SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT TESTS District Level: Maintenance of Effort School Level: Comparability of Services Child Level: Educational.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Principal’s Guide to Title I, Part A and LAP Requirements
Advertisements

Title IA Fiscal Issues Jackie Godbout Title IA Program Consultant
10 Components of School Improvement LEA School Support Team Technical Assistance Workshop Supplemental Information August 2010.
Title I, Part A and Section 31a At Risk 101
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
Title One Program Evaluation Report to the CCSD Board of Education June 17, 2013 Bill Poock, Title One Coordinator Leslie Titler, Title One Teacher.
MPS, Title I, and Family Engagement. Purpose Understand the connection between the SIP and the FIP Be able to access resources related to Title I Parent.
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines Sheldon ISD.
The 10 Components of a Schoolwide Title I Program Presented by: Dr. Denise Ellis Director State and Federal Programs Dr. Ken Wagner Principal Rancho Mirage.
Understanding the Requirements of Title I, Part A November 15, 2012 Caribe Royale LaTrell Edwards, Florida Department of Education Anna Moore, Florida.
Imagine Madison Avenue Community School Title I Parent Meeting May 28, :00PM.
What is the Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? Why do we have a Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? (PIP) PARENT INVOLVEMENT PLAN 1.
Title One Program Evaluation Report to the CCSD Board of Education August 20, 2012 Bill Poock, Title One Coordinator.
Maintenance of Effort, Comparability, and Supplement/Supplant PAFPC April 2011.
Partnering with Parents in using Federal Programs for Quality Education for all Students Parent Summit 02/21/2014 SAISD Federal Programs Dept. Barbara.
Title I, Part A Fiscal Requirements for Comparability FY Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Title I, IIA, VI, & X December 2012.
Title I Program Evaluation Report to the IDOE (Site Visit): April 3 rd, 2014 Parent Advisory Meeting/Program Evaluation: May 27 th, 2014 Report to the.
Federal Programs Fall Conference Title I and the ACIP Logan Searcy and Beth Joseph.
What Does Supplement, Not Supplant Mean?. 2 Fiscal Requirements Supplement, not Supplant –
Karen Seay PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 101 – Writing a compliant policy and compact We’re all in this together:  State Department of Education 
Title I Schoolwide Ray Draghi and Rasha Hetata October 2014.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Understanding Title I. Title I Defined A federal allocation of funds for schools classified as low income for the purpose of assisting students to demonstrate.
Title I Schoolwide Program Proposal for Change. What is Title I  Title I — A Federal Program with the goal of Improving The Academic Achievement Of the.
Virginia Department of Education Division Leadership Liaison Meeting January 7, 2013.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
HOOKS ISD TITLE I PARENT INVOLVEMENT Shiva McCraw Director of Curriculum & Special Programs.
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines.
July 18, Glover Marietta, Georgia 1.  Federally funded program which provides resources to schools, based on the poverty percent at that school.
Schoolwide Consolidation Consolidation Legislation and Guidance Title I Schoolwide Fiscal Guidance issued February, 2008 [Section E] Designing Schoolwide.
Oklahoma State Department of Education Janet Barresi State Superintendent of Public Instruction Consolidated Schoolwide Funds.
Title I Part A: Back to Basics ESEA Odyssey Fall 2010.
School-Wide Plans Presented by: Marlon Cousin, Title I Coordinator East Baton Rouge Parish School System Cheryl Landry, Title I Coordinator Lafourche.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 3 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
PARENT & COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT GRACIELA AVILA DIVISION OF INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORT OFFICE OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT, ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
No Child Left Behind Application 1 Title I, Part A Part 1.
2013.  Familiarize staff with parent involvement requirements  Learn process to involve parents in the development of activities and policies  Learn.
Steps to Becoming a Title I Schoolwide Program (Title I SWP): An Overview Guide for Parents Office of State/Federal Education Policy and School Improvement.
What are the Differences Between Targeted and Schoolwide Title I Programs?
WHAT A GREAT IDEA!! Focusing on Results and Using IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) Part D Investments to Support Improved Outcomes for.
Larry Fazzari Program Supervisor k12.wa.us 1 TITLE I, PART A PROGRAMS SCHOOLWIDE VS. TARGETED
Cora Howe Annual Title I Meeting and Open House Understanding Title 1 Support for Schools September 12, 2013.
Partnering with Parents in using Federal Programs for Quality Education for all Students Federal Programs Department Parent Summit March 10, 2016.
A Principal’s Guide to Title I, Part A and LAP Requirements
Private School Consultation
Private School Consultation
Title III Fiscal Requirements and ESSA changes
Title I Information Lake Preston School District 38-3
Title I Annual Meeting September 20, 2011
MIDDLETOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Title I and Prekindergarten
Title I A Comparability Report
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
Title One Program Evaluation
Parent Involvement and No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Title One Program Evaluation
Studio School Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools Federal and State Education Programs Branch.
Constructing High Performing Schoolwide Programs
BCCHS Annual Title I Meeting A Single-School District LEA September 10, 2015 December 3, 2015.
School Title I Stakeholder Meeting
Campus Improvement Planning
Taylor ISD Title I Parent Meeting
Title I, Part A Virginia Department of Education
Developing and Revising Schoolwide Plans
Maintenance of Effort, Comparability & Supplement, Not Supplant
ESSA Schoolwide 2017.
Presentation transcript:

SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT

SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT TESTS District Level: Maintenance of Effort School Level: Comparability of Services Child Level: Educational Program Services

MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT ensure that federal assistance serves a supplemental rather than a basic education function grantees do not shift to the federal government their ongoing responsibility for basic education

yearly per pupil expenditure from the Annual Statistical Report to determine their effort with respect to the provision of free public education MOE (continued)

EXPENDITURES INCLUDE Expenditures for: administration instruction attendance health services pupil transportation

plant operation and maintenance fixed charges net expenditures to cover deficits for food services and student body activities EXPENDITURES (continued)

EXCLUSIONS community services capital outlay debt service expenditures for which an applicant is specifically accountable to the federal government

COMPARABILITY the LEA may receive Part A funds only if it uses State and local funds to provide services in Part A schools that are at least comparable to the services provided in other schools

COMPARABILITY the LEA must use State and local funds to provide services that are substantially comparable in each Part A school (continued)

COMPARABILITY the LEA must demonstrate that it will use State and local funds to provide services that are substantially comparable in each school, even if all schools in the LEA are served (continued)

MEETING COMPARABILITY REQUIREMENTS The LEA shall be considered meeting requirements when the SEA has a written assurance of an established and implemented: district wide salary schedule

MEETING COMPARABILITY REQUIREMENTS Policy to ensure equivalence among schools: in teachers, administration and other staff in the provision of curriculum materials and instructional supplies (continued)

RECORDS The LEA: files a written assurance keeps records to document that the salary schedule and policies were implemented and equivalence was achieved among schools

COMPLIANCE The LEA must: develop procedures for compliance with the comparability requirement implement those procedures annually document compliance with the comparability requirement biennially

UNPREDICTABLE CHANGES student enrollment personnel assignments Therefore: establish an early date for comparability any reassignment would require reassessment of comparability

INSTRUCTIONAL STAFF Includes: staff who provide instruction to children or assist or supervise those who provide instruction teachers, principals, consultants, librarians, supervisors of instruction, guidance and psychological personnel

INSTRUCTIONAL STAFF clerical personnel and other para- professionals who assist other instructional staff (continued)

SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT may use Title I funds only to supplement and increase the level of funds that would, in the absence of Title I funds, be made available from non Federal sources in no case may Title I funds take the place of non Federal funds

PURPOSE To ensure that all children have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high-quality education and reach, at a minimum, proficiency on challenging State academic achievement standards and State academic assessments. Section 1001

Steps to Proficiency, Sec §High-quality academic assessments §State accountability systems §Teacher preparation and training §Alignment of curriculum and materials with standards and assessments §Common expectations for student academic achievement

Steps to Proficiency, continued §Meet the educational needs of low- achieving children in high poverty schools, limited English proficient students, migratory children, children with disabilities, Indian children, neglected or delinquent children, and of children in need of reading assistance.

Although the achievement gap between disadvantaged children and other children has been reduced by over half in the past two decades INTENT OF THE LAW Section 1001 a sizable gap remains many segments of our society lack the opportunity to become well educated

Intent of the Law (Sec. 1001) §To close the achievement gap between high- and low-performing children §To hold schools, local educational agencies, and states accountable for improving the academic achievement of all children §To provide children with a high quality education §To distribute and target resources sufficiently to make a difference to local education agencies and schools where needs are the greatest

Intent of the Law (Sec. 1001) §To improve and strengthen accountability, teaching, and learning by using State assessment systems §To provide greater decision making authority and greater flexibility to schools §To provide children an enriched and accelerated educational program §To promote schoolwide reform

Intent of the Law (Sec. 1001) §To significantly elevate the quality of instruction by providing staff with substantial staff development opportunities §To coordinate services among Title programs §To afford parents substantial and meaningful opportunities to participate in the education of their children

SCHOOLWIDE PROGRAMS particularly address the needs of children who are members of the target population of any program strategies for meeting the educational needs of historically underserved populations Section 1114