certainly too high 1/1000,000? Measuring interspecific interactions in natural ecosystems is a non-trivial task and the results are still too sparse to allow generalization across different plant communities or even among years (Turnbull et al. 2004)

Bioscience – Aarhus University Measuring competitive interactions in natural plant communities Competition is a process occurring in time Just as you need more than one measurement in time to measure a velocity or a rate, you need more than one measurement in time to measure the effect of the neighboring plants on growth (= change in biomass) of the target plant species Longitudinal (=time series) plant abundance data Non-destructive sampling

Bioscience – Aarhus University Measuring ecological success

Bioscience – Aarhus University Measuring ecological success Natural and semi-natural plant communities are dominated by spatially structured perennial species with variable life histories Often difficult to count individual plants Large size variation among individuals of the same species. The ecological success may be assessed using the pin-point method cover (= relative area that the species cover) vertical density (= 3D space occupancy ~ biomass, plant volume, and LAI)

Bioscience – Aarhus University Plant cover and vertical density – assumptions i) Plant cover and vertical density measure ecological success ii) Due to the growth form of most plant species, the vertical density will increase relatively faster than plant cover during the growing season iii) Species with a high cover in spring will have relatively high vertical density at the end of the growing season, however, the vertical density is reduced by the cover of other species due to competition  iv) A plant species that grows to a relatively high vertical density has a relatively high cover the following year, i.e., plants allocate resources into occupying resource space the following year

Bioscience – Aarhus University Plant cover and vertical density – model X: cover Y: vertical density P1: competitive growth P2: survival, establisment etc.

Bioscience – Aarhus University Plant cover and vertical density – model Competitive growth (P1): Y i = increasing function of X i * decreasing function of X j,k,… Survival and establishment (P2): X i,y+1 = increasing function of Y i,y * decreasing function of Y j,k,…,y

Bioscience – Aarhus University Plant cover and vertical density – model Competitive growth (P1): Survival and establishment (P2): Structural variation: for predictions Effect of environment:

Bioscience – Aarhus University The effect of glyphosate on the competitive interactions between Festuca ovina and Agrostis capillaris Christian Damgaard Beate Strandberg Solvejg K. Mathiassen Per Kudsk Aarhus University

Bioscience – Aarhus University Festuca ovina and Agrostis capillaris Festuca ovina (solid) Agrostis capillaris (stripped)

Bioscience – Aarhus University Estimating the competitive interactions

Bioscience – Aarhus University Marginal distribution of competition parameters Festuca ovinaAgrostis capillarisOther species Percent.2.5%50%97.5%2.5%50%97.5%2.5%50%97.5% Process equation 1 – during the growing season: c constant c slope Process equation 2 – among growing seasons: c constant c slope Significant competitive effect Competitive effect depends on glyphosate

Bioscience – Aarhus University Importance of competitive interactions relative to the effect of glyphosate Importance of competition is highest in the growing season Importance of competition on A. capillaris increases with glyphosate

Bioscience – Aarhus University Competitive interactions between Festuca ovina Agrostis capillaris - summary F. ovina and A. capillaris compete for resources! The competitive effect of F. ovina increases with glyphosate The competitive effect of A. capillaris decreases with glyphosate Importance of competition is highest in the growing season Importance of competition of F. ovina on A. capillaris increases with glyphosate Structural equation models allow the separation of structural and measuring variance Quantitative ecological predictions with a known uncertainty

Bioscience – Aarhus University Competitive interactions were measured using the pin-point method I.Effect of climate change (temperature, draught, C0 2 ), on the competitive interactions between Calluna vulgaris and Deschampsia flexuosa in dry heathlands  Draught increased the probability that Deschampsia would outcompete Calluna (Damgaard et al. 2009, Ransijn et al., 2015, in prep.) II.Effect of glyphosate and nitrogen on the competitive interactions of Festuca ovina and Agrostis capillaris  Glyphosate increased the competitive effect of Festuca ovina (Damgaard et al. 2012, 2014) III.Effect of water level on the competitive interactions among grassland species  The importance of competition varied with water level (Merlin et al, 2015) IV.Measure the competitive interactions of different plant traits (Damgaard, submitted)

Bioscience – Aarhus University Evidence for competitive interactions in plant communities II Competition is measured by the effect of neighboring plants on plant growth longitudinal plant abundance data Macro-ecological assumption I: the biomass of neighboring plant is used as a proxy for interspecific interactions Variation in total biomass due to plot heterogeneity Macro-ecological assumption II: plant communities are assumed to in equilibrium Generally known not to be true Problematic to assume that plant abundance is in equilibrium in a test of the very nature of the ecological mechanism that control plant abundances

Bioscience – Aarhus University “Demography” of space occupancy Christian Damgaard Department of Bioscience Aarhus University

Bioscience – Aarhus University “Demography” of space occupancy Often difficult to distinguish individuals in natural and semi- natural plant communities Instead of measuring individual plants, record if a species is present at a fixed pin-position in at least two years If a new species is recorded at a position, then a colonisation event may have occurred If a species disappear at a position, then a mortality event may have occurred

Bioscience – Aarhus University Events and transition probabilities EventDescriptionTransition probability X 1 :A t, A t+1 A plant species A was present in year t and was also present in year t+1p( s(z) + 1 ( 1 – s(z) ) c(z) ) X 2 :nA t,nA t+1 A plant species A was not present in year t and was also not present in year t+1( 1 – p ) (1 – c(z) ) X 3 :A t,nA t+1 A plant species A was present in year t but was not present in year t+1 (indicates a possible mortality event) p( 1 – p ) (1 – c(z) ) X 4 :nA t, A t+1 A plant species A was not present in year t but was present in year t+1 (indicates a possible colonization event) ( 1 – p ) c(z)

Bioscience – Aarhus University Change in cover and elasticity

Bioscience – Aarhus University Demography along a flooding gradient Collaboration with Anne Bonis, Rennes Marais du Poitevin, France,

Bioscience – Aarhus University Species 2.5%50%97.5%2.5%50%97.5%2.5%50%97.5%2.5%50%97.5% Agrostis stolonifera Cynosurus cristatus Lolium perenne Hordeum secalinum Carex divisa Poa trivialis

Bioscience – Aarhus University Elasticity along a water gradient Abundance Elasticity p :

Bioscience – Aarhus University Elasticity along a water gradient Abundance Elasticity

Bioscience – Aarhus University Demography and the niche Results support the hypothesis that colonization has a predominant role for determining the ecological success along a hydrological gradient compared to survival Connection between the Hutchinson realized niche and demography Maguire (1973) Results suggests that it may be possible to predict the realized niche of different species from demographic studies