System Definition Review 3/27/07 Team 1

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Company Presentation.
Advertisements

Sensors and location technologies – the front end of ISR
Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Presentation. Customization for each client Each order is specifically designed to meet each clients’ aerial needs. On-board.
Daniel Graves –Project Lead James Reepmeyer – Lead Engineer Brian Smaszcz– Airframe Design Alex Funiciello – Airfoil Design Michael Hardbarger – Control.
October 28, 2011 Christopher Schumacher (Team Lead) Brian Douglas Christopher Erickson Brad Lester Nathan Love Patrick Mischke Traci Moe Vince Zander.
Extremely Maneuverable UCAV
Vertical Launch UAV Project Plan. ∞ Construct an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) with a camera payload ∞ UAV must autonomously navigate with real-time video.
Range (nm) Payload (kg) Payload (lb) Endurance (hr) As a total system, Vigilante.
INNOCON Innovative solutions to the modern real time Arial surveillance challenges.
System Definition Review AAE 451 Andrew Mizener Diane Barney Jon Coughlin Jared ScheidMark Glover Michael CoffeyDonald Barrett Eric SmithKevin Lincoln.
AT 209 Introduction to Civil Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS)
JLFANG-LDS Light Dynamic Strikefighter Dr. James Lang, Project Advisor Aircraft Design by Team Bling-Bling Marcus Artates Connor McCarthy Ryan McDonnell.
Oculus Superne. 2 System Definition Review Mission Objectives Concept of Operations Aircraft Concept Selection Payload Constraint Analysis and Diagrams.
1 System Definition Review Team III Derek Dalton Megan Darraugh Sara DaVia Beau Glim Seth Hahn Lauren Nordstrom Mark Weaver.
1 AAE 451 Senior Aircraft Design Spring 2006 Systems Definition Review Group VI Team Members: John Collins Chad Davis Chris Fles Danny Sze Ling Lim Justin.
Request for Proposal: Joint Strike Fighter for Australian Air Force JLFANG Black Knight 170 Aerospace Engineering Design I University of California, San.
Oculus Superne 1 1.) Introduction 2.) Mission & Market 3.) Operations
1 Oculus Superne AAE 451 Team 2. 2 System Requirement Review Mission Overview Business Plan Customer Requirements Concept of Operations.
1 1 1 AAE Aircraft Senior Design TEAM III Sumitero (Calvin) Darsono Charles Hagenbush Keith Higdon Seung-il Kim Matt Lewis Matt Richter Jeff Tippmann.
AAE 451 SPRING 2007 SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTS REVIEW TEAM 4: Kevin Kwan Dan Pothala Mohammad A. Rahim Nicole Risley Sara Tassan John Thornton Sean Woock Alvin.
Aircraft Performance Charts Private Pilot Ground School
1 System Design Review Mike Dumas Ben Scott Jason Darby Adam Naramore Gaetano Settineri Tim Sparks David Wilson EcoJet Group Two.
MAE 4261: AIR-BREATHING ENGINES
Justin DeStories Aircraft Design. Objective/Requirements  The UAV team at Arizona State University is designing, optimizing, and building an autonomous.
Aerospace Engineering By Patrick Ferrell. Aerospace Engineering is the main branch of engineering concerned with the research, design, development, construction,
Overview of Chapter 6 Douglas S. Cairns Lysle A. Wood Distinguished Professor.
Modern Equipment General Aviation (MEGA) Aircraft Progress Report Flavio Poehlmann-Martins & Probal Mitra January 11, 2002 MAE 439 Prof. R. Stengel Prof.
System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 1 System Definition Review Robert Aungst Chris Chown Matthew Gray Adrian Mazzarella Brian.
UAV Sojka. tactical unmanned aerial vehicle Range: km Flight speed: kmph Endurance: hours Ceiling:2,000 metres MTOW: 145 kg Payload:
1th UAS Team RQ-5A Hunter2008 Unmanned Air System 2008 Unmanned Aerial System Team RQ-5A/MQ-5B Hunter 1 st Team
PROPRIETARY James Bearman AJ Brinker Dean Bryson Brian Gershkoff Kuo Guo Joseph Henrich Aaron Smith Daedalus Aviation Conceptual Design Review: “The Daedalus.
