CPSC 481 – Week 10 Heuristic Evaluation Sowmya Somanath (based on previous tutorials by Alice Thudt, Jonathan Haber and Brennan Jones)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Acknowledgements: Most of this course is based on the excellent course offered by Prof. Kellogg Booth at the British Columbia University, Vancouver, Canada.
Advertisements

Dialog on - Usability Düsseldorf / PVpage 1 USABILITY Based on a lecture by Raino Vastamäki, Research Director Adage Oy in Kiljava on May 2003.
Evaluation (cont.): Heuristic Evaluation Cognitive Walkthrough CS352.
Usability presented by the OSU Libraries’ u-team.
Part 4: Evaluation Days 25, 27, 29, 31 Chapter 20: Why evaluate? Chapter 21: Deciding on what to evaluate: the strategy Chapter 22: Planning who, what,
Heuristic Evaluation. Sources for today’s lecture: Professor James Landay: stic-evaluation/heuristic-evaluation.ppt.
Heuristics  Basis  Evaluators –Qualifications –Training  Preparation –Scenario  Results –List of problems –Severity –Group synthesis.
HCI 201 Week 4 Design Usability Heuristics Tables Links.
Heuristic Evaluation IS 485, Professor Matt Thatcher.
Heuristic Evaluation Evaluating with experts. Discount Evaluation Techniques  Basis: Observing users can be time- consuming and expensive Try to predict.
Evaluation Through Expert Analysis U U U
Heuristic Evaluation.
Usability 2004 J T Burns1 Usability & Usability Engineering.
Evaluation: Inspections, Analytics & Models
S MART P HONE H EURISTICS 09 August H EURISTIC EVALUATION To analyze a user interface for conformance with recognized usability principles (heuristics).
Review an existing website Usability in Design. to begin with.. Meeting Organization’s objectives and your Usability goals Meeting User’s Needs Complying.
Usability 2009 J T Burns1 Usability & Usability Engineering.
Heuristic evaluation IS 403: User Interface Design Shaun Kane.
©2011 1www.id-book.com Analytical evaluation Chapter 15.
Heuristic Evaluation “Discount” Usability Testing Adapted from material by Marti Hearst, Loren Terveen.
1 Usability evaluation and testing User interfaces Jaana Holvikivi Metropolia.
Heuristic Evaluation VINCENT SCHOENMAKERS CARLOS A. TIJERINA IBARRA EDGAR I. VILLANUEVA.
SAMPLE HEURISTIC EVALUATION FOR 680NEWS.COM Glenn Teneycke.
INFO3315 Week 4 Personas, Tasks Guidelines, Heuristic Evaluation.
Part 1-Intro; Part 2- Req; Part 3- Design  Chapter 20 Why evaluate the usability of user interface designs?  Chapter 21 Deciding on what you need to.
Nielsen’s Ten Usability Heuristics
Heuristic evaluation of user interface Dušanka Bošković Computing and Informatics, Master Programme Faculty of Electrical Engineering Sarajevo, 2011/12.
Usability Evaluation/LP Usability: how to judge it.
Usability Expert Review Anna Diubina. What is usability? The effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction with which specified users achieve specified goals.
Multimedia Specification Design and Production 2012 / Semester 1 / week 5 Lecturer: Dr. Nikos Gazepidis
Usability Evaluation June 8, Why do we need to do usability evaluation?
Heuristic Evaluation and Discount Usability Engineering Taken from the writings of Jakob Nielsen – inventor of both.
©2011 Elsevier, Inc. Heuristic Evaluation of MealpayPlus website Ruidi Tan Rachel Vilceus Anant Patil Junior Anthony Xi Li Kinberley Seals Niko Maresco.
Trulia Heuristic Evaluation Presented by: Raudel Rosales Kevin Rodriguez.
Y ASER G HANAM Heuristic Evaluation. Roadmap Introduction How it works Advantages Shortcomings Conclusion Exercise.
Chapter 15: Analytical evaluation. Inspections Heuristic evaluation Walkthroughs.
Chapter 15: Analytical evaluation Q1, 2. Inspections Heuristic evaluation Walkthroughs Start Q3 Reviewers tend to use guidelines, heuristics and checklists.
Evaluating a UI Design Expert inspection methods Cognitive Walkthrough
June 5, 2007Mohamad Eid Heuristic Evaluation Chapter 9.
Heuristic Evaluation JUAN MONRREAL JANETTE VAZQUEZ INEZ VELA.
Heuristic Evaluation Short tutorial to heuristic evaluation
Chapter 15: Analytical evaluation. Aims: Describe inspection methods. Show how heuristic evaluation can be adapted to evaluate different products. Explain.
RUGGAAMUFFIN Requirements analysis and design Shane Murphy.
Usability Heuristics Avoid common design pitfalls by following principles of good design Nielsen proposes 10 heuristics, others propose more or less. Inspect.
Administrivia  Feedback from the mid-term evaluation  Insights from project proposal.
ParaQ Usability ParaQ Summit II March 14, 2006 Matthew Wong, SNL/CA.
1 Usability evaluation and testing User interfaces Jaana Holvikivi Metropolia.
Oct 211 The next two weeks Oct 21 & 23: Lectures on user interface evaluation Oct 28: Lecture by Dr. Maurice Masliah No office hours (out of town) Oct.
Ten Usability Heuristics with Example.. Page 2 Heuristic Evaluation Heuristic evaluation is the most popular of the usability inspection methods. Heuristic.
CS 575 Spring 2012 CSULA Bapa Rao Lecture 6. Agenda for today Review of previous meeting Student Comments Heuristic Evaluation Presentation Team reports.
COGNITIVE WALKTHROUGH Vigneshwar Poojar. The cognitive walkthrough is a formalized way of imagining people’s thoughts and actions when they use an interface.
User Interface Evaluation Heuristic Evaluation Lecture #17.
APPLE MAPS FOR APP Heuristic Evaluation By Rayed Alakhtar.
© 2016 Cognizant. © 2016 Cognizant Introduction PREREQUISITES SCOPE Heuristic evaluation is a discount usability engineering method for quick, cheap,
Ten Usability Heuristics These are ten general principles for user interface design. They are called "heuristics" because they are more in the nature of.
Heuristic Evaluation May 4, 2016
SIE 515 Design Evaluation Lecture 7.
Human Computer Interaction Lecture 15 Usability Evaluation
Heuristic Evaluation August 5, 2016
Evaluation Techniques 1
Heuristic Evaluation 3 CPSC 481: HCI I Fall 2014
Heuristic Evaluation Jon Kolko Professor, Austin Center for Design.
PostPC Computing Heuristic Evaluation Prof. Scott Kirkpatrick, HUJI
Evaluation ECE 695 Alexander J. Quinn March 30, 2018.
Chapter 26 Inspections of the user interface
User Interface Design.
Miguel Tavares Coimbra
Miguel Tavares Coimbra
Miguel Tavares Coimbra
Evaluation: Inspections, Analytics & Models
Presentation transcript:

CPSC 481 – Week 10 Heuristic Evaluation Sowmya Somanath (based on previous tutorials by Alice Thudt, Jonathan Haber and Brennan Jones)

Today Quick overview/review of Heuristic Evaluation You will be using this method for your final portfolio deliverables. In-class activity Top-performing group will receive a gift of some kind...

Heuristic Evaluation … a usability inspection method for computer software that helps to identify usability problems in the user interface (UI) design. Now widely taught and practiced in industry. Real-world technique for UIs designed in a short space of time on a budget that may restrict the amount of money available to provide for other types of interface testing.

Usability Heuristics for UIs 1.Visibility of System Status 2.Match Between System and the Real World 3.User Control and Freedom 4.Consistency and Standards 5.Error Prevention 6.Recognition Rather than Recall 7.Flexibility and Efficiency of Use 8.Aesthetic and minimalist design 9.Help Users Recognize, Diagnose, and Recover from Errors 10.Help and Documentation Heuristics based on a factor analysis of 249 usability problems [Nielsen 1994a] to derive a set of heuristics with maximum explanatory power, resulting in this revised set of heuristics [Nielsen 1994b].

Usability Heuristics for UIs

Today’s Activity General steps: 1.Perform an independent assessment of which heuristics a system violates 2.In your groups, discuss and aggregate your individual results, listed by heuristic 3.Assign severity ratings for each bug 4.Presentation on five or six most important bugs to fix

Because it’s almost the holidays… I will be offering a gift to the group that discusses the most interesting/insightful bugs and suggested fixes

System: Accuvote accuvote.swf This is a simulation of an electronic voter terminal. These have gotten significant play in the US media due to fears of voter fraud/system bugs, etc. Imagine that you are brought in to evaluate this system, and to identify issues that need to be addressed.

1. Individual Assessment (15 min.) Create a Google Docs spreadsheet: Name | Heuristic Violated | Description | Suggested Fix Perform your assessment on Accuvote with the 10 Neilson’s Heuristics Note that you may identify a bug that doesn’t fit a particular heuristic. Feel free to note this without a heuristic number. For each bug under the name field, just put your name in there

2. Aggregate Bugs (10 min.) In your groups merge all of your spreadsheets together into a single spreadsheet Re-order the bugs according to the Heuristic violated Discuss each bug with every member of your group, and remove duplicate bugs

3. Severity Ratings (10 min.) a.Get a copy of the aggregate list from your group b.Individually, assign severity ratings for each bug 0 – don’t think this is a usability problem 1 – cosmetic problem 2 – minor usability problem 3 – major usability problem; important to fix 4 – usability catastrophe; must fix c.Return to your group, and discuss severity ratings where there is high variance (e.g., >= 2 pt difference), and find agreement

4. Present and Discuss Prepare (5 min) Write your groups results on the board (5 min) Discussion Amongst Class (10 min)

Remaining Time Start on the heuristic evaluation of your own prototype! * REMEMBER: This is actually part of your final portfolio deliverable.