Large Crowd Surveillance UAV
INTERNATIONAL DESIGN TEAM Collaborative Conceptual Design of a U.A.V Initial Concept Proposed by Virginia Tech and Loughborough University to meet.
System Requirements Review - AAE Team 5 February 20, 2007 Slide 1 System Requirements Review Robert Aungst Chris Chown Matthew Gray Adrian Mazzarella.
Team 2 AAE451 System Definition Review Chad CarmackAaron MartinRyan MayerJake SchaeferAbhi MurtyShane MooneyBen GoldmanRussell HammerDonnie GoepperPhil.
System Design Design of UAV Systems Objectives
23-1 Design of UAV Systems Methodology Correlationc 2002 LM Corporation Objectives Lesson objective - Methodology correlation including … F-16 RQ-4A (Global.
Control stations Design of UAV Systems Lesson objective - to discuss
AEM 5333 UAV Search and Surveillance. Mission Description Overhead surveillance and tracking – Humans on foot – Moving vehicles Onboard GPS transceiver.
1 Conceptual Design Review 4/17/07 Team 1 John Horst John Horst Jared Odle Jared Odle Keith Fay Keith Fay Boyce Dauby Boyce Dauby Andrew Kovach Andrew.
1. Systems Design Review Presentation Joe Appel Todd Beeby Julie Douglas Konrad Habina Katie Irgens Jon Linsenmann David Lynch Dustin Truesdell 2.
Final report and briefing
Conceptual Design Review - AAE Team 5 April 17, 2007 Slide 1 Conceptual Design Review Robert Aungst Chris Chown Matthew Gray Adrian Mazzarella Brian.
Propulsion PDR #2 AAE451 – Team 3 November 11, 2003 Brian Chesko Brian Hronchek Ted Light Doug Mousseau Brent Robbins Emil Tchilian.
Doris Hamill UAV Business Development Lead NASA Langley Research Center and Hampton Roads First Responders.
HALE UAV Preliminary Design AERSP 402B Spring 2014 Team: NSFW Nisherag GandhiThomas Gempp Doug RohrbaughGregory Snyder Steve StanekVictor Thomas SAURON.
UK Aerial Robotics Team UK IDEA Laboratory Workforce Development: The UK Aerial Robotics Team and the PAX River Student UAV Competition Dale McClure (Matt.
1. Mission Statement Design Requirements Aircraft Concept Selection Advanced Technologies / Concepts Engine / Propulsion Modeling Constraint Analysis.
DRONE: UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE Seminar Co-Ordinator:  Mr. A.K.Singh Seminar Presented by: Ajit Pal Singh.
MAE 155A Aerospace Engineering Design I
AE 2350 Lecture Notes #9 May 10, 1999 We have looked at.. Airfoil aerodynamics (Chapter 8) Sources of Drag (Chapter 8, 11 and 12) –Look at the figures.
AAE Team 1 - 2/20/07 System Requirements Review 2/20/07 Team 1 John Horst John Horst Jared Odle Jared Odle Keith Fay Keith Fay Boyce Dauby Boyce.
UAS for Remote Sensing Myths and Realities 33rd International Symposium of Remote Sensing of the Environment Steve Wegener Bay Area Environmental Research.
Brian Acker Lance Henricks Matthew Kayser Kevin Lobo Robert Paladino Ruan Trouw Dennis Wilde.
Zuliana-July Lecture 1: INTRODUCTION AIRCRAFT MASS (WEIGHT) & PERFORMANCE By: Zuliana Ismail, 2010.
AAE 451 Group IV -- January 31, BAT Co. 01/31/06 Slide 2 System Requirements Review Content Introduction Business Case Competing Existing Aircraft.
12/11/12 Brandon Campbell & Ernesto Chairez. Purpose  Civil Transport  Large Volume  Efficient  Quiet  Long Range.
System Requirements Review
SYSTEMS DEFINITION REVIEW Brian Acker Lance Henricks Matthew Kayser Kevin Lobo Robert Paladino Ruan Trouw Dennis Wilde.
Vehicle Sizing AAE 451: Team 2 Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin
VEHICLE SIZING PDR AAE 451 TEAM 4
Washington Army National Guard
Phantom Eye Boeing UAV Brandon Witte.
PAX River Competition UK Aerial Robotics Team University of Kentucky.
PROPULSION PDR 2 AAE 451 TEAM 4
A R C E R I A L O B O T I C S L U B AIRFRAME: Piccolo LT Autopilot
Lockheed Martin Challenge
Unit 2 Unmanned Aircraft
Charlie Rush Zheng Wang Brandon Wedde Greg Wilson
Presentation transcript:

System Definition Review 3/27/07 Team 1 Introduction Target Market Concept of Operations Design Requirements Concept Selection Payload Description Performance Constraints Representative Layout Requirements Compliance Future Work System Definition Review 3/27/07 Team 1 John Horst Jared Odle Keith Fay Boyce Dauby Andrew Kovach Akshay Raje Jason Darby Manish Handa AAE 451 - Team 1 - 3/27/07

Representative Layout Introduction Target Market Concept of Operations Design Requirements Concept Selection Payload Description Performance Constraints Representative Layout Requirements Compliance Future Work Mission Statement: The objective is to provide a fixed-wing, semi- autonomous, long-endurance, continuous-area coverage unmanned aerial vehicle to relay communication of tactical importance for an extended period of time. Department of Defense Front-line tactical communication relay to/from warfighter Relief Agencies/FEMA Front-line tactical communication relay to/from ground first responders Commercial Customers Damaged service locations, scouting of new telecommunication markets, and remote locations AAE 451 - Team 1 - 3/27/07

Representative Layout Competition Introduction Target Market Concept of Operations Design Requirements Concept Selection Payload Description Performance Constraints Representative Layout Requirements Compliance Future Work Broadcast Towers Communication Satellites Lighter-Than-Air Vehicles Shadow 200 Hunter Predator AAE 451 - Team 1 - 3/27/07

Representative Layout Introduction Target Market Concept of Operations Design Requirements Concept Selection Payload Description Performance Constraints Representative Layout Requirements Compliance Future Work CONOPS Takeoff Conventional runway takeoff (Autonomous or Remote Operation) Distance from Takeoff to Coverage Area Transmitting/Receiving Ground Forces  UAV  Command Station or other Ground Forces Control Autonomous with manual backup/mission override Remote Operators Trained military UAV pilots controlling from Mission Command Center Level of Threat Design for high threat environment AAE 451 – Team 1 – 3/27/07 4

Representative Layout CONOPS Introduction Target Market Concept of Operations Design Requirements Concept Selection Payload Description Performance Constraints Representative Layout Requirements Compliance Future Work http://www.afcea.org/signal/articles/templates/SIGNAL_Article_Template.asp?articleid=507&zoneid=4 Provide continuous area coverage for and extended time period Multiple UAVs in system Redundancy by overlapping coverage Survivability via electronic countermeasures AAE 451 – Team 1 – 3/27/07 5

Design Requirements Target Threshold Endurance 24 hr 14 hr Range* Introduction Target Market Concept of Operations Design Requirements Concept Selection Payload Description Performance Constraints Representative Layout Requirements Compliance Future Work Design Requirements Target Threshold Endurance 24 hr 14 hr Range* 100 nm 50 nm Ceiling 30,000 ft MSL 15,000 ft MSL Takeoff 500 ft 1,000 ft Landing Transportation Volume Fit inside C-130 55’x10’x9’ Fit inside C-5 143’x19’x13.5’ AAE 451 - Team 1 - 3/27/07

Representative Layout Pugh’s Method Introduction Target Market Concept of Operations Design Requirements Concept Selection Payload Description Performance Constraints Representative Layout Requirements Compliance Future Work An iterative approach to synthesize novel concepts Choose Criteria Clarify Concepts Choose Baseline Concept Choose relative rankings (+,-,S) Create hybrids better than any first generation concepts Iterate AAE 451 - Team 1 - 3/27/07

Representative Layout Introduction Target Market Concept of Operations Design Requirements Concept Selection Payload Description Performance Constraints Representative Layout Requirements Compliance Future Work A F K B H J AAE 451 - Team 1 - 3/27/07

Representative Layout Introduction Target Market Concept of Operations Design Requirements Concept Selection Payload Description Performance Constraints Representative Layout Requirements Compliance Future Work P N L M AAE 451 - Team 1 - 3/27/07

Pugh’s Method Rankings AAE 451 - Team 1 - 3/27/07

Representative Layout Current Concept Introduction Target Market Concept of Operations Design Requirements Concept Selection Payload Description Performance Constraints Representative Layout Requirements Compliance Future Work Twin-Engine, Retractable Tail-Dragger Landing Gear Unswept Tapered Low Wing, Conventional Tail Wingspan = 55 ft Taper Ratio = 0.4 AAE 451 - Team 1 - 3/27/07

Communications Payload Introduction Target Market Concept of Operations Design Requirements Concept Selection Payload Description Performance Constraints Representative Layout Requirements Compliance Future Work AJCN - Adaptive Joint C4ISR Node by BAE Systems Weight 200 – 270 lbs Power 1500 W Volume* 6 – 9 ft3 Range (Air-to-Ground) 55 – 100 nm @ 15,000 ft Range (Air-to-Air) 60 nm @ 15,000 ft *Volume approximated by avionic density: 0.02 – 0.03 ft3/lb AAE 451 - Team 1 - 3/27/07

Representative Layout Additional Payload Introduction Target Market Concept of Operations Design Requirements Concept Selection Payload Description Performance Constraints Representative Layout Requirements Compliance Future Work Camera MicroPilot - Dayview/Nightview Interchangeable with Thermal Imaging Mode 25x Optical Zoom 320 x 240 Resolution 3 Watts of Power 2.2 pounds (Ø) 4.3 in x (H) 8.3 in AAE 451 - Team 1 - 3/27/07

Representative Layout Additional Payload Introduction Target Market Concept of Operations Design Requirements Concept Selection Payload Description Performance Constraints Representative Layout Requirements Compliance Future Work Missile Warning/Countermeasures - BAE Systems AN/ALQ-156(V) Warning System 425 Watts of Power 50 pounds 20.4 × 10.2 × 7.6 in AN/ALE-47 Dispensing System Automatic Response Protects Against: Air Interceptor (AI), Anti-Aircraft Artillery (AAA), and Surface-to-Air Missiles (SAMs) 20 pounds Fielded on 1,307 Aircraft 43.7 x 39.5 x 26.8 in AAE 451 - Team 1 - 3/27/07

Constraint Diagrams Assumptions: Combat Radius 100 nm L/D 12 Introduction Target Market Concept of Operations Design Requirements Concept Selection Payload Description Performance Constraints Representative Layout Requirements Compliance Future Work Assumptions: Combat Radius 100 nm L/D 12 Propeller Efficiency 0.8 Specific Fuel Consumption (cbhp) 0.4 lb/hp-hr (cruise) 0.5 lb/hp-hr (loiter) Loiter Velocity 80 kts we/w0 (from UAV database) Aspect Ratio 10 Λ CLmax 1.8 (Takeoff) 1.6 (Landing) AAE 451 - Team 1 - 3/27/07

Representative Layout Constraint Diagrams Introduction Target Market Concept of Operations Design Requirements Concept Selection Payload Description Performance Constraints Representative Layout Requirements Compliance Future Work AAE 451 - Team 1 - 3/27/07

Preliminary Carpet Plot Introduction Target Market Concept of Operations Design Requirements Concept Selection Payload Description Performance Constraints Representative Layout Requirements Compliance Future Work AAE 451 - Team 1 - 3/27/07

Representative Layout Design Mission Introduction Target Market Concept of Operations Design Requirements Concept Selection Payload Description Performance Constraints Representative Layout Requirements Compliance Future Work 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0-1 Taxi/Takeoff 1-2 Climb to Cruise Altitude 2-3 Cruise to Target 3-4 Change to Loiter Altitude 4-5 Loiter 5-6 Change to Cruise Altitude 6-7 Cruise to Runway 7-8 Descend 8-9 Land/Taxi AAE 451 - Team 1 - 3/27/07

Representative Layout Design Mission Introduction Target Market Concept of Operations Design Requirements Concept Selection Payload Description Performance Constraints Representative Layout Requirements Compliance Future Work 500 ft takeoff Cruise to/from combat area Altitude: 15,000 ft AGL Distance: Up to 100 nm Loiter above combat area Velocity: 80 kts Endurance: Up to 20 hrs 500 ft landing AAE 451 - Team 1 - 3/27/07

Representative Layout Sizing Codes Introduction Target Market Concept of Operations Design Requirements Concept Selection Payload Description Performance Constraints Representative Layout Requirements Compliance Future Work MATLAB Used to generate current constraint diagrams and preliminary carpet plots FLOPS Current issues involve parametric optimization, variable definitions, and power-to-thrust conversion ACS Currently refining accuracy of variables Carpet plots possible, accuracy questionable AAE 451 - Team 1 - 3/27/07

Representative Layout Component Layout Introduction Target Market Concept of Operations Design Requirements Concept Selection Payload Description Performance Constraints Representative Layout Requirements Compliance Future Work 1 2 5 4 3 1. Engine Nacelles 2. Camera 3. AJCN 4. Avionics 5. Fuel Tanks AAE 451 - Team 1 - 3/27/07

Representative Layout Component Layout Introduction Target Market Concept of Operations Design Requirements Concept Selection Payload Description Performance Constraints Representative Layout Requirements Compliance Future Work AAE 451 - Team 1 - 3/27/07

Representative Layout Compliance Matrix Introduction Target Market Concept of Operations Design Requirements Concept Selection Payload Description Performance Constraints Representative Layout Requirements Compliance Future Work Target Threshold Current Endurance 24 hr 14 hr 20 hr Range* 100 nm 50 nm Ceiling 30,000 ft MSL 15,000 ft MSL ~30,000 ft MSL Takeoff 500 ft 1,000 ft Landing Loiter Altitude 15,000 ft AGL Current Gross Weight 3,250 lbs * Distance to Mission Area AAE 451 - Team 1 - 3/27/07

Representative Layout Future Work Introduction Target Market Concept of Operations Design Requirements Concept Selection Payload Description Performance Constraints Representative Layout Requirements Compliance Future Work Sizing Update Carpet Plots More Accurate Results from ACS and FLOPS Component Selection Airfoil, Engine, and Propeller Selection Performance Define Operating Envelope Structures Structural Layout Material Selection Stability and Control Center of Gravity Static Margin AAE 451 - Team 1 - 3/27/